| SORP | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| reference | ||||
| Summary | ofthe purposes ofthe | Para 1.17 | he charity's objects are: | |
| charity as set out in its governing document |
1) to relieve the physical and emotional distress ofthe elderly who have suffered abuse or neglect in care settings; |
|||
| 2) to advance the education ofthose working |
||||
| in the care sector to enable them to | ||||
| recognise and report on elderly abuse or | ||||
| neglect. | ||||
| Summary | ofthe main activities | Para 1.17and | Helpline for families ofpeople who live in care | |
| in relation the public |
to those purposes for benefit, in particular, |
1.19 | homes or who receive domiciliary care, and for workers raising concerns about the care sector, with ongoing support. |
|
| the activities, projects or | ||||
| services identified in the accounts. |
Monitoring and responses to reports issued by regulators and Government policies affecting elderly people. |
|||
| Increasing public awareness and education re |
||||
| elderly abuse by research and publishing evidence. |
||||
| Statement | confirming whether the |
Para 1.18 | he Trustees confirm that they have had regard | to |
| Trustees have had regard to the guidance issued by the Charity |
he guidance issued by the Charity Commission public benefit. |
on | ||
| Commission on public benefit |
| Policy on social investment program related investment |
Policy on social investment program related investment |
Policy on social investment program related investment |
including | including | Para 1.38 | Not applicable as the charity does not make any investments |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contribution | made by volunteers | Para 1.38 | Volunteers have made significant contributions |
by | |||
| practical assistance to our beneficiaries, including |
|||||||
| attending hearings, drafting documents ik general |
|||||||
| phone support. | |||||||
| Other | |||||||
| ~ | |||||||
| ~ | |||||||
| SORP | |||||||
| reference | |||||||
| Summary | ofthe main achievements | Para 1.20 | Our work for the year was severely impacted | ||||
| ofthe charity, identifying | the | by the repeated malicious allegations made by |
|||||
| difference the charity's work | has | BUK and the disruption this caused to our |
|||||
| made to | the | circumstances | ofits | daily work. Seefurther information. |
|||
| beneficiaries | and any wider benefits | ||||||
| to society as | a whole. | he charity's work was recognized and |
|||||
| hortlisted in the final six for The European |
|||||||
| Parliament GUE/NGL Award for our work |
|||||||
| protecting and supporting whistleblowers, the |
|||||||
| irst UK charity to ever nominated. . |
|||||||
| e continued highlighting serious concerns |
|||||||
| ith the Health and Social Care Department | |||||||
| hroughout this time period. |
|||||||
| e published a report called bad at being good |
|||||||
| hich highlighted anomalies in a spot check of |
|||||||
| 29 CQC recently inspected homes, which all |
|||||||
| had identical failures in compliance and |
|||||||
| contradictory compliance ratings. |
|||||||
| s a result ofover fifteen thousand helpline |
|||||||
| allers raising serious concerns about | |||||||
| regulators, safeguarding, professional bodies |
|||||||
| nd other investigatory bodies, we recognized |
|||||||
| hat there were consistent failures to | |||||||
| investigate abuse. We launched a call for |
|||||||
| vidence on all regulators in order to identify |
|||||||
| ommon themes. This is a major piece of | |||||||
| research work and so far, we have received | |||||||
| wenty thousand detailed responses, we aim |
to | ||||||
| publish our findings in a comprehensive report |
|||||||
| s soon as possible. | |||||||
| he trustees continued to remain in close |
|||||||
| ontact via zoom and skype throughout the |
|||||||
| pandemic and subsequent lockdowns with 17 |
| etailed discussions. |
|---|
| 212 hours were spent countering the malicious |
| allegations made by WBUK |
| esubmitted formally when contacted by |
| mnesty International regarding the |
| overnments continuing policy ofplacing Covid |
| positive Hospital patients into care homes |
| hich has resulted in many thousands of |
| elderly deaths. Our continuing work |
| hroughout the pandemic was recognized in |
| he subsequent Amnesty international report |
| into UK Human rights abuses in care. |
| e formally responded on FOI law proposals. |
| Families ofabuse victims and whistleblowers |
| rely on accessing information. |
| odate We have supported families and |
