OpenCharities

This text was generated using OCR and may contain errors. Check the original PDF to see the document submitted to the regulator.

2025-03-31-accounts

Docusign Envelope ID.. 07A8A58&E3FF494F-AgD9￿E9AE3AFA2A3 REGISTERED COMPANY NUMBER: 02748744 {EDgl4Dd and Wale5) REGisfERED CHARITY NUMBER: 1062008 Report of the TYu$tees and Unaudited Financial Statements for the Year Ended 31 Marcb 2025 for The Monitoring Group Limited Grant Ham)d Lernian Davis LLP Chartered Accountant5 Second Floor, Kirkland House 11-15 Peterborough Road Harrow Middlesex IL412AX

Docusign Envelope ID: 07A8A5B8-E3FF494F-AgD9-OEgAE3AFA2A3 The Monitorillg Group Limited Contents of lh¢ Financi41 Stat¢mtnts for the year ended 31 March 2025 Page Report of the Trustees Independent Examiner's Report Statement of Finan¢ial Attivities 10 B&lanee Sheet Notes to the FinaDCjg1 Ststements 12 to 16

Docuslgn Envelop8 ID.. 07A6A5BB-E3FF494F-A9Dg-OE9AE3AFA2A3 The Monitoring Group Limited Report of the Trustees for tbe year ended 31 Mgrch 2025 The trustees who are also directors of the charity for the purposes of the Companies Act 2006, present their report with the financial statements of the charity for Ilke year ended 31 March 2025. The tnTStees have adopted the provisions of Accounting and Reporting by Charities: Statement of Recomm¢nd¢d Practice applicable to charities preparing their a¢¢ounts in accordan¢¢ with the Financial Reporting Standard applicable in the UK and Republi¢ of Ireland (FRS 102) (effective l January 2019). Page I

Docusign Envelope ID: 07A8ASBB-E3FF494FA9DWE9AE3AFA2A3 The Monitoring Group Limited Report of the Trnstees for tbe year ended 31 Marcb 2025 OBJECTIVES AND ACTIVITIES Signifi¢ant getivities I: The impact of Covid 19 pandemic aDd lockdoivn Th¢ fallout from COVID 19 contlnues to havt an impact on our worlL - Increase in working hours for some staff despite adapting to working remotely ' Our team-work has suffered given the lack of person and person contact and absences ' Increascd us¢ of emotional support to everyone involved with our services Increased volunt¢¢rin8 to provide muthal aid to many our clients suffered cconomic hardship. De5Plte our efforts ihe impact of poverty in poorer communities w&8 harder to manage and bear In summary, the group continued to appraise it work will in the thture by assessing on the following areas: - Increase in remote Working - Expanded roles for Trustees and staff ' Separation of critical skills and roles - De-humanising of people in work settings - Building resilience to face the uncertainty and impact of th¢ pandemic 2: Advocacy for victims of race hate crimes- the nyain headlines Baekground and Purpose TMG has continued its commitment to supporting victims of racism in London through its ongoing involvement in the CATCH project. CATCH (CommuTJity Alliance to Combat Hate) is a collaborative initiative comprising severnl specialisl Charities providing advocacy and support services to victims of hate Qrimes, with 8 particular focus on Tac¢-based incidents. CATCH Consortium Member5 The project benefits from the strengths aT)d specialisms of the following partner organisations: - Ga]op - Advocacy for LGB T+ hate Crime victims - East European Resource Centre (EERC) - Support for Eastern European communities - Community Security Trust (CST) - Addressing antisemitic hate crime - Tell MAMA- Ta¢kling anti-muslim (Islamophobic) hate Crime - Choic¢ in Hackn¢y- Advocacy on anti-disability hate crime - Stay Safe East - Anti-disability hate crim¢ support - Real - Advowy for people with disabilities Projeet Signifieince and Sust4in#billty Over the past years, the CATCH proje¢t has evolved to deliver improved outcomes for victims navigating the criminal justice system. It remains a unique initiativ¢ within the UK, unmatched in its scope and collaborative mod¢l. While the framework and perforn]an¢¢ metric5 linked io external funding do not always aligm precisely wftth TMG'S broader mission, th¢ project currently accounts for approximately 75Q/o of our annual income. As such, we have maintained strong engagement with the project to ensure its continuation. Service Delivery 4nd Impsict In the reporting year, TMG provided support to 819 individuals. At any given tim¢, our casework team manages approximately 145 active c￿¢5. The nature of these Cases varies significantly, ranging from peTSi5tcnt harassment (e.g. verbal abuse, noise complaints) to threats of violence and physical assaults, including death threats. Our client b&8e is drawn from communities racialised as minorities, often referred to as global majority b￿kgrOUnd$. Within this group* signifi¢ant intersectional factors are present: - Over 600/0 of clients are women - 4O/b identify as LGB T+ 160/• are living with disabilities, including mental health challenges The majority of ¢lients require emotional support, legal guidan¢e, and practical inforntstion. TMG directly delivers th¢s¢ services in-house, with fewer than lQ/o of Clients r¢f¢rred externally. Page 2

