OpenCharities

This text was generated using OCR and may contain errors. Check the original PDF to see the document submitted to the regulator.

2024-03-23-accounts

FiTraniial reiJieii. Brfet ststement of Cl￿￿5 poliry on FIC QJTrSf)S Q£e-(? io l)etalls of any fvnd5 materfally in deffcft Funher financkl fevlew detsll5 {opti1N￿l Informatlon) You rftay to Indude additlonal inf0M￿tiOn, wheTE Tdevant, abouL" . the tharftys prfntlpal Sour￿ of funds Ondudlng ony fw￿ra1$1ng),. . how expeftdlluFe IHS supported the key oblecuves of the tharlty, . Investment pollcy afid objertI￿S Indudlng any elhlcaj Investment pollcy alopted. r) &9 % i L44Y, trtovJtsJ&-A I v+1 S Q&ooLZ %oPQoC)z 4K5LAZ, Ilther optlOFiiJl ii)foiiii¢ilioii LILJclar3rioD Slgned on ra* tsustees Sgnatwe{s) Rjll narrf5) so P05iOon {eg SeuetsrK Chatr. etc) AA1

',>È:ctioti B SlaterfiaTrt of as5et5 <Jnd 5iabilities at thè en60[ thE Pefiod UnFe5tritted Restrttted EEKIowtnent IEds Tuftds funds th￿r￿are$l totheAe3Rst etsits 81 (ash iogG {all￿el￿t7￿￿ wIttE *gsGndpoyments arc0￿￿? Unreslrickd ResEricted ft7r.rjs knll¥eneBW kntkenearest tolhereare5t Del3ds Fuftd to wh(th asset belon95' Cul￿nt ¥alue (optiona4 (optiOAal) Fund trj ssetbElongs Cosl {oplioftal) Cu￿en1v￿1Ue (optlanal) Oetsils Fund ID Yihlch liabilliy Felaies When due (optlonal) Oetsils (tipti¢Jttal) sig￿ byotP OT two tnts on belolf otall the In￿ SÈgnature inl name OBle of app14KI <c)vvL F%oNJ 25 (C16a M¥(h 2012

CHARITY COMMISSION Independent Examiner's Report on the Accounts section A Independent Examiner's Report Cl41Lp￿￿{ OF AJoo£ I Oft accounts Cknity no Crf any) set￿t￿ poge5 aR4 exallthr Ilwtan ￿dit is not rewired for this year uThJersectKm 144 of the It is my re5p(rsthty ttr. examwe the Uftd￿ sectt(￿ 14S of the ChafitiesA . to follow [ffldu￿ lald doyffl ￿ the gewal DifErtiDfs glveft ty the (h Cotnms$5ion (￿r￿tr 5edion 145(5)i%} ol the awities Act). aThl 10 state eth& parti0￿MatterS have (c￿et0 my attenlKxL statem￿1 Charity Comrriw. kn enmtsulioft indude5 a review of the a(a)unting re£Dfds kept by the charity arml a comparison of the accounts wpsenled wlth ￿c0￿ It a150 indudes (ottydeTth of any unusual Items w di5dosuTrs In the actounts arla 5eekiftg explanaliors from the tnjskes (oncemiThJ any suth maller& The pmcedure5 undertaken do not piovlde all the Eviden￿ that be Rquired in an audlL and consequenlly opinion is giM as tD whether the aCCfJJnts pR5ent a true and fa vlew and the report is lunfted to those mattus Srfout in the ststv1￿t Lthw. 5tataneth In coftnettinn with my examlTration. no maiter Iws corne to my atteniion (1) which gp￿5 me reasonabk (auo to herv￿ th& ￿ any re¥cL the lo keep accounw fec￿5 li 3tcfftsn￿ ￿ sedKfft 130 of d Charitres A¢. witlt the act[H￿tIng requ￿em￿jts of the (ithritses ArthaNE rxrt left md: or (2) ro which, In my OPth￿Tr. attentw Sho￿ be in ￿der ID a Emtyer understandtsig of the a(rwts ts be "Plecse delele Ihe words in the brockets if they th rntopNy. Iro ANJIDP -fHANAPt-41&0mku Rd￿allt tffrAes￿[Thl quthfètion(s) orb[￿Y (tt any) 6 .fj4 KPTrJ I t¥r-JGi iAr-4 rn @LJ K I fl4Ai C)