Royal Academy of Engineering Annual Report and Accounts 202012021
Who are we?
Values
A charity
We deliver public benefit from engineering excellence and technology innovation.
A National Academy
We provide progressive leadership for engineering and technology, and independent expert advice to government, in the UK and beyond.
In everything we do, we are guided by our five values:
-
Progressive leadership – embodying the courage, commitment and ambition to drive positive change for engineering and society.
-
Diversity and inclusion – creating cultures in which everyone can thrive and diverse perspectives enrich our collective performance.
A Fellowship
We bring together an unrivalled community of leading business people, entrepreneurs, innovators and academics from every part of engineering and technology.
Our vision is engineering in the service of society.
-
Excellence everywhere – bringing evidence, expertise, integrity and a passion for continuous improvement to everything we do.
-
Collaboration first – prioritising collaboration and building partnerships to improve outcomes.
Our charitable mission is to deliver public benefit through engineering excellence and technology innovation.
- Creativity and innovation – solving problems and generating opportunities through creative thinking and innovation.
We have outstanding convening power nationally and internationally.
We understand how to make systems and innovations make a positive difference to society.
We are trusted for our independence and professional excellence.
Royal Academy of Engineering Incorporated by Royal Charter
HRH The Prince Philip Duke of Edinburgh KG KT OM GBE Founding Senior Fellow
HRH The Princess Royal KG KT GCVO QSO
Royal Fellow
HRH The Duke of Kent KG GCMG GCVO Royal Fellow
Professor Sir Jim McDonald FREng FRSE
President
Front cover photo:
University of Southampton students explore properties of fluids in their civil engineering degree programmes © University of Southampton
----- Start of picture text -----
2 Royal Academy of Engineering
----- End of picture text -----
Contents
| Foreword | 2 |
|---|---|
| Response to COVID-19 | 4 |
| Highlights from the past year | 8 |
| Talent and diversity | 10 |
| Innovation | 13 |
| Policy and engagement | 16 |
| People and operations | 19 |
| Future plans | 22 |
| Report of Trustee Board | 24 |
| Recipients of Academy grants | 28 |
| Structure, governance and management | 30 |
| Auditor’s report | 32 |
| Consolidated statement of financial activities | 35 |
| Balance sheets | 36 |
| Consolidated statement of cash flows | 37 |
| Notes to the accounts | 38 |
| Legal and administrative information | 53 |
View the online version of the Annual Report and Accounts, along with the full Annex, at: www.raeng.org.uk/publications/strategy-and-finance
----- Start of picture text -----
Annual Report and Accounts 2020|2021 1
----- End of picture text -----
Foreword
At the close of the last financial year, the UK had just entered its first lockdown in an effort to curb the growth of a pandemic that many of us expected would only disrupt our lives for a short time. Few of us would have imagined that we would still be locked down at the close of the following financial year, and that COVID-19 would cause such devastating losses and challenges to everyday lives and livelihoods.
In spite of the turmoil the virus created over those 12 months, the Academy not only continued to deliver all of its core activities, but we also started implementing a new strategy and brand, established a pandemic response programme that provided vital engineering solutions and advice to government, supported our awardees with pandemic resilience, reinvented our events programme to engage audiences virtually, and recognised some of the exceptional engineers who responded to the crisis with a new set of awards.
The commitment, resilience and professionalism of our Fellows and Academy staff in developing the momentum required to deliver our strategic objectives has been remarkable given the exceptional circumstances. This has been exemplified by the work of our Operating Committees and the quality of their efforts and outputs.
It has also been a year that has reinforced the value of our role, distinctiveness and contribution, as much as it has challenged us. Following the rapid launch of our COVID-19 Positive Response programme in March 2020 and a call for ideas that would address pandemic challenges, we received over 500 responses, which were triaged by an expert panel of Fellows to identify those that needed fast tracking, those that needed resources and those where the Academy could make connections to enable progress. With our partners in the National Engineering Policy Centre, we provided advice to government on, among other issues, supply chain challenges, approaches to limiting transmission
in hospital settings, and the impact of the pandemic on startups and R&D-intensive businesses.
Engineers played a huge role in developing solutions that helped protect people from the virus, and we were pleased to be able to award support grants for the research and innovation of such solutions. This support extended beyond the UK – through Project CARE we mobilised African entrepreneurs from our African programmes to make vital PPE. We have also worked with our global networks to exchange insights and launched a global pandemic preparedness programme as part of our Engineering X partnership with Lloyd’s Register Foundation, which is funding 25 projects across 10 countries to gather the evidence needed to engineer resilience to future pandemics. Ongoing international collaboration is critical to ensuring health security, and the Academy’s international reputation and relationship with engineering organisations across the world mean we can continue to play an important role here.
The pandemic has helped us to accelerate progress towards digitising our activities, making our events more accessible to new and existing audiences. Many Fellows have told us that they have appreciated not having to travel to London to attend Academy events, and we are determined to ensure that our events continue to be accessible beyond the capital, even when in-person gatherings resume. Our 2020–25 strategy sets out an ambition to build an inclusive economy and to strengthen engagement across all parts of the UK, and this includes establishing new hubs in regions and devolved nations, as well as using digital technologies to make London-based activities accessible from elsewhere. Over the past year, we also launched our Northern Ireland Enterprise Hub and a West Midlands STEM engagement programme in honour of the late Lord Bhattacharyya CBE FREng FRS, with plans for further regional activities under development.
Inclusion, for the Academy, also means the inclusion of those from under-represented backgrounds and we have been pleased by the enthusiastic response to our Fellowship Fit for the Future campaign, launched shortly before the publication of our last annual report. We have seen a notable increase in the diversity of engineers nominated for Fellowship and look forward to meeting the truly excellent cohort of new Fellows who were successfully elected when they join us this autumn. The coming year’s intake will also include a greater number of Honorary Fellows than previously elected, who will introduce further diversity of background and expertise to our community, and help champion the role of engineers in new networks and allied professions.
----- Start of picture text -----
2 Royal Academy of Engineering
----- End of picture text -----
Foreword
Another significant new activity to further our efforts to grow a more diverse and inclusive engineering community was The Hamilton Commission, a partnership with Formula 1 racing driver and Honorary Fellow Sir Lewis Hamilton MBE. The Commission undertook extensive research to understand the barriers to Black people pursuing careers in motorsport and made a series of recommendations to overcome them. The findings will reap benefits well beyond the small, but highly visible, motorsport sector and – we hope – improve inclusion across engineering.
The last year has also seen the Academy lay important foundations for the achievement of our other major strategic goal: to harness engineering to build a sustainable society. The National Engineering Policy Centre’s net zero project published its first major output and will make important contributions to policy thinking in the run up to, and beyond, the COP26 conference in Glasgow later this year. Both the MacRobert Award, the UK’s premier prize for engineering innovation, and the Queen Elizabeth Prize for Engineering, the leading international award for engineers and engineering, recognised engineering innovations that contribute significantly to sustainability: the world’s first volume produced fully electric digger and LED lighting respectively. In fact, all three 2020 MacRobert Award finalists were recognised for innovations that improved sustainability.
As a thought leader on the role of engineering in achieving net zero, it is critically important that we adhere to best practice in the sustainability of our own operations. To ensure that we are doing this just as well as our policy and engagement efforts on the same topic, we introduced a new Environmental Sustainability Policy, and have established an Environmental Sustainability Action Group to take forwards a plan to minimise the environmental impact of the Academy’s work.