| histleblowers to make 4031Subject Access |
| requests and 5646 Freedom ofInformation |
| requests. |
| e published the naked truth, in line with our |
| policy in highlighting help line themes directly |
| impacting vulnerable people and |
| histleblowers. |
| Due to continuing demand during lockdowns, |
| e spent 577 hours on helpline calls outside |
| he normal helpline hours of10am to 4pm |
| Monday to Wednesday. |
| e published a new report responding to |
| academic research and whistleblowing law |
| highlighting serious and evidenced |
| inconsistencies. |
| he Charity Appeared on RTTV and LBCradio re |
| are home nursing. Around a 35%increase |
| helpline contacts immediately followed these |
| November broadcasts. |
| he Charity did interviews on Times Radio and |
| daily Mail Radio at the end ofNovember which |
| also resulted in a 35%increase in helpline calls. |
| consistently high number offamilies ofabuse |
| ictims requested support in the process of |
| ppealing flawed Safeguarding investigation |
| onclusions. |
| e published our 14'" live time Covid Crisis |
| report in November, an urgent alert that |
| patients were being escorted from wards to |
| hospital discharge waiting rooms. Families |
| ere only informed at the last minute; families |
| ere arriving at these waiting areas to find |
| relatives confused and distressed about to be |
| aken to a care home. Denying individuals and |
|---|
| amilies time to find a suitable care homes. |
| Due to our unique work publishing Live time |
| Covid Crisis helpline reports we were asked to |
| ive evidence as an expert witness at the |
| ortoise media event looking in detail at what |
| ent wrong in care homes. |
| Published our 15'"Covid Crisis report, |
| Designated Disaster highlighting that |
| numerous families across the LiK had |
| discovered by chance their loved one's care |
| home was about to become a designated Covid |
| home. That many ofthese homes had long |
| histories ofvery poor care, poor hygiene, and |
| infection control. |
| Published a full response to the Serious case |
| review into the Morleigh Care homes abuse |
| ases. |
| Private Eye Covered our, Live time, Covid |
| report, Designated Disaster. This resulted in a |
| 30%increase in helpline calls and 7substantial |
| donations to the charity. |
| Over the Christmas period we responded to 2 |
| erious incidents requiring us to contact the |
| police. |
| FOI health department re Vaccine |
| implementation |
| Karis Winton joins us as a new trustee, Karis is |
| a trainee solicitor and has been a volunteer for |
| he charity for a number ofyears. Karis is a |
| ormer whistleblower who contacted our |
| helpline when her repeated reports to CQC, |
| afeguarding and police fell on deaf ears. Her |
| ase subsequently featured on BBCpanorama, |
| Behind care home doors. Two abusive care |
| taff were subsequently jailed and will never |
| ork with vulnerable people again. During the |
| ime that Panorama were filming abuse and |
| neglect in the home, the regulator CQC |
| inspected the home and rated the home Good. |
| Karis brings invaluable lived experience ofthe |
| issues, to our team oftrustees. |
| The other trustees, volunteers and |
| beneficiaries want to thank Eileen Chubb for |
| her dedication and incredible hard work, for |
| onsistently working up to 12hours a day and |
| longer, 7 days a week which allows this charity |
| o help so many people and produce so much |
| histleblowing, censorship, and data ethics. |
|---|
| Eileen spoke at one UK symposium on |
| developments in UK whistleblowing law. |
| We have spent 151hours on administration |
| asks such as recording helpline cases in an |
| anonymous format and identifying themes as |
| hey emerge. writing letters for families and |
| assisting whistleblowers with SAR requests, |
| paperwork, and other practical help. Filing the |
| incoming evidence re the call for evidence on |
| regulators, which isthe largest task we have |
| undertaken, and which will help to identify |
| hemes and will gotothe root cause ofwhy so |
| many people are failed by these authorities. |
| his will be the largest investigation into |
| regulators ever undertaken in the UK. |
| egave a quote to the Telegraph re a story |
| about DNRs based on our helpline evidence on |
| he issue. 29%increase in helpline calls. |
| pril, Eileen spoke to a disability rights |
| am paign group. |
| ribunal assistance in the form ofpractical help |
| ith paperwork provided to a number of |
| histleblowers. Eileen spoke via zoom to a |
