| Asian Women's | Resource Centre | Resource Centre | Resource Centre | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Comic Relief | ||||
| Kering Foundation | ||||
| Latin American | Women's Aid |
|||
| London &Quadrant | Housing | Association | ||
| London Borough | of | Haringey | ||
| London Borough | of | Newham | ||
| Ministry ofHousing | Communities | and Local Government | ||
| NHS East London Foundation |
Trust | |||
| HSBC Pic | ||||
| IRISi | ||||
| MOPAC | ||||
| Public donations | received via | Virgin Money Giving |
| REFERENCE AND AD | REFERENCE AND AD | MINISTRATIVE INFORM |
ATION |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chari ty JVatoe | London Black Women's | Project | |
| Company | number | 02393931 | |
| Charity number | 1001834 | ||
| Registered | ojgice und | ||
| Operational address |
661 Barking Road | ||
| Plaistow | |||
| London | |||
| E139EX | |||
| Directors | and Trustees |
| Ms | Anjum Mouj | Co Chair | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ms | Donna M ECarty | Co Chair | |
| Ms | Surriya Ahmad | Deputy Chair | |
| Ms | Saika Alam | Secretary | |
| Ms | Rena Pathak | ||
| Ms | Palvinder Kudhai1 |
||
| Ms | Edem BNtumy | resigned 6June 2023 | |
| Ms | Chardine T Stone | resigned 7 March 2023 |
| Income and Expenditure | Summary | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Notes | Restricted | Unrestricted | Total | Total | ||
| Funds | Funds | Funds | Funds | |||
| 2023 | 2023 | 2023 | 2022 | |||
| f | ||||||
| Income and endowments | from: | |||||
| Donations and legacies |
142,759 | 34,856 | 177,615 | 348,701 | ||
| Charitable activities |
530,398 | 873,097 | 1,403,495 | 1,091,613 | ||
| Investments | 2,020 | 2,020 | 49 | |||
| Total income and endowments | 673,157 | 909,973 | 1,583,130 | 1,440,363 | ||
| Expenditure on: Costs ofraising funds |
1,732 | 1,732 | 54 | |||
| Charitable activities |
570,701 | 923,577 | 1,494,278 | 1,289,028 | ||
| Total expenditure | 570,701 | 925,309 | 1,496,010 | 1,289,082 | ||
| Net income/(expenditure) | 102,456 | (15,336) | 87,120 | 151,281 | ||
| Transfers between funds |
19 | |||||
| Net movement in funds |
for the year | 102,456 | (15,336) | 87,120 | 151,281 | |
| Reconciliation offunds | ||||||
| Total funds brought forward |
137,226 | 268,853 | 406,079 | 254,798 | ||
| Total funds carried forward | 239,682 | 253,517 | 493,199 | 406,079 |
| Notes | 2023 | 2022 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| f, | |||||
| Tangible Fixed Assets | 14 | 3,910 | 5,688 | ||
| Current Assets | |||||
| Debtors | 16 | 137,614 | 105,512 | ||
| Cash at bank and in hand | 541,305 | 528,029 | |||
| 678,919 | 633,541 | ||||
| Creditors: | Amounts | falling due within one year | 17 | (189,630) | (233,150) |
| btet Current | Assets | 489,289 | 400,391 | ||
| Net Assets | 493,199 | 406,079 | |||
| Funds | |||||
| Restricted funds | 20 | 239,682 | 137,226 | ||
| Unrestricted | funds | ||||
| - General funds | 20 | 253,517 | 268,853 | ||
| Total funds | 493,199 | 406,079 |
| Notes | 2023 | 2022 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cashflow from operating | activities | ||||
| Net cash provided by operating activities |
22 | 12,856 | 112,560 | ||
| Cashflow from investing activiiies |
|||||
| Interest income | 2,020 | 49 | |||
| Purchase oftangible fixed | assets | (1,600) | (8,53I) | ||
| Net cash (used in)/provided | by investing | activities | 420 | (8,482) | |
| Net increase in cash and cash equivalents | in the year | 13,276 | 104,078 | ||
| Cash and cash equivalents | at the beginning ofthe year | 528,029 | 423,951 | ||
| Cash and cash equi valents | at the end ofthe year | 541,305 | 528,029 | ||
| Analysis ofcash and cash | equivalents | ||||