Just beyond the end of the strategy period that we have set ourselves to advance these two goals, the Academy will turn 50. In the year ahead, you will hear from us about our ambitions for our 50[th] year, how these will build on our current strategic goals and how you can play a role in helping us achieve them. Against the backdrop of a challenging fundraising environment, we will be working hard to diversify our sources of financial support and to provide a wide variety of opportunities to get involved. We will also be looking to honour the legacy of our Senior Fellow, HRH The Duke of Edinburgh, whose passing, while shortly after the close of the financial year, it would be remiss of us not to mention. His tireless work in support of engineering innovation and the Academy will continue
to inspire our work as we place engineering firmly at the heart of society and our economy.
In so many ways, we hope the year ahead will look very different from the year that we look back on in this review. But we also recognise the important lessons we have learned from the challenges and opportunities it presented, and the greater resilience, influence and agility they have resulted in. We would like to acknowledge the vital contributions of the Academy staff during this exceptional year, as well as those of the Trustee Board, wider Fellowship and our partners across the community. We look forward to continuing to work with you all to realise our vision of engineering in the service of society.
Professor Sir Jim McDonald FREng FRSE
President, Royal Academy of Engineering
Dr Hayaatun Sillem CBE
CEO, Royal Academy of Engineering
HRH The Prince Philip Duke of Edinburgh KG KT OM GBE 1921 to 2021
Founding Senior Fellow
As our Founding Senior Fellow, HRH The Duke of Edinburgh has worked tirelessly to support the Academy right from its inception in 1976 as the Fellowship of Engineering.
We will always be indebted to Prince Philip for his active interest in engineering and technology. His genuine enjoyment and passion for engineering were evident in his many visits to the Academy and his typically challenging discussions with the engineers he met. He has been a staunch supporter of UK industry and presented the Academy’s highest award for UK engineering, the MacRobert Award, almost every year since it began in 1969.
No organisation could possibly have wished for a better informed or more enthusiastic patron than Prince Philip and the world of engineering will be much the poorer without his wise counsel and encouragement.
----- Start of picture text -----
Annual Report and Accounts 2020|2021 3
----- End of picture text -----
Response to COVID-19
This annual report begins with a summary of the risks that COVID-19 has posed to the Academy since March 2020 and the actions we have taken, and are still taking, to get through the pandemic. As well as affecting the Academy financially, it has impacted on our operation and use of Prince Philip House as a venue. However, we also responded proactively to help coordinate the engineering community’s contribution to addressing the pandemic and many of the Academy’s activities were able to continue, albeit with changes made to delivery models in many cases. In some cases, new activities were created to apply the Academy’s expertise to some of the challenges presented by COVID-19 (more details on our COVID-19 ‘Positive Response’ programmes are included in later sections).
All Academy staff have the ability and tools to work from home securely and our IT support and infrastructure has coped extremely well, enabling a successful transition to a digital-first model of working.
Our priority in the decisions we have taken and the planning we have done is the safety of our staff, stakeholders and visitors to Prince Philip House.
Going Concern Policy (No material uncertainty)
No material uncertainties that may cast significant doubt about the ability of the charity to continue as a going concern have been identified by the Trustees and therefore these accounts have been prepared on a going concern basis.
Finance and operations
The COVID-19 outbreak and associated measures the government put in place to tackle it have significantly affected the Academy’s ability to raise funds from corporate partners and reduced the income that we receive from our trading subsidiary, RAE Trading Limited.
Since the initial impact of the outbreak in March 2020, we continued to engage with prospective corporate partners, but our priority has been maintaining existing valued relationships. As a result, some activities that are reliant on corporate funding, for example This is Engineering , were adapted to take account of budgetary restrictions. We examined our cost base and have taken prudent measures to make savings to offset the decline in revenue.
In contrast, we experienced an uplift in individual giving and philanthropy through personal donations from Fellows responding to specific Academy projects – particularly those relating to the COVID-19 response. Engineering’s role in managing the pandemic will shape how we make a case for future financial support, so the Academy’s development team is working to capture examples of the role undertaken by the Academy and Fellows during this period.
As Prince Philip House has been largely closed to staff and visitors since 20 March 2020, the pandemic has severely disrupted the Prince Philip House events business run through our trading subsidiary, RAE Trading Limited. Requests for cancellations and postponements of events escalated dramatically during March 2020 and continued during 2020/21 with very few new bookings made over the period. We have worked closely with our catering business partner, CH & Co, to reduce costs and plan for the safe return of visitors and events to Prince Philip House. Some income was generated over the final quarter of the year and we hope that this will be built on in the course of the 2021/22 financial year.
Royal Academy of Engineering
The COVID-19 pandemic has, however, had a significant impact on the Academy, and in particular on our ability to operate in a normal manner at Prince Philip House.
The Academy’s senior management team monitors the group and charity’s cash position monthly by looking at the cash flow forecast for the next 12 months, broken down by month. This forecast, combined with an assessment of the future reserves position, forms the basis of our assessment of going concern. It has been stress tested to reflect several possible scenarios regarding the COVID-19 pandemic and its impact on the wider economy, including using reverse stress testing. In doing so, we have particularly considered the impact of a global economic recession that results in austerity measures and the charity’s government funding being reduced over and above our key risk assumptions (set out in the Financial Review – page 24).
Based on these forecasts, we believe that the going concern basis of accounting remains appropriate for our accounts. We have also considered whether there is any material uncertainty that may cast significant doubt over the use of that basis for a period of at least 12 months from the date of approval of the financial statements and we do not believe that this is the case.
RAE Trading Limited
RAE Trading Limited derives its income from catering and hospitality activities at Prince Philip House. Due to the various government-imposed actions to combat the COVID-19 pandemic, these activities largely ceased over the 2020/21 financial year and are expected to continue to have a significant impact on the company’s projected income for the next 12 months.
While there is a significant demand for the company’s services to resume as we progress through the government roadmap out of the pandemic, continued
----- Start of picture text -----
4 Royal Academy of Engineering
----- End of picture text -----
Response to COVID-19
social distancing measures and the potential of delays in reaching stages of the roadmap could affect expected demand and could result in a cash flow shortfall. During 2020/21, financial support was required from the Royal Academy of Engineering to sustain operations. The Trustees considered the need with a supporting business plan for repayment and approved the provision of £150,000 in support, of which £90,000 had been utilised as at 31 March 2021. Current operating conditions indicate that there is a material uncertainty that may cast significant doubt about the ability of the company to continue as a going concern. However, there is a high level of confidence that all necessary support will be provided if required and therefore RAE Trading Limited is a going concern.
together the thoughts of leading experts from across our networks including Fellows, awardees and engineering partners. The events are broadcast live on LinkedIn to help attract a broad and engaged audience. Another online series, Technical briefings , takes place with a different guest speaker at each briefing discussing a topic in technical detail, followed by a Q&A session.
Similarly, we have launched the Academy CAFÉ (Connecting Awardees, Fostering Engagement) series to provide engagement opportunities for research awardees and alumni. These ‘in conversation with’ events allow awardees to continue benefiting from the expertise and experience within our network while working remotely, as well as to share ideas, challenges and best practice.
Queen Elizabeth Prize for Engineering Foundation
The Queen Elizabeth Prize for Engineering Foundation derives its income from donations and investment income. Its Trustees have determined that there is sufficient cash, short-term deposits and investments held by the Foundation to pay its contractually committed expenditures for the next 12 months. As a result, a material uncertainty does not exist that the Foundation will have sufficient funds to weather the impact of COVID-19 and continue as a going concern for the foreseeable future and the Foundation continues to adopt the going concern basis in preparing the financial statements.
Activities
The circumstances surrounding COVID-19 necessitated the rapid development of digital events knowledge and skills.
Last year, many Academy events were postponed or hosted virtually. However, our events programme has successfully adopted digital formats that have provided our key audiences with greater accessibility, flexibility, and the ability to continue benefiting from the expertise and experience in the Academy’s networks throughout this period. New flagship virtual events have been added to the existing programme including the Engineering review of the year – a celebration of some of the major achievements engineering delivered in what was a truly remarkable 12 months. In addition, several new online event series were developed to broaden engagement with critical audiences and to provide further opportunities to position many of our existing or new thought leadership materials to a wider engineering professional community. These included Innovation in a crisis , an online Q&A series that highlighted the different ways the engineering profession is responding to the pandemic.
