Company number: 01348975 Charity Number: 507162
The Gaddum Centre
Report and financial statements For the year ended 31 March 2025
The Gaddum Centre
Reference and administrative information
for the year ended 31 March 2025
Company number 01348975 Charity number 507162 Registered office and operational address St Wilfrid’s Enterprise Centre Royce Road Hulme Manchester M15 5BJ
Trustees Trustees, who are also directors under company law, who served during the year and up to the date of this report were as follows:
| Elaine Mills | Chair | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Ady Bibby | |||
| Jonathan Brewer | |||
| John McKernaghan | |||
| Beth Plant | |||
| Sarah Thompson | |||
| Ian Williamson | |||
| Robert Cookson | (appointed 11 September | 2024) | |
| Jacqueline Nickson | (appointed 11 September | 2024) | |
| Zoe Robertson | (appointed 11 September | 2024) | |
| Adunola Ige | (appointed 12 February 2025) | ||
| Key management | Ben Whalley | Chief Executive | |
| personnel | Lauren Edwards | Head of Operations | |
| Emma Jackson | Head of Finance | ||
| Jo Campbell | Head of Development | (to June 2024) | |
| Bankers | Lloyds Bank | ||
| 42-46 Market Street, | |||
| Manchester, M1 1PW | |||
| Auditors | Slade & Cooper Limited | ||
| Beehive Mill, Jersey Street, Ancoats, Manchester, M4 6JG |
1
The Gaddum Centre
Trustees’ annual report
for the year ended 31 March 2025
The trustees (who are also Directors of the Charity for the purposes of the Companies Act) present their annual report and the audited financial statements of The Gaddum Centre (the Charity) for the year ended 31 March 2025. Included within the trustees’ report is the directors’ report as required by company law.
Reference and administrative information set out on page 1 forms part of this report. The financial statements comply with current statutory requirements, the memorandum and articles of association and the Statement of Recommended Practice - Accounting and Reporting by Charities: SORP applicable to charities preparing their accounts in accordance with FRS 102.
Summary
The 2024/25 financial year has been one of growth, stabilisation, and strategic preparation for Gaddum.
Forecasting a significant deficit for the period, the Board of Trustees implemented a Deficit Reduction Strategy which was delegated to the new-in-post Chief Executive, Ben Whalley. In Quarter 1, the Senior Leadership Team was rationalised, with streamlining seeing a 25% reduction in staffing.
Under the new Senior Leadership structure, Gaddum has seen greater impact in the period, and increased income through new business. Alongside other efficiency measures, this has seen Gaddum in a financially advantageous position at year end, despite the challenging economic climate and wider pressures affecting the voluntary, community and social enterprise sector (VCSE) sector.
November 2024 saw the unexpected closure of Greater Manchester Council for Voluntary Organisations (GMCVO) through insolvency. This was a significant loss to the sector for an organisation that, since the 1970’s has been an infrastructure organisation for the entire VCSO sector across Greater Manchester. As a trusted partner, Gaddum worked with the NHS Greater Manchester to support the commissioning authority at this time – ultimately taking contracts for grant distribution for VCSE organisations in-year and for the years ahead.
Building on the foundations laid during a period of significant change in 2023/24, this year focused on bringing together beneficiaries, workforce, volunteers and strategic partners to develop our vision for the future. During the period, the organisation co-produced a refreshed set of values, beliefs and – ultimately – the vision for a future that the Charity seeks to bring into existence.
Gaddum’s Values:
-
Meaningful Connection: treating every individual as a whole person, developing relationships through empathy and acceptance
-
Being Heard: no matter why or how someone finds their way to us, we will listen
-
Purposeful Work: paying attention to others’ needs and voices, we channel our resources into actions and outcomes that matter to the people we serve
-
Thoughtful Safe Services: providing clear reasons for decisions and efficient, safe and effective practices, we earn confidence and trust by focussing on quality
-
Collaborative Curiosity: harnessing our skills, knowledge, talents and the insights of others, we create new possibilities by exploring with people
Beliefs
-
Everyone has mental health and it is as important as physical health
-
Life can be hard and everyone needs a helping hand sometimes
-
Everyone has rights including to support when and how they need it, no one should be overlooked
-
In holding the whole person at the heart of our approach and embracing solutions that lie within communities
2
The Gaddum Centre
Trustees’ annual report
for the year ended 31 March 2025
-
There is injustice in the world but systems and society can change for the better
-
We make positive change working with others, learning from diverse lived experiences, and advocating for fairness.
Progress made in these fundamental areas have created the foundations on which the Charity has been able to develop a new strategic approach that is ready to launch in the first quarter of the next year 2025-26.
With respect to beneficiary service delivery for the period, demand for Gaddum’s services continued to grow across Greater Manchester, reflecting both the continuing pressures on health and social care systems and the strength of our reputation as a trusted and compassionate provider. This was particularly evident in our carer support services, therapy provision, and culturally appropriate advocacy, all of which reached more people, more effectively, than ever before.
Gaddum’s reputation as a trusted partner has continued to grow. We have maintained and deepened partnerships with local authorities, NHS partners, voluntary and community organisations, and national bodies. By embedding co-production and lived experience throughout our work, the organisation ensuring services remain meaningful, equitable, and impactful.
As we look to the year ahead, Gaddum is well-placed to build on these strong foundations, embracing opportunities to innovate, influence systems change, and deliver high-quality support to those who need it most.
Objectives and activities
Gaddum’s charitable objectives continue to be rooted in its commitment to promoting health and wellbeing, alleviating disadvantage, and supporting individuals and communities to live full and empowered lives. In 2024/25, our objectives and activities were focused on:
-
Service delivery and impact Throughout the year, we have delivered a broad range of high-quality services across Greater Manchester, focusing on:
-
Carer support services in Manchester and Salford, ensuring unpaid carers of all ages receive information, assessments, and practical and emotional support.
-
Specialist therapy services for children, young people, and adults, including bereavement counselling, NHS Talking Therapies, and complex care therapy.
-
Culturally appropriate advocacy for racially marginalised communities, influencing national discussions on mental health and racial disparities.
-
Anchor organisation, providing support partnership opportunities and strategic system roles that support the broader aims of values aligned VCSE organisations and groups.
-
Partnership working and co-production
-
Our work has continued to be shaped by strong relationships with partners in statutory and voluntary sectors. We have deepened collaboration with NHS systems, local authorities, and community organisations, embedding co-production with people with lived experience at the heart of service design and delivery.
-
Organisational strength and governance
The Board of Trustees has maintained active oversight of strategic direction, financial stewardship, and risk management. A strong emphasis on safeguarding, quality assurance, and workforce development has ensured that services remain safe, effective, and compassionate.
- Public benefit and reach
All services are delivered free at the point of access and are designed to meet identified needs in local communities. Our work aligns with charitable purposes relating to:
3
The Gaddum Centre
Trustees’ annual report
for the year ended 31 March 2025
-
Relief of poverty and disadvantage
-
Advancement of health and wellbeing
-
Promotion of community development and resilience
Future direction
2024/25 has been a year of preparation for a new organisational strategy that will be launched in the coming year. This will consolidate our learning and set out a clear, ambitious vision for the future of Gaddum as an influential, sustainable, and values-driven charity. Quarters 3 and 4 of the year has also seen business growth opportunities through new partnerships and collaborations. These will be mobilised – and reported – in the year 2025-26.
Through these objectives and activities, Gaddum continues to make a measurable difference to thousands of people every year, delivering services that are trusted, inclusive, and life-changing.
PUBLIC BENEFIT
The Trustees have complied with their duty to have due regard to the public benefit guidance published by the Charity Commission. The Charities Act 2011 identifies 13 descriptions of charitable purpose and in our view the work of the Charity meets the following:
-
relief of poverty
-
advancement of education
-
advancement of health
-
advancement of community development
-
relief of those in need by reason of youth, age, ill-health, disability, financial hardship or other disadvantage
Activities undertaken to further charitable objectives for public benefit are described below. All services are provided free of charge to beneficiaries.
The trustees review the aims, objectives, and activities of the charity each year. This report looks at what the charity has achieved and the outcomes of its work in the reporting period. The trustees report the success of each key activity and the benefits the charity has brought to those groups of people it is set up to help. The review also helps the trustees ensure the charity's aims, objectives and activities remained focused on its stated purposes.
The trustees have referred to the guidance contained in the Charity Commission's general guidance on public benefit when reviewing the charity's aims and objectives and in planning its future activities. In particular, the trustees consider how planned activities will contribute to the aims and objectives that have been set.
All Trustees support Gaddum as volunteers on Gaddum Trustee Board. Gaddum continues to offer placements to social work students, counselling students and return to practice counsellors. The Placement Lead acts a qualified practice educator lead with assistance from designated staff who are similarly qualified. The contribution of volunteers is stated in service reports to Trustee Board and reflected as social value offers in budgets, for tenders and bids for funding.
Achievements and performance
During the financial year 2024/25, Gaddum continued to deliver on its strategic objectives while maintaining a strong commitment to its core values. The organisation demonstrated resilience and adaptability in a challenging operating environment, strengthening its position as a trusted provider of health and social care support across Greater Manchester.
4
The Gaddum Centre
Trustees’ annual report
for the year ended 31 March 2025
Over the course of the year, Gaddum strengthened its service delivery across key areas, and the organisation experienced an overall increase in engagement from beneficiaries, reflecting both the growing demand for its work and its reputation for delivering high quality and trusted support. Positive feedback and outcomes demonstrated the continuing impact of Gaddum’s approach, which places people and their lived experiences at the centre of all interventions. Collaboration remained integral to this success, with strong partnerships maintained and developed across local authorities, NHS providers, and community organisations to ensure integrated and equitable access to support.
Governance standards remained robust, with the Board of Trustees providing active oversight and strategic leadership throughout the period, undertaking regular reviews of risk management, safeguarding, and quality assurance frameworks. A culture of transparency, accountability, and ethical practice was maintained across all areas of operation.
Through these combined efforts, Gaddum has continued to deliver measurable impact while strengthening its foundations for the future. The organisation remains committed to its long-term strategic priorities ensuring that it continues to listen beneficiaries and provides compassionate, effective support to those who need it most.
Carers
Gaddum Carers Salford – Annual Report Summary 2024/25
Introduction
Gaddum Carers Salford provides dedicated support to unpaid carers of all ages across the city, ensuring they are recognised, valued, and able to access the support they need. During 2024/25, the service has continued to grow, adapt and innovate in response to the impact of the cost-of-living crisis, and ongoing pressures within health and social care systems. Carer feedback continues to shape the onward development of the service.
Key data
-
550 referrals (227 young carers/ 323 adult carers)
-
School engagement is a key referral pathway for young carers
-
Self-referral remains the key referral pathway for adult carers
-
14% of referrals from are for Carers from non-white backgrounds
-
The majority of carers accessing the service provide care for a person with a long-term health condition or a mental health condition
Key Achievements
-
The service reshaped its delivery model, uniting Young Carers and Adult Carers teams under a single management structure. This has improved opportunities for shared learning.
-
Smooth delivery of Carers Assessments and full integration of the service into Adult Social Care systems.
-
Carers Week events and celebrations were well attended and received excellent feedback from carers and other key stakeholders.
-
Greater school involvement with the young carers service
5
The Gaddum Centre
Trustees’ annual report
for the year ended 31 March 2025
Adult Carers
-
Transitioned from a 6–8 session model to a more flexible 4-session model, reducing waiting times and making support more accessible.
-
Delivered a wide range of groups and activities including Come for a Cuppa, carers walks, themed social events, and focus groups with around 70 active members contributing to coproduction.
-
Introduced an Employment Support Worker, working with Elevate Salford to help carers reenter or sustain employment. This post is funded externally.
Young Carers
-
Delivery of school-based support proving fruitful, with new schools signing up and school groups running on a frequent basis. This has proved to be an area of growth for the service and has received positive feedback from commissioners.
-
Young Carers Action Day and the SPARK project to empower young people to express their experiences, including through posters and celebration events.
-
Developed tailored support for Young Adult Carers (aged 16–24) and those not in education, employment or training (NEET).
-
Continued to use wellbeing tools to measure impact, with most young carers showing reduced psychological distress after 1:1 support.
Partnership & Coproduction
-
Carers themselves remained central to service design, with strong input into activities, surveys, focus groups, and Carers Strategy 2025 refresh development.
-
The team worked closely with health, education, and voluntary sector partners to widen reach and increase referrals.
Service Activity & Impact
-
Over 7,000 instances of support delivered across the year, through 1:1 sessions, groups, drop-ins, and events.
-
Carers Assessment delivery exceeded annual targets, with 100% of carers reporting positive outcomes.
-
Hybrid delivery (face-to-face, telephone and online) ensured accessibility and choice.
Challenges & Responses
-
External IT system challenges caused some delays, but collaborative problem-solving with partners has led to improvements.
-
Demand for both young carers and adult carers services continues to grow, requiring ongoing adaptation to best support carers in Salford.
Success Stories
Amanda
Amanda is a 16-year-old female, caring for her mum who is in a wheelchair. She also cares for her younger sister who has mental health needs. Amanda was re-referred into the service by college staff. Amanda was also accessing support through CAHMS. Amanda had previously not wished to access support.
Due to caring responsibilities Amanda become isolated and did not have a solid friendship group, displayed low self-esteem and confidence and was waiting to start college. Amanda had no peer support as she had not been attending school for a long time.
6
The Gaddum Centre
Trustees’ annual report
for the year ended 31 March 2025
Amanda completed six sessions with the service. Sessions focussed on building confidence, prepare for transition to college and to introduce Amanda to new activities for peer support. I attended several Child in Need meetings for Amanda and her family, raising any issues from the young carer’s perspective to help professionals supporting the family to understand the situation.