DO¢￿SIgn Envelope ID, O7A8ASB￿3FF494F-A9D￿EgAE3AFA2A3 The Monitoring Group LAmited Report of the Trustees for the year ended 31 March 2025 On average, we receive l O new referrals per week via the CATCH neiwork, maintaining a ¢onsistently high workload. Despite these demands, our oulcomes frir clients remain strong, even as w¢ often contend with systemic failures from statutory agencies such as the poli¢¢, local authorities, and housing PToviders. These institutions frequently lack eff￿lIve strategies to prioritise victim support or long-terni resolution planning. Review and Tender Outcome In 2023, the CATCH service underwent a fornial review by the Greater London Authority. The review included both data analysis and client inlerviews. Findings were overwhelmingly positive, validating the impact and necessity of the service. In April 2023, the CATCH project was re-tendered, and TMG once again joined its consortiwn partners in submitting a bid, We are pleased to report that the bid was successful, securing £401,830 in fi￿dIrtg to support the continuation of the project through to October 2028. Fulure Plans 4nd Development Looking beyond 2025, TMG aims to div¢r5ify its funding streams by approaching new ¢xternal fvndeTS. We also intend to conduct a Comprehensive review of racist viol¢n¢¢ tn London, drawing on data and insights from our CATCH Casework. This will include an assessment of systemic failings across police services, local authorities, and mental health providers. Recognising the isolation many of our clients experience. we will be launching weekly support groups and advice surgery from November 2023. These sessions will provide a space for clients to share experiences, build networks of mutual support, and co4evelop strategies for resilien¢e. 3: CORE WORK In addition to advising and supporting victims of racist crimes and discriminatiott, the Group has suc¢essfi]Ily developed national anti-racist responses lo Stst¢ racism and violence by establishing public ￿9Mpaign$ and innovative ¢ommunity led initiatives to both expose state cornplicity or hold state agencies to account. Over the last 12 months, our advocacy staff dealt wth 180 cases and advised over 800 callers nationally. 150/0 of the ¢ases involves serious crimes involving arson, serious injury or death. We also established or sustained 8 public ¢ampaigns for families suffering state racism having lost a loved member of the family through su5pi¢ious or unexplained death. The work included developing ¢omprehensive media strategy, organising public events, r¢pr¢s¢ntation for reinvestigations at the most senior levels ranging from Mayoral. Chief Constable to Commissionefs offices and undertaking public law legal strategies wtth lawyers. 4: Independent Commission of Inquiry into the Violenee fin Leieester, August-september 21122 Over this period, the Inquiry fooused on literatyre review, gaining access to people and agencies who wuld provide factual eviden¢¢ and analysis of the events in 2022 COMMMtSSlONS Tenns of Reference Purpose (Mission): During Augu5t-September 2022, serious violence between South Asian5 from Hindu and Muslim backgrounds shocked th¢ city of LeicesÈer, East Midlands, a ¢ity often viewed as a model for community harn)ony and conviviality- Tbe violence threatened to spread to other major cities in Britain. and it also had international reper¢ussions. The Independent Commission of Inquiry will investigate the r￿OnS for the violenc¢ and community dishamony in Leicester in 2022. It will investigate the roles of civil so¢iety organizations, independent actors, and social media both in the f05tering of and mitigating against Such disharnlony. Th¢ Conllnission will evaluate the response of the relevant statutory agencies to the violence and ¢onsider the impaets of the events. The Commission will make recommendations abo￿ local, national, and community-b&8ed strategies aimed at preventing such hostility and violence in the future. The Commission is committed to fjjlly exploring the events, including th¢ir consequences and impact on people's lives and on Leicester's civil society. It is cornmitted to exploring what needs to be done in th¢ face of such violence and disharniony, including addressing xnjustice, potential abuses of human rights. and discrimination. The initial idea for a Commission of Inquiry into the events and their causes arose through work and engagement with ommunity groups in Leicester. Local groups expressed strongly, and in the spirit of community reconciliation, the need to understand why the violence occurred and what steps could be undertaken to prevent such violenG¢ in the future. Page 3