| number offamilies ofabuse victims who have |
| ormed local groups. Eileen spoke at an |
| international festival ofwhistleblowing over a |
| eekend in April. |
| rustees and administrator attended a legal |
| event in order to raise concerns about how |
| libel law is being maliciously manipulated in |
| rder to censor valid lawful free speech. Which |
| are legal issues intrinsically linked to |
| histleblowing in human rights law. |
| rustees discussed and issued our policy on |
| mandatory vaccines. |
| pecial follow up report on our earlier work |
| exposing homophobic abuse in care homes and |
| ur FOI which exposed that Homophobic abuse |
| as not recorded via site ofabuse. We were |
| ontacted by the LGBT community and our |
| evidence featured in Gay Vouge. |
| efeatured in three Private Eye Articles which |
| exposed that this charity was targeted with |
| malicious allegations by WBUK and the |
| vidence ofconcern regarding the charity's |
| ommissions evidenced misconduct, see |
| urther information section on this. |
| By May 2021we had published our 20'" Covid |
| Crisis Report, Complacent Or compliant, |
|---|
| exposing homes that had long history ofpoor |
| are and were not rated as failing the special |
| covid requirements were allocated as |
| designated homes, something which the DHSC |
| stated would not happen. |
| In May we were contacted by a new publisher |
| regarding writing another book and film rights |
| re the Charity Commission and WBUKs story. |
| Like all our books the royalties will go direct to |
| he charity. We are considering this proposal as |
| it would highlight some very important issues |
| hat affect our beneficiaries and would be in a |
| ormat that would reach a very large audience. |
| Our work has been recognized in a new play |
| about elderly care and whistleblowing which |
| e look forward to seeing in the near future. |
| Huge response from the public re the Private |
| Eyes stories on the Charity Commissions |
| Misconduct. |
| Published 10further Covid reports highlighting |
| hemes emerging from our helpline data |
| ubmitted detailed evidence to the House of |
| Commons Public Standards select committee |
| inquiry into lobbying and APPG dishonesty |
| affecting our beneficiaries. |
| ubmitted detailed evidenced submissions to |
| he DMCS select committee |
| Press release circulated ahead ofbook |
| publication. Book published and selling well. |
| he malicious allegations made by WBUK, and |
| he conduct ofthe Charity Commission have |
| aken 212hours ofthe charities time, time that |
| ould have been spent helping families of |
| abuse victims and whistleblowers. Seefurther |
| information section |
| Quotes given to The Times and various other |
| nationals led to around a 30%increase in |
| helpline calls and donations from the public |
| ho supported our stance on the issues. |
| e published a report on the Gables Care |
| home highlighting specific issues. |
| e Published a report on Tall Trees Care |
| home, which due to our archive ofcare home |
| reports. We were able to present the previous |
| history ofthe home which led up tothe events |
| overed by BBCnews. |
| e have responded to many individual |
| ribunal cases, highlighting relevant issues and |
| 10 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Important | further | Information | Para | 1.41 | hilst we are restricted in what we can say, as |
| here is an active police investigation into the |
|||||
| malicious allegations made by WBUK Halford |
|||||
| Hall, and the Charity Commissions subsequent |
|||||
| onduct, which featured in 3 issues ofPrivate |
|||||
| Eye. We can only highlight what is already in |
|||||
| he public domain, namely that this charity was |
|||||
| attacked specifically because we raised, |
|||||
| robustly evidenced comprehensive concerns |
|||||
| hat WBUK had caused harm to whistleblowers | |||||
| and allowed the continuing abuse and neglect |
|||||
| fvulnerable people. We would take the same |
|||||
| action again without hesitation. |
|||||
| Our case also raises a number ofvery | |||||
| important issues, charities who challenge |
|||||
| rongdoing that directly affects their |
|||||
| beneficiaries are vulnerable to political attacks |
|||||
| and there needs to be specific protection for | |||||
| uch situations in future. We have experienced |
|||||
| harassment, malicious allegations, bullying, |
|||||
| abuse ofpower and injustice. | |||||
| sa charity run by whistleblowers, our very |
|||||
| heartbeat is speaking out about wrongdoing, |
|||||
| hat kind ofcharity would we be ifwe | |||||