We have created a new Critical conversations online series of fireside chats focused on topical issues faced by the global professional engineering community. The series, which we are continuing to host in 2021, brings
To reach as wide an audience as possible, all online events are available to view on the Academy’s website after they have taken place, and many will remain in the annual programme going forward.
Many activities carried out by our education and programmes teams were able to continue with minimal disruption, with selection interviews for Engineering Leaders Scholarships and Visiting Professors all held online. In response to schools closing, the STEM at Home section of the website was created to support parents who were home schooling and teachers who were providing online activities for children, giving them access to our most practical, hands-on activities for young learners. In addition, we have remodelled our popular STEM teaching and learning resource boxes, instead providing individual ‘letterbox’ packs containing materials needed for each activity that can be used in socially distanced classrooms or posted to pupils remote learning at home. Of the nearly 16,000 This is Engineering: Entertainment packs disseminated last year, over 50% of them were sent to pupils to use at home.
All Enterprise Hub events were delivered online, including the annual showcase where the latest cohort of Enterprise Fellows demonstrated and pitched their innovations, and the Hub’s Building future resilience Q&A series, which focused on topics such as strategy planning, setting up a business and making the most of opportunities for growth. This series was available to all engineering and technology entrepreneurs in the UK, not just Hub members. A resources page has been added to the Hub microsite with useful links for business support, funding opportunities, working practices, and wellbeing. In cases where applicants for awards were personally involved in the COVID-19 response, we have made sure that they were not disadvantaged in any way, by delaying decisions on their applications or extending awards as appropriate. We also launched a COVID-19 support programme for early-stage entrepreneurs on our Enterprise Fellowship
----- Start of picture text -----
Annual Report and Accounts 2020|2021 5
----- End of picture text -----
Response to COVID-19
programme. The bridge grant of £15,000 was awarded to those entrepreneurs who were able to demonstrate the greatest impact of the pandemic on fundraising and future activities. The grants were designed to help them extend the runway for up to three months until they were able to resume planned activities and fundraising. A total of four awards were made.
Our international activities have been significantly impacted by COVID-19. Inevitably, travel bans and health and safety considerations disrupted planned international meetings and training sessions. Our Leaders in Innovation Fellowships, Africa Prize for Engineering and Frontiers programmes have all been successfully delivered via alternative digital delivery models, providing the required training, as well as ensuring that awardees have been able to connect with peers and continue collaboration.
Proactive response
At the start of the first lockdown in March 2020, we launched a cross-Academy Positive Response programme to support the contribution that engineering and engineers could make to tackling the challenges associated with COVID-19. The programme provided brokerage, policy advice and expertise, and funding and support through grant and delivery programmes. As part of the brokerage stream, we used our network to provide support for innovators, and a clear route for government to access the breadth of expertise and capability across the profession was created. We launched a call for ideas, advertised through the professional engineering institutions, which yielded over 500 ideas, innovations and offers of help. We brought together a group of Fellows with expertise across healthcare, pharmaceuticals, manufacturing, infrastructure, and international innovation to review the ideas and products submitted. The ideas with the greatest potential were supported through Academy networks in industry, academia and government. We also secured volunteering offers from more than 1,000 respondents to serve as auxiliary engineers for field hospitals.
Alongside the reactive work, the Academy has been identifying longer-term risks and issues highlighted by the pandemic, including through a paper addressing infrastructure interdependencies, the role of research and development investment in securing the future of the UK knowledge economy, and opportunities to learn from this crisis for future resilience (an overview of the reports produced are covered in section three).
Internationally, the Engineering X collaboration, which the Academy co-founded with the Lloyd’s Register Foundation, has launched the Pandemic Preparedness programme in response to COVID-19, which also benefits from Global Challenges Research Fund and Investment in Research Talent support. The grant scheme is funding innovative engineering that tackles the new challenges created by COVID-19, such as infection control, medical innovations and the ‘new normal’, building connections between engineers across the world who are responding to the pandemic. An initial call for proposals resulted in 25 grants made to engineers in Colombia, Ghana, India, Kenya, Malawi, Mexico, Nigeria, Peru, Tanzania, and the UK. The programme is actively working with awardees to build the strong evidence base and global community needed to engineer resilience to future pandemics.
In March 2020, we launched Project CARE to mobilise the Academy’s alumni of African-based entrepreneurs, as well as leverage the expertise of the Fellowship and their networks. The aim was to help strengthen capacity and provide resources to address the consequences and impacts of COVID-19 in African communities in a constructive and sustainable way. The project initially tried to identify products that might contribute to alleviating the pandemic, strengthen the capacity of entrepreneurs, and potentially provide them with a revenue stream while their normal businesses were suspended. The project then evolved to focus on 3D printing, vacuum-forming and assembling reusable PPE, given the significance of global PPE shortages.
Summary
The process and the lessons learned for future crises were published in the report, Engineering our way out of a crisis: mobilising engineering capability .
We have also been working with our partners in the National Engineering Policy Centre (NEPC) to support government with engineering advice. Drawing on the expertise across the NEPC, our policy team has provided inputs to the Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies on topics such as ventilation and hospital-acquired infection. The Positive Response programme has also rapidly collated engineering evidence on PPE manufacturing and reuse, supply chain challenges, and research and development investment for high-tech startups.
The world has been tackling the biggest public health crisis of our time, and engineers have been key enablers of the technology, infrastructure and services that society has relied on throughout this disruption. While the pandemic’s impact on the global economy still requires us to be prudent, there has never been a more urgent need for engineering expertise to inform public debate and provide workable solutions to our shared challenges. We expect Academy activities to continue to respond to the medium- and longer-term needs created by the pandemic. The relevance of our role in the context of COVID-19 reinforces our commitment in our new strategy to advance engineering in the service of society.
----- Start of picture text -----
6 Royal Academy of Engineering
----- End of picture text -----
Annual Report and Accounts 2020|2021
© This is Engineering7
Highlights from the past year
We engaged 255,000 school students in STEM learning opportunities and reached more than 25,000 university students through exchanges between academia and university
We granted awards to a further 78 talented researchers to support worldleading research
The Enterprise Hub launched its first regional hub in Belfast, while Hub companies secured £103 million in followon funding and created 506 new jobs
We were shortlisted for the 2020 Employers Network for Equality & Inclusion Awards in the Inclusive Culture category
More than 40% of new
Enterprise Fellows supported are working on sustainable solutions , including software that enables faster and safer charging of electric vehicle batteries
We invested £22 million in eight new Chairs in Emerging Technology , five of whom are addressing sustainability challenges, including novel power electronics
----- Start of picture text -----
8 Royal Academy of Engineering
----- End of picture text -----
Highlights from the past year
Talent and diversity Innovation Policy and engagement
The expertise of our Fellows was used to shortlist over 500 ideas, innovations , and offers for help as part of a rapid response to the COVID-19 pandemic
We supported 376 policymakers in the UK and overseas to access engineering expertise, evidence and advice to address their goals , on topics including stimulating R&D and net zero
The Africa Prize received 210 applications , and was won by a woman for the first time
This is Engineering films have been seen 54 million times across social media , including Instagram, Twitter, Snapchat, and YouTube
Leaders in Innovation Fellowships participants have raised a total of $80 million in further funding for their companies and created 1,500 new jobs
Our online events reached more than 7,000 people in six of the seven continents (the only continent not reached was Antarctica)
Videos capturing engineering’s role in meeting the Sustainable Development Goals have been viewed more than 30,000 times
----- Start of picture text -----
Annual Report and Accounts 2020|2021 9
----- End of picture text -----
Talent and diversity
The Academy’s education and skills programmes are focused on addressing the engineering skills crisis: the UK must produce more highly skilled engineers and technicians to meet its requirements, especially in light of the COVID-19 pandemic and Brexit creating a need to ‘build back better’. The profession also doesn’t adequately represent the diversity of the UK population. We work with teachers and employers to make the profession more resilient, diverse and prepared for the future.