| Cash in bank and in hand | 541,305 | 528,029 | |||
| Cash and cash equivalents | at the end of | the year | 22.1 | 541,305 | 528,029 |
| Office | equipment | 3 | years | straight | tine | (33%) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Computer equipment |
3 | years | straight | line | (33%) | |||
| Hostel | furniture | and | equipment | 3 | years | straight | line | (33%) |
| income from D | onat | ions a | nd Legacies | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Restncted | Unrestricted | Total | Total | ||||
| Funds | Funds | Funds | Funds | ||||
| 2023 | 2023 | 2023 | 2022 | ||||
| L | |||||||
| Public donations | 32,906 | 32,906 | 18,085 | ||||
| Subsistence receipts |
1,660 | 1,660 | 2,850 | ||||
| Other income | 290 | 290 | |||||
| General Grants | |||||||
| Big Lottery Fund - | Vision | ofMe | 40,000 | ||||
| Asian Women's | Resource | Centre | 69,320 | 69,320 | |||
| Kering Foundation | 69,473 | 69,473 | 17,071 | ||||
| Clifford Chance | LLP | 15,000 | |||||
| Comic Relief- | Counselling | Services | 3,966 | 3,966 | 94,335 | ||
| Comic Relief/MOJ | IT Infrastructure | I 12,960 | |||||
| City Bridge Trust | 48,400 | ||||||
| 142,759 | 34,856 | 177,615 | 348,701 |
| 4 | Incomefrom CirarirableAcriviries |
Incomefrom CirarirableAcriviries |
Incomefrom CirarirableAcriviries |
||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Restricted | Unrestricted | Total | Total | ||||||
| Funds | Funds | Funds | Funds | ||||||
| 2023 | 2023 | 2023f | 2022 | ||||||
| Performance Related Grants |
|||||||||
| Big Lottery Fund - | Reaching | Communities | 75,284 | ||||||
| Big Lottery Fund - | Equine Project | 9,400 | |||||||
| DLUHC (formerly | M.H.C.L.G.) —LBofNewham | 100,000 | 100,000 | 100,000 | |||||
| MOPAC - OYA Project | 62,181 | 62,181 | 62,208 | ||||||
| NHS East London | Foundation | Trust | 86,535 | 86,535 | 27,000 | ||||
| London Borough ofNewham | - Supporting | People | 198,000 | 198,000 | 197,928 | ||||
| London Borough ofHaringey | - Revenue | Grant | 35,000 | 35,000 | 37,500 | ||||
| IRISi | 57,250 | 57,250 | |||||||
| MOPAC Service I | 210,347 | 210,347 | |||||||
| MOPAC Service 2 | 100,620 | 100,620 | |||||||
| Rent &Service Charges Receivable | 553,562 | 553,562 | 582,293 | ||||||
| 530,398 | 873,097 | 1,403,495 | 1,091,613 |
| Income from Invesimenrs | Unrestricted | Unrestricted |
|---|---|---|
| Funds | Funds | |
| 2023 | 2022 | |
| Bank interest receivable | 2,020 | 49 |
| 7 | Analysis ofExpendi | Analysis ofExpendi | ture on Char |
itableActiviiies | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Charitable Activities |
—2023 | ||||||||
| Restricted | Unrestricted | Total | Total | ||||||
| Funds | Funds | 2023 | 2022 | ||||||
| 6 | |||||||||
| Staff costs | 358,018 | 214,361 | 572,379 | 435,820 | |||||
| Premises costs | 16,120 | 197,630 | 213,750 | 190,726 | |||||
| External staff related | costs | 109,973 | 88,750 | 198,723 | 152,666 | ||||
| Communications | 442 | 1,946 | 2,388 | 2,742 | |||||
| Printing, postage & |
stationery | 1,544 | 4,890 | 6,434 | 3,057 | ||||
| Training, travel and |
recruitment | 49,800 | 13,051 | 62,851 | 10,532 | ||||
| Depreciation | 3,378 | 3,378 | 3,226 | ||||||
| Servicing ofequipment | 773 | 7,718 | 8,491 | 7,225 | |||||
| IThardware | 8,756 | 3,585 | 12,341 | 99,624 | |||||
| ITsottware &maintenance | 13,848 | 60,301 | 74,149 | 48,335 | |||||
| Housing association |
management | charge | 202,844 | 202,844 | 211,269 | ||||
| Audit and accountancy | 3,564 | 20,256 | 23,820 | 22,660 | |||||
| Other professional | fees | 2,124 | 10,274 | 12,398 | 12,148 | ||||
| Other costs | 4,781 | 25,311 | 30,092 | 20,694 | |||||
| Beneficiary costs | 94 | 504 | 598 | 1,888 | |||||