| remained silent on issues ofserious abuse? |
|||||
| his charity has no paid staff, it is run by those | |||||
| ho have witnessed abuse and have suffered |
|||||
| or reporting it. |
|||||
| e are effective in the work we do because we | |||||
| really listen to whistleblowers and families of |
|||||
| buse victims and all our policies are based on | |||||
| he experiences ofwhistleblowers and families |
|||||
| fabuse victims. Our work is aimed at | |||||
| hallenging the root causes ofabuse and we |
|||||
| identify those issues by listening to those who | |||||
| are directly experiencing them. |
|||||
| s a result ofthe WBUK malicious allegations |
|||||
| and the Charity Commissions political attack on |
|||||
| us, we have endured what can only have been |
|||||
| an attack with intent to silence us permanently | |||||
| by trying to exhaust our small resources, taking | |||||
| 212hours away from our vital work and | |||||
| attacking until we were forced to spend E43a |
|||||
| day on legal fees. We are trying to recoup this | |||||
| ia crowd justice, and we are so grateful that | |||||
| o many came forward to donate from the | |||||
| little they had to spare. | |||||
| his charity has and will continue to exist by | |||||
| he goodwill ofthose we have directly helped. |
| 11 | |
|---|---|
| Our typical donations are from previous |
|
| helpline callers such as Sue, who every year |
|
| donates on her father's birthday and thanks |
us |
| or saving his life and giving her an extra six | |
| precious years with him. | |
| e want to thank all our volunteers who give |
|
| so much time and love, we want to thank all |
|
| hose who support us because they have seen |
|
| Irst-hand the work we do, our volunteers are |
|
| hose we have helped and want to give that |
|
| same help to others. Our funders are | |
| predominantly those we have helped in the |
|
| past and who remember us in the future. This |
|
| is testament to our work and says everything |
|
| about who we are and what we do. We run on | |
| a daily spend off49 but we run-on love, |
|
| dedication, passion, zero tolerance ofabuse, |
|
| and lived experience and we cannot measure | |
| hat in money, but it isthat which isthe true |
|
| meaning ofthe word ~charit |
| Performance | offundraising | offundraising | activities | Para 1.41 | No fundra ising activities were carried out in this | No fundra ising activities were carried out in this |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| against objectives set | period. | |||||
| Investment | performance | against | Para 1.41 | Not applicable as no investments | made. | |
| objectives | ||||||
| Other |
| SORP | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| reference | ||||||
| Review ofthe charity's financial position at the end ofthe period |
Para 1.21 | The financial position remains good and this year harity has again received well above average onations. |
the | |||
| Statement explaining the policy for |
Para 1.22 | No reserve policy is in place as the running costs |
have | |||
| holding reserves | stating | why they | been met by donations | |||
| are held | ||||||
| Amount ofreserves held | Para 1.22 | Zero | ||||
| Reasons for holding zero | reserves | Para 1.22 | Not applicable. | |||
| Details offund | materially | in deficit | Para 1.24 | Not applicable as not in deficit. | ||
| Explanation ofany uncertainties |
Para 1.23 | There is never any uncertainty about the commitment |
||||
| about the charity | continuing | as a | ofthe Trustees, Volunteers and our Supporters |
to | ||
| going concern | continue the work ofthe charity. Please see the section below about the principal |
risks | ||||
| to the chari | ||||||
| Additional information |
(optional) | |||||
| You may choose to include | further | statements | where relevant about: | |||
| SORP | ||||||
| reference | ||||||
| The charity's principal sources of |
Para 1.47 | The charity does not accept any funding from |
||||
| funds (including | any fundraising) | Government (local or national) or the care sector. This is so that we can remain independent snd able to |
||||
| report and challenge where necessary. |
||||||
| Donations come mainly &om individual members |
ofthe | |||||
| ublic occasional le acies and charitable trusts |
||||||
| Investment policy and objectives |
Para 1.46 | |||||
| including any social investment |
ot applicable. | |||||
| policy adopted | ||||||
| A description ofthe principal | risks | Para 1.46 | he principal risk is due to the nature ofour work |
in | ||