One way in which we do this is through our education programmes, which have worked with hundreds of schools, colleges and educators to improve and strengthen engineering education. They also aim to inspire and motivate young people from all backgrounds to study STEM subjects and pursue a career in engineering.
This year, we launched the Lord Bhattacharyya Engineering Education Programme in memory of the late Professor Lord Kumar Bhattacharyya CBE FREng FRS, founder of WMG, who was a leader in industry-academia collaboration and extremely passionate about inspiring the next generation of engineers and technicians. The five-year, £2.5 million programme, funded by the Department for
Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy (BEIS), delivers engineeringfocused STEM education support for students and their teachers at 25 schools in the West Midlands. Its support aims to help students, particularly those from underrepresented groups, progress into further and higher education. So far, it has awarded four higher education bursaries to students studying engineering at university, along with 18 post-16 technical education bursaries to students studying at Level 3, and has allocated over £44,000 of funding to 20 secondary schools and several further education colleges in the region. One of the first bursary recipients, Abdulhakim Fundikira, said: “I am looking forward to being involved in projects that benefit communities all around the world and, as a modern engineer, working towards providing more sustainable solutions to carrying out our daily tasks as human beings that are friendlier to the environment without compromising on practicality.”
Over the past 10 years, our Connecting STEM Teachers (CST) programme has gone from strength to strength. Supported by Shell as a strategic partner, as well as Amazon, The Arthur Clements Fund, Boeing, the estate of the late Mr John Gozzard, the Helsington Foundation and the Royal Air Force, it helps
teachers and school coordinators to engage a greater number and wider spectrum of school pupils with STEM education and careers. Its local regional networks build teachers’ knowledge and confidence so that they can provide pupils with hands-on cross-curricular activities and thought-provoking real-world engineering projects.
Despite school closures, 618 teachers from 577 schools attended network meetings during the 2020 summer term and 640 individuals from 597 different schools attended online Academy network meetings during the 2020 autumn and 2021 spring terms.
Howes Primary School in Coventry used the programme’s Code and Rescue resource box to inform crosscurricular activity for its Year 5 group. The school dedicated five afternoons to Code and Rescue lessons, which comprised a short teacher-led session followed by a long practical session in which students worked independently on the coding and design activities. The school found that students were very engaged when using the Code and Rescue materials, focused on their learning and made better than expected progress, so also linked it to its English lessons. Students were asked to write adventure stories about a
10
Royal Academy of Engineering
Talent and diversity
Howes Primary School pupils use the Code and Rescue STEM resource
secret mission in which they were the protagonists, which were connected with various activities in the Code and Rescue package including What3Words, Morse code and making a winch. The school found that all students could access the learning and was particularly pleased that those who had lower starting points made accelerated progress.
A total of 739 STEM resources boxes were sent out to teachers during the school closures in the 2020 summer term, plus 17,500 This is Engineering: Entertainment packs and 15,500 Engineering in a Pandemic packs to schools across the country during the second lockdown between November 2020 and March 2021. We have also recently started awarding young people with digital
“I didn’t know anything about engineering before. I didn’t know that it was about making things to rescue people. I really liked it.”
Howes Primary School student
11
Annual Report and Accounts 2020|2021
Talent and diversity
STEM badges for completing the challenges in the activity packs, launched alongside the This is Engineering: Entertainment resource. Teachers submit student work to our new dedicated website and, so far, we have awarded almost 100 badges.
Diversity and inclusion (D&I) represent a critical thread that not only runs throughout our education activities but is embedded across the Academy’s work to ensure we are both representative and inclusive. The D&I programme continues to work with industry, education institutions, partners, and professional engineering institutions (PEIs) through activities such as the D&I Progression Framework and the Graduate Engineering Engagement Programme (GEEP) to attract and retain talented people from all backgrounds, and help build a truly inclusive workforce.
Over 100 engineering employers participate in our diversity events, campaigns, training sessions, and steering groups, and students from more than half of UK universities take part in GEEP, which has engaged more than 1,000 undergraduates to date.
Over 300 delegates attended our annual D&I event in March 2020, on the theme of ‘engineering change’,
Sir Lewis Hamilton MBE HonFREng (centre) is chairing the Hamilton Commission with Academy CEO Dr Hayaatun Sillem CBE (sixth from left)
which had seven sessions led by 35 speakers, panellists and facilitators from across and beyond the engineering profession. On the day, 30% of the companies in attendance committed to taking specific action connected to the theme.
recommendations from the Creating cultures where all engineers thrive report.
This year, we also partnered with Sir Lewis Hamilton MBE HonFREng to launch the Hamilton Commission, a research project that is identifying the key barriers to recruitment and progression of Black people in UK motorsport, and provide actionable recommendations to overcome them. The Commission is co-chaired by Sir Lewis and Academy CEO Dr Hayaatun Sillem CBE. They oversee an independent Board of Commissioners made up of 14 experts and industry leaders from the UK, who represent a wide range of expertise including motorsport, engineering, schools, colleges and universities, community and youth groups working with young Black people, and representation from UK major political parties. The Commission’s findings, recommendations and actions were published in July 2021.
During National Inclusion Week in 2020 (28 September to 2 October), we launched four interactive D&I team workshops for engineers, which are highly interactive and intended to provoke discussion and debate. They are designed to assist any project or functional team working in an engineering environment to identify how and why they should work together more inclusively. The workshops were developed by practising engineers and D&I specialists from an action group that included representatives from Airbus, Atkins, EDF, KBR, the Ministry of Defence, Mott MacDonald, Network Rail, QinetiQ, and RollsRoyce. These workshops are the final resource developed in response to
12
Royal Academy of Engineering
Innovation
We invest in some of the UK’s most creative and exciting engineering ideas and support and fund talented innovators. We work with industry, entrepreneurs and academia to create wealth, employment and benefit for society.
Over the past year, our research programmes have supported 87 early-career engineering researchers spread across 31 universities and 34 Chairs in Emerging Technologies at 19 universities.
Collectively, they have raised £29.6 million in follow-on funding from industry and other sources, to carry out work ranging from the development of digital technologies and smart infrastructure to manufacturing, robotics and healthcare engineering. Our industry-enabled schemes also continue to thrive: 80 engineering companies co-sponsor our Research Chair, Senior Research Fellowships and Industrial Fellowships programmes, and awardees have raised a total of £20.6 million in follow-on funding.
The Enterprise Hub has supported over 220 technology entrepreneurs to realise their potential since its launch in 2013. For the first time this year, we doubled our Enterprise
Fellowship annual intake: new awardees include Dr Yan Zhao of Breathe Battery Technologies, who is creating software that significantly improves the performance, cost and safety of electric vehicle batteries; Matt Escott of Protolaunch, which is developing an engine for microlaunchers for small satellites that uses carbon-neutral fuels; and Dr Youmna Mouhama whose Myana Naturals’ applicator-comb makes applying treatments to afro hair quicker and less painful, supporting women and making everyday haircare a celebration of their beauty. We’re now building on these foundations, growing in size and working towards new goals in member diversity, geographical reach and sector balance. In October, the first regional base for the Enterprise Hub was established in Belfast, supported by Invest Northern Ireland. Senior Regional Business Development Manager Gillian Gregg is based at the Belfast Hub, championing ambitious engineering entrepreneurs in Northern Ireland, and growing a local network of mentors, institutions, accelerators and investors. In its first six months, more innovators from Northern Ireland applied for the Hub’s programmes and membership in the region increased by 29%. We also worked with Beauhurst in January to publish Spotlight on spinouts: UK academic spinout trends , which
for the first time gathers evidence in one place to examine where and how effectively university innovations are being turned into commercially successful enterprises. The report – the first in an annual series – tracks progress, the impact of changes and helps us understand the state of UK spinouts now and in future. The data includes top sectors, investments, survival, growth rates, and exits. It also examines which universities are generating successful spinouts, their IP policies, and stakes taken by universities, with the aim of informing best practice. We hope that it will incentivise progressive policy change, encourage the sharing of technology transfer best practice and guide academic entrepreneurs who wish to commercialise their research.