| Maintenance charge |
864 | 23,955 | 24,819 | 6,963 | |||||
| Bad debts provision | 44,823 | 44,823 | 59,453 | ||||||
| 570,701 | 923,577 | 1,494,278 | 1,289,028 | ||||||
| 7. | 1 | Charitable Activities |
—2022 | ||||||
| Restricted | Unrestricted | Total | Total | ||||||
| Funds | Funds | 2022 | 2021 | ||||||
| f. | 6 | ||||||||
| Staffcosts | 222,167 | 213,653 | 435,820 | 449,749 | |||||
| Premises costs | 14,267 | 176,459 | 190,726 | 155,352 | |||||
| External staff related |
costs | 110,349 | 42,317 | 152,666 | 146,345 | ||||
| Communications | 748 | 1,994 | 2,742 | 5,220 | |||||
| Printing, postage & |
stationery | 2,469 | 588 | 3,057 | 1,006 | ||||
| Training, travel and |
recruitment | 7,214 | 3,318 | 10,532 | 12,267 | ||||
| Capital expenditure | 21,714 | ||||||||
| Depreciation | 1,432 | 1,794 | 3,226 | 1,713 | |||||
| Servicing ofequipment | 863 | 6,362 | 7,225 | 12,015 | |||||
| IT hardware | 99,624 | 99,624 | |||||||
| IT software & maintenance | 16,270 | 32,065 | 48,335 | 41,321 | |||||
| Housing association |
management | charge | 211,269 | 211,269 | 176,191 | ||||
| Audit and accountancy | 1,517 | 21,143 | 22,660 | 14,100 | |||||
| Other professional | fees | 2,948 | 9,200 | 12,148 | 26,705 | ||||
| Other costs | 3,344 | 17,350 | 20,694 | 5,221 | |||||
| Beneficiary casts | 1,185 | 703 | 1,888 | 769 | |||||
| Maintenance charge |
1,586 | 5,377 | 6,963 | 28,718 | |||||
| Bad debts provision | 8,500 | 50,953 | 59,453 | 96,607 | |||||
| 494,483 | 794,545 | 1,289,028 | 1,195,013 |
| 8 | Analysis ofSupport aad Governance | Analysis ofSupport aad Governance | Analysis ofSupport aad Governance | Costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Support | Governance | Total | Total | |||||
| costs | costs | 2023 | 2022 | |||||
| f. | ||||||||
| Communications | 156 | 156 | 16 | |||||
| External staff related costs |
4,025 | 4,025 | ||||||
| Audit &accountancy | 9,528 | 1,986 | 1,986 | |||||
| Other professional fees |
4,833 | 4,833 | ||||||
| Sundry costs | 1,303 | 1,303 | 1,284 | |||||
| 19,845 | 19,845 | 3,286 | ||||||
| 9 | Net Incootel(Expenditure) | for tire Year | 2023 | 2022 | ||||
| 6 | ||||||||
| This is stated aPer charging: | ||||||||
| Depreciation | 3,378 | 3,226 | ||||||
| Auditor*s remuneration | 10,560 | 10,560 | ||||||
| 10 | Trustee Jtemaneratioa | aad Expenses |
| The trustees were not paid |
any | remuneration | nor received | any other | benefits | during | the year (2022 —nil). | Travel | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| expenses offnil (2022 - f21)were | paid on behalf ofno trustee | (2022 —one trustee). | |||||||
| 11 | Analysis ofSiaJfCosts | 2023 | 2022 | ||||||
| Wages and salaries | 534,905 | 397,224 | |||||||
| Social security costs | 30,800 | 32,420 | |||||||
| Employers pension costs |
6,674 | 6,176 | |||||||
| 572,379 | 435,820 |
| employees (including casual and part time stag during th |
e year was as follows: | |
|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 2022 | |
| Number | Number | |
| Management | 1.8 | 1.0 |
| Project workers | 12.1 | Ib.I |
| Administration | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| 14.9 | 12.1 |
| l4 | Fixed rtssets | Office Equipment | Hostel Furniture | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| &Computers | & Equipment | Totnl | ||||
| Cost | ||||||
| At I April 2022 | 183,704 | 56,183 | 239,887 | |||
| Additions | 1,600 | 1,600 | ||||
| At 31 March 2023 | 185,304 | 56,183 | 241,487 | |||
| Depreciation: | ||||||
| At I April 2022 | 180,897 | 53,302 | 234,199 | |||
| Charge for the year | 1,937 | 1,441 | 3,378 | |||
| At 31 March 2023 | 182,834 | 54,743 | 237,577 | |||
| Net Book Value; | ||||||
