FiTraniial reiJieii. Brfet ststement of Cl5 poliry on FIC QJTrSf)S Q£e-(? io l)etalls of any fvnd5 materfally in deffcft Funher financkl fevlew detsll5 {opti1Nl Informatlon) You rftay to Indude additlonal inf0MtiOn, wheTE Tdevant, abouL" . the tharftys prfntlpal Sour of funds Ondudlng ony fwra1$1ng),. . how expeftdlluFe IHS supported the key oblecuves of the tharlty, . Investment pollcy afid objertIS Indudlng any elhlcaj Investment pollcy alopted. r) &9 % i L44Y, trtovJtsJ&-A I v+1 S Q&ooLZ %oPQoC)z 4K5LAZ, Ilther optlOFiiJl ii)foiiii¢ilioii LILJclar3rioD Slgned on ra* tsustees Sgnatwe{s) Rjll narrf5) so P05iOon {eg SeuetsrK Chatr. etc) AA1
',>È:ctioti B SlaterfiaTrt of as5et5 <Jnd 5iabilities at thè en60[ thE Pefiod UnFe5tritted Restrttted EEKIowtnent IEds Tuftds funds thrare$l totheAe3Rst etsits 81 (ash iogG {allelt7 wIttE *gsGndpoyments arc0? Unreslrickd ResEricted ft7r.rjs knll¥eneBW kntkenearest tolhereare5t Del3ds Fuftd to wh(th asset belon95' Culnt ¥alue (optiona4 (optiOAal) Fund trj ssetbElongs Cosl {oplioftal) Cuen1v1Ue (optlanal) Oetsils Fund ID Yihlch liabilliy Felaies When due (optlonal) Oetsils (tipti¢Jttal) sig byotP OT two tnts on belolf otall the In SÈgnature inl name OBle of app14KI <c)vvL F%oNJ 25 (C16a M¥(h 2012
CHARITY COMMISSION Independent Examiner's Report on the Accounts section A Independent Examiner's Report Cl41Lp{ OF AJoo£ I Oft accounts Cknity no Crf any) sett poge5 aR4 exallthr Ilwtan dit is not rewired for this year uThJersectKm 144 of the It is my re5p(rsthty ttr. examwe the Uftd sectt( 14S of the ChafitiesA . to follow [ffldu lald doyffl the gewal DifErtiDfs glveft ty the (h Cotnms$5ion (rtr 5edion 145(5)i%} ol the awities Act). aThl 10 state eth& parti0MatterS have (cet0 my attenlKxL statem1 Charity Comrriw. kn enmtsulioft indude5 a review of the a(a)unting re£Dfds kept by the charity arml a comparison of the accounts wpsenled wlth c0 It a150 indudes (ottydeTth of any unusual Items w di5dosuTrs In the actounts arla 5eekiftg explanaliors from the tnjskes (oncemiThJ any suth maller& The pmcedure5 undertaken do not piovlde all the Eviden that be Rquired in an audlL and consequenlly opinion is giM as tD whether the aCCfJJnts pR5ent a true and fa vlew and the report is lunfted to those mattus Srfout in the ststv1t Lthw. 5tataneth In coftnettinn with my examlTration. no maiter Iws corne to my atteniion (1) which gp5 me reasonabk (auo to herv th& any re¥cL the lo keep accounw fec5 li 3tcfftsn sedKfft 130 of d Charitres A¢. witlt the act[HtIng requemjts of the (ithritses ArthaNE rxrt left md: or (2) ro which, In my OPthTr. attentw Sho be in der ID a Emtyer understandtsig of the a(rwts ts be "Plecse delele Ihe words in the brockets if they th rntopNy. Iro ANJIDP -fHANAPt-41&0mku Rdallt tffrAes[Thl quthfètion(s) orb[Y (tt any) 6 .fj4 KPTrJ I t¥r-JGi iAr-4 rn @LJ K I fl4Ai C)