Our innovation support extends beyond the UK. Our global entrepreneurship programmes train innovators worldwide to commercialise their work. And we bring together some of the world’s best engineers, in collaboration with other professions, to form international partnerships addressing some of the planet’s biggest challenges.
Engineering X, our international collaboration founded in partnership with the Lloyd’s Register Foundation and with additional support from the government’s Newton Fund, has had
13
Annual Report and Accounts 2020|2021
Innovation
Africa Prize winner Charlette N’Guessan’s BACE API software uses facial recognition and artificial intelligence to verify identities
Enterprise Hub member Dr George Frodsham (right). His company, MediSieve, won a £1.6 million COVID-19 grant from UK Research and Innovation to trial a product designed to remove the inflammatory cytokine IL-6 from patients’ blood
an active and successful first year. In July, it awarded nearly £1 million in grants to six projects in the UK and overseas aimed at tackling the complex social, environmental and engineering challenges of decommissioning ships and offshore structures as part of its Safer End of Engineered Life mission. Engineering X also published the Global Review on Safer End of Engineered Life as part of this mission, which examined what happens to consumer goods and other engineered products at the end of their useful life. Conducted and coordinated by the University of Leeds with a consortium of partners and supported by an international technical advisory group of experts, the study found widespread use of unsafe management and disposal practices and called for urgent action to address the risks posed to human life and health. Workshops have also been held as part of its Safer Complex Systems mission, a £5 million fiveyear programme to enhance the
14
Royal Academy of Engineering
Innovation
“In six months, I made two years’ progress with the help and support of my mentor. LIF gave me the support I needed to face the difficulties of being a woman in an engineering business in Brazil.”
Lisane Valdo, LIF2 participant
safety of complex infrastructure systems such as food and water supply, healthcare, housing, transportation, and communication globally. An initial review of safety in the design, management and governance of complex systems was published in July 2021. Produced by the University of York, it makes several recommendations to the programme and sets out an initial framework that enables people in different sectors and disciplines to talk about, analyse and manage safety in different contexts.
In 2020, our Leaders in Innovation Fellowship (LIF) programme celebrated its fifth anniversary. The programme brings together emerging global leaders who have an engineering-based innovation that could contribute to the social and economic development of their country through commercialisation. It is delivered as part of the UK Newton Fund in partnership with in-country organisations. Since 2015, LIF has worked alongside agencies in 17 countries that are eligible for Overseas Development Assistance (ODA) funding to produce a global network of over 1,100 innovators, each building their own businesses within a strong support structure, nationally, regionally and globally.
LIF participants have become influencers and decision-
makers, created more than 2,500 jobs, and developed a huge range of innovations to tackle different aspects of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), which have gone on to be trialled and produced.
In 2020, we also launched LIF Advanced to complement the original LIF training programme objectives, bringing together a carefully selected cohort that includes one innovator from each LIF country to focus on the theme of innovative medtech. Participants receive tailored relationship-building opportunities in the UK with people and organisations that can help them fulfil their commercial potential. The programme has already initiated 100 connections into the UK, which included introductions to subject experts, leading to many participants pivoting their offering in response to the input and feedback received. In November, participants showcased their health tech innovations, from a Luke Skywalker-inspired hand prosthesis to a smart cane and wearable mobility device, as part of the Global MedTech Showcase and many now see the UK as a primary initial market for their technologies.
In September, Charlette N’Guessan, a Cote D’Ivorian technology
entrepreneur based in Ghana, won the 2020 Africa Prize for Engineering Innovation, taking the first prize of £25,000 and becoming the first woman to win. Charlette, Co-Founder Samuel Mensah and their team developed BACE API, software that uses facial recognition and artificial intelligence (AI) to verify identities remotely. The Africa Prize mentorship and training helped the team focus more on their business development, and since being shortlisted, helped with defining strategies to improve BACE API’s market position. They have signed key partnerships with local financial institutions, improved the accuracy of the model and reduced the verification time. In partnership with a data controller that deals with certified government-issued identity documents, BACE API has access to Ghanaian passports and other identity documents to use during its verification processes. This year, the live final of the prize, which is supported by The Shell Centenary Scholarship Fund and the Global Challenges Research Fund, took place on a bespoke online platform: the four finalists delivered pitches before taking questions from the Africa Prize judges and audience, and the platform included an interactive exhibition, allowing the audience to learn more about all the shortlisted innovations and connect with the entrepreneurs.
15
Annual Report and Accounts 2020|2021
Policy and engagement
Much of our work aims to improve awareness and recognition of the crucial role engineers play and of engineering’s impact on lives, both in the UK and internationally.
The National Engineering Policy Centre (NEPC) continues to collaborate with its partners to connect with policymakers and ensure policy issues are informed by critical engineering expertise, with the NEPC providing independent guidance that draws on the expertise of more than 450,000 engineers.
Launched in 2019, our Policy Fellowships programme is an intensive professional development programme that supports better evidence-based policymaking by building stronger connections between policymakers and the nation’s leading engineers. It offers policymakers the opportunity to make rapid progress on a chosen policy challenge, to expand their personal networks with the Academy’s community of innovators and leaders, and to learn first-hand how engineers solve problems using techniques such as systems thinking.
We award Policy Fellowships three times a year, with 33 policymakers supported to date.
After graduating, Policy Fellows also join an alumni programme that offers development opportunities such as networking and alumni-led events, and supports involvement in other Academy policy work relevant to their interests. Alumni Louise Dunsby, then Deputy Director of Innovation Policy at BEIS, joined the programme to ensure that civil servants take equality and inclusivity into account while developing and implementing new policies. She had discussions with experts that helped her identify ‘inclusion’ as aligned with the systems-based approach advocated by engineers and went on to create a public sector equality duty (PSED) champion role to encourage policy officials to consider the implications of their actions.
Alongside our proactive response to COVID-19 detailed earlier, the NEPC has published several reports across the year that look at engineering’s role in responding to and emerging from the pandemic. Meeting challenges from COVID19 highlighted several risks and opportunities that the pandemic posed for the UK beyond the immediate crisis response, which the engineering community identified and provided support on; Engineering a resilient future showcased ideas and insights into longer-term resilience from the engineering community; while
A rapid review of the engineering approaches to mitigate the risk of COVID-19 transmission summarised input from Academy Fellows and members of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers on behalf of transport providers and manufacturers. These were all completed alongside ongoing projects on net zero, resilience, safety and ethics of autonomous systems, sustainable living places, and latestage R&D.
The NEPC’s net zero project launched with the publication of Net zero: a systems perspective on the climate challenge in May 2020. The programme aims to explore, inform and advise policymakers on some of the challenges and opportunities that need to be addressed if the UK’s 2050 target is to be reached. Programme activity has included a workshop to gather evidence and insight into what needs to be done to bring construction onto a net-zero pathway; the policy paper Beyond COVID-19: laying the foundations for a net-zero recovery , which found a large gap between government funding commitments and the scale of changes required for a sustainable economic recovery from COVID19; and a Critical conversations discussion about the challenges facing engineers and policymakers on the road to net zero, which was attended by more than 450 people.