Docusign Envelope ID.. O7A8ASB￿3FF4géFth9D9.OE9AE3AFA2A3 The Monitoring Group Llmited Report of the Truste for the year ended 31 March 2025 The Conllhission will: l. Examine the Circumstances surrounding the public disturbances of August and September 2022 and their afternia including: o The factual context of these events, including an ￿ldenc￿based chronology of key events before, during and after the disturbance5 o The causes and key drivers of violence and disharniony o The response of local stat￿ory agencies prior to, during, and after the events The Tole of Civil Society, local associations, independent actors, and social media in these events, including in mitigating the violence and working towards community peace. 2. Hold public hearings in which it will: o Consider carefully individual experiences from members of the public. Although the Commission will not make detailed findings on individual cases, those cases will infortn its ￿nCluSiOnS and recommendations o Gather evidence from staMtory and volunlary agencies 3. Make legal and policy recommendations about appropriate mechanisms for future prevention, in¢luding by identifying: o Relevant Principl￿ of equality and non-discrimination o Material principles of transitional justice and reconciliation relevant to its work o Factors relevant to ensuring justice o Examples of good practice o Relevant lessons learned 4. Provide regular inforn)alion about Ihe work it has undertaken. 5. Produce a final report of its findings and recommendations in a timely manner and as 500n &8 reasonably practicable. Values The Inquiry will strive to work in accordance WAth the following Core values: o Commitment to highquality, indep¢nd¢nt. evidence-based. impartial, and objective investigation o Commitment to principles of equality and non-discrimination o The highest standards of professional conducL including in designing th¢ sthdy. ￿lleCtIng data and other evidence, and in ensuring appropriate data security o Commitment to participation of local communities o Strength¢ning dialoglle between groups and within civil society o Transparency in comrnunications before. during and after Investigatio￿ relating to the pro¢¢ss and the findings o Aivning for the widest participation of affected local organisations and people. including in making Submi￿10n5 to the Commission. and in the dissemination of its findings o Sensitivity to any safety concerns for those engaging with the Commission, including protection of inforniation and making available routes for submission and discussion that guarantee confidentiality and anonymity where necessary o Working to avoid wherever possible the exacerbation of disharn)ony in ils approach and methods of working The Commission of Inquiry Without prejudging any factors. the Commission's scope of investigation is flexible and will consider relevant local, national. and international dim¢nsions. The Commission is attuned to the compleK multi-layered dynami¢s that ar¢ relevant in situations of ¢onfltct. including in Leicester. The Commission's approach is multi4lisciplinary, reflected in its composition, structure. and methods of working. Th¢ Commisgion will comprise several dimensions of activity, including: Page 4

Docusign Envelope ID.. 07A8A5B&E3FF494F-A9D9-OE9AE3AFA2A3 Tbe Monitoring Group Limited Report of the Trustees for the year ended 31 March 2025 o Legal and p)licy analysis and recommendations infonned by the panel's expertise in domestic and international human rights, anti4iscrimination and equality law, as well as expertise in the Conduct of public inquiries following sittlations of community conflict. o An independent stream of academic research that will infonn the Commission and which is sensittve to several institutional and geographical soles of analysis. The research will be conducted by two reputable universities and a team of researchers. o A Leicester-based Advisory Group that will advise the commission on local issues of community concern, including recent and historic issues of discrimination and disadvantage, as well as relations within communities. Community and youth engagement and development work wtth Leicester organizations, including religious and community gTOUPS, yOUtIL Glubs and organizations, and the education sector. The Commission Panel The Comrnission of Inquiry will be chaired by Juan Mendez, Professor of Human Rights Law at washIn￿On College of Law, American University. Juan Mendez was United Nations Special Rapporteur on Torture and Other Cruel, Itthuman and Degrading Treatment or Punishment. He was also Special Advisor to the Prosecutor of the Intemational Criminal Court. The Chair ts a renowned, experien¢ed international expert of independence and probity, and panel members were selected because of their independence, experience, and legal and academic expertise. The wmposition of the Inquiry panel refleGts knowledge and expertise in law and policy, human righls, anti-discrimination, work in South Asian ommunities, and academic research methods. Lisa Magarrell. a human rights and transitional justice expert based in New York who was an advisor to the community-based Greensboro Trnth and Reconcili&tion Commission in North Carolina IUS). Subir Sinha, Reader. Department of Development Studies, School of Oriental and African Studies. Chetan Bhati Professor. Department of So¢iology, London School of Economics and Political S¢ience. Suresh Grover, Founder and national coordinator. The Monitoring Group, a pre-erninent organization working against ra¢ism and discrimination stnce the late 1970s, and whi¢h played a leading role in several public inquiries, in¢ludAng the Stephen Lawrence, Zahid Mubarek and Victoria Climbie inquiries and numerous other campaigns. Lei¢ester Advisory Group The Leicest¢r Advisory Group, Umesh Patel, Naim Razak and oth¢T5. are con)munity experts who will advise the Inquiry on various lo¢al matters that mighl arise, including ￿MMunity relations. race equality, youth provision. policin& minority representation, data confidentiality and security. The publi¢ Hearings On In Mid-July (12th and 13ih) 2024, the Independent Commission of Inquiry into the Violence in Leicester in 2022. The event was held at the Y-Th¢atre in Leicester, and members of ihe publi¢ could attend to hear the testimony being presented to the inquiry. The session was well managed, well explained and was led by an expert panel who treafed the witnesses with respect and allowed them to express their views. The hearing was an opportunity to learn more about the causes and consequences of the violence that shook the City two years ago, and to hear the voices of those who were directly affected by it. "I was impressed by the professionalisrn and sensitivity of the commission, and by the courage and honesty of the witnesses. I hope that this inquiry will contribute to the restoration of peace and harniony between the different communities of Lei¢es¢er, and to the prevention of such conflicts in the future" a participant at the Inquiry The Indepcndent Commission aims to investigate the underlying causes and impacts of the violen¢e that eTUPted b¢twe¢n Souih Asian Hindu and Muslim communilies in Leicester in 2022. The investigation is directly related to matters of social cohesion, as it seeks to understand and address the factors that disrnpted community accord in a city previously knoNwm for its ￿nvivIallty and multicultural integrdtion. Page 5

