FiTraniial reiJieii.
Brfet ststement of Cl￿￿5 poliry on
FIC QJTrSf)S Q£e-(? io
l)etalls of any fvnd5 materfally in deffcft
Funher financkl fevlew detsll5 {opti1N￿l Informatlon)
You rftay to Indude additlonal
inf0M￿tiOn, wheTE Tdevant, abouL"
. the tharftys prfntlpal Sour￿ of funds
Ondudlng ony fw￿ra1$1ng),.
. how expeftdlluFe IHS supported the key
oblecuves of the tharlty,
. Investment pollcy afid objertI￿S Indudlng
any elhlcaj Investment pollcy alopted.
r) &9 % i L44Y,
trtovJtsJ&-A I v+1 S Q&ooLZ
%oPQoC)z 4K5LAZ,
Ilther optlOFiiJl ii)foiiii¢ilioii
LILJclar3rioD
Slgned on ra* tsustees
Sgnatwe{s)
Rjll narrf5)
so
P05iOon {eg SeuetsrK Chatr. etc)
AA1

',>È:ctioti B
SlaterfiaTrt of as5et5 <Jnd 5iabilities at thè en60[ thE Pefiod
UnFe5tritted Restrttted EEKIowtnent
IEds
Tuftds
funds
th￿r￿are$l totheAe3Rst
etsits
81 (ash
iogG
{all￿el￿t7￿￿ wIttE *gsGndpoyments arc0￿￿?
Unreslrickd ResEricted
ft7r.rjs
knll¥eneBW kntkenearest tolhereare5t
Del3ds
Fuftd to wh(th
asset belon95'
Cul￿nt ¥alue
(optiona4
(optiOAal)
Fund trj
ssetbElongs
Cosl
{oplioftal)
Cu￿en1v￿1Ue
(optlanal)
Oetsils
Fund ID Yihlch
liabilliy Felaies
When due
(optlonal)
Oetsils
(tipti¢Jttal)
sig￿ byotP OT two tnts on belolf
otall the In￿
SÈgnature
inl name
OBle of app14KI
<c)vvL F%oNJ
25
(C16a
M¥(h 2012

CHARITY
COMMISSION
Independent Examiner's
Report on the Accounts
section A
Independent Examiner's Report
Cl41Lp￿￿{ OF AJoo£ I
Oft accounts
Cknity no Crf any)
set￿t￿ poge5
aR4 exallthr Ilwtan ￿dit is not rewired for this year uThJersectKm 144 of the
It is my re5p(rsthty ttr.
examwe the Uftd￿ sectt(￿ 14S of the ChafitiesA
. to follow [ffldu￿ lald doyffl ￿ the gewal DifErtiDfs glveft ty the (h
Cotnms$5ion (￿r￿tr 5edion 145(5)i%} ol the awities Act). aThl
10 state **eth& parti0￿MatterS have (c￿et0 my attenlKxL
statem￿1 Charity Comrriw. kn enmtsulioft indude5 a review of the a(a)unting re£Dfds
kept by the charity arml a comparison of the accounts wpsenled wlth ￿c0￿*
It a150 indudes (ottydeTth of any unusual Items w di5dosuTrs In the actounts arla
5eekiftg explanaliors from the tnjskes (oncemiThJ any suth maller& The pmcedure5
undertaken do not piovlde all the Eviden￿ that be Rquired in an audlL and
consequenlly opinion is giM as tD whether the aCCfJJnts pR5ent a true and fa
vlew and the report is lunfted to those mattus Srfout in the ststv1￿t Lthw.
5tataneth In coftnettinn with my examlTration. no maiter Iws corne to my atteniion
(1) which gp￿5 me reasonabk (auo to herv￿ th& ￿ any re¥*cL the
lo keep accounw fec￿5 li 3tcfftsn￿ ￿ sedKfft 130 of d
Charitres A¢.
witlt the act[H￿tIng requ￿em￿jts of the (ithritses ArthaNE rxrt l*eft md: or
(2) ro which, In my OPth￿Tr. attentw Sho￿ be in ￿der ID a Emtyer
understandtsig of the a(rwts ts be
"Plecse delele Ihe words in the brockets if they th rntopNy.
Iro
ANJIDP
-fHANAPt-41&0mku
Rd￿allt tffrAes￿[Thl qu*thfètion(s)
orb[￿Y (tt any)
6 .fj4 KPTrJ I
t¥r-JGi iAr-4 rn @LJ K I
fl4Ai C)