16
Royal Academy of Engineering
Policy and engagement
“The Policy Fellowships programme helped me demonstrate that the promotion of PSED [public sector equality duty] is an opportunity for civil servants to become better policy professionals.” Louise Dunsby, Policy Fellow
A QR code on Paralympian Jonnie Peacock’s running blade links to the Museum of Engineering Innovation
We also engage the public to broaden perceptions of the profession and raise awareness of the critical role engineering plays in society. One of the main ways in which we do this is through This is Engineering , our campaign in partnership with EngineeringUK and other major engineering organisations to open the eyes of millions to the wonders of engineering, challenge preconceptions and show how engineers make a difference. On our second This is Engineering Day in November 2020, we launched the
Museum of Engineering Innovation, a virtual museum hosted on Google Arts & Culture, with plans to create physical access points to the digital content via QR codes in locations around the UK. The first exhibits included reigning world champion and Paralympic gold medallist Jonnie Peacock’s carbon-fibre running blade, which had a QR code placed on it to raise awareness of the launch of the museum. An online exhibit about the blade enables visitors to learn about the incredible engineering that went into it and how far the sporting world has
come thanks to engineered highperformance prosthetics. “Whenever I wear my blade I get such a great response, particularly from children, able bodied and disabled, who think it’s really cool,” said Jonnie. “I’d like them to know that I wouldn’t be where I am today and have this super cool prosthetic leg if it wasn’t for engineers and amazing feats of engineering.”
Our awards programme seeks to recognise and raise awareness of the very best of engineering talent whose achievements have
17
Annual Report and Accounts 2020|2021
Policy and engagement
President’s Special Awards for Pandemic Service winners Jean Morris and Arthur View. Jean and a team of young engineers from the National Physical Laboratory took a central role in building and testing prototype ventilators against a developing MHRA specification © thisisjude.co.uk
a significant impact on society. This year, the MacRobert Award, the most prestigious prize for UK engineering innovation, supported by the Worshipful Company of Engineers, was awarded to JCB for the world’s first electric digger, which significantly reduces carbon emissions. If it was used across the global construction sector, which contributes 39% of all carbon emissions, CO2 savings could reach billions of tonnes. All three of the finalists for the 2020 award aim to accelerate progress towards net zero: Babcock LGE’s ecoSMRT® technology improves the efficiency of transporting liquefied natural gas, delivering a 50% reduction in carbon footprint, while Jaguar Land Rover’s I-PACE is the world’s first battery-electric sports utility vehicle.
In August, we awarded 19 individuals and teams of engineers with the President’s Special Awards for Pandemic Service, reflecting exceptional engineering
achievements in tackling COVID-19 throughout the UK. Specially commissioned silver medals were presented to winners who had worked on areas including ventilators, PPE, testing and social distancing systems, and who had provided advice to the NHS and government.
In February, the 2021 Queen Elizabeth Prize for Engineering (QEPrize) was awarded to the five engineers responsible for the creation and development of LED lighting – which forms the basis of all solid-state lighting technology and is 75% more energy efficient than traditional bulbs. The announcement was made by Lord Browne of Madingley FREng FRS, Chairman of the QEPrize Foundation, during a global livestream hosted by Danielle George MBE, Professor of Radio Frequency Engineering at the University of Manchester. The broadcast opened with congratulations from HRH The
Princess Royal, Royal Fellow of the Academy, who reflected on the importance of previous QEPrizewinning innovations in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. The winners will be awarded at a ceremony in late 2021 with a trophy designed by Hannah Goldsmith, aged 20, from the UK, who won the Create the Trophy competition with her design inspired by circuit boards. Due to the high standard of entries, for the first time the judges made a Highly Commended award in the competition, recognising 18-year-old Indian student Atharva Gai’s design, which impressed the judges with its careful and considered eye for detail and traditional manufacturing techniques.
Lord Browne also announced that the QEPrize will now be awarded on an annual basis, rather than biennial, to offer greater opportunities to recognise the full diversity of engineering excellence and pace of innovation.
18
Royal Academy of Engineering
People and operations
As a charity, the Academy delivers public benefit from engineering excellence and technology innovation. Our Fellowship represents an unrivalled community of leading businesspeople, entrepreneurs, innovators, and academics from every part of engineering and technology. Our credibility with partners, funders and the engineering community is underpinned by our ability to deliver.
Academy staff have, for the most part, worked remotely since Prince Philip House (PPH) closed in March 2020. Our IT support and infrastructure has coped extremely well, and to support effective and comfortable home working, we have sent over 350 items of equipment to staff home addresses and carried out many virtual workplace assessments. Staff have worked flexibly during the pandemic to accommodate personal circumstances and wellbeing needs and, when government guidance allowed, PPH has been opened for those who need or prefer to work there. When the building reopens permanently, this commitment to agile working and continued flexibility will continue.
There has also been further investment in the working space at PPH. While the office has been mainly unoccupied, we have been able to push ahead with several projects without disrupting staff.
Level three has been completely refurbished to accommodate the Academy’s growth and support agile working. To accommodate postpandemic working, Perspex screens have been added to all desks and a new ventilation system installed on level three to provide a high volume of external air along with a rapid re-circulation.
Since March 2020, we have recruited 21 new members of staff, bringing our total to 128.
This has included the creation of 14 new posts to expand underresourced and strategic priority areas and the appointment of our first Director of People, Sharon Noble. The senior leadership team has also been restructured, with Chris Boyle appointed Chief Operating Officer, to provide more oversight of operations, more evenly distribute workloads and create new synergies between activities that will help cross team working, learning and support.
Of course, the pandemic has been a difficult time for many and the wellbeing of staff has been a priority. We continue to invest in and support the work of our staff wellbeing committee, have expanded our pool of Mental Health First Aiders, implemented quarterly wellbeing days, and enhanced our Employee Assistance Programme.
In March 2020, we also launched our Environmental Sustainability Action Group with a goal to ensure the Academy is greener every year than it was before. The cross-Academy group is committed to:
-
developing and delivering an Environmental Sustainability Action Plan
-
making a series of targeted changes to Academy activities, including a review of policy and practices applied to procurement of materials, equipment, utilities, services, and waste management
-
making systemic changes across Academy activities, including building improvement in our environmental performance into both corporate decision-making and individual behaviours, such as proactive reduction of carbon emissions, and awareness-raising campaigns across staff and Fellowship to promote personal action and responsibility
-
learning from innovative engineering practices developed within our networks and sharing that with partners.
We are currently assessing our carbon footprint to identify a set of targets to meet over the coming years.
Prior to the pandemic, in-person events both in the UK and overseas served as important vehicles for engaging with Fellows, awardees
19
Annual Report and Accounts 2020|2021
Delivery
award winners in the absence of the Awards Dinner, and reflected on the key stories of the last 11 months from an engineering perspective. Chaired by TV presenter, journalist and broadcaster Fiona Bruce, the panel discussed the significant role engineering has played in society in 2020. Alongside our quarterly printed Fellows’ newsletter, we have also launched a monthly e-newsletter for Fellows, keeping them informed of Academy news and opportunities to get involved with activities.
and partners. Restrictions in place because of the pandemic have meant that such activities have taken place online. In September, the Academy’s 44[th] Annual General Meeting (AGM) took place at the University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, with only the President and Professor Trish Connolly FREng FRSE in attendance and 135 Fellows joining online – a record number that will see future meetings also made available online. In December, we also hosted the Engineering review of the year online, made possible thanks to support from BP (Headline Sponsor) and Rolls-Royce (Sponsor). The event recognised the impact of engineers, including our 2020
As we look towards our 50[th] anniversary in 2026, it is important that the Fellowship embodies the full breadth and diversity of
As in-person LGBT+ celebrations didn’t take place during Pride month in 2020 because of social distancing restrictions, Academy staff created their own human Pride flag
engineering excellence, so we have set an aspiration to elect half of all new Fellows from groups currently under-represented in the Fellowship. Based on the available data, the current Fellowship comprises 6.4% women and 6.5% Black, Asian and minority ethnic engineers, and the average age at election has been around 55 for several years. To deliver a Fellowship that is Fit for the Future, we are seeking to elect more outstanding candidates who:
-
are from under-represented groups, including women, Black, Asian and minority ethnic, LGBT+ and disabled engineers
-
have come into engineering via vocational and non-traditional routes
-
are achieving excellence at an earlier career stage than is typical
-
work in emerging technologies and new industries, including areas that are important to address major societal challenges.