Docusign Envelope ID". 07A8A58B.E3FF494F-A9D&OEgAE3AFA2A3 The Monitoring Group Limited Report of the Trustees for the year ended 31 Mar¢b 2025 The ¢ommission is examining the mles of various actors, including civil society organisations and $oci21 medi4 in both fostering and mitigating the violence and disharniony. It 15 85sessing the responses of local agencies and the impads on the affected communities. By doing so, the cornmission aims to identify and recommend strat¢gies to prevent such conflicts in the future. thereby fostering stronger social cohesion and ensuring justice and equaliry be￿een the different communities. Th¢ commkssion h&$ placed a strong emphasis on community participation. encouragin¥ affected individuals and groups to share their experiences and insights. This inclusive approach is designed to build iru5L promote dialogue. and enhance the sense of community solidarity, which are essential components of social cohesion. The Commission employs a comprehensive approach to gathering evidence. aiming for thoroughness and inclusivity. Their methods include: Public Hearings and Testimonies: The commission hold5 public he2riT]gs to gather individual experiences from community members. These hearings are essential for understsnding the personal impacts of the violence and to infonn the commission's conclusions and recommendations. Engagement with Local Communities: The commission ¢mphasises participation from local conimunities, including religious and youth organisations. This engagement is designed to ensure a wide range of voices and perspectives are heard, which is crucial foT a holistic Und￿Standing of the events. Collaboration with Statutory and Voluntsry Agencies: The commission collects evidence from both statutory and voluntary agencies to understand the broader context and insiitutional responses before. durin& and after the violence. Independent Academic Research.. Two universities are involved in ¢ondu¢ting independent research to Provide an eviden¢e-b&sed understanding of the violence. This research component 5UPPQrts the commission's work with rigorous academic analysis. Community Surveys and Confidential Submissions.. To facilitate wider community involvement. the ¢ommission h&$ set up confidential surveys and submission Channels. This allows individuals who may not be able to attend publi hearings to ¢ontribute their experiences and perspectives safety and privately. Analysis of Social Media and Independent Actors: The Commission also investigates the role of social media and independent actors in both - exacert)ating and mitigating th¢ viol¢n¢e. which is ¢rucial for understanding the dynamics of the confltct. 5: Far right riots (Summer 2024) Since summer 2024, we have travelled extensively meeting people and communlties directly affected by far right violence in 27 cities and speaking to a few of those whose neighbours or relatives were involved in public disturbances. The PUTpose of our visits was to understsnd the str¢ngth of the far-right groups and their reach and to prepare, enable and empower communities under attack. In mid-AugusL only weeks after the public disturbances, together wlth other groups we organised ihree meeting. ¢a¢h of these were attended by around 80 people, bringing a cross Section of diverse communities to discuss the way forward for the thtur¢. Contrary to what is claimed by some oificial experts on the subject, the racist rioting in Summer this year was unprecedent in British History - the 1919 race rioling are probably comparable if one discounts the role of social media today. Although limited in fomal organising. this is th¢ first occasion in post-war Britain that far right groups were able to orchestrate and Coordinate violent protests tar¥eting spaces, resources and sites used by Migrant and Musli communities in 27 towns in England and N Ireland. The most severe rioting took place over the weekend of 3-4 August, when far right protesters attacked homes and businesses owned by immigrdnts and attacked hotels housing asylum seekers. The disorder included racial violence. arson and looting. The shape of far-right dis¢ourse is focused on alleged migrant or Muslim criminality and sexual violence against white women and children, and the alleged degradation by migrants of the quality of evcryday, especially urban, suburban and even rural life. Alongside are other far-right themes of distrust of the institutions of the media, politics, law, policing and a¢¢ess to health service. These institutions are seen as favouring Tacialised minorities or are delib¢ral¢ly unfair or deceptive to the native populatiory or are agents of 'globalist', '¢lite', 'deep state. or'woke, forces. Page 6