| At 31 March 2023 | 2,470 | 1,440 | 3,910 | |||
| At I April 2022 | 2,807 | 2,881 | 5,688 | |||
| l5 | Financial instruments | 2023 | 2022 | |||
| 8 | ||||||
| Carrying amount |
ofJinanciel | assets | ||||
| Debt instruments | at amortised | cost | 583,171 | 584,122 | ||
| Carrying amount |
ofJinancial | liabilities | ||||
| Measured at amortised cost |
189,630 | 233,150 | ||||
| I6 | Debtors | 2023 | 2022 | |||
| Operating debtors |
322,016 | 286,708 | ||||
| Less: Provision for doubtful | debts | (287,5443 | (242,721) | |||
| 34,472 | 43,987 | |||||
| Other debtors | 7,394 | 12,102 | ||||
| Prepayments and |
accrued income | 95,748 | 49,423 | |||
| 137,614 | 105,512 |
| 17 | Creditorst | Amounts falling due within oneyear | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Operating | creditors | 67,118 | 71,311 | |
| Taxation | and social security | 11,058 | 7,026 | |
| Other creditors | 41,360 | 88,089 | ||
| Accruals | 65,661 | 51,064 | ||
| Deferred | Income | 4,433 | 15,660 | |
| 189,630 | 233,150 |
| Deferred | income comprises ofgrants received in a | dvance for work taking place aher th | e year end. |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total | |||
| Balance | as at I April 2022 |
15,660 | |
| Amount | released to income earned from charitable | activities | (15,660) |
| Amount | deferred in year | 4,433 | |
| Balance | as at 31 March 2023 | 4,433 |
| Unrestricted | Funds —Current | Year | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Balance | Incoming | Outgoing | Transfers | Balance | |||
| I Apr 2022 | Resources | Resources | f | 31Mar2023 | |||
| General funds | 268,853 | 909,973 | (925,309) | 253,517 | |||
| Unrestricted | Funds —Previous | Year | |||||
| Balance | Incoming | Outgoing | Transfers | Balance | |||
| I Apr 2021 g |
Resources | Resources f |
g | 31 Mar 2022 6 |
|||
| General funds | 199,484 | 865,705 | (794,599) | (1,737) | 268,853 | ||
| IVame ofunrestricted fund | Description, | nature and purposes | ofthefund |
| Restricted Funds —Currenr Year |
|||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Balance | Incoming | Outgoing | Transfers | Balance | |
| I | Apr 2022 | Resources | Resources | 31Mar 2023 | |
| 8 | |||||
| Asian Women*s Resource Centre | 1,115 | 69,320 | (84) | 70,351 | |
| Clifford Chance LLP | 15,167 | 15,167 | |||
| Comic Relief —Counselling Services |
57,675 | 3,966 | (55,34'/) | 6,294 | |
| Comic Relief —MOJ/ IT Infrastructure | 784 | 784 | |||
| City Bridge Trust | 1,308 | 1,308 | |||
| Kering Foundation | 17,071 | 69,473 | (61,922) | 24,622 | |
| DLUHC (formerly M.H.C.L.G.) —Covid-19 DLUHC (formerly M.H.C.L.G.) —LBofNewha |
23 m |
100,000 | (99,226) | 23 774 |
|
| DLUHC (formerly M.H.C.L.G.) —OYA Project |
120 | 120 | |||
| MOJ —MOPAC | 72 | 72 | |||
| MOPAC - OYA Project | 1,926 | 62,181 | (64,023) | 84 | |
| MOPAC —Service I |
210,347 | (170,966) | 39,381 | ||
| MOPAC —Service 2 | 100,620 | (94,776) | 5,844 | ||
| IRISi | 57,250 | (24,357) | 32,893 | ||
| Rosa Fund | 49 | 49 | |||
| London Community Fund |
2,530 | 2,530 | |||
| London Community Fund (Wave 2) |
1,195 | 1,195 | |||
| HM Government in Partnership with |
|||||
| National Lottery Community Fund |
67 | 67 | |||
| Big Lottery Fund - Equine Project | 5,229 | 5,229 | |||
| Big Lottery Fund —Vision ofMe | 32,895 | 32,895 | |||
| Total | 137,226 | 673,157 | (570,701) | 239,682 | |
| Restricted Funds —Previous Year |
|||||
| Balance | Incoming | Outgoing | Transfers | Balance | |
| I | Apr 2021 | Resources | Resources | 31 Mar 2022 | |
| Asian Women's Resource Centre |
1,115 | 1,115 | |||
| Clilford Chance LLP | 167 | 15,000 | 15,167 | ||
| Comic Relief —Counselling Services |
94,335 | (36,660) | 57,675 | ||