Through support Amanda’s confidence grew. Amanda became more open about her caring role and how it has and will affect her life, studies and future. Amanda is now aware of support packages available to help her during times of intense caring. College staff recognised improvements and fed back that Amanda had become more comfortable in college, created a friendship group, and went out with her friends more.
| Case Study Title | Young Carer |
|---|---|
| Summary (Brief outline) |
I completed six sessions at a variety of different places from coffee shops to The Trafford Centre. This allowed the young carer a safe, open line of communication to speak about their caring responsibilities and allow respite from caring. |
| Background | The young carer is a 16-year-old female, caring for her mum who is in a wheelchair. She also cares for her younger sister who has mental health needs. The young carer had previously been referred into our services, however at the time did not have a school placement and they did not engage with me or the service. The young carer was re-referred into the service by staff at her college placement and engaged with support. Theyoungcarer was also accessingsupport through CAHMS. |
| Challenge | The referral was made for the young carer to allow her a safe space to speak about her caring role due to the following reasons: The young carer had become isolated and did not have a solid friendship group. Low self-esteem and confidence. She lacked peers as she had not been attending school for a long time. Was waiting to start college. To provide her respite from her caring role and her home life situation – caring for 2 family members. One challenge was that the young person had previously declined support – and to find new ways to allow her to engage with the service. |
| Approach | All sessions took place outside of school/college environment as I was aware that this was not a place the young carer felt comfortable. I wanted to make sure the young carer felt she had time away from her caringrole doingfun activities,whilst still beingsafe |
7
The Gaddum Centre
Trustees’ annual report
for the year ended 31 March 2025
| and to build up her confidence to ensure she was able to continue to do activities by herself and with friends once our sessions had completed. I attended several Child In Need meetings for the young carer and her family. This allowed me to make sure the voice of the young carer was heard, raising any issues from the young carer’s perspective. This allowed all professionals to get a fuller picture of theyoungcarer’s life. |
|
|---|---|
| Obstacles and issues |
Finding relevant support for the carers age – after being out of school for so long. This has led to a piece of work, developing our service offer with ‘transition age’ young carers to establish what groups and activities they would like to see, which the young person was involved with. |
| Evidence of good practice |
I built an excellent rapport with the young carer to establish trust and safety in myself and the service. Though session work the young carer became more open about her caring responsibilities and how she was feeling and speak freely. I kept in regular contact with the young carer between each session,so she knew the support was always there when needed. |
| Actual outcomes | From receiving support, the young carer became more open during the sessions, speaking about her caring role and how it has and will affect her life in the future. The young carer’s confidence grew. She began to suggest where to go for some of the sessions and led the conversation. This growth and confidence have been noted outside of the sessions. With college staff recognising that she had become more comfortable in college, created a friendship group, and went out with her friends more and more. The family also came off a child in need plan and know how to access relevant support if needed. |
Looking Ahead (2025/26)
Priorities for the year ahead include:
-
Delivering an impactful Carers Week with city-wide activities.
-
Expanding young adult carers and NEET support.
-
Building on hospital discharge pathways to improve carer visibility within health settings.
-
Strengthening workforce development through supervision, student placements, and ongoing CPD.
8
The Gaddum Centre
Trustees’ annual report
for the year ended 31 March 2025
Conclusion
2024/25 has been a year of growth, innovation, and resilience for Gaddum Salford Carers. The service has supported thousands of carers across Salford, ensuring their voices are heard and their needs met. Looking forward, the service remains committed to partnership working, co-production, and working towards the Carers Strategy Refresh in 2025.
Carers Manchester – Annual Report Summary 2024/25
Introduction
Carers Manchester continues to be the central point of contact for unpaid carers across the city. Through the Contact Point helpline, the Carers Manchester Pathway, and a network of 18 local partners, we have supported thousands of carers to access advice, information, carers assessments, and financial help. 2024/25 has been a year of transition, with staff recruitment and innovative projects developed to support and identify carers.
Key data
2431 calls/ referrals into the helpline
- 1140 referrals/ signposts for local carers support
Key Achievements
Carers Manchester Contact Point (CMCP)
-
Supported 1,800+ carers over the year, with 466 accessing support in Q4 alone.
-
Main areas of support included Carers Assessment referrals, welfare benefits advice, and emergency grants.
-
Established the Contact Point reference Group
-
The Contact Point has become a member of the Helpline Standards Association.
-
Delivered 87 Emergency Fund applications in Q4 alone, helping carers meet urgent needs such as utility bills and essential household items.
-
Expanded the Welfare & Benefits Advice service, achieving average gains of £22 per week per carer.
Carers Manchester Pathway & Network
-
Established a new Carers Strategy Board structure, induction for members, and forward planning to ensure stronger governance.
-
Developed locality action plans aligned to a city-wide carers action plan, ensuring consistency across neighbourhoods.
-
Facilitated the IMPACT project, engaging carers and partners in redesigning how carers access adult social care support.
-
Strengthened the Carers Network with new structures, member-led meetings, and funding opportunities for network partners.
-
Launched new workstreams on Equalities and Carers in Paid Employment, including training for employers and the successful bid for GMCA funding to support 20 carers into employment or training.
-
Prepared the launch of the Carers Identification Card, rolled out from Carers Week 2024, with potential for retail discounts, leisure access, and integration with the Emergency Card scheme.
9
The Gaddum Centre
Trustees’ annual report
for the year ended 31 March 2025
Respite & Wellbeing
-
Piloted Carefree, a new service providing free/ discounted short breaks for carers, delivered with local partners.
-
Maintained strong cultural partnerships, supporting nearly 90 carers to attend Halle Orchestra concerts before the matinee programme ended. Work is underway to develop new cultural offers with the Halle and Bridgewater Hall.
-
Planned creative Carers Week celebrations including poetry workshops, community events, and city-wide showcases.
Volunteering & Workforce Development
-
Set up a Carers Manchester Volunteer Steering Group to design and oversee a volunteer programme, including role outlines, induction, and supervision processes.
-
Developed student placements and training opportunities, helping future social workers understand carers’ issues.
-
All new staff are completing Helpline Skills training (Level 2/3) to ensure high-quality delivery.
Service Activity & Impact
-
Thousands of carers reached across Manchester, with self-referral remaining the primary entry route (58% of Q4 referrals).
-
Carers spanned all age groups, but the largest proportion accessing support were aged 35– 64.
-
71% of carers supported were women, reflecting national trends.
-
Carers represented a diverse city population, with 35% identifying as from non-white ethnic backgrounds, and strong representation from Muslim and South Asian communities.
-
Caring relationships were varied, with carers supporting parents, partners, children, and extended family members across a wide range of health conditions, including dementia, autism, and long-term physical illness.
Challenges & Responses
-
High demand for financial support highlighted the ongoing impact of the cost-of-living crisis. The Emergency Fund and welfare advice offer were expanded in response. A budget spreadsheet is in place to ensure this fund stays in-budget.
-
Loss of Halle matinee concerts meant fewer cultural respite options; alternative partnerships are being pursued to maintain this valued support.
-
Demand remains high for carers assessments and ongoing casework – a sign of continued pressure on carers but also of increased awareness and accessibility of support.
Success Stories
Fatima
Fatima is in her fifties and cares for her mother, who has mental health and physical conditions. Fatima had contacted the helpline for advice around Carer Breaks.
From the conversation with Fatima, it was clear that she was overwhelmed with her situation and did not know where to turn for support. Through conversation, I was able to find relevant support that would be of use to Fatima and her situation.
I referred Fatima for a Carer’s Assessment review to address urgent needs. I also signposted Fatima to other organisations locally who can assist with carer breaks and respite options. Fatima was also signed up to the Carers Manchester newsletter so she can keep up to date with all that is going on with the service and in her local area.
10
The Gaddum Centre
Trustees’ annual report
for the year ended 31 March 2025
Fatima was relieved and happy with support. Fatima replied to confirm that she would follow up on the information sent about carer breaks and bereavement support that had been signposted. Fatima left the following feedback:
“Thank you for your time the other day - it was appreciated very much. I am overwhelmed & lots have gone on as mentioned, so it was probably a little longer than intended that call. Sorry if your ears were burnt out.”
Case Study Title: Fatima
| Case Study Title: Fatima | Case Study Title: Fatima |
|---|---|
| Background | Fatima is in her fifties and cares for her mother, who has mental health and physical conditions. |
| Presenting issue(s) | Fatima had contacted the helpline for advice around Carer Breaks. |
| CMCP intervention(s) | I referred Fatima for her annual Carer’s Assessment/personal budget and emailed her organisations that support with carer breaks (grants; accessible accommodation). I also emailed her details of alternative sources of bereavement support. Referred for Carer’s Assessment review Signposted to Mobilise website – carer breaks/respite Signposted to Greater Manchester Bereavement Support Service, Marie Curie’s Bereavement Support Service and Sue Ryder’s Online Support Service Signposted to CMCPe-newsletter |
| Outcomes | Fatima replied to confirm that she would follow up on the information sent about carer breaks and bereavement support. |
| Feedback | “Thank you for your time the other day - it was appreciated very much. I am overwhelmed & lots have gone on as mentioned, so it was probably a little longer than intended that call. Sorryifyour ears were burnt out.” |
Looking Ahead (2025/26)
Priorities include:
-
Carers Manchester Contact Point helpline accreditation
-
Launch of the Carers ID Card and expanded respite options.
-
Delivery of the Carefree pilot and development of a wider respite strategy.
-
Embedding new Equalities and Employment workstreams, ensuring carers from all backgrounds and working carers are better supported.
-
Strengthening the Volunteer Programme, capturing social value, and celebrating volunteer contributions.
-
Continued acknowledgement of Carers Week as a major opportunity for awareness and celebration.
11
The Gaddum Centre
Trustees’ annual report
for the year ended 31 March 2025
Conclusion
2024/25 has been a year of significant change and renewal for Carers Manchester. The service has delivered vital support to thousands of unpaid carers across the city, increasing financial stability, improving access to carers assessments. The year ahead will see a focus on delivering the new contract for the 2-year extension granted by Manchester City Council.
Therapy Services
Gaddum provides a wide range of Therapy services across Greater Manchester, focused around the key themes below:
-
Bereavement therapy for children and young people
-
Open-ended therapy for families where a child has a complex care need or is receiving palliative care
-
NHS Talking Therapies for adults in Manchester
-
Wraparound, practical support for people who are accessing Talking Therapies in Heywood, Middleton and Rochdale (‘Getting Help’), and in Manchester.
These services and their impact are described below.
Children and young people’s bereavement therapy
We provide bereavement services offering therapeutic support to children and young people in Manchester and Salford who have experienced the loss of a loved one.
Our specially trained bereavement therapists provided compassionate care to those struggling to cope with the challenging emotions that arise from the death of a family member or friend. Our approach prioritises holistic support, not only for the child but also for their families, ensuring care extends beyond therapy sessions. We deliver a wraparound service that provides consistent, ongoing assistance which strengthens the family unit and builds resilience to manage health and social challenges better, at home, in the future. This improves resilience within the family unit and has the additional benefit of reducing demand on urgent and emergency care services.
Key statistics for 2024-25:
-
Our Salford bereavement service received 174 referrals, and Manchester received 202 referrals into the service
-
In Salford we delivered 903 sessions, far exceeding our target of 480. Across the year, we worked with 88 CYP, more than doubling our target of 35-40.
-
In Manchester, with a smaller staff body, we delivered 760 sessions and worked with 85 CYP.
-
• The largest referral source was schools, although we also continued to work with GPs, Early Help and VCSE providers and received referrals directly from families.
-
Reasons for referral into the service provide an insight into complexity of the work, with CYP affected by loss related to suicide, drugs and alcohol, serious illness, murder, and multiple deaths.
-
Demand for these services exceeded our ability to deliver, resulting in significant waiting lists (Manchester 90+ and Salford 68 children and young people, respectively) and many months waiting.
12
The Gaddum Centre
Trustees’ annual report
for the year ended 31 March 2025
Recognising waiting periods as significant challenges whereby issues can escalate, and health deteriorate, Gaddum’s expert therapy team:
-
designed a grief workbook for involved professionals such as teachers and youth workers to use while the child / young person is on the waiting list, and received good feedback on this, and
-
continued to use the SilverCloud online therapy platform for access to evidence-based online courses to support children and young people while they waited for our service to begin.
Feedback from children and young people, and from their parents, has continued to be very positive, as illustrated in the statistics, quotes and case stories below.
Feedback highlights:
-
98% of CYP strongly agreed or agreed that their therapist listened to them and treated them fairly
-
97% of CYP strongly agreed or agreed that their therapist gave them choice about activities or what was talked about
-
88% of CYP strongly agreed or agreed that they got help that was important to them
-
96% of parents/carers strongly agreed or agreed that their CYP was treated fairly when accessing the service
-
95% of parents/carers strongly agreed or agreed that their CYP was listened to while accessing therapy
-
94% of parents/carers strongly agreed or agreed that their CYP received the help that mattered to them
Quotes from children and young people:
-
“The most helpful thing was sitting down and talking with the Therapist who is the kindest person I have met. She listens to me when others don't”
-
“I have seen a change in my mindset and approach to things. I appreciated just having someone to talk to”
-
“I've not been worrying much anymore, I feel calmer. I've been opening up to other people more about my emotions, and that helps. Being able to talk about my late uncle was the most useful thing about the sessions”
-
“My sleep has improved. I feel more able to talk about my feelings and have started doing this more with my mum. I don’t feel as sad about my grandma, I think talking about her helped”.