We will be working with our Proactive Nominations Panel, Fellows and wider networks to stimulate more nominations for talented engineers from under-represented groups. In addition, we will increase the number of Fellows we elect each year until 2026 from 50 to 60. During the past year, we have also been conducting a Governance Review, led by former Vice-President Professor Iain Gray CBE FREng FRSE, which is looking at the numbers of Honorary Fellows as well as ensuring that the Academy can continue to comply with best practice in charity governance.
20
Royal Academy of Engineering
*For a full list of funders, please see the Annex to the Annual Report and Accounts, which can be found at www.raeng.org.uk/publications/strategy-and-financeAnnual Report and Accounts 2020|2021
© Rolls-Royce21
Future plans
As set out in our five-year strategy, launched in March 2020, the Academy’s overarching goal is to harness the power of engineering to build a sustainable society and an inclusive economy that works for everyone .
We work in three ways to address these goals: fostering talent and diversity, promoting innovation , and influencing policy and public perceptions . In keeping with our values, many of these goals will be delivered
through active collaboration with key partners around the world, across and beyond engineering.
In our strategy we have committed to the following actions over the five-year period. The annual report details the significant progress made against these actions over the 2020/21 financial year. We aim to accelerate progress against these actions over the following year .
Talent and diversity
Innovation
Policy and engagement
-
Raising awareness of the key role of engineers in enabling sustainable development to encourage many more, and more diverse, people to join the profession
-
Embedding sustainability and global responsibility as a core element of our support for engineering education, training and professionalism
-
Mobilising the global engineering community and creating strong international alliances to support sustainability
-
Ensuring all relevant Academy activities and operations reflect our commitment to sustainability
-
Continuing to support capacity building in engineering as a priority in international development programmes.
-
Expanding and improving our support for excellent researchers and entrepreneurs developing innovations targeted at sustainability challenges
-
Enabling more promising cleantech and sustainabilityfocused innovations to be brought to market and companies to grow to scale
-
Stimulating more effective international research and innovation collaborations to accelerate development and deployment of tools to advance sustainability.
-
Enhancing engineers’ capacity to engage effectively with policymakers and media on the UK’s commitment to net zero greenhouse gas emissions by 2050 (net zero) and other sustainability challenges
-
Building demand from
-
government, other policymakers and media for engineering input and commentary on plans for net zero and other sustainability challenges
-
Embedding a systems approach in UK and global policymakers’ responses to sustainability challenges
-
Enhancing public awareness of the critical role that engineering plays in advancing global sustainability.
----- Start of picture text -----
22 Royal Academy of Engineering
----- End of picture text -----
Future plans
Talent and diversity
Innovation
Policy and engagement
-
Boosting the numbers and diversity of those entering engineering careers
-
Promoting and expanding the use of innovative approaches and best practice in engineering education and training
-
Catalysing a step-change in the diversity of the workforce at all levels and prevalence of inclusive cultures across engineering industry
-
Continuing to diversify the Academy’s Fellowship and awardees and embedding D&I across all our activities
-
Stimulating modernisation of the UK approach to professional development and lifelong learning for engineers and technicians
-
Ensuring that ethical best practice is fully embedded in UK engineering education, training and professional development.
-
Ensuring that Academy grants made within the UK reflect and support excellence and societal benefit across all parts of the country
-
Establishing a national network of Enterprise Hub regional centres and growing our regional support offer
-
Supporting more excellent researchers and entrepreneurs developing innovations that promote UK security, safety, public health and resilience
-
Celebrating and enabling business–university collaboration across all parts of the UK
-
Embedding integrity and ethics into our support for engineering.
-
Enhancing the capacity of engineers to engage with impact on policy relating to innovation, R&D, entrepreneurship, business–university collaboration, and technological and digital disruption
-
Building demand from policymakers for engineering input to policies on topics relating to inclusive economic development, resulting in more effective policies
-
Embedding engineering expertise across government, including local, regional and devolved
-
Understanding and informing societal views about the impact of technology and digitalisation, through public and media engagement
-
Developing strategic alliances of UK and international partners to inform and engage policymakers.
----- Start of picture text -----
Annual Report and Accounts 2020|2021 23
----- End of picture text -----
Report of Trustee Board
Financial Review
Results for the year
The Academy has produced group accounts for the year, having consolidated its accounts with those of its two subsidiaries: the Queen Elizabeth Prize for Engineering Foundation (QEPF) and RAE Trading Limited. The annual report, incorporating the financial statements for the year ended 31 March 2021, has been prepared in accordance with the Academy’s Royal Charter, and in compliance with Accounting and Reporting by Charities: Statement of Recommended Practice 2019, applicable to charities preparing their accounts in accordance with the Financial Reporting Standard applicable in the UK and Republic of Ireland (FRS102) (effective 1 January 2015) – (Charities SORP (FRS102)), the Financial Reporting Standard applicable in the UK and Republic of Ireland (FRS102). The Academy meets the definition of public benefit entity under FRS102. These financial statements are prepared under FRS102.
Group income for the year was £51.2 million (2019/20 £53.0 million). During the year, income from grants and other contracts totalled £49.0 million (2019/20 £48.0 million). Donations totalled £0.5 million (2019/20 £1.7 million), of which £0.2 million was to the QEPF. Other major sources of income during the year were: investments, subscriptions, events, and facilities hire income at a total of £1.7 million compared to £3.2 million in the previous year.
Group expenditure on charitable activities was £53.3 million (2019/20 £48.8 million): 98% of total resources expended. Of this total, £49.4 million represented charitable activities and grants paid under various programmes and £3.9 million represented the costs of operating those programmes.
The cost of generating funds across the group was £1.0 million: 2% of total resources expended. The cost of generating funds consists of fees paid to investment managers, facilities hire and catering, and the staff costs and expenses associated with fundraising. The Academy is continuing with major fundraising activity aimed at obtaining funds for the enhancement and expansion of the Academy’s programmes to support talent and diversity, innovation, and policy and engagement, as well as central infrastructure.
Royal Academy of Engineering
Total income for the year was £50.1 million (2019/20 £51.2 million). The Academy is grateful to the Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy (BEIS) for providing the government core grant to support activities aimed primarily at promoting engineering research in the UK. The core grant at £13.7 million (2019/20 £11.7 million) represented 27% of total group incoming resources.
Income from other grants and contracts decreased by 3% to £35.2 million. Included in this amount were grants received from BEIS of £14.0 million from the Investment in Research Talent fund, £8.3 million from the Global Challenges Research Fund and £7.8 million from the Newton Fund programme.
Expenditure on charitable activities was £51.5 million compared to £48.1 million in the previous year. An analysis based upon the principal objective of each activity shows that, of the total charitable expenditure of £51.5 million: 85% was on innovation; 10% on policy and engagement; and 5% on talent and diversity. Employment costs increased from the previous year by 13% to £7.4 million due to additional resources required to deliver the increased scale of programmes.