| Comic Relief —MOJ/ IT Infrastructure | 112,960 | (112,176) | 784 | ||
| City Bridge Trust | 48,400 | (47,092) | 1,308 . | ||
| 1mkaan | 27,000 | (27,130) | 130 | ||
| Kering Foundation | 17,071 | 17,071 | |||
| M.H.C.L.G. —Covid-19 | 23 | 23 | |||
| M.H.C.L.G. —LBofNewham | 139 | 100,000 | (101,213) | 1,074 | |
| M.H.C.L.G. —OYA Project | 120 | 120 | |||
| MOJ —MOPAC | 72 | 72 | |||
| MOPAC - OYA Project | 62,208 | (60,282) | 1,926 | ||
| Rosa Fund | 49 | 49 | |||
| London Community Fund |
2,530 | 2,530 | |||
| London Community Fund (Wave 2) |
1,195 | 1,195 | |||
| HM Government in Partnership with |
|||||
| National Lottery Community Fund |
67 | 67 | |||
| Big Lottery Fund - Equine Project | 9,400 | (4,171) | 5,229 | ||
| Big Lottery Fund —Vision ofMe | 22,703 | 40,000 | (29,808) | 32,895 | |
| Big Lottery Fund —Reaching Communities | 134 | 75,284 | (75,951) | 533 | |
| Total | 55,314 | 574,658 | (494,483) | 1,737 | 137,226 |
| Kering Foundation | The Kering Foundation has provided three years funding of242,980 Euros |
|
|---|---|---|
| as part of their social investment to improve the lives of women and girls |
||
| internationally, from abuse and sexual exploitation. Sexual Harassment sits within the wider social contexts of domestic and |
||
| gendered violence against women and girls. Until October 2020, London |
||
| Black Women's Project delivered legal advice and casework to BME and |
||
| migrant women and girls, as victims of sexual harassment, through the project 'My Body, My Rules '. Learning revealed that: I) professionals |
||
| were not addressing sexual harassment as a specific issue and there was |
||
| little professional awareness and remedy of how to respond to need. 2) |
||
| BME and migrant women experienced racialized sexual harassment, linked |
||
| to immigration and low-paid work status. 3) Legal options to protect |
||
| women were restricted due to sexual harassment not being a crime. LBWP |
||
| were provided with an opportunity to extend the work, initiated fmm Rosa |
||
| funding, in previous years. |
||
| The 'Safe Haven' project has 3 key objectives: |
||
| I. Increase knowledge of how sexual harassment impacts racialized |
||
| women to promote wider good practice. | ||
| 2. Increase BME and migrant women access to legal advice and/or |
||
| casework support. | ||
| 3. Develop service users with lived experiences to become Co- |
||
| production experts. |
||
| DLUHC (formerly | M.H.C.L.G.) —Covid-19 | The funding was extended to support the provision ofPPE equipment as a result ofCOVID19 still being around, staff cover and deep cleaning. No |
| women were infected with COVID19 during this period. All women were |
||
| encouraged to take up preventative vaccines during the period, through |
||
| local partnerships. | ||
| DLUHC (formerly | M.H.C.L.G.)— | |
| LBofNewham | A project supported by the LB Newham to provide additional emergency |
|
| crisis bedspaces to enable women and children to escape from domestic |
||
| violence at home, during the height ofthe pandemic. Many women became |
||
| trapped at home due to government restrictions and the spread ofCOVID19 |
||
| virus and mutations. The funding provided emergency crisis |
||
| accommodation solutions to enable women and their children to escape. |
||
| The service provided an access route to refuge accommodation through |
||
| telephone help and guidance. It also paid for salaried roles: Refuge |
||
| Caseworker, Children's Worker, and Counsellor. Women were able to |
||
| receive practical support and advice around their legal rights |
||
| (immigration/criminal/civil)/ housing advice) and access to transcultural |
||