Quotes from parents/carers:
-
“[X] enjoyed the sessions and having someone to talk to. The way he described it was like sharing his problems with a mate that listened to him and didn't try to tell him what to do”
-
“[X] found the sessions very helpful, and she seems to be able to manage her emotions better now”
-
“I have noticed she [a girl with suicidal thoughts] speaks up more about what she is feeling and does not hide when she is upset as much”
-
“he is able to manage his emotions better, and he learnt how to control them. He is able to speak about Dad now, and it seems that he understands the situation better as well”
-
“the biggest difference is in her motivation to study – she seems to be more confident and driven – her attendance improved, and she seems to be coping with pressures at college better”
-
“I have noticed the changes in all my children that they are calmer and understand their grief more”
-
“Recently [X] seems a lot happier in herself. She is able to keep on top of her anxiety more. [X] is getting outside a lot more with me (Mum) and she is also eating a lot better recently”
13
The Gaddum Centre
Trustees’ annual report
for the year ended 31 March 2025
-
“He seems a lot calmer, he is talking more. Over the last few weeks, whilst he’s been having therapy, it seems like a weight has been lifted off his shoulders – he doesn’t get as frustrated or angry”
-
“It's a wonderful service and I thank you from the bottom of my heart for helping my children”.
Case Study: Jordan’s Story
Jordan’s dad passed away from cancer around the time Jordan entered their teenage years. Although their dad had been unwell since Jordan was a toddler, his death still came as a profound and unexpected shock to the whole family. It was an especially tough time for Jordan, who was grappling not only with bereavement but also with the emotional weight of celebrating a birthday shortly after the loss. They struggled deeply with the idea of growing older without their dad by their side and found the thought of navigating life without him incredibly overwhelming.
In the months that followed, Jordan became increasingly withdrawn. Despite their mum’s gentle encouragement to talk, Jordan found it almost impossible to open up. They worried about becoming a burden to those around them and kept their emotions bottled up. This inner turmoil led to mounting anxiety and an intense sense of pressure that they carried alone.
Things began to shift when Jordan was referred to bereavement therapy and started sessions with our CYP Bereavement Therapist. The first few sessions were difficult, as trusting someone new and talking about such painful emotions didn’t come easily. But by the third session, Jordan started to feel more at ease. With our therapist’s support, they began to share treasured memories of their dad, not just the difficult final days, but the happy moments they had spent together. As the sessions continued, Jordan noticed that talking about their dad helped them reconnect with the joy of those memories, rather than feeling consumed by grief.
This emotional breakthrough also made it easier for Jordan to talk about their dad with their mum and other family members. Loved ones quickly noticed a change with Jordan seeming to be “more open, calmer, and lighter.” By the end of the sessions, Jordan reflected that therapy had “really helped me talk about dad.” If they could change one thing, it would be to have “more sessions.”
Jordan’s mum also observed a significant transformation: “Jordan is so much more settled now. They’re sleeping better and seem more like their old, happy self.” Both Jordan and their mum expressed deep gratitude for the support they received and have already recommended Gaddum’s bereavement service to other families facing similar loss.
Additional funding
Supported by specific external funding from Greater Manchester Police (using monies seized from the proceeds of crime and repurposed into community initiatives), we also delivered an enhanced bereavement therapy service in Manchester and Salford in cases where children and young people had experienced sudden and unexpected loss as a direct result of crime.
This service provided bespoke, trauma-informed, more intensive therapeutic support that helped 20 children and young people (over one year) deal with additional distress and difficulty, including but also over and above the usual grieving process. Considerable impact was achieved, not only in the immediate term but in respect of enhancing future life prospects, illustrated by Liam’s story below.
14
The Gaddum Centre
Trustees’ annual report
for the year ended 31 March 2025
Case Study: Liam’s story
Liam is 10 years old and is dealing with the loss of his mother’s partner, who was murdered in the home by intruders. His mother reports that Liam is prone to anger and that he finds these feelings difficult to regulate.
Liam came to Gaddum at the start of 2024 for one-to-one therapeutic interventions. Our therapist offered a range of approaches, tailored to Liam’s needs, such as play therapy, talking therapies, and art therapy. The structure of play therapy supported Liam to explore and scaffold a discussion of his feelings, and our therapist employed a drama work style to help Liam enact situations and see the point of view of others.
Our therapist has also been working to support Liam’s 11-year-old sister and adapted his approach to complete a final session with the two children together. We have worked alongside the children’s mother throughout and conducted a family therapy session as well as psychoeducation sessions with mum, to support her to embed the therapeutic work into family life and build resilience in the family.
Liam stated that he feels that something has changed for him, and that this change is noticeable to others, saying that “when I get angry, I can handle it better [...] I've been more calm in situations I don't like and she [mum] has noticed it and complimented me”. Mum added that the sessions have helped with Liam’s transition to High School, and with his anxiety around these changes.
Complex care therapy for parents and families
We continued to provide high quality, timely access to therapy for parents and families with children who have a life-limiting or complex care need. By working with and supporting the Complex Care Nursing Teams in Salford, Rochdale, and Stockport, we offer a flexible, therapeutic approach that allows parents, siblings, and other family members to access support that is tailored to them. In turn, this helps them to navigate their thoughts and emotions, and to focus on the time that they have with their child.
Key statistics for 2024-25
-
In Salford, with a small staff complement, we worked with 27 individuals, exceeding our target of 5-6 long term clients and 3-4 short term. We were able to deliver 116 sessions, over half of which were attended face-to-face.
-
In HMR, we worked with 40 clients across the year, and delivered 300 sessions, completing a mixture of in-person, telephone, and video appointments.
-
In Stockport, we deliver a small service of only 8hrs per week. In this contract year, we worked with 7 clients, and delivered 111 sessions, the majority of which were face-to-face.
Case Study: Amy’s Story
Amy was referred to the Complex Care service to access therapeutic support while navigating the emotional and physical demands of her son Connor’s diagnoses of Cerebral Palsy and Epilepsy. Connor’s health needs include challenges with mobility, communication, and ongoing medical vulnerabilities. Amy, a mother of four, sought therapy to find calm and regain a sense of control amid the pressures of caregiving.
From the outset, Amy spoke with honesty and depth about her role as a parent. She shared her unconditional love for her children and the ongoing effort of balancing Connor’s intensive care needs with the responsibilities of parenting her other children. She emphasised the importance of having a safe, non-judgemental space to express her emotions—something that had been missing from her life for some time.
15
The Gaddum Centre
Trustees’ annual report
for the year ended 31 March 2025
Since starting therapy, Amy has managed a particularly demanding period, with Connor experiencing recurrent seizures, frequent hospital admissions, and increasing medical complexity. She described frustrations with the lack of adequate support from Connor’s school during this time, adding to her emotional burden. Despite this, Amy remained steadfast in her caregiving, coordinating care for her other children and being by Connor’s side both at home and in hospital.
One session focused on a particularly traumatic hospital stay, during which Amy witnessed the sudden death of another child on the ward, which she described as terrifying and unforgettable. She shared concerns about returning for future appointments, worried she might become overwhelmed with emotion. In therapy, we explored the impact of this event, and Amy acknowledged that she typically avoids crying in front of others, only doing so when she feels completely safe.
Amy also reflected on her long-standing tendency to suppress her emotions; a coping mechanism she traced back to her own childhood. She described her default response to distress as “it is what it is,” illustrating the emotional numbing she’s developed over time to manage the needs of those around her. While this has allowed her to continue supporting her children, it has left her feeling depleted. She described herself as emotionally drained, sharing that her “cup is empty,” and has been for a while. Her sleep is fragmented and limited, further compounding her exhaustion and increasing her anxiety levels.
Throughout our work together, therapy has provided Amy with space to begin reconnecting with her own needs. We’ve worked to process recent traumas, and Amy has started to gain insight into how her emotional patterns have developed and how they affect her well-being. This reflective space has helped her speak openly, often for the first time, and focus solely on herself without feeling guilt or judgment.
Amy expressed that face-to-face sessions would better support her need for trust and emotional safety in therapy. We agreed on a flexible plan, with the option to update and reschedule sessions as needed. Amy has chosen to continue therapy, focusing particularly on managing her anxiety around Connor’s future hospital admissions. A hybrid model of telephone and in-person sessions will support her continued engagement.
Amy shared: “Thank you for today you’re really great at what you do, you do make me feel safe and getting me to open up”
Talking Therapies Manchester
We continued to deliver part of the NHS Talking Therapies service for adults in the Manchester City Council area. This comprised a range of one-to-one therapy including Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CBT) informed work, person-centred counselling, Counselling for Depression (CfD), eye movement desensitisation and reprocessing (EMDR) therapy and support to access groups and guided online therapy courses using CBT techniques via the SliverCloud online therapy platform.
Key statistics for 2024-25
-
In the contract year, 237 clients began therapy sessions with our team, far exceeding our target of 180 annually.
-
By the final quarter of the year, 91% of clients were being seen within 6 weeks of referral, against a target of 75%.
-
Across the year, 98% of clients were seen within 18 weeks of their referral, exceeding the target of 95%.
-
Recovery, reliable recovery, and reliable improvement continue to strengthen within the service, with reliable improvement averaging over 60% across the year, against a target of 67%.
16
The Gaddum Centre
Trustees’ annual report
for the year ended 31 March 2025
- Our team booked nearly 2500 appointments across the year, delivering a blend of in-person and remote therapy sessions.
Case study: Katarina’s story
Katarina is in her late 20's and from Eastern Europe. She came to therapy due to feeling lonely, disconnected, and carrying a lot of anxiety and worry for the future. Katarina was hopeful for therapy but expressed that she was a 'fixer 'and therefore felt that talking therapy might be a challenge. She built a great relationship with her therapist and together they were able to explore some of her childhood experiences and recognise the ways in which these experiences were having an impact upon many areas of her life. By not looking for just the 'quick fixes', Katarina grew in self-awareness and was able to understand herself better, as well as see significant changes in her day-to-day life.
Katarina started to develop more confidence to make social connections and joined a local running club, where she has been able to make friends. Her Gaddum therapy sessions taught her the importance of sharing her feelings with others and now she feels better supported because she is more open with those around her.
At the end of therapy, Katarina gave the following feedback:
"My therapist was amazing; so knowledgeable and so friendly. This was an amazing experience, and I am leaving healthy, confident and happy. Changed my life in 11 sessions, I can't thank my therapist enough."
Getting Help HMR
We continued to deliver the Getting Help service (Getting Help is a partnership of organisations in Heywood, Middleton and Rochdale) through the provision of free, one-to-one practical support for people who are accessing therapy/counselling and are experiencing a range of issues, including money issues, loneliness and isolation, housing or homelessness problems, domestic violence or abuse, managing a caring role, identity-specific support, and drug or alcohol issues, amongst others. Unfortunately, this service was subsequently decommissioned for reasons beyond our control, but despite this we are keen to summarise our provision and the impact it had.
Partnership working
By working in partnership with 5 local organisations with differing specialist provisions, we can extend our reach into the community and ensure residents receive holistic support that take into account the whole person and all of their needs. The partnership consists of:
-
Petrus: Petrus provides residential and day support to people who are homeless or in housing need, or at risk. Petrus has 50 years’ experience of engaging with the most socially marginalised groups in the borough, many with complex need.
-
The Proud Trust: The Proud Trust is an LGBT+ organisation that supports LGBT+ young people through youth groups, peer support, mentoring programs, and the Proud Connections chat service.
-
Recovery Republic: The Recovery Republic CIC is a Heywood-focused, self-help wellbeing centre dedicated to supporting the local community. They welcome everyone, including those with mental health needs, learning difficulties, poor mobility, those who are socially isolated, and anyone who would like to be part of the centre.
-
Rochdale Connections Trust: Rochdale Connections Trust are the leading independent provider of Domestic Abuse services, family support services, and targeted youth support interventions throughout the borough of Rochdale. RCT delivers a wide range of services for those affected by domestic abuse.
17
The Gaddum Centre
Trustees’ annual report
for the year ended 31 March 2025
- Rochdale Women’s Welfare Association: RWWA is a dedicated woman-led organisation striving to empower Black, Asian, and Minority Ethnic women to reach their full potential, tackling inequalities, eliminating violence Against Women and Girls, providing holistic support in a safe, culturally appropriate environment.
Key statistics for 2024-25
-
The team supported 292 unique individuals over the last full year of the service, over the phone, online and in-person at various community hubs across Heywood, Middleton and Rochdale. Despite the wind-down of the service, the team were close to achieving their target number of 300 clients.
-
In addition, the team delivered 128 public-facing community events, against a goal of 120 annually.
-
For people in the service, approximately 62% reported a measurable increase to their mental wellbeing from the start to the end of their sessions, against a goal of 60%.
-
Key issues were topics such as money worries, housing issues, caring roles, social isolation and drug/alcohol issues.
The service was delivered by a team of Community Engagement Workers trained in Motivational Interviewing and providing one-to-one solution-focused support. The intention was to put people in a better place to move forward, thereby avoiding the need for therapy services where possible and supporting people to be ready for therapy where this is still needed. An example of impact – illustrating both short-term impact and helping to lay foundations for enhanced life prospects – is provided by the case study below.
Case Study: Terry’s story (Getting Help HMR)
Terry is a man in his 20s living in Rochdale. Terry was referred into Getting Help’s Community Engagement team after his initial assessment with HMR Talking Therapies for support with debts and finances.
During the initial conversation with his Community Engagement Worker, Terry shared that he was a guarantor for a loan for a friend, who, unbeknownst to Terry, had increased the amount they borrowed. This friend had since severed communication with Terry, leaving him responsible for debts of over £11,000. Terry also disclosed that because of his ADHD, he struggles with understanding his finances more generally and that his previous attempts to address this issue independently had been unsuccessful.
In his sessions with Getting Help, Terry worked alongside his Community Engagement Worker on creating a household budget as this is the first step debt support agencies will ask of a client accessing their services. Using the figures in the household budget, we supported Terry with identifying savings he could make and discussed cheaper alternatives or eliminating some of the unnecessary spending entirely. Getting Help also supported Terry with creating an account with Step Change debt support and submitting the figures from his household budget.