| facing the charity | xposing abuse ofvulnerable adults, the authorities' ailure to act on valid concerns raised by whistleblowers |
|||||
| d challenging Government on policies that have |
led to | |||||
| voidable deaths and suffering in care homes. All of |
||||||
| hese aspects ofour work make us vulnerable to |
||||||
| alicious allegations and political attacks. |
||||||
| e charity always has full evidence available to respond | ||||||
| o an such elle ations. |
||||||
| Other |
| Description of charity's | trusts: | trusts: | SORP | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| reference | ||||||||||||||||
| Type ofgoverning document |
Para 1.25 | rticles of | Association | |||||||||||||
| (trust deed, royal charter) | ||||||||||||||||
| How isthe charity constituted? | Para 1.25 | haritsble | company | limited by guarantee | ||||||||||||
| (e.g unincorporated association, |
CIO) | |||||||||||||||
| Trustee selection methods | Para 1.25 | ny new rustee must ave at least 4years' experience Isupporting the charity. |
||||||||||||||
| including details ofany constitutional provisions |
In addition they must being a whistleblower |
have relevant or supportinq |
experience ofeither a whistlebiower, and |
|||||||||||||
| e.g. election to post | must have relevant personal expenence ofelderly care, whether in a work role oras a family member |
or | ||||||||||||||
| or name ofany person or body | send. | |||||||||||||||
| entitled to appoint one or more | II current | Trustees | must approve any new | Trustee. | ||||||||||||
| ditional information (optional) |
||||||||||||||||
| ou may choose to include further | statements | where relevant | about: | |||||||||||||
| SORP | ||||||||||||||||
| reference | ||||||||||||||||
| Policies and procedures adopted |
for | Para 1.51 | ||||||||||||||
| the induction and training of |
||||||||||||||||
| Trustees | ||||||||||||||||
| The charity's organisational | structure | Para 1.51 | ||||||||||||||
| and any wider network with | which | |||||||||||||||
| the charity works | ||||||||||||||||
| Relationship with any related parties |
Para 1.51 | e charity slled The |
works Whistler |
with sseparate non-charitable group which was established by one ofthe |
||||||||||||
| hsrity trustees, | Eileen Chubb. The Whistler does | not | ||||||||||||||
| eceive any | charity | funds snd is operated separately | to the | |||||||||||||
| hsrity. It | provides | support to the charity and deals with | ||||||||||||||
| histleblowing | cases | which are not related | toacare | |||||||||||||
| ettin or elderl |
eo | le. | ||||||||||||||
| Other | ||||||||||||||||
| Charity name | Compassion | In | Care | |||||||||||||
| Other name the charity uses | Not applicable | |||||||||||||||
| Registered charity number |
1102282 | |||||||||||||||
| Charity's principal address |
19ATransmere | Road | ||||||||||||||
| Petts Wood | ||||||||||||||||
| Orpington | ||||||||||||||||
| BR5 1DT |
| 14 | 14 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Names ofthe charity | Trustees who manage the charity | ||||||
| Trustee name | Office (Ifany) | Dates acted if not for | Name of person | (or | |||
| whole year | body) entitled to | appoint | |||||
| Trustee (if any) | |||||||
| Eileen Chubb | Trustee | & Director | |||||
| 2 | Stephen | Honour | Trustee | ||||
| 3 | Karis Le Winton | Trustee | 10/12/2020 | ||||
| 4 | Margaret | Roffey | Trustee |
| Director | name |
|---|---|
| Eileen Chubb | |
| Stephen | Honour |
| Karis Le | Winton |
| Margaret | Roffey |
| Description ofthe assets | held in this | Not applicable |
|---|---|---|
| capacity | ||
| Name and objects ofthe | charity | Not applicable |
| on whose behalf the assets are | ||
| held and how this falls within the | ||
| custodian charity's objects |
||
| Details ofarrangements | for safe | Not applicable |
| custody and segregation | ofsuch | |
| assets from the charity's | own assets |
| Type of adviser | Name | Address | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lawyers | Stone | King | oundary | House, 91Charterbouse | Street, London ECIM 6HR |
| Accountant | erdant Accountants | 20-22 Wenlock Road London N 1 7GU |
| 2.1 INCOME | 2.1 INCOME | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Recognition ofincome |
These are induded in the Statement of Financial Activities (SoFA) when: |
|||
| ~ the charitv becomes entitled to the resources; |
||||
| ~ it is more likelv than not that the trustees will receive the resources; |
||||
| ~ the monetarv value can be measured with sufficient relisbilitv. |
||||