Docusign Envelope ID.. 07A8ASBB-E3FF494F-A9D￿EgAE3AFA2A3 The Monitoring Group Limited Report of the Trnstees for the year ended 31 March 2025 However, within this far-right configuralion, there is now considerable space for non-white right-wing and far-right for¢e5 to align with while supremacist and nativist projects, including sections of minority communities who are anti-migrant (despite being migrants themselves). For the first time in post war British history, these forces are represented through Reforn] UK in UK paTliaTnent and their views are shored by the l¢adership of the opposition party. In addition, follomryng unprecedented. large-scale violence in Leice5teT in September 2022 between Hindus and Muslim5, it no accident that Tommy Robinson made a call to his supporters thxt they should go to Leicester to defend Hindus. Among several Hindu far-Tight groups, Robinson's words and videos are not only actively disseminated but h¢ is invTrted to share speaking platfonns with Hindutva ideologues and welcomed in India by the BJP-led government (REFS). Robinson's political ideology is actively pro-Hindutva and anti-muslim. For us to challenge the racism of the far righi in the CUTrent political and social environment underpinned by decides of austerity and otticial demonisation of particulaT racialised groups. we need an innovative grass roots approach. We wlsh to recTuiI a part time community mobiliser who will be tsskcd to.. - engage with racialised communities with - to work with young people so that effective support groups within localities can be established - to create national training on community mobilising that can be delivered in an accessibl¢ manner - to work with trade unions so that community hubs - delivering much needed r¢sources - can be piloted in disaffected and poorer localities where the far right have gained support Some of the work described above 15 already being undertaken but in an adho¢ and disjointed manner. For IDStance, there have been widespread meetings held to Create an Asian D¢fian¢e Network bringing young and older activists of South Asian Origin together. We are also in contact with activists based in communities and housing estates who have are keen to develop a broader movemenl to Challenge the far right - in all its variants - with equal detemination and thal requires a medium to long tenn strategy. FINANCIAL REVIEW Reserves policy The Trustees have established a policy whereby the unrestri¢ted funds not committed or invested in tangible fixed assets ("the free reserves") held by the charity should be equal to 3 months of unrestricted operating expenditure, which equated to £25.000 in general fvnds. At this level the Trustees f¢¢1 that they would be able to continue the cu)Tent activities of the charity in the event of a significant drop in funding. It would obviously be necessary to consider how the funding would be replaced or a¢tivities changed. The Management Committee has examined the charity's requirements for reserves in light of the main risks lo the organisation. The present level of reserves available to the charity met the tsrget level. Although the strategy is to continue to build reserves through planned operdting surpluses, the Management Committee has a150 considered the extent to which existing activitie5 can be rationalised. should such circumslances arise. FirruRE PLANS The Monitoring Group continues to build contacts with n¢w funders and make bids to develop its work strat¢gically complernenting its operational response to the problem of racism is all its f0rn15. The current landscape on funding is changing significantly but we rernain hopeful in galvanising our resources on a national b&8is. as one of the pivotal organisations in the UK that supports victims and communities experiencing the problem. A key element in our development plan is to increase our profile with private funders and usage of social media and media outlets. STRUCTURE, GOVERNANCE AI¥D MANAGEMEIYT Governing documeDt The charity is controlled by its governing documenl, a deed of trusL and wnstitutes a limited Company, limit¢d by guarantee, a5 defined by the Companies Act 2006. REFERENCE AND ADMINISTRATIVE DETAILS Regislered Company number 02748744 {England and Wales) Registered Charity number 1062008 Page 7

Docusign Envelope ID.. 07A8A5B&E3FF494F-A9D￿EgAE3AFA2A3 The MoDltoring Group Limited Report of the Trn5tees for the year ended 31 Mareh 2025 Registered office 2 Langley Lane Vauxhall London SW8 IGB Trustees A Njie Professor J I Siddiqi R Davies A Babarinde Dr A Elliot-cooper J Niiiar Company Secretary Professor J I Siddiqi IndepeDdeDt Ex*miner Grant Harrod Lern)an Davis LLP Chartered Accountants Second Floor, Kirkland House 11-15 Peterborough Road HaTrow Middlesex HAI 2AX Approved by order of the board of trustees on .... l6..l.Iz.l..£.oz5............. and signed on it5 behalf by: p4￿￿￿Y.. A Njie - Trustee Page È