| counselling (in their language of strength) to address the mental and |
||
| emotional impact of violence, on them and their relationship with their |
||
| children. Children received 'play for play*s sake sessions, enabling them to |
||
| overcome trauma by replacing negative thoughts about violence at home, |
||
| with positive play and outing experiences. Parents were supported to rebuild |
||
| relationships with their children through play, trips out and advice and |
||
| support around understanding and managing children*s behaviour following |
||
| traumatic events. The children's worker also supported parents to be |
||
| proactive in getting children into nursery/school/college, registering with |
||
| GPs and health services and dealing with (not avoiding) any social care |
||
| concerns and/or issues. On some occasions parents receive support to |
||
| challenge biased assumptions and victim blaming. |
||
| DLUHC (formerly | M.H.C.L.G.)— | |
| OYA Project | A key focus of this funding was to safeguard the health and welfare of |
|
| service users in multiple occupancy refuges. Funding supported the |
||
| acquisition ofcleaning materials and resources to maintain a high standard |
||
| of hygiene to prevent the spread of infection, within 7 ofour Newharn and |
||
| Haringey refuges and central offices. This included the shared and single |
||
| use accommodations spaces, used by women and/or any children. Deep |
| cleans took place on a weekly basis and we were able to supply PPE |
||
|---|---|---|
| equipment was also supplied to cleaners, staff and residents (we had enough |
||
| supplies through periods ofshortage). Handwashing and the use of hand gel |
||
| (all funded) was a regular occurrence. COVID19 testing kits were part of |
||
| our regime as a preventative measure. This funding stream recognised that |
||
| the spread of the COVID19 virus could impact staft)ng levels (as part of |
||
| contracting covid19 themselves). This would have detrimental effects on |
||
| service delivery, therefore it enabled the payment for additional staff cover, |
||
| that would not have been accounted for in original budgets or contracts. |
||
| Finally, transitioning from Face-to- Face work to remote working became |
||
| the new normal during lockdown and this funding supported LBWP*s |
||
| infrastructure change for remote working, when compelled by the |
||
| government at various points oftime. |
||
| MOJ - MOPAC | A fundraiser (20 days) was employed through this stream of funding to |
|
| support the financial sustainability of the organisation. Matched funding |
||
| was also required for the following roles: project coordinator (2 days) and |
||
| facilities manager (80 hours). Matched funding was also required for the |
||
| ongoing supply of COVID19 compliant deep cleaning, PPE resources, |
||
| travel costs for service users and X8 statf in relation to attending 30 |
||
| emergency face to face appointments. 50 BME women were able to benefit |
||
| from 14sessions ofcounselling, witch took into account their intersectional |
||
| and equality needs (i.e. language), following trauma. Counsellors benefitted |
||
| from group clinical supervision for a period of6 months. |
||
| MOPAC - OYA Project | The OYA consortium has been granted temporary funding for six months in |
|
| 2021-22 by the GLA in the context ofthe covid19 emergency response for |
||
| the maintenance of increased support and capacity in by and for specialist |
||
| refuge provision. This is an extension ofthat grant that aims to maintain the |
||
| increased refuge bedspaces available to BME women and provide further |
||
| support. The Mayor*s Needs Assessment presentation recognized the needs |
||
| ofBME women accessing refuge spaces and spaces where intersectionality, |
||
| race and social status were integrated, because of women*s narratives and |
||
| journeys to safe accommodation taking longer and encountering racism and |
||
| discrimination from many bodies along the way. |
||
| MOPAC —Service | I | Safe Accommodation services employs the following roles to add wrap |
| around support and improve quality services to women living in refuges; |
||
| Complex Case Worker, Specialist Housing Advisor, immigration Advisor, |
||
| Family Law Advisor. Women who are resettled/move on. |
||
| MOPAC —Service | 2 | Safe Accommodation services employs the following roles to add wrap |
| around support and improve quality services to women living in refuges; |
||
| Children*s and Family Therapist, Counselling Coordinator and Counsellor, |
||
| Women who are resettled/move on also have access to the services. |
||
| IRISi | LBWP was commissioned to deliver specific training to GP Practices, |
|
| health professionals and reception staff to work together to ask the question |
||
| about domestic abuse and then to respond by referring to an Advocate |
||
| Educator employed by LBWP. In addition, two Clinical Lead -GP |
||
| practitioners with safeguarding training an expertise, would support GP and |
||
| practice staff to identify survivors and ensure that they refer into the |
||
| service. The AE and the CL's deliver three sets of training programmes |
||
| identified as CLI,CL2 and Reception and Admin. |
||
| Rosa Fund | My Body, My Rules: Specialist legal advice project focusing on the |
|
| experiences ofsexual harassment and abuse ofBMEand migrant women in |
||
| the north-south BME and migrant women's concentrations. The Rosa Fund |
||
| and LBWP worked together to understand the needs and complexities of |
||
| Sexual Harassment within the context of Violence Against Women and |
||
| girls. 3 x Advice workers were employed to support the development ofthe |
| work and to support women to utilise rights based services to change their |
|||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| situations. | |||||
| London Community | Fund | Matched funding for vulnerable women, so that they can travel to key |
|||
| appointments in a safety. Taxi costs were covered to prevent women fram |
|||||
| being spotted. This funding cannot be under-estimated because, it also |
|||||
| prevented women from using public transport at periods oftime during the |
|||||
| pandemic where nat every member of the public were wearing masks. |
|||||
| Using this form of transport when women lived in multiple occupancy |
|||||
| accommodation was not viable. |
|||||
| London Community | Fund (Wave 2) | Funding was used to support additional hours required to maintain the |
|||
| strategic leadership ofthe director (increase of4 to 5 days), in being able to | |||||
| steer the organisation through COVIDI9 and to establish key partnerships |
|||||
| to share good practice and knowledge, to protect staff and users. In |
|||||
| addition, the arrival of COVIDI9, muted discussions about BREXIT and |
|||||
| delayed responses from government to safeguard the welfare ofwomen and |
|||||
| children meant that women presented with more intense needs. LBWP was |
|||||
| concerned to mitigate against vicarious trauma and therefore clinical |
|||||
| supervision for staff was imperative. To manage the distances between sites |
|||||
| within Newham and Haringey, flnancial support enabled improved |
|||||
| coordination of PPE, additional health and safety measures, organizing |
|||||
| floor and wall signage/posters prosocial distancing through a Facilities |