| Grants and donations | Grants and donations are only included in the SoFA when the general income recognition criteria are met (5.10to 5.12 FRS102SORP). |
|||
| Legacies are included in the SOFA when receipt is probable, that is, when there has been |
||||
| Legacies | grant ofprobate, the executors have established that there are sufficient assets in the estate and any conditions attached to the legacy are either within the control ofthe charity or have |
|||
| been met. | ||||
| Gift Aid receivable is included in income when there is a valid declaration from the donor. |
||||
| Tax reclaims on donations and gifts |
Any Gift Aid amount recovered on s donation is considered to be part ofthat gift and is treated ss sn addition to the same fund as the initial donation unless the donor orthe terms |
of | ||
| the appeal have specified otherwise. | ||||
| Income from | interest, | This is included in the accounts when receipt is probable snd the amount receivable can |
be | |
| royalties and | dividends | measured reliably. |
||
| 2.2 EXPENDITURE | AND LIABILITIES | |||
| Liabilities are recognised where it is more likely than not that there is a legal or constructive |
||||
| Liability recognition | obligation committing the charity to pay out resources and the amount ofthe obligation can measured with reasonable certainty. |
be | ||
| Governance ebs'Is |
and support | Support costs have been allocated between governance costs and other support. Governance costs comprise all costs involving public accountability ofthe charity and its |
||
| compliance with regulation and good practice. |
||||
| Defened income | No material item ofdeferred income has been included in the accounts. |
|||
| Creditors | The charity hss creditors which are measured st settlement amounts less any trade discounts |
|||
| Provisions for liabilities | A liability is measured on recognition at its historical cost and then subsequently measured the best estimate ofthe amount required to settle the obligation at the reporting date |
at | ||
| 2.3ASSETS | ||||
| Tangible fixed assets for | These are capitalised ifthey csn be used for more than one year, and individual items costing |
|||
| use by charity | at least Et000. | |||
| They are valued at cost. |
||||
| Depreciation is calculated to write down the cost oftangible fixed assets, over the useful |
life | |||
| ofthe assets. The rate adopted by the charity are: Furniture and fittings and Office |
||||
| Equipment 20%Straight line. |
| Restricted | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analysis | of income | Unrestricted funds |
income funds |
Endowment funds |
Total funds | Pnor year | ||||||
| 6 | ||||||||||||
| Donations | Donations | and | ifts | 29,469 | 29,469 | 88,104 | ||||||
| and legacies: | Gift Aid | |||||||||||
| Legacies | ||||||||||||
| General grants | provided | by government/other | ||||||||||
| charities | ||||||||||||
| Membership | subscriptions | and | sponsorships | |||||||||
| which are in | substance | donations | ||||||||||
| Donated goods, | facilities | and | services | |||||||||
| Other | ||||||||||||
| Total | 29,469 | 29,469 | 88,104 | |||||||||
| Charitable | ||||||||||||
| activities: | ||||||||||||
| Other | ||||||||||||
| Total | ||||||||||||
| TOTAL INCOME | 29469 | 29469 | 88 104 | |||||||||
| Other Information: | ||||||||||||
| Ag Income in the prior year | was | unrestricted. |
| Note 4 | E | xpen | diture | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| This | year | Last | year | ||||||||||
| Restricted | Restricted | ||||||||||||
| Unraau | Ictad | income | Endowman | Unrestricted | income | Endowment | |||||||
| Analysis | funds | funds | lfunds | Total funds | funds | funds | funds | Total funds | |||||
| Expenditure on raising funds: |
|||||||||||||
| Misc | |||||||||||||
| Total expenditure | on raising funds | ||||||||||||
| Expenditure on charitable |
activities: | ||||||||||||
| Stationery &Postage |
51 | 51 | 293 | 293 | |||||||||
| Website Fees | 1,068 | 1,068 | 575 | 575 | |||||||||
| Companies House Fee |
13 | 13 | 13 | 13 | |||||||||
| Sundries | 288 | 288 | 240 | 240 | |||||||||
| Consultant Fees |
12,580 | 12,580 | 14,503 | 14,503 | |||||||||
| Legal &Professional Fees |
15,721 | 15,721 | |||||||||||
| Bank Charges | 17 | 17 | |||||||||||
| Publishing | 2,499 | 2,499 | |||||||||||
| Office Equipments | not capitalised | 463 | 1,349 | 1,349 | |||||||||
| Independent Examination |
& | Accounting | 900 | 9OO | |||||||||
| Total expenditure | on charitable | activities | |||||||||||
| 33,583 | 33,583 | 16,990 | 16,990 | ||||||||||
| TOTAL EXPENDITURE | 33,583 | 33,583 | 16,990 | 16,990 |