Doejjsign Envelope ID: 07A8AsB￿3FF4g4F-A9D￿E9AE3AF￿2A3 Independent ExAminer's Report to the Trustees of The Monitoring Group Limited Independent examiner's report to the trustees of The Monitoring Group Limited ('tbe Company,) I report to the charity trustees on my examination of the accounts of the Company for the year ended 31 March 2025. Responsibilities and basis of report As the charity's trustees of the Company (and also its directors for the purpose5 of company law} you are responsible for the preparation of the accounts in accordance with the requirements of the Companies Act 2006 ('the 2006 ACV). Having Satisfied myself that the a¢¢ounts of the Company are not Tequired to be audited under Part 16 of th¢ 2006 Act and are eligible for independent examination. J report in respect of my examination of your charity's a¢wunts as carried out under Section 145 of the Charities Act 2011 {Ihe 2011 Act?. In carrying out rny examination I have followed the Directions giv¢n by the Charity Commission under Seclion 145{5) (b) of the 2011 Act. Independenl examiner's statement Slnce your charity's gross income exceeded £250,000 your examiner must be a member of a listed body. I can ¢onfwm that l am qualified to undertake the examination because I am a member of the Association of Chartered Certified Accountants, whicli is one of the listed bodies. I have completed my examination. I confirni that no matters have come to my attention in connection with the examination giving me cause to believe: accounting records were not kept in respect of the Company as required by Section 386 of th¢ 2006 Actr, or the accounts do not accord with those records" or the accounts do not Comply with thc accounting requRrements of Section 396 of the 2006 Act other than any requirement that the accounts give a true and fair view whirh AS not a matter considered as part of an independent examination" or the accounts have not been prepared in accordance with the methods and principles of the Statement of Recommended Practice for a¢¢ounting and reporting by charities (applicable to charities preparing their accounts in accordance with the Financial Reporting Standard applicable in the UK and Republic of Ireland (FRS 102)). I have no conceTns and hav¢ wme across no other matters in connection with the examination to which attention should be drawn in this report in ord¢T lo enable a proper understanding of the a¢¢ounts to be Teached. 81ywdty.' 262DDCQCF0214FB... Jeremy Ha￿0d FCCA Grant Harrod Lern￿n Davis LLP Chartered Accountsnts Second Floor, Kirkland House 11-15 Peterlx)rough Road Harrow Middlesex FL412AX Date:... Page 9

Do¢)Jsl9n Envelope ID.. O7A8A5BBE3FF494FA9D￿oEgAEJAF￿2A3 The Monitoring Group Limited Statement of Finanelal Artiviti¢s for the year ended 31 Marth 2025 2025 Totsl fund5 2024 Tota] funds Unrestricted nds Restricted funds Notes INCOME AND ENDOWMENTS FROM Donations and legacies 60 60 106 Chgrit4ble 2ctivitie3 Charitable activities 291,494 291.494 264,731 Other trading activities 8,000 8.000 3,000 Total 8,060 291,494 299.554 267,837 EXPENDITURE ON Cbaritable aCti￿tieS Charitable activities 2, 168 315.494 317.662 265,156 NET INCOMEI(EXPENDITURE) 5,892 (24,000} (18,108) 2,681 RECONCILIATION OF FUNDS Total funds brought forward 29.299 24,000 53,299 50.618 TOTAL FUNDS CARRIED FORWARD 35,191 35,191 53,299 The nofrs forni part of these financial statements Page 10