Queen Elizabeth Prize for Engineering Foundation
Total income for the year was £0.8 million (2019/20 £0.9 million). Expenditure on charitable activities was £1.8 million compared to £0.8 million the previous year. The Queen Elizabeth Prize for Engineering will move from a biennial to an annual cycle going forward. An award was made in 2020/21. The Foundation pays a management fee to the Academy for services, which includes staff employed and office space. In February 2021, the Trustee Boards of the Royal Academy of Engineering and QEPF agreed that Dr Hayaatun Sillem CBE would henceforth serve as joint CEO of both organisations.
RAE Trading Limited
The commercial activity undertaken by the company during the year was the provision of rooms and catering services within Prince Philip House, primarily to corporate customers. Catering services are also provided to the Academy at cost. Revenue for the year was £21,000 (2019/20 £1.4 million). Operating expenditure, including the cost of providing a service to the Academy, was £173,000 (2019/20 £1.2 million). The net loss for the year was £152,000 compared to a net profit of £228,000 in the previous year.
Group asset value
The carrying value of the group’s net assets was £68.4 million (2019/20 £62.6 million). Investments were valued at £53.1 million, with the Academy holding £26.7 million and QEPF holding £26.4 million. Tangible fixed assets valued at £24.8 million included the £11.0 million value of the Carlton House Terrace lease and the £12.7 million of leasehold improvements to Prince Philip House. The main liability was a bank loan of £11.5 million, which funded the extension of the Academy’s property lease secured in 2017. The loan also funded part of the lower ground floor extension and settled the previous loan with NatWest.
----- Start of picture text -----
24 Royal Academy of Engineering
----- End of picture text -----
Report of Trustee Board
Fixed assets
Capital expenditure during the year amounted to £0.7 million, which was on computer systems and equipment, office fixtures and fittings, and leasehold improvement.
Investments
The value of the Academy’s investment portfolio increased over the year by £4.3 million to £26.7 million. Realised and unrealised investment gains during the year were £4.2 million. 71% of the Academy’s investment portfolio is held in global equities and 29% is held in fixed interest bonds and asset backed and alternative investments. Income to the Academy from dividends decreased by 29% during the year to £641,000 while bank interest decreased by £18,000 to £3,000. Group investment income decreased by £419,000 to £1.2 million, of which £573,000 was income from QEPF’s investments, which are managed separately to those of the Academy.
The Academy’s investments are held in a managed investment fund and index funds. QEPF’s investments are held in a managed investments fund.
The Academy has adopted the following sustainable principles within its investment policy:
-
The Academy’s assets should be invested in line with its aims.
-
The Academy aims for the best possible financial return from its investments. However, the Academy understands the importance of sustainable investing practices that are compliant with the United Nations Principles of Responsible Investments (UN PRI). The Trustees believe that the two considerations are not contradictory and that sustainable investing principles should not lead to lower return expectations over the long term.
-
The Academy’s charitable object is the pursuit, encouragement and maintenance of excellence in the whole field of engineering to useful purpose. The Trustees conclude that a blanket exclusionary policy on certain sectors, as followed by many institutional investors, is not appropriate for the Academy.
-
The Academy requires its fund managers to pay appropriate regard to relevant corporate governance, social, ethical, and environmental considerations in the selection, retention and realisation of all fund investments. The Academy requires all investment managers to be signatories to UN PRI.
-
These principles will be reviewed on a regular basis to ensure that they are in-sync with the broader ethical and sustainability policies of the Academy.
Reserves policy
The Academy’s intention is to maintain sufficient reserves to ensure financial resilience and sustainability, including protection against risks identified in the risk register. The reserves policy sets out the target reserves level and the key principles by which the Academy will manage any excesses or deficits compared to the target. The aim is to strike the appropriate balance between ensuring a sustainable financial position and using funds to fulfil the charitable objectives of the Academy and deliver public benefit. The reserves policy is reviewed regularly.
| Year ended 31 March | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| £000 | £000 | ||
| Total funds as per group balance sheet | 68,411 | 62,553 | |
| Exclude: | |||
| Restricted funds | 36,326 | 33,947 | |
| Unrestricted funds tied up in | |||
| tangible fixed assets | 24,836 | 24,642 | |
| Designated and special funds Free reserves |
3,198 4,051 |
2,457 1,507 |
Free Reserves
Free Reserves are available to be spent for any purpose that meets the Academy’s charitable objectives. Free Reserves would cover a short-term emergency or longerterm structural change. The reserves policy states that the recommended range for Free Reserves is £3.0 million to £4.5 million. Whenever the Academy’s Free Reserves fall below the recommended range, the intention is to build the level of Free Reserves to be within the recommended range within five years.
Designated Funds
A strategic development fund of £2.5 million has been created to deliver impactful charitable activities over the next five years and/or strengthen the Academy for the longer term and fund non-recurring costs of major projects without impacting annual operating budgets.
Capital building fund
Within restricted funds there is a fund of £2.9 million to cover major capital improvements to Prince Philip House.
QEPF Trustees consider the level of the Foundation’s reserves as part of their risk assessment review process. These reserves are restricted within the group balance sheet. There are no reserves held by RAE Trading Limited as all profit arising is gift aided to the Academy.
----- Start of picture text -----
Annual Report and Accounts 2020|2021 25
----- End of picture text -----
Report of Trustee Board
The specific uses and needs of the restricted and designated funds held by the Academy are detailed separately in the notes to the accounts referred to above. The Academy’s reserves are available and adequate to fulfil the current obligations of the Academy.
The funds have been invested in a diversified portfolio of assets. The core of the portfolio has been invested in the income and return generating assets. Asset classes include domestic and international equities, fixed income instruments, property, commodities, cash, and any other assets deemed suitable for the Academy.
Investment policy
The Trustees’ general powers of investment derive from and are restricted by the Trustee Act 2000. These powers are not restricted by the Academy’s Royal Charter, which states that “the Board may invest any monies of the Academy not immediately required for the purposes of the Academy”.
The investment objective is to generate a total return of inflation (Consumer Price Index) plus 4% per annum over the long term, after expenses. This will allow the Academy to maintain the real value of the assets, while funding annual expenditure at the level generally not exceeding 4% per annum.
Risk management and appetite
The Trustees have agreed a risk appetite statement and associated risk management policy. The Audit and Risk Committee reviews the risk register four times a year. The Chair of the Audit and Risk Committee provides updates to the Trustee Board. Risk management is supported by the work of the Audit and Risk Committee as well as various operating committees. The Academy’s overall approach to risk is illustrated by the following table:
Risk appetite table
| Risk appetite table | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zero | Very low | Low | Some | Acceptance | |
| Health, safetyand security | 3 | ||||
| Safeguarding | 3 | ||||
| Compliance andgovernance | 3 | ||||
| Dataprotection and cybersecurity | 3 | ||||
| Reputation | 3 | ||||
| IT infrastructure and development | 3 | ||||
| People and culture | 3 | ||||
| Financial | 3 | ||||
| Programme delivery | 3 | ||||
| Impact | 3 | ||||
| Programme innovation | 3 |
Risk appetite classification
| Zero | Avoidance of risk and uncertainty (aspiration even though difficult to achieve). |
|---|---|
| Verylow | Preference for verysafe options that have a low degree of inherent risk. |
| Low | Preference for safe options that have a low degree of residual risk. |
| Some | Willing to consider all potential options and choose one that is most likely to result |
| in successful delivery, despite thepotential for some degree of risk. | |
| Acceptance | Eager to innovate and to choose options offering potentially higher reward, despite |
| greater inherent risk. |
----- Start of picture text -----
26 Royal Academy of Engineering
----- End of picture text -----
Report of Trustee Board
The most significant risks currently faced by the Academy and mitigating actions are shown in the