|||||
| management. Children also received. 10 tablets ta help with homework |
|||||
| when there were school closures as mums could not afford laptops to access | |||||
| online learning. Deep cleaning requirements were persistently needed |
|||||
| across all sites. | |||||
| HM Government | in Partnership | with | |||
| National | Lottery | Community | Fund | Six month grant to expand our current specialist counselling service to |
|
| reach more BAME young women and girls, BAME refugees and asylum |
|||||
| seekers and children who are experiencing mental and emotional issues as a |
|||||
| result ofdomestic and other forms ofgendered violence, due to an increase |
|||||
| in demand for counselling during the Covid-19 crisis. |
|||||
| BLF - Equine | Project | Big Lottery Funding of a summer program to improve health and |
|||
| weflbeing. LBWP believes that therapy and healing so be diverse and |
|||||
| interactive for afl services users. We conceived the idea of alternative |
|||||
| therapy and the Equine project. LBWP looked at the impact ofCOVIDI 9 |
|||||
| on its residents and decided to provide an alternative experience of going |
|||||
| into the countryside and experiencing an alternative environment from an |
|||||
| urban city. We considered that BME on benefits or who were working but |
|||||
| had a tight budget would not be able to atford this type ofopportunity, so |
|||||
| we felt being given this opportunity to experience a different way ofbeing |
|||||
| and living was important. | |||||
| The purpose is 3-fold |
|||||
| I. To help BME women and children to improve their mental health and |
|||||
| well-being through learning about horses and experiencing nature, |
|||||
| providing tools to promote wellness and reflection when returning to |
|||||
| an urban environment. | |||||
| 2. To provide an unconventional space for women to talk and create |
|||||
| ideas that will contribute to future projects at LBWP. |
|||||
| 3. Provide fun activities for children in a space where they can run, play, |
|||||
| explore through close interaction with horses and the environment. |
|||||
| The project happened during August/September 2021; 5 x 4-hour sessions |
|||||
| twice a week for 5 weeks; 5 women and 3 children per session. Total: 25 |
|||||
| women and 15 children. |
| Restricted | Unrestricted | Total | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Funds | Funds | |||||
| 2023 | 2023 | 2023 | ||||
| 6 | ||||||
| Tangible fixed assets | 3,910 | 3,910 | ||||
| Cash at bank and in hand | 239,682 | 301,623 | 541,305 | |||
| Other net current assets/(liabilities) | (52,016) | (52,016) | ||||
| 239,682 | 253,517 | 493,199 | ||||
| Analysis ofNet Assets between Funds —Previous | Year | |||||
| Restricted | Unrestricted | Total | ||||
| Funds | Funds | |||||
| 2022 | 2022 | 2022 | ||||
| 8 | ||||||
| Tangible fixed assets | 5,688 | 5,688 | ||||
| Cash at bank and in hand | 137,226 | 390,803 | 528,029 | |||
| Other net current assets/(liabilities) | (127,638) | (127,638) | ||||
| 137,226 | 268,853 | 406,079 | ||||
| ZZ | tteconcitiation ofNet income to Net Cash Flowfrom Operating | Activities | 2023 f |
2022 | ||
| Net income for the year | 87,120 | 151,281 | ||||
| Adjustments for: |
||||||
| Interest income | (2,020) | (49) | ||||
| Depreciation | 3,378 | 3,226 | ||||
| (Increase)/decrease | in debtors | '(32,102) | (44,913) | |||
| Increase/(decrease) | in creditors | (43,520) | 3,015 | |||
| 12,856 | 112,560 |
| 22.i | Analysis ofChanges in Net Debt | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| At 1 April | Cash-flows | At 31 March | ||
| 2022 | 2023 | |||
| Cash in bank and in hand | 528,029 | 13,276 | 541,305 |