Docu81gn Envebpe ID.. 07A8ASB&E3FF494FA9D9.OE9AE3AFA2A3 The Monitoring Group Limited Balance Sheet 31 March 2025 2025 Total fund5 2024 Tot funds Unrestricted fimd5 Restricted nds Not¢s FIXED ASSETS Tangible assets 4,318 4,318 5,243 CURRENT ASSETS Debtors Cash at bank 45,735 l9,184 45,735 19.184 45,980 40,730 64,919 64,919 86.710 CREDITORS Amounts falling due within one year (34,046) {34,046) (38.654) NET CURRENT ASSETS 30,873 30,873 48.056 TOTAL ASSETS LE&S CURRENT LIABILITIES 35.191 35,191 53299 NET ASSETS 35,191 35,191 53,299 FUNDS Unrestricted funds Restricted funds 35,191 29,299 24,1)00 TOTAL FUNDS 35.191 53,299 The charitsble company is entitled to exempiion from audit under Section 477 of the Companies Act 2006 for the year ended 31 March 2025. The rnembets have not required the company to obtain an audit of its financjal statements for the year ended 31 March 2025 in a¢cordance with Section 476 of the Companies Act 2006. The trusle¢s a¢l(nowledge their responsibilities for {a) ensuring that the ¢haritsble Company keeps accounting records thal Comply with Sections 386 and 387 of the Companies Act 2006 and pr¢paring financial statements which give a trne and fair view of the state of affairs of the charilable company as at the end of each financial year and of its surplus or deficit for each financial year in accordance with the requirements of Sections 394 and 395 and which otherwise comply with the requirement5 of the Companies Act 2006 relating to financial statements. so far as applicable lo the charitable wmpany. (b} These financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the provisions applicable to charitable companies subject to the small companies regime. The financial statements were approved by the Board of Trustees and authorised for issue . and were signed on its behalf by.. on A Njie - Trustee The notes forn) part of these financial statements Pagell

Docusign Envelope ID: 07A8A5BB-E3FF494F-A9D9.OE9AE3AFA2A3 The Monitoring Group Limited Notes to the Finan¢i91 Ststements for the year ended 31 March 2025 ACCOUNTING POLICIES Basis of preparing the finanefial statements The fmancial statements of the charitable company, Mthich is a public benefit entity under FRS 102, have been prepared in accordance with the Charities SORP (FRS 102) 'Accounting and Reporting by Charities: Ststement of Recommended Practice applicable to charities preparing their accounts in ￿COrdanCe with the Financial Reporting Standard applicable in the UK and Republic of Ireland (FRS 102) (effective l January 2019),. Financial Reporting Standard 102 The Financial Reporting Standard applicable in the and Republic of Ireland, and the Companies Act 2006. The financial statements have been prepared under the historical ¢ost convention. Income All in¢ome is recogni5ed in the Statement of Financial Activities on¢e the charity entitlement Éo the funds, it is probable that the income will be received and the amount can be me&8ured reliably. Expenditure Liabilities are Tecognised as expenditure as soon as there is a legal or construdive obligation committing the charity to that expenditure. it is probable that a transfer of economi¢ benefits will be required in settlement and the amount of the obligation can be measured reliably. Expenditure is accounted for on an accruals basis and has been classified under headings that aggregate all ¢ost relat¢d to the category. Where costs cannoi be directty attributed to particular headings they have been allocated to activities on a basis consAslent with the use of resources. Tangible fixed assets Depreciation is provided at the following annual ra*s in ordcr to write off each asset over its estimated useful life. Fixtures and fittings 150/0 on reducing balance TaxgtioD The charity is exempt from coryoration tsx on its charitable activities. Fund accountlng Unrestricted funds ¢an be used in a¢¢ordan¢e with the charitable objective5 at the discretion of the trnstees. Restricted fvnds can only be used for particular restricted purposes within the objects of the charity. Re5tri¢tions arise when specified by the donor OT when funds are raised for particular re5trACted purposes. Further explanation of the n&ture and purpose of each fund is included in the notes to the financial statements. OTHER TRADING ACTIVITIES 2025 2024 Activities for generating fund5 8.000 3,000 Page 12 continued.-.

Docu81gn Envelope ID.. 07A8ASBB-E3FF494F-A9D&OE9AE3AFA2A3 The Monitoring Group Limited Notes to the Financial Stal¢ments- continued for the year ended 31 March 2025 NET INCOMEI(EXPENDITURE) Net income/(expenditUTe) is stated after charging/(crediting): 2025 2CI24 Depreciation- owmed assets 925 925 TRUSTEES, REMUNERATION AND BEIYEFITS There were no trustees, remuneration or other benefits for the year ended 31 March 2025 nor for the year ended 31 March 2024. Trustees, upenses There were no trustees, expenses paid for the year ended 31 March 2025 nor for the year ended 31 March 2024. COMPARATIVES FOR THE STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL AcfiviTIES Unrestricted funds Restricted funds Total funds INCOME AND ENDOWMEIYTS FROM Donations and legacies 106 106 Charitable 4¢tivities Charitable activities 16,082 248,649 264,731 Other trnding activities 3,000 3,000 Total 19,188 248,649 267,837 EXPENDITURE ON Charitabl¢ g¢tivitie5 Charitable activities 36,975 228,181 265,156 NET IIYCOMEI(EXPENDITURE) Transfers betw¢en funds {17.787} 8,468 20,468 (8,468) 2,681 Net movement in funds (9,319) 12,000 2,681 RECONCILIATION OF FUNDS Total funds brought forW￿d 38,618 12,000 50,618 TOTAL FUNDS CARRIED FORWARD 29,299 24,000 53,299 Page 13 continued...