Terry was given debt management options to choose from and asked for our assistance in understanding these – whilst we were unable to provide direct financial advice, we helped him understand some of the terminology used in the options provided by Step Change and offered signposting to organisation such as Citizen’s Advice Bureau and local community money advice services in case Terry wanted further guidance.
18
The Gaddum Centre
Trustees’ annual report
for the year ended 31 March 2025
In his final session, Terry shared that he was able to make an informed decision on which option to select in his Debt Management Plan from Step Change and that he would be completely debt-free within 3 years. Terry thanked Getting Help for all of their support adding that there was “a huge relief” knowing that he would be debt-free in 3 years, adding that he could “be hopeful about the future again”.
Getting Help MCR
Supported by specific external funding from a corporate funder, we also delivered a Getting Help type service in Manchester, whereby a Community Engagement Worker provided short-term practical support for people accessing or waiting to access our Manchester Talking Therapies service.
This supported some 70 people over a year to address practical challenges impinging on their mental health – most commonly in respect of housing, financial security, employment and debt – and supported people to feel more confident and to prepare for therapy where that was still needed.
Key statistics for 2024-25
-
Our worker completed 222 one-to-one sessions across 57 clients
-
We delivered three courses of the Living Life to the Full course, with 20 people attending across the 3 cohorts.
-
Overall, the service worked with 76 unique individuals, against a target of 75.
Case Study: John’s story (Getting Help MCR)
John* is a security worker in his late fifties who was initially referred to our Talking Therapies services by his GP due to experiencing a series of traumatic bereavements. When counselling started, it soon became apparent that there were wider health and social care needs contributing to his stress and low mood, including issues around finances and benefits, social isolation, and food poverty. He was also being offered fewer shifts at work following a recent heart attack. John’s therapist referred John to our Community Engagement Service, and our worker arranged to meet him in the community to agree some goals and explore what additional support could be offered.
The first time our worker met John, he spoke less about his financial situation and more about grieving his wife, about the loss of his grandchild to murder and feeling pushed out at work. Although John was benefiting from counselling, it was felt that he needed to speak to someone who understood and had been through a loss like this. Our Community Engagement Worker was able to connect John to peer support through the agency Support After Murder and Manslaughter (SAMM) and liaised directly with one of their agents to ensure he got the support.
To address his financial issues, our worker provided food bank vouchers to help in the short term and signposted to a local cooperative pantry to ease the burden in the longer term. We also successfully applied to a local emergency fund which ensured that John could pay his phone bill. John struggles with literacy, making it difficult to navigate the benefits system himself. Together with our worker, he reviewed his benefits and ensured he was receiving everything that he was entitled to. We also made a referral to Adult Social Care to request a full needs assessment.
During the time that we have been working with John, we have been able to improve his financial situation both in the short term and apply for long term solutions. He leaves the service with on-going support from SAMM. John has expressed gratitude for the support Gaddum has been able to offer.
19
The Gaddum Centre
Trustees’ annual report
for the year ended 31 March 2025
Community
Culturally Appropriate Advocacy
From October 2023 to March 2025, Gaddum delivered the Department of Health and Social Care’s (DHSC) Culturally Appropriate Advocacy Pilot (Phase II), supporting 289 people across Greater Manchester. Using our rights-based, anti-racist, and culturally appropriate model, we helped people from racially marginalised backgrounds access the care and support they needed, challenge discrimination in services, and promote culturally appropriate practice across the sector.
This service was one of only two pilots nationally, funded as part of the DHSC’s work to reform the Mental Health Act. The findings will directly inform how advocacy can address racial disparities and racism in mental health services, as well as shape what a national model of culturally appropriate advocacy should look like. The service was independently evaluated, with the final report due next year.
As part of the programme, we also supported the development of the Patient Carer Race Equality Framework (PCREF) across two NHS trusts, providing feedback in line with standard 1.7 and using institutional advocacy to improve care and outcomes for patients. Outcomes
Outcomes
-
94% reported we helped them understand their rights
-
87% said we supported them to access the care they needed to recover
-
• 61% reported that we helped them leave hospital sooner
Influencing and Institutional Advocacy
A key focus of this pilot was strengthening our approach to influencing and institutional advocacy. Our activities included:
-
AMHP engagement – attending practice development sessions, delivering training, and raising awareness
-
NHS Trust strategy – contributing as members of the GMMH Anti-Racism Steering Committee and PCNHSFT Health Inequalities Oversight Group
-
PCREF implementation – using the framework to improve patient experience
-
ICB and GM-wide influence – engaging in the s136 improvement plan steering group, presenting patient feedback, and amplifying lived experience voices
-
Research contributions – influencing Manchester Metropolitan University’s research on Black men and the Mental Health Act, and presenting at the Westminster Symposium on the Act, highlighting culturally appropriate advocacy as a key demand
Impact:
“ You have started a chain of improvement events here at GMMH that will make a huge difference to our service users and carers.”
– GMMH Head of Service User Experience and Improvement
20
The Gaddum Centre
Trustees’ annual report
for the year ended 31 March 2025
Case Studies in Practice
1. Medicines Access for Inpatients
The service identified that many new inpatients were not receiving timely access to medications for preexisting conditions—especially speakers of other languages and those in PICU. In some cases, patients only received their medications after Advocate intervention.
Solutions proposed by Experts by Experience and Advocates:
-
Prompt access to pre-existing medications upon admission
-
Clear explanations when medications are withheld
-
Increased staff awareness of the stress caused by not receiving essential medication
Actions taken:
-
Advocates and Experts by Experience met with Medicine Safety Officers to share patient experiences
-
Raised concerns about withdrawal risks and the potential for misinterpreting behaviours during s2 assessments
Outcomes:
-
GMMH’s Medicine Safety Standard Operating Procedures are being updated to emphasise medication provision on admission
-
Training resources, including a video and newsletter featuring lived experience voices, are being shared with staff
2. Reducing Length of Stay and Preventing Readmissions
Psychiatric inpatient care costs between £424 and £723 per day. During the pilot, 35 people reported that advocacy support enabled them to leave hospital sooner. Assuming just a two-week reduction in stay, this represents a saving of £354,270 over 15 months.
In addition, 39 people reported that advocacy reduced the risk of being detained or re-detained. With the average inpatient stay at 39 days, this equates to a further cost saving of £1,099,683.
Our impact extends beyond crisis services. In the community, Advocates have contributed to system efficiencies by:
-
Ensuring care and support plans are appropriate and effective
-
Identifying needs early and facilitating timely interventions
-
Supporting people on Community Treatment Orders to stay well and avoid relapse
21
The Gaddum Centre
Trustees’ annual report
for the year ended 31 March 2025
Case Studies Case study 1: helping people leave hospital
Background
AM was detained on Macoll ward Initially under Section 2, then subsequently Section 3. His preferred language was Urdu, making communication a significant factor in his care. Due to this, he requested one on one meetings with us to better express his needs.
His key concern was a lack of clarity around where he would be housed after discharge. AM was having issues with his partner and was unsure if he could return to his partners home, where he was living before his detention. AM also believed that he may require supported accommodation, due to his Bipolar diagnosis.
In addition to this, AM seemed to be unaware of many of his rights under the Mental Health Act, including rights to appeal his detention and right to a translator.
Due to these circumstances, AM required Advocacy support to help inform him of his rights, particularly rights relating to housing post discharge, and communicate his views effectively with staff involved in his care.
Actions
- Language Support: I liaised with AM effectively in his preferred language, Urdu, to empower him by ensuring his rights and queries were addressed in a way in which he would clearly understand.
AM was initially not aware of many of his rights, including his right to a Tribunal to appeal his Section 2 Detention. AM initially opted to apply for this, but later cancelled his application, due to changes in circumstance making him confident that he would be discharged before the expiration of his Section 2 (improvement in his Mental Health and relationship with his partner).
I also made AM aware of his right to a translator being arranged for his one to ones and ward reviews. AM said he thought he would greatly benefit from this, leading me to request ward staff to arrange this. He later discovered that his consultant spoke Urdu, making him deem this unnecessary, however, he mentioned that we would not have been aware of these rights if weren’t for advocacy support.
- Care Coordinator and Discharge Plan: AM’s primary concern was the lack of assistance he was receiving regarding housing arrangements post-discharge. I explained that if he does not have a registered address or an address he can return to after he is discharged, then accommodation will be arranged for him, either through the local authority or under Section 117 aftercare. I explained the role of a Care Coordinator and how they would be the appropriate individual to help Atif Navigate these concerns.
I followed up with the ward staff multiple times to ensure a care coordinator would be assigned, stressing the importance of discharge planning for his care. I also
22
The Gaddum Centre
Trustees’ annual report
for the year ended 31 March 2025
advocated for clarity around his discharge process and raised his concerns with the charge nurse and consultant.
-
Consultant Communication: AM was briefly placed on a Section 3 before he was discharged. He found this concerning, as he was confident that he would be discharged before the expiration of his Section 2. I liaised with staff around the reason for this and I was made aware that unresolved concerns about his relationship with his wife were delaying his discharge. He informed me that he found this very confusing, as his relationship with his wife had improved in the days leading up to this.
-
I advocated on his behalf, requesting that the consultant communicate directly with him regarding these issues so he can get a better idea of AM’s perspective on his relationship. This support led directly to AM being discharged sooner, as because of this intervention, AM’s consultant conversed with him and deemed it appropriate for him to be discharged back to his partner’s home.
Outcomes
-
Access to Care: AM indicated in his CAAP outcomes questionnaire that he felt the advocacy support helped him access the care he needed. I feel this was achieved by ensuring he was informed and empowered through effective communication in Urdu and communicating his views and requests on his behalf to staff and his consultant, ensuring cohesive understanding between the client and staff.
-
Discharge Timing: AM felt that the advocacy support expedited his discharge, as he was discharged shortly after my intervention. He was clear that the concerns about his relationship were resolved, and he was able to leave the hospital sooner with all his needs addressed.
-
Understanding of Rights: I explained AM’s rights under the Mental Health Act (right to appeal his detention and right to a translator) to him, which he acknowledged helped him make informed decisions about his care.
-
Culturally Appropriate Care: The culturally appropriate advocacy played a key role in ensuring AM felt understood and supported during his hospital stay. This was displayed through effective communication with the client in his preferred language, and through cultural awareness of the client’s background (relationship dynamics in South Asian Culture).
Summary
AM was discharged earlier, due to intervention from an advocate, leading to clearer communication between him and his consultant. This highlights the importance of communication between advocacy and healthcare professionals.
AM consistently mentioned how seeing an individual from the same cultural background as him made him feel much more comfortable in expressing his views and wishes, and said this had a positive impact on his mental health during his detention, this highlights the efficacy of Culturally Appropriate Advocacy.
23
The Gaddum Centre
Trustees’ annual report
for the year ended 31 March 2025
Case study 2: keeping people well in the community
Background
S is a 52-year-old British-Pakistani woman. S was undergoing EDMR therapy for childhood trauma when she was told her care plan may be reduced with no explanation as to why. This impacted her mental health causing anxiety and feelings of depression and disrupted her therapy. She wanted CAAP support to help keep her care hours.
Actions:
During our first visit S told us that adult social services were considering reducing her care plan hours. After meeting with S and making an advocacy plan, I contacted her social worker to highlight why S’s care plan hours should not be reduced and suggested that if this is being considered she should be provided with a care act advocate. Whilst I was waiting for a response from the social worker, S contacted me to tell me that the care hours had been reduced. Following this, the social worker contacted me explaining their decision and stating that she does not believe a review or care act advocate is needed.
After seeking advice from my manager and researching into care review procedures on the government website and The Social Care Institute for Excellence website I emailed the social worker again requesting a formal light-tough review of the care plan. I outlined the impact on S’s mental and physical health as well as stating that she did not feel involved in the initial process and highlighting the importance of providing her with a care act advocate who can support her through the review process. Following this, the social worker contacted me to let me know that they would complete a home visit, light-touch care package review and refer her for a Care Act Advocate.
Initially, the social worker stated that S make changes to her schedule to cut downon time, such as having toast or cereal for breakfast instead of the cultural food that she had been having. Working in a culturally appropriate manner benefitted this case as I was able to advocate for the importance of S being able to have time for her cultural food to be prepared as this is what she has eaten her whole life and is culturally important to her. Whilst waiting for the review I regularly contacted S to check what further advocacy needs she might have in the meantime, such as looking into debt advice services and community activities available in her area. I also chased up the Care Act Advocacy referral with the social worker and local Advocacy provider until it was allocated.
Outcomes
Due to CAAP support S was able to get a light-touch review of her care package as well as access to a Care Act Advocate to support her through the process. While the review is still in process, I have been providing S support by calling regularly and checking in to see if she has further advocacy needs. For example, her EDMR therapy was being disrupted and had to be stopped due to the stress and anxiety of the review. Therefore, I referred her to counselling and therapy services at ACMHS so that she still had a support network for her mental health. S has expressed her appreciation of the service before, stating that our “sincere support” is making a “real difference” and “it is important to know there are people who care”
Recovery in Community
In January 2025 we launched Recovery in Community: a collaborative initiative between Manchester Mind and Gaddum. The service is funded by the Greater Manchester Health and Social Care Partnership. We seek to draw on the strengths of the VCSE sector to solve problems in our Mental Health system, specifically supporting people be discharged into the community after mental health care treatment. The aim of Recovery in Community is to:
24
The Gaddum Centre
Trustees’ annual report
for the year ended 31 March 2025
-
Repatriate: wherein Manchester residents are in an out of area placement (OAP) work to get them back to Manchester
-
Discharge: provide practical support to expediate the discharge of people in mental health hospital who are ready to leave.
-
Recover: support people to stay well in the community post discharge, by ensuring they stay connected to the resources they need and support them for 6 months post discharge.
The first 3 months of the service focussed on partnership building and values alignment as well as the development of our brand. We took our first referrals in February and March and had appointed the majority of caseworkers by the end of March 2025. We also built relationships with the hospitals to establish a referral route from the ward teams.
Coproduction
In August 2023, Gaddum was formally awarded a contract by Greater Manchester’s Integrated Care Board (ICB) to embed co-production in community mental health commissioning across the region.
Following a rapid mobilisation phase, Gaddum’s co-production team grew significantly during 2024/25 expanding from three to six members. This growth enabled us to facilitate co-production both at a system level and within local mental health workstreams.
Strengthening Internal Structures
-
Established a Co-Production Management Group (CMG), chaired by Lived Experience representatives and supported by 10 active members, facilitated by Gaddum.
-
Built a network of 200+ people with Lived Experience, providing valuable insight into coproduction across the system, further broadened through promotional activity.
Embedding Lived Experience at a Strategic Level (2024/25)
We have ensured lived experience voices are central to the following system-wide workstreams:
-
Complex Emotional Relational Needs
-
Perinatal Mental Health
-
Talking Therapies
-
Community Care & Rehabilitation
-
Complex Care & Mental Health Rehab Task & Finish Group
-
Adult Eating Disorders
-
Mental Health Community Crisis
-
Co-Occurring Conditions
-
Contributed to the GM ICB Lived Experience Strategy
Partnership with Big Life Group (Co-Occurring Conditions Project)
Through our joint work with Big Life Group, we have:
-
Gathered insights from 100 people about current service provision.
-
Supported Expert by Experience (EBE) involvement in the Manchester Drug Conference and CTI training.
-
Collaborated with Greater Manchester Dual Diagnosis Liaison Service (GMDDLS) to co-produce forthcoming Community Dual Diagnosis Training for professionals.
-
Attended COHMAD and worked with GM & 10GM to deliver a fully co-produced research project, making the business case for increased investment in peer-led recovery programmes.
25
The Gaddum Centre
Trustees’ annual report
for the year ended 31 March 2025
Carer Engagement
In Salford, we facilitated carer-led focus groups exploring key themes: mental health, male carers, and the cost of living. Insights gathered are actively shaping the Salford Carers Strategy (2025).
“Thank you… it’s great to be part of discussions that benefit carers across Salford, and to feel our voices are truly being recognised and heard.”
Peer Facilitator Support
We continue to empower peer facilitators by:
-
Creating an online directory and resources, co-designed with peers.
-
Developing a core co-production group to support initiatives and pursue training opportunities.
-
Providing training such as Body Language, Active Listening, and tailored Q&A sessions.
-
Leading on a Salford University project combining live talks and podcasts: “The speaker’s openness was deeply moving and inspiring. His bravery reduced stigma and encouraged honest conversations, leaving me with a greater sense of empathy, understanding, and hope.” — Student Nurse
-
Coordinating an October 2025 event celebrating Mental Health Peer Workers.
-
Collaborating with Lingua GM to provide translation support, including Arabic-speaking peer workers, and exploring the delivery of training in multiple languages.
Other Initiatives (2024/25)
-
Bolton Changing Futures: Steering group involvement and CMG member contributions to workshops.
-
Gallery of Ideas: Supporting Collaborate Out Loud to develop accessible leadership boards as part of Fairer Health.
-
Mental Health & Carers Week: Co-produced celebration of art, creativity, and co-production.
-
“I and We” Statement Workshops: Reviewing clarity of language; Phase 2 to develop a toolkit and embed co-production principles.
Social Work Student Placements in Numbers
Gaddum’s Student Social Worker Placement Programme has provided 27 Students with a practice learning opportunity throughout the course of this academic year. 23 completed placements with a pass, 1 student failed placement and 3 students have carried over into the 25/26 academic year. Students have benefited from learning opportunities that have spanned our core service offer as placements have been provided across our Carers, Therapy and Advocacy services.
For this report we will provide data on the 24 placements that have finished within the 24/25 academic year.
First Placements
19 students have been working towards completing their first practice placement with us. These placement opportunities take place across 70 days. They have been provided by the following Gaddum services:
Salford Adult Carers (4) Salford Young Carers (6) Manchester Carers Contact Point (5) Rise project – Talking Therapies (3) Getting Help Rochdale (1)
26
The Gaddum Centre
Trustees’ annual report
for the year ended 31 March 2025
In total, students completing their first practice placements have contributed 1,294 working days across these services.
Final Placements
5 students have been working towards completing a final practice placement with Gaddum. In order for a final practice placement to meet the learning needs of a student at this level, the placement must provide learning opportunities that have a statutory function. For this reason, final practice placements have been provided by the following Gaddum services:
Salford Adult Carers (4) Culturally Appropriate Advocacy Provision (1)
In total, students completing their final practice placements have contributed 500 working days to these services.
Let’s add it all together…
Collectively, throughout the 24/25 academic year and based on the 24 finished placements students worked for 1794 days . Based on a working week of 35 hours, working for 42 weeks per year (210 days), our social work students have contributed the equivalent hours of just over 8.54 full-time members of staff.
Therefore, based on the current front-line salary of £24,412 the financial Return of Investment for this academic year is £208,478 .
Financial review
For the year ending 31st March 2025, the charity’s financial position reflects the significant progress made to grow and stabilise the organisation following a period of considerable challenge. The previous two years were extremely demanding, and forecasts for 2024–25 anticipated a continuation of those difficulties. However, through careful financial stewardship and renewed focus on sustainability, the charity has achieved a much-improved financial outcome. At the year end, £220,709 of the total funds are restricted, and the charity also generated an unrestricted surplus of £256,482, of which £80,000 will be used to support the organisation in funding the continued increasing cost base, in particular the increase in Employers’ National Insurance rate which is anticipated to cost the organisation an additional £60,000 per annum.
Total income for the year was £3,507,314, the highest level in the charity’s history and a 40% increase year on year. This significant growth demonstrates the success of our efforts to strengthen the relationships with our key funders as much of the additional income came via existing income streams. Expenditure was managed prudently throughout the year, with a continued emphasis on ensuring that charitable funds are used effectively to deliver impact. Staffing costs remain the largest area of expenditure, and the full year impact of the 2023–24 pay review (2%–9% across the workforce), was felt, which was then followed with a further 2% uplift in 2024–25. These increases were necessary to retain skilled staff and to align with sector benchmarks, particularly in light of inflationary pressures.
Operational and project costs were monitored closely to ensure resources were directed toward charitable objectives.
As with the previous year, the market value of the charity’s long-term investments improved year on year. As at 31st March 2025, an investment gain of £33,358 was recognised, contributing positively to the overall financial strength of the organisation.
27
The Gaddum Centre
Trustees’ annual report
for the year ended 31 March 2025
Unrestricted funds at the year end totalled £2,876,764, of which £1,290,531 represents free reserves, excluding amounts held in tangible fixed assets and fixed asset investments.
Reserves policy
The Trustees continue to review the charity’s reserves policy to ensure that adequate unrestricted funds are held to safeguard operational continuity and respond to future opportunities or risks.
As with the previous year, there are significant reserves being held following the sale of Gaddum’s head office premises in September 2021. These reserves are being held as the organisation continues to lease space whilst seeking opportunities to reinvest monies into a new head office location. The organisation has engaged with an external consultant who is supporting the organisation in sourcing a property that is aligned to our charitable vision, supporting individuals and communities we exist to serve to achieve equitable health, wealth and self, and one that will be fit for Gaddum’s needs far into the future. It is expected that a material amount of the £2.721m unrestricted reserves will be reinvested in a property that meets the needs of, not only staff members, but the services we currently deliver and communities we serve.
In the event of the loss of substantial core funding, service delivery staff would be eligible for TUPE arrangement to the new provider with no redundancy costs liable for Gaddum. However, three months organisational operating costs of approx. £160k will be retained in reserves as a minimum to cover core costs.
Structure, governance and management
The recruitment of new Trustee Board members follows a similar process to Gaddum’s wider recruitment processes under its HR policies and procedures. There is a wide advertising campaign using a variety of social media and traditional platforms including the Gaddum website, LinkedIn, VCSE infrastructure networks, GM VCSE leadership networks, professional networks of Trustee Board members and Senior Management Teams. The use of VCSE networks ensures Trustee Board vacancies are disseminated into communities. Recruitment includes the following statement: -
‘We are seeking people from diverse backgrounds and communities to be more reflective of our service users and the wider Greater Manchester population. These are voluntary positions, and we are looking for people with experience and knowledge at a strategic or senior level. Key attributes will be leadership, accountability, integrity, and commitment.’
Potential new members for Trustee Board are interviewed by the Chair, Deputy Chair, Chief Executive, and other Trustees as appropriate or applicable. Potential new Trustees are asked to attend a Trustee Board meeting as an observer before a final decision to appoint is made by all members of Trustee Board. New Trustees are expected to undertake “Role of Trustee” training delivered by Salford CVS after appointment and as an update as required. A bespoke programme of Trustee Board development is ongoing, delivered by an external consultant; Trustees are expected to attend.
The Full Board meets once a quarter, in the evenings (every other meeting being in person). There are then additional subgroups with a reduced number of trustees on specific strategic organisational areas:
-
Finance Subgroup – quarterly
-
Building Task & Finish – quarterly
-
Remuneration committee – annually as part of finance subgroup
-
Business Development Subgroup – quarterly
-
Governance Subgroup - quarterly
The Chief Executive and Executive Leadership Team have day to day strategic and operational responsibility for running Gaddum. Reports and papers outlining key organisational decisions are
28
The Gaddum Centre
Trustees’ annual report
for the year ended 31 March 2025
presented at Trustee Board meetings for sign off by Trustees. A number of Trustees have specialist expertise, and their advice is sought when required.
The Executive Leadership Team in 2024-25 comprised of: - Ben Whalley – Chief Executive Lauren Edwards – Programmes & Strategy Director Emma Jackson – Finance & Resources Director Jo Campbell – Head of Development (resigned 22nd June 2024)
The organisation is a charitable company limited by guarantee and registered as a charity.
The company was established under a memorandum of association which established the objects and powers of the charitable company and is governed under its articles of association.
Members of the charity guarantee to contribute an amount not exceeding £1 to the assets of the charity in the event of winding up. The Trustees are members of the charity, but this entitles them only to voting rights. The Trustees have no beneficial interest in the charity.
All Trustees give their time voluntarily and receive no benefits from the charity. Any expenses reclaimed from the charity are set out in note 11 to the accounts.
Related parties and relationships with other organisations
All members of Trustee Board and Senior Management Team are requested to declare Related parties and relationships with other organisations on appointment and at appropriate intervals.
Remuneration policy for key management personnel
The remuneration of Chief Executive & Executive Leadership Team is considered separately by the Trustee Board.
Risk management
A Strategic Risk Register has been developed and is presented, reviewed, and revised at each relevant Subgroup and Trustee Board meetings.
Fundraising
Gaddum does not undertake direct fundraising, but receives donations and funds raised by individuals and groups
29
The Gaddum Centre
Trustees’ annual report
for the year ended 31 March 2025
Statement of responsibilities of the trustees
The trustees (who are also directors of The Gaddum Centre for the purposes of company law) are responsible for preparing the trustees’ annual report and the financial statements in accordance with applicable law and United Kingdom Accounting Standards (United Kingdom Generally Accepted Accounting Practice).
Company law requires the trustees to prepare financial statements for each financial year which give a true and fair view of the state of affairs of the charitable company and of the incoming resources and application of resources, including the income and expenditure, of the charitable company for that period. In preparing these financial statements, the trustees are required to:
-
Select suitable accounting policies and then apply them consistently
-
Observe the methods and principles in the Charities SORP
-
Make judgements and estimates that are reasonable and prudent
-
State whether applicable UK Accounting Standards and statements of recommended practice have been followed, subject to any material departures disclosed and explained in the financial statements
-
Prepare the financial statements on the going concern basis unless it is inappropriate to presume that the charity will continue in operation
The trustees are responsible for keeping proper accounting records that disclose with reasonable accuracy at any time the financial position of the charitable company and enable them to ensure that the financial statements comply with the Companies Act 2006. They are also responsible for safeguarding the assets of the charitable company and hence for taking reasonable steps for the prevention and detection of fraud and other irregularities.
In so far as the trustees are aware:
-
There is no relevant audit information of which the charitable company’s auditors are unaware
-
The trustees have taken all steps that they ought to have taken to make themselves aware of any relevant audit information and to establish that the auditors are aware of that information
The trustees are responsible for the maintenance and integrity of the corporate and financial information included on the charitable company's website. Legislation in the United Kingdom governing the preparation and dissemination of financial statements may differ from legislation in other jurisdictions.
30
The Gaddum Centre
Trustees’ annual report
for the year ended 31 March 2025
Auditors
Slade & Cooper Ltd were appointed as the charitable company's auditors during the year and have expressed their willingness to continue in that capacity.
This report has been prepared in accordance with the provisions applicable to companies subject to the small companies’ regime of the Companies Act 2006.
The trustees’ annual report has been approved by the trustees on 20/11/2025 and signed on their behalf by
Elaine Mills
Chair
31
Independent auditors’ report
to the members of
The Gaddum Centre
Opinion
We have audited the financial statements of The Gaddum Centre (the ‘charitable company’) for the year ended 31 March 2025, which comprise the Statement of Financial Activities (including the income and expenditure account), the Balance Sheet, the Statement of Cash Flows and the related notes. The financial reporting framework that has been applied in their preparation is applicable law and United Kingdom Accounting Standards, including Financial Reporting Standard 102 The Financial Reporting Standard applicable in the UK and Republic of Ireland (United Kingdom Generally Accepted Accounting Practice).
In our opinion the financial statements:
-
give a true and fair view of the state of the charitable company’s affairs as at 31 March 2025, and of its incoming resources and application of resources, including its income and expenditure, for the year then ended;
-
have been properly prepared in accordance with United Kingdom Generally Accepted Accounting Practice; and
-
have been prepared in accordance with the requirements of the Companies Act 2006.
Basis for opinion
We conducted our audit in accordance with International Standards on Auditing (UK) (ISAs (UK)) and applicable law. Our responsibilities under those standards are further described in the Auditor’s responsibilities for the audit of the financial statements section of our report. We are independent of the charitable company in accordance with the ethical requirements that are relevant to our audit of the financial statements in the UK, including the FRC’s Ethical Standard, and we have fulfilled our other ethical responsibilities in accordance with these requirements. We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion.
Conclusions relating to going concern
In auditing the financial statements, we have concluded that the trustees’ use of the going concern basis of accounting in the preparation of the financial statements is appropriate.
Based on the work we have performed, we have not identified any material uncertainties relating to events or conditions that, individually or collectively, may cast significant doubt on the charitable company's ability to continue as a going concern for a period of at least twelve months from when the financial statements are authorised for issue.
Our responsibilities and the responsibilities of the trustees with respect to going concern are described in the relevant sections of this report.
Other information
The trustees are responsible for the other information. The other information comprises the information included in the trustees’ annual report, other than the financial statements and our auditor’s report thereon. Our opinion on the financial statements does not cover the other information and, except to the extent otherwise explicitly stated in our report, we do not express any form of assurance conclusion thereon.
32
Independent Auditor’s Report (continued)
In connection with our audit of the financial statements, our responsibility is to read the other information and, in doing so, consider whether the other information is materially inconsistent with the financial statements or our knowledge obtained in the audit or otherwise appears to be materially misstated. If we identify such material inconsistencies or apparent material misstatements, we are required to determine whether there is a material misstatement in the financial statements or a material misstatement of the other information. If, based on the work we have performed, we conclude that there is a material misstatement of this other information, we are required to report that fact.
We have nothing to report in this regard.
Opinions on other matters prescribed by the Companies Act 2006
In our opinion, based on the work undertaken in the course of the audit:
-
the information given in the trustees’ report (incorporating the directors’ report) for the financial year for which the financial statements are prepared is consistent with the financial statements; and
-
the trustees’ report has been prepared in accordance with applicable legal requirements.
Matters on which we are required to report by exception
In the light of our knowledge and understanding of the charitable company and its environment obtained in the course of the audit, we have not identified material misstatements in the trustees’ report.
We have nothing to report in respect of the following matters in relation to which the Companies Act 2006 requires us to report to you if, in our opinion:
-
adequate accounting records have not been kept, or returns adequate for our audit have not been received from branches not visited by us; or
-
the financial statements are not in agreement with the accounting records and returns; or
-
certain disclosures of trustees’ remuneration specified by law are not made; or
-
we have not received all the information and explanations we require for our audit; or
-
the trustees were not entitled to prepare the financial statements in accordance with the small companies’ regime and take advantage of the small companies’ exemptions in preparing the Trustees’ Annual Report and from the requirement to prepare a strategic report.
Responsibilities of trustees
As explained more fully in the trustees’ responsibilities statement set out on page 30, the trustees (who are also the directors of the charitable company for the purposes of company law) are responsible for the preparation of the financial statements and for being satisfied that they give a true and fair view, and for such internal control as the trustees determine is necessary to enable the preparation of financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.
In preparing the financial statements, the trustees are responsible for assessing the charitable company’s ability to continue as a going concern, disclosing, as applicable, matters related to going concern and using the going concern basis of accounting unless the trustees either intend to liquidate the charitable company or to cease operations, or have no realistic alternative but to do so.
33
Independent Auditor’s Report (continued)
Auditor’s responsibilities for the audit of the financial statements
Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements as a whole are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and to issue an auditor’s report that includes our opinion. Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance, but is not a guarantee that an audit conducted in accordance with ISAs (UK) will always detect a material misstatement when it exists. Misstatements can arise from fraud or error and are considered material if, individually or in the aggregate, they could reasonably be expected to influence the economic decisions of users taken on the basis of these financial statements.
Irregularities, including fraud, are instances of non-compliance with laws and regulations. We design procedures in line with our responsibilities, outlined above, to detect material misstatements in respect of irregularities, including fraud. The specific procedures for this engagement and the extent to which these are capable of detecting irregularities, including fraud is detailed below:
-
enquiry of management and those charged with governance around actual and potential litigation and claims.
-
enquiry of the charity's staff, management and those charged with governance to identify any instances of non-compliance with laws and regulations.
-
reviewing minutes of meetings of those charged with governance.
-
reviewing financial statement disclosures and testing to supporting documentation to assess compliance with applicable laws and regulations.
-
auditing the risk of management override of controls, including through testing journal entries and other adjustments for appropriateness, and evaluating the business rationale of significant transactions outside the normal course of business.
Because of the inherent limitations of an audit, there is a risk that we will not detect all irregularities, including those leading to a material misstatement in the financial statements or non-compliance with regulation. This risk increases the more that compliance with a law or regulation is removed from the events and transactions reflected in the financial statements, as we will be less likely to become aware of instances of non-compliance. The risk is also greater regarding irregularities occurring due to fraud rather than error, as fraud involves intentional concealment, forgery, collusion, omission or misrepresentation.
A further description of our responsibilities is available on the Financial Reporting Council’s website at: https://www.frc.org.uk/auditorsresponsibilities. This description forms part of our auditor’s report.
34
Independent Auditor’s Report (continued)
Use of our report
This report is made solely to the charitable company’s members, as a body, in accordance with Chapter 3 of Part 16 of the Companies Act 2006. Our audit work has been undertaken so that we might state to the charitable company’s members those matters we are required to state to them in an auditor’s report and for no other purpose. To the fullest extent permitted by law, we do not accept or assume responsibility to anyone other than the charitable company and the charitable company’s members as a body, for our audit work, for this report, or for the opinions we have formed.
Christy Yun Hing Lau FCCA CTA DChA Senior Statutory Auditor
for and on behalf of
Slade & Cooper Limited Statutory Auditors Beehive Mill Jersey Street Manchester M4 6JG Date 23/12/2025
35
The Gaddum Centre
Statement of Financial Activities
(including Income and Expenditure account) for the year ended 31 March 2025
| Unrestricted | Restricted | Total funds | Total funds | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| funds | funds | 2025 | 2024 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Note | £ | £ | £ | £ | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Income | from: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Donations | and | legacies | 3 | 426 | - | 426 | 310,578 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Charitable | activities: | 4 | 2,735,681 | 703,049 | 3,438,730 | 2,165,869 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Investments | 5 | 68,158 | - | 68,158 | 47,504 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total | income | 2,804,265 | 703,049 | 3,507,314 | 2,523,951 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Expenditure on: Raising funds Charitable activities: |
6 7 |
12,128 2,655,889 |
- 601,337 |
12,128 3,257,226 |
11,156 2,772,800 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total | expenditure | 2,668,017 | 601,337 | 3,269,354 | 2,783,956 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net income/ (expenditure) before | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| net gains/ (losses) on investments Net gains/(losses) on investments |
136,248 33,358 |
101,712 - |
237,960 33,358 |
(260,005) 102,355 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net income/ (expenditure) for the year Transfer between funds |
9 | 169,606 86,876 |
101,712 (86,876) |
271,318 - |
(157,650) - |
||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net movement in funds for the year Reconciliation of funds |
256,482 | 14,836 | 271,318 | (157,650) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total | funds | brought | forward | 2,620,282 | 205,873 | 2,826,155 | 2,983,805 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Total | funds | carriedforward | 2,876,764 | 220,709 | 3,097,473 | 2,826,155 |
The statement of financial activities includes all gains and losses recognised in the year. All income and expenditure derive from continuing activities. A full comparative SOFA is available at the end of the accounts.
36
The Gaddum Centre Company number 01348975
Balance sheet as at 31 March 2025
| Note | 2025 | 2024 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| £ | £ | £ | £ | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Fixed | assets | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Tangible assets | 14 | 10,111 | 24,114 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Investments Total fixed assets Current assets Debtors Cash at bank and in hand Total current assets Liabilities Creditors: amounts falling due in less than one year |
15 16 17 18 |
221,621 1,637,687 1,859,308 (348,068) |
1,595,043 1,605,154 |
119,224 1,500,879 1,620,103 (351,748) |
1,533,686 1,557,800 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net current assets | 1,511,240 | 1,268,355 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total assets less current liabilities Creditors: amounts falling due after more than one year 20 Net assets The funds of the charity: Restricted income funds 22 Unrestricted income funds 23 |
3,116,394 (18,921) 3,097,473 220,709 2,876,764 |
2,826,155 - 2,826,155 205,873 2,620,282 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total | charity | funds | 3,097,473 | 2,826,155 |
These accounts are prepared in accordance with the special provisions of part 15 of the Companies Act 2006 relating to small companies and constitute the annual accounts required by the Companies Act 2006 and are for circulation to members of the company.
The notes on pages 39 to 56 form part of these accounts.
Approved by the trustees on 20/11/2025 and signed on their behalf by:
Elaine Mills (Chair)
37
==> picture [200 x 46] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [252 x 92] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [259 x 45] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [161 x 274] intentionally omitted <==
The Gaddum Centre
Notes to the accounts for the year ended 31 March 2025
1 = Accounting policies
The principal accounting policies adopted, judgments and key sources of estimation uncertainty in the preparation of the financial statements are as follows:
a Basis of preparation
The financial statements have been prepared in accordance with Accounting and Reporting by Charities: Statement of Recommended Practice applicable to charities preparing their accounts in accordance with the Financial Reporting Standard applicable in the UK and Republic of Ireland (FRS 102), second edition - October 2019 (Charities SORP (FRS 102)), the Financial Reporting Standard applicable in the UK and Republic of Ireland (FRS 102) and the Companies Act 2006 and UK Generally Accepted Accounting Practice.
The Gaddum Centre meets the definition of a public benefit entity under FRS102. Assets and liabilities are initially recognised at historical cost or transaction value unless otherwise stated in the relevant accounting policy note.
b Preparation of the accounts on a going concern basis
The trustees consider that there are no material uncertainties about the charitable company's ability to continue as a going concern. The trustees have made no key judgments which have a significant effect on the accounts.
The trustees do not consider that there are any sources of estimation uncertainty at the reporting date that have a significant risk of causing a material adjustment to the carrying amount of assets and liabilities within the next reporting period.
c Income
Income is recognised when the charity has entitlement to the funds, any performance conditions attached to the item(s) of income have been met, it is probable that the income will be received and the amount can be measured reliably.
Income from government and other grants, whether ‘capital’ grants or ‘revenue’ grants, is recognised when the charity has entitlement to the funds, any performance conditions attached to the grants have been met, it is probable that the income will be received and the amount can be measured reliably and is not deferred. For legacies, entitlement is taken as the earlier of the date on which either: the charity is aware that probate has been granted, the estate has been finalised and notification has been made by the executor(s) to the charity that a distribution will be made, or when a distribution is received from the estate. Receipt of a legacy, in whole or in part, is only considered probable when the amount can be measured reliably and the charity has been notified of the executor’s intention to make a distribution. Where legacies have been notified to the charity, or the charity is aware of the granting of probate, and the criteria for income recognition have not been met, then the legacy is a treated as a contingent asset and disclosed if material.
Income received in advance of a provision of a specified service is deferred until the criteria for income recognition are met.
39
The Gaddum Centre
Notes to the accounts for the year ended 31 March 2025 (continued)
d Interest receivable
Interest on funds held on deposit is included when receivable and the amount can be measured reliably by the charity; this is normally upon notification of the interest paid or payable by the Bank.
e Fund accounting
Unrestricted funds are available to spend on activities that further any of the purposes of charity.
Restricted funds are donations which the donor has specified are to be solely used for particular areas of the charity’s work or for specific projects being undertaken by the charity.
f Expenditure and irrecoverable VAT
Expenditure is recognised once there is a legal or constructive obligation to make a payment to a third party, it is probable that settlement will be required and the amount of the obligation can be measured reliably. Expenditure is classified under the following activity headings:
-
Costs of raising funds comprise the costs of investment management fees & expenditure in relation to staff members who are directly engaged in fund raising.
-
Expenditure on charitable activities includes the costs undertaken to further the purposes of the charity and their associated support costs.
-
Other expenditure represents those items not falling into any other heading.
Irrecoverable VAT is charged as a cost against the activity for which the expenditure was incurred.
g Allocation of support costs
Support costs are those functions that assist the work of the charity but do not directly undertake charitable activities. Support costs include back office costs, finance, personnel, payroll and governance costs which support the charity's programmes and activities. These costs have been allocated between the different charitable activities. The charity has calculated its allocation of the support costs based on the income from the individual projects to the total income of all work streams. Operating leases Operating leases are leases in which the title to the assets, and the risks and rewards of ownership, remain with the lessor. Rental charges are charged on a straight line basis over the term of the lease.
h Operating leases
i Tangible fixed assets
Individual fixed assets costing £400 or more are capitalised at cost and are depreciated over their estimated useful economic lives on a straight line basis as follows:
Office fixtures and equipment
20% to 33%
40
The Gaddum Centre
Notes to the accounts for the year ended 31 March 2025 (continued)
j Fixed asset investments
Investments are a form of basic financial instrument and are initially recognised at their transaction value and subsequently measured at their fair value as at the balance sheet date using the closing quoted market price. The statement of financial activities includes the net gains and losses arising on revaluation and disposals throughout the year.
The Charity does not acquire put options, derivatives or other complex financial instruments.
The main form of financial risk faced by the charity is that of volatility in equity markets and investment markets due to wider economic conditions, the attitude of investors to investment risk, and changes in sentiment concerning equities and within particular sectors or sub sectors.
k Debtors
Trade and other debtors are recognised at the settlement amount due after any trade discount offered. Prepayments are valued at the amount prepaid net of any trade discounts due.
| Cash at bank and in hand
Cash at bank and cash in hand includes cash and short term highly liquid investments with a short maturity of three months or less from the date of acquisition or opening of the deposit or similar account.
m Creditors and provisions
Creditors and provisions are recognised where the charity has a present obligation resulting from a past event that will probably result in the transfer of funds to a third party and the amount due to settle the obligation can be measured or estimated reliably. Creditors and provisions are normally recognised at their settlement amount after allowing for any trade discounts due.
n Financial instruments
The charity only has financial assets and financial liabilities of a kind that qualify as basic financial instruments. Basic financial instruments are initially recognised at transaction value and subsequently measured at their settlement value with the exception of bank loans which are subsequently measured at amortised cost using the effective interest method.
41
The Gaddum Centre
Notes to the accounts for the year ended 31 March 2025 (continued)
o Pensions
The cost of providing retirement pensions and related benefits is charged to the Statement of Financial Activities over the periods benefitting from the employees' services.
The disclosures in the financial statements follow the requirements of Section 28 of FRS 102 in relation to multi ~~-~~ employer funded schemes in which the Charity has a participating interest.
Contributions payable under an agreement with the scheme to fund past deficits are recognised as a liability in the financial statements calculated by the repayments known, discounted to the net present value at the year end using a market rate discount factor of 5.52% at 31 March 2023, 5.31% at 31 March 2024 and 4.84 at 31 March 2025. The unwinding of the discount is recognised as a finance cost in the Statement of Finance Activities in the period incurred.
The Charity also operates a money purchase pension scheme for its employees. The assets are held separately from those of the Charity. The annual contributions payable are charged to the Statement of Financial Activities. The disclosures in the financial statements follow the requirement of FRS102.
2 ~_ Legal status of the charity
The charity is a company limited by guarantee registered in England and Wales and has no share capital. In the event of the charity being wound up, the liability in respect of the guarantee is limited to £1 per member of the charity. The registered office address is disclosed on page 1.
3 Income from donations and legacies
| Current reporting | Current reporting | Current reporting | Current reporting | period | period | Unrestricted | Restricted | Total 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| £ | £ | £ | ||||||
| Donations for Salaries Total |
426 426 |
- - |
426 426 |
|||||
| Previous reportingperiod | Unrestricted | Restricted | Total 2024 | |||||
| General Donations | £ 28,863 |
£ 281,215 |
£ 310,078 |
|||||
| Donations for Salaries | 500 | - | 500 | |||||
| Total | 29,363 | 281,215 | 310,578 |
42
The Gaddum Centre
Notes to the accounts for the year ended 31 March 2025 (continued)
4 Income from charitable activities
| Current | Current | Current | Current | Current | reporting period | reporting period | reporting period | reporting period | reporting period | reporting period | reporting period | reporting period | Unrestricted | Unrestricted | Restricted | Total 2025 | Total 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| £ | £ | £ | |||||||||||||||
| Capacity | Building | 52,163 | 419,885 | 472,048 | |||||||||||||
| Carers | Services | 1,089,772 | 237,413 | 1,327,185 | |||||||||||||
| Community | 522,326 | - | 522,326 | ||||||||||||||
| Coproduction | 186,072 | 30,648 | 216,720 | ||||||||||||||
| Therapy | Services | 880,752 | 15,103 | 895,855 | |||||||||||||
| Central | 4,596 | - | 4,596 | ||||||||||||||
| Total | 2,735,681 | 703,049 | 3,438,730 | ||||||||||||||
| Previous reportingperiod Advocacy Services Carers Services Coproduction Therapy Services Central Total 5 Investment income Quoted investments |
Unrestricted £ 496,538 463,493 66,667 722,144 38,397 1,787,239 2025 £ 68,158 |
Restricted £ - 248,015 49,776 80,839 - 378,630 2024 £ 47,504 |
Total 2024 £ 496,538 711,508 116,443 802,983 38,397 2,165,869 |
||||||||||||||
| 68,158 | 47,504 |
All investment income is unrestricted.
43
The Gaddum Centre
Notes to the accounts for the year ended 31 March 2025 (continued)
6 Cost of raising funds
| 2025 | 2024 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| £ | £ | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Investment | management costs | 12,128 | 11,156 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 12,128 | 11,156 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| All expenditure on cost of raising funds is unrestricted. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Analysis | of | expenditure on | charitable activities | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Direct Salary | Support | Utner Support |
|||||||||||||||||||||
| Current | reporting period | Costs | Salary Costs | Costs | Total 2025 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Restricted resources expended Capacity Building Carers Services Coproduction Therapy Services |
£ 98,768 113,620 14 15,286 |
£ 7,304 25,502 3,289 1,621 |
£ 273,719 56,433 3,550 2,231 |
£ 379,791 195,555 6,853 19,138 |
|||||||||||||||||||
| 227,688 | 37,716 | 335,933 | 601,337 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Direct Salary | Support | Utner Support |
|||||||||||||||||||||
| Current | reporting period | Costs | Salary Costs | Costs | Total 2025 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Unrestricted resources expended £ Capacity Building 59,291 Carers Services 750,600 Community 217,038 Coproduction 101,633 Therapy Services 500,452 Governance Costs (see note 8) - |
£ 5,598 116,978 56,056 19,969 94,522 - |
£ 14,775 212,758 176,917 33,052 289,722 6,528 |
£ 79,664 1,080,336 450,011 154,654 884,696 6,528 |
||||||||||||||||||||
| 1,629,014 | 293,123 | 733,752 | 2,655,889 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Total | resourcesexpended | 1,856,702 | 330,839 | 1,069,685 | 3,257,226 |
- 7 Analysis of expenditure on charitable activities
44
The Gaddum Centre
7 Analysis of expenditure on charitable activities continued
Notes to the accounts for the year ended 31 March 2025 (continued)
| Previous | Previous | Previous | Previous | Previous | reporting period | reporting period | reporting period | reporting period | reporting period | reporting period | reporting period | Direct Costs | Support Costs | Total 2024 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Restricted resources | expended | £ | £ | £ | ||||||||||||||
| Carers Services | 503,669 | 81,521 | 585,190 | |||||||||||||||
| Coproduction | 41,824 | 5,747 | 47,571 | |||||||||||||||
| Therapy Services | 66,786 | 25,036 | 91,822 | |||||||||||||||
| 612,279 | 112,304 | 724,583 | ||||||||||||||||
| Previous | reporting period | Direct Costs | Support Costs | Total 2024 | ||||||||||||||
| Unrestricted resources expended | £ | £ | £ | |||||||||||||||
| Advocacy | Services | 458,453 | 84,621 | 543,074 | ||||||||||||||
| Carers Services | 472,126 | 154,464 | 626,590 | |||||||||||||||
| Coproduction | 52,968 | 28,125 | 81,093 | |||||||||||||||
| Therapy Services | 550,498 | 241,322 | 791,820 | |||||||||||||||
| Governance Costs (see | note 8) | - | 5,640 | 5,640 | ||||||||||||||
| 1,534,045 | 514,172 | 2,048,217 | ||||||||||||||||
| Total resources expended | 2,146,324 | 626,476 | 2,772,800 | |||||||||||||||
| 8 | Analysis | of governance and support costs | ||||||||||||||||
| Current reporting period Audit fees Accommodation Admin Fees and charges General Expense ICT Partnerships and sub-~~c~~ontracts |
Total 2025 £ 6,528 102,102 36,906 89,552 301,745 96,977 277,729 |
Total 2024 £ 5,640 98,607 14,816 101,368 97,295 93,004 149,967 |
||||||||||||||||
| Staff | Costs | 158,146 | 65,779 | |||||||||||||||
| 1,069,685 | 626,476 | |||||||||||||||||
| 9 | Net income/(expenditure) for the year This is stated after charging/(crediting): 2025 £ Depreciation 20,181 Auditor's remuneration ~~-~~ audit fees 6,528 Auditor'sremuneration~~-~~accountancyfees 3,468 |
2024 £ 25,077 5,640 3,000 |
45
The Gaddum Centre
Notes to the accounts for the year ended 31 March 2025 (continued)
10 Staff costs
Staff costs during the year were as follows:
| 2025 | 2024 | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| £ | £ | |||||||||||||
| Wages and salaries | 1,916,261 | 1,796,636 | ||||||||||||
| Social security | costs | 168,725 | 157,429 | |||||||||||
| Pension costs | 89,596 | 84,559 | ||||||||||||
| Other Staff Costs | 3,844 | 1,273 | ||||||||||||
| Redundancy | and | termination costs | 7,771 | 8,496 | ||||||||||
| 2,186,197 | 2,048,393 | |||||||||||||
| Allocated as follows: Charitable activities |
2,186,197 | 2,048,393 | ||||||||||||
| 2,186,197 | 2,048,393 |
One employee has employee benefits in excess of £60,000 but below £70,000 (2024: 1). No employees with benefits in excess of £70,000 and below £80,000 (2024: Nil). No employees have benefits in excess of £80,000 and below £90,000 (2024: Nil). No employees have benefits in excess of £90,000 and below £100,000 (2024: Nil)
The average number of staff employed during the period was 82 (2024: 78).
The key management personnel of the charity comprise the trustees and the senior management team and are listed in the Trustees' report. The total employee benefits of the key management personnel of the charity were £219,651 (2024: £243,472).
11 Trustee remuneration and expenses, and related party transactions
No related party connected to the management committee received remuneration during the year (2024: One, as detailed below).
The spouse of Ady Bibby (trustee) was paid £35,173 for marketing and PR consultancy during 2023/24. The legal authority for this is through the governing document of the charity.
One (2024:no) member of the management committee received travel expenses of £190 during the year (2024: E£nil).
Aggregate donations from related parties were ENil (2024: ENil).
There are no donations from related parties which are outside the normal course of business and no restricted donations from related parties.
No trustee or other person related to the charity had any personal interest in any contract or transaction entered into by the charity, including guarantees, during the year (2024: One).
46
The Gaddum Centre
Notes to the accounts for the year ended 31 March 2025 (continued)
12 Government grants
The government grants recognised in the accounts were as follows:
| 2025 | 2024 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| £ | £ | ||||||
| Manchester | City | Council | 825,690 | 855,794 | |||
| 825,690 | 855,794 |
13 Corporation tax
The charity is exempt from tax on income and gains falling within Chapter 3 of Part 11 of the Corporation Tax Act 2010 or Section 256 of the Taxation of Chargeable Gains Act 1992 to the extent that these are applied to its charitable objects. No tax charges have arisen in the charity.
14 Fixed assets: tangible assets
| Computer & office | Computer & office | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| equipment | Total | ||||||||||
| Cost At 1 April 2024 Additions Disposals At 31 March 2025 Depreciation At 1 April 2024 |
£ 149,414 6,178 - 155,592 125,300 |
£ 149,414 6,178 - 155,592 125,300 |
|||||||||
| Charge for Disposals |
the year | 20,181 - |
20,181 - |
||||||||
| At 31 | March 2025 | 145,481 | 145,481 | ||||||||
| Net | book value | ||||||||||
| At 31 | March 2025 | 10,111 | 10,111 | ||||||||
| At31 | March2024 | 24,114 | 24,114 |
47
The Gaddum Centre
Notes to the accounts for the year ended 31 March 2025 (continued)
15 Investments
| 2025 | 2024 | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| £ | £ | ||||||||||||||||||
| Market | value at the start of | the | year | 1,533,686 | 1,366,151 | ||||||||||||||
| Add: additions | to investments at cost 411,919 |
857,558 | |||||||||||||||||
| Disposals | at carrying value | (383,920) | (792,378) | ||||||||||||||||
| Add net gain/(loss) on revaluation 33,358 Market value at the end of the year 1,595,043 Investments at fair value comprised: UK Bonds 164,258 UK investments and unit trusts 217,886 Global investments 1,212,899 |
102,355 1,533,686 144,967 221,232 1,167,487 |
||||||||||||||||||
| 1,595,043 | 1,533,686 |
Investments are all carried at fair value and are all traded in quoted public markets.
16 Debtors
| Debtors | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Trade debtors | 2025 2024 £ £ 148,605 57,830 |
||
| Accrued Income | 28,558 36,405 |
||
| Prepayments | 39,602 19,773 |
||
| Other Debtors | 4,856 5,216 |
||
| 221,621 119,224 |
|||
| Cash at bank and in hand Short term cash investments Short term deposits |
2025 2024 £ £ 23,316 23,543 1,018,096 1,011,915 |
||
| Cash at bank and | on hand | 596,275 465,421 |
|
| 1,637,687 1,500,879 |
17 Cash at bank and in hand
48
==> picture [400 x 39] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [455 x 466] intentionally omitted <==
The Gaddum Centre
Notes to the accounts for the year ended 31 March 2025 (continued)
21 Pension Fund
The company participates in the scheme, a multi ~~-~~ employer scheme which provides benefits to some 521 non- ~~a~~ ssociated participating employers. The scheme is a defined benefit scheme in the UK. It is not possible for the company to obtain sufficient information to enable it to account for the scheme as a defined benefit scheme. Therefore it accounts for the scheme as a defined contribution scheme.
The scheme is subject to the funding legislation outlined in the Pensions Act 2004 which came into force on 30 December 2005. This, together with documents issued by the Pensions Regulator and Technical Actuarial Standards issued by the Financial Reporting Council, set out the framework for funding defined benefit occupational pension schemes in the UK. The scheme is classified as a "last man standing arrangement". Therefore the Charity is potentially liable for other participating employers' obligations if those employers are unable to meet their share of the scheme deficit following withdrawal from the scheme. Participating employers are legally required to meet their share of the scheme deficit on an annuity purchase withdrawal from the scheme.
A full actuarial valuation for the scheme was carried out at 30 September 2023. This valuation showed assets of £514.9m, liabilities of £531.0m and a deficit of £16.1m. To eliminate this funding shortfall, the Trustee has asked the participating employers to pay additional contributions to the scheme as follows:
Deficit contributions
From 1 April 2025 to 31 March 2028: £2,100,000 per annum (payable monthly)
Unless a concession has been agreed with the Trustee the term to 31 March 2025 applies.
Note that the scheme’s previous valuation was carried out with an effective date of 30 September 2020. This valuation showed assets of £800.3m, liabilities of £831.9m and a deficit of £31.6m. To eliminate this funding shortfall, the Trustee asked the participating employers to pay additional contributions to the scheme as follows:
Deficit contributions
From 1 April 2022 to 31 January 2025: £3,312,000 per annum (payable monthly)
The recovery plan contributions are allocated to each participating employer in line with their estimated share of the Series 1 and Series 2 scheme liabilities.
50
The Gaddum Centre
Notes to the accounts for the year ended 31 March 2025 (continued)
21 Pension Fund continued
Where the scheme is in deficit and where the company has agreed to a deficit funding arrangement the company recognises a liability for this obligation. The amount recognised is the net present value of the deficit reduction contributions payable under the agreement that relates to the deficit. The present value is calculated using the discount rate detailed in these disclosures. The unwinding of the discount rate is recognised as a finance cost.
| Present value of provision | Present value of provision | Present value of provision | Present value of provision | Present value of provision | Present value of provision | Present value of provision | Present value of provision | Present value of provision | Present value of provision | Present value of provision | Present value of provision | Present value of provision | Present value of provision | Present value of provision | Present value of provision | Present value of provision | Present value of provision | Present value of provision | Present value of provision | Present value of provision | Present value of provision | Present value of provision | Present value of provision | Present value of provision | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 31 March | 31 March | 31 March | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (Es) | (Es) | (Es) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Present | value of | provision | 27,514 | 11,968 | 25,621 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Reconciliation | of | opening | and closing | provisions | Year ending | Year | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 31 March | ending 31 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Provision at start of period Unwinding of the discount factor (interest |
expense) | 2025 (Es) 11,968 316 |
March 2024 (Es) 25,621 980 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Deficit contribution Remeasurements ~~-~~ Remeasurements ~~-~~ |
paid impact of any change in assumptions amendments to the contribution schedule |
(12,202) 174 27,258 |
(14,642) 9 - |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Provision | at the | end | of the period | 27,514 | 11,968 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Income and | expenditure impact | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Year ending | Year | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 31 March | ending 31 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2025 | March 2024 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (Es) | (Es) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Interest expense Remeasurements Remeasurements |
~~-~~ ~~-~~ |
impact of any change in assumptions amendments to the contribution schedule |
316 174 27,258 |
980 9 - |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Contributions | paid in | respect of future | service* | * | * | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Costs | recognised | in | incomeandexpenditureaccount | * | * |
*includes defined contribution scheme and future service contributions (i.e. excluding any deficit reduction payments) to defined benefit schemes which are treated as defined contribution schemes.
51
The Gaddum Centre
Notes to the accounts for the year ended 31 March 2025 (continued)
Pension Fund continued Assumptions
==> picture [509 x 494] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|31|March|31|March|31|March|
|2025|2024|2023|
|%|perannum|%|perannum|%|per|annurr|
|Rate|of|discount|4.84|5.31|5.52|
|The|discount|rates|shown|above|are|the|equivalent|single|discount|rates|which,|when|used|to|discount|
|the|future|recovery|plan|contributions|due,|would|give|the|same|results|as|using|a|full|AA|corporate|
|bond|yield|curve|to|discount|the|same|recovery|plan|contributions.|
|Analysis|of|movements|in|restricted|funds|
|Current|reporting|
|.|Balance|at|
|period|Balance|at|31|March|
|1|April|2024|Income|Expenditure|Transfers|2025|
|£|£|£|£|£|
|Activities|
|Capacity|Building|-|419,885|(379,791)|-|40,094|
|Carers|Services|148,447|237,413|(195,555)|(33,485)|156,820|
|Coproduction|-|30,648|(6,853)|-|23,795|
|Therapy|Services|637|15,103|(19,138)|3,398|-|
|Central|Services|56,789|-|-|(56,789)|-|
|Total|205,873|703,049|(601,337)|(86,876)|220,709|
|Previous|balance|at|Balance|at|
|reporting period|1|April|31|March|
|2023|Income|Expenditure|Transfers|2024|
|£|£|£|£|£|
|Activities|
|Carers|Services|206,055|529,230|(585,190)|(1,648)|148,447|
|Coproduction|-|49,776|(47,571)|(2,205)|-|
|Therapy|Services|18,679|80,839|(91,822)|(7,059)|637|
|Central|Services|56,789|-|-|-|56,789|
|Total|281,523|659,845|(724,583)|(10,912)|205,873|
----- End of picture text -----
22 Analysis of movements in restricted funds
Name of restricted fund Description, nature and purposes of the fund
Balance at 31 March 2025
There are no material individual balances included within the different restricted activities at the year end.
The following funds are material balances within restricted funds
Carers Services
Balance at 31 March 2024 Carers Manchester - Manchester Carers Network £117,844
52
The Gaddum Centre
Notes to the accounts for the year ended 31 March 2025 (continued)
23 Analysis of movement in unrestricted funds
| Current reporting period |
Current reporting period |
Current reporting period |
Current reporting period |
Balance at 1 April 2024 |
Balance at 1 April 2024 |
Income | Expenditure | Expenditure | investment gains/ (losses) |
investment gains/ (losses) |
Transfers | As at 31 March 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| £ | £ | £ | £ | £ | £ | |||||||
| General fund | 2,620,282 | 2,804,265 | (2,668,017) | 33,358 | 86,876 | 2,876,764 | ||||||
| 2,620,282 | 2,804,265 | (2,668,017) | 33,358 | 86,876 | 2,876,764 | |||||||
| Previous | Balance at | investment | AS at 31 | |||||||||
| reportingperiod | 1 April 2023 |
Income | Expenditure | gains/ (losses) |
Transfers | March 2024 |
||||||
| General fund | £ 2,702,282 |
£ 1,864,106 |
£ (2,059,373) |
£ 102,355 |
£ 10,912 |
£ 2,620,282 |
||||||
| 2,702,282 | 1,864,106 | (2,059,373) | 102,355 | 10,912 | 2,620,282 |
Name of unrestricted fund Description, nature and purposes of the fund
General fund The free reserves after allowing for all designated funds
53
The Gaddum Centre
Notes to the accounts for the year ended 31 March 2025 (continued)
24 Analysis of net assets between funds
| Current reporting period | Current reporting period | Current reporting period | Current reporting period | Current reporting period | Current reporting period | Current reporting period | Current reporting period | Current reporting period | Current reporting period | General | General | Restricted | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| fund | funds | Total | ||||||||||||
| £ | £ | £ | ||||||||||||
| Tangible fixed assets | 10,111 | - | 10,111 | |||||||||||
| Fixed asset investments | 1,595,043 | - | 1,595,043 | |||||||||||
| Net current assets/(liabilities) | 1,290,531 | 220,709 | 1,511,240 | |||||||||||
| Total | 2,876,764 | 220,709 | 3,097,473 | |||||||||||
| Previous | reportingperiod | General | Restricted | |||||||||||
| Tangible fixed assets | fund £ 24,114 |
funds £ - |
Total £ 24,114 |
|||||||||||
| Fixed asset investments | 1,533,686 | - | 1,533,686 | |||||||||||
| Net current assets/(liabilities) | 1,062,482 | 205,873 | 1,268,355 | |||||||||||
| Total | 2,620,282 | 205,873 | 2,826,155 |
25 Operating lease commitments
The charity's total future minimum lease payments under non- ~~c~~ ancellable operating leases is as follows
| Equipment | Equipment | Equipment | |||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Less | than | one | year | 2025 £ 440 |
2024 £ 440 |
||||||||||||||||||
| One to | five | years | 769 | 1,209 | |||||||||||||||||||
| 1,209 | 1,649 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Reconciliation | of net | movement in | funds to net cash flow from operating activities | activities | activities | ||||||||||||||||||
| Net income/ (expenditure) for the year Adjustments for: Depreciation charge (Gains)/losses on investments Dividends, interest and rents from investments Decrease/(increase) in debtors |
2025 £ 271,318 20,181 (33,358) (68,158) (102,397) |
2024 £ (157,650) 25,077 (102,355) (47,504) (9,485) |
|||||||||||||||||||||
| Increase/(decrease) | in creditors | 15,241 | (30,809) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Netcash | providedby/(usedin)operating | 102,827 | (322,726) |
26 Reconciliation of net movement in funds to net cash flow from operating activities
54
The Gaddum Centre
Notes to the accounts for the year ended 31 March 2025 (continued)
27 Private Charities
The total balance held on behalf of independent private charities and third parties at the 31st March 2025 is £346,829 (2024: £296,724). This balance is not included in the assets of the Gaddum Centre. The charity holds as custodians on behalf of the independent private charities an investment portfolio with Brewin Dolphin, the current value of which is £262,581 (2024: £252,149). This is not shown as an asset of the Gaddum Centre.
Investments are held as a separate entity within our investment portfolio. This is recorded and accounted for as a separate entity within our investment schedule. A second bank account is held for trust funds. This is accounted for separately, with all inter ~~-~~ charity transfers clearly documented and approved by two Senior Managers. This ensures the funds of the trust funds are not being used for The Gaddum Centre activities.
==> picture [499 x 367] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
|||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|Investments|are|held|by|the|Gaddum|Centre|as|a|custodian|for|the|following|charities:|
|Charity|Objects|
|Robertobert|Bell|Chari|For|the|benefit|of|people|on|low|income,|resident|in|the|City|of|
|Bell|Charity|Manchester.|
|William|Cavanagh|Trust|For|people|on|low|income|living|in|Gorton|or|West|Gorton|only.|
|This|charity|is|restricted|to|helping|women|who|are|Manchester|
|Darbishire|H|Trust|residents.|Preference|is|given|to|teachers|or|ex-teachers|who|are|
|arpisnire|Mouse|'rus|retraining|and|are|Manchester|residents|and|unable|to|cover|the|
|whole|costs|themselves.|
|Pratt|.|Small|grants|in|support|of|respectable|women|over|the|age|of 60|
|Charity|who|reside|in|the|city|of|Manchester.|
|John|Royle|Fund|Originally|for|leather workers,|but|now|helps|individuals|on|low|
|income|who|are|Manchester|residents.|
|Provides|convalescence|for|people|who|have|received|hospital|
|Satterfield|Charity|care.|It|can|also|be|used|to|provide|clothing|or|help|someone|
|recovering|at|home.|Covers|an|area|within|60|miles|of|
|Manchester.|
|Shylock|.|For|people|on|low|income,|over|55|years|of age|who|live|within|a|
|Charity|radius|of|eight|miles|of Manchester Town|Hall.|
|The|money|comes|from|South|Africa|and|varies|from|year|to|
|Yates|Charity|year.|Grants|can|be|made|to|people|on|low|income|who|are|
|residents|of|Higher|Openshaw|and|its|surrounding|areas.|
|Gratrix|Charit|Fund|for|plumbers|and|associated|tradesmen|and|their|
|ratrix|Knarity|dependants|who|are|Greater|Manchester|residents|in|need.|
|Ann|Butterworth|and|Daniel|Supports|students|aged|21|or|under|who|are|studying|the|arts.|
|Bayley|Charity|Helps|with|costs|directly|associated|with|their|course.|
|7|Societ|The|purpose|of the|Society|is|to|encourage|children|to|learn|life|
|umane|Society|saving|skills.|This|is|not|a|registered|Charity.|
----- End of picture text -----
These are the charities who have a combined portfolio with Brewin Dolphin
For both the Ann Butterworth and Daniel Bayley Charity and the Humane Society, decisions are made by the trustees of those charities and Gaddum receives instructions for payment of invoices or grants.
For the other charities, Gaddum Trustees make the decisions on how the money is spent on advice from Chief Executive & Senior Leadership Team.
55
The Gaddum Centre
Notes to the accounts for the year ended 31 March 2025 (continued)
28 Prior year Statement of Financial Activities (including Income and Expenditure account)
==> picture [519 x 460] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|Unrestricted|Restricted|Total|funds|Total|funds|
|funds|funds|2024|2023|
|£|£|£|£|
|Income|from:|
|Donations|and|legacies|2,185|203,891|206,076|171,975|
|Charitable|activities:|2,000,150|571,202|2,571,352|2,618,408|
|Investments|27,975|-|27,975|8,362|
|Total|income|2,030,310|775,093|2,805,403|2,801,795|
|Expenditure|on:|
|Raising|funds|11,166|-|11,166|7,177|
|Charitable|activities:|2,206,744|1,003,278|3,210,022|2,685,937|
|Total|expenditure|2,217,910|1,003,278|3,221,188|2,693,114|
|Net|income/|(expenditure)|before|
|net|gains/|(losses)|on|investments|(187,600)|(228,185)|(415,785)|108,681|
|Net|gains/(losses)|on|investments|(87,830)|-|(87,830)|18,754|
|Net|income/|(expenditure)|for|the|
|year|(275,430)|(228,185)|(503,615)|2,357,790|
|Transfer|between|funds|10,912|(10,912)|-|-|
|Net|movement|in|funds|for|the|year|(264,518)|(239,097)|(503,615)|2,357,790|
|Reconciliation|of|funds|
|Total|funds|brought|forward|2,702,282|281,523|2,983,805|1,129,630|
|Total|funds|carried|forward|2,437,764|42,426|2,480,190|3,487,420|
----- End of picture text -----
The statement of financial activities includes all gains and losses recognised in the year. All income and expenditure derive from continuing activities.
56