Doujsign Envelope ID.. O7A8ASBBE3FF494F-A9D￿0EgAE3AF￿2A3 The Monitoring Group Limited Notes to tbe FinAncial Statements - eontiDu¢d for the ye*r ended 31 March 2025 TANGIBLE FIXED ASSETS Fixtures fittings COST At l April 2024 and 31 Ma￿h 2025 84.947 DEPRECIATION At l April 2024 Charge for y¢ar 79,704 925 At 31 March 2025 80.629 NET BOOK VALUE At 31 March 2025 4,318 At 31 March 2024 5,243 DEBTORS: AMOUNTS FALLIIYG DUE WITHIN ONE YEAR 2025 2024 Trade debtors Pr¢payments and a¢crud income 41,715 4,020 40.500 5.480 45.735 45.9SO CREDITORS: AMouNfs FALLING DUE WITHIN ONE YEAR 2025 2024 Trade ¢reditors Social security and other taxes Other creditors Accrnals and defe￿¢d income 11,479 3.098 1,189 18,280 3,126 13.248 22,280 34,IM6 38,654 MOVEMENT IN FUNDS Net movement in funds At 31.3.25 At 1.4.24 Unrestricted fuDd$ General fund 29,299 5,892 35,191 Restrict￿ funds GALOP (CATCH project) Open Society Fund 9,000 15,000 (9,0(10) (15.0(Kl) 24,000 {24,000) TOTAL FUNDS 53,299 {18,108} 35.191 Page 14 continued...

Docusign Envelope ID: 07A8ASB￿3FF49lF-AgD9-oE9AE3AFA2A3 The Monitoring Group Limited Notes to the Financial Statements- ¢ontinued for th¢ y¢*r ended 31 March 2025 MOVEMENT IN FUNDS - continued Net rnovement in funds, included in the above ar¢ as follows: Incoming resour¢es Resources expended Movement in fi]nds Unrestricled funds G¢n¢ral fund 8,060 (2.168) 5,892 Rt5trieted funds The Joseph Rowntree Charitable Trust GALOP (CATCH project) Open So¢iety Fund 27,334 169,290 94.870 (27,334) (178,290} (109.870} (9,000) {15,000) 291.494 (315,494) {24,000) TOTAL FUNDS 299,554 (317.662) {18,108) Comparatives for movement in funds Net movement in funds Transfers bettveen funds At 31.3.24 At 1.4.23 Unrestrieted funds General fund i8.618 (17,787} 8,468 29.299 Restricted funds GALOP (CATCH project) Open Society Fund 12.000 3,962 16,506 (6,962) (1,506) 9.000 15,000 12,000 20,468 (8,468) 24,000 TOTAL FUNDS 50,618 2,681 53.299 Comparntive net movernent in ￿nds, included in the above are as follows: Incoming resources Resources expendcd Movement in funds UDrestrieted fullds General fund 19,188 (36,975) (17.787) Restricted tsnds GALOP (CATCH project) Open Society Fund 162,000 86,649 (158,038) (70,143) 3.962 16,506 248,649 (228,181) 20,468 TOTAL FUNDS 267.837 (265,156) 2,681 Page 15 continued...

DoGu*gn Envelope ID.. 07A8AsBB-E3FF494F-A9D9￿E9AE3AF￿2A3 The Monitorlng Group Limfiled Notes to the Financial Statements- continued for the year ended 31 March 2025 MOVEMENT IN FUNDS- continued A current year 12 months and prior year 12 months combined position is as follows: Net movement in ￿ndS Transfers bettveen fiinds At 31.3.25 At 1.4.23 Unrestricted funds General fund 38.618 (11,895) 8.468 35.191 Restricted funds GALOP {CATCH project) Open Society Fund 12,000 (5,038) .506 (6,962) (1,506) 12,000 (3.532) {8.468) TOTAL FUNDS 50,618 (15,427) 35,191 A current year 12 months and prior year 12 rnonths Combined net movement in fjjnds, included in the above are as follows: Incoming resources Resources expended Movement in funds Unrestricted funds Generdl fund 27,248 {39,143) (11,895) Restricted fund8 The Joseph Rowntree Charitsble Trust GALOP (CATCH project) Open Society Fund 27,334 331.290 181,519 {27,334) (336,328) (180,013) (5.038) 1,506 540.143 (543,675) (3,532) TOTAL FUNDS 567.391 (582,818) (15,427) io. RELATED PARTY DISCLOSURES Thcre were no related paty transaction5 for th¢ y¢ar ¢nded 31 March 2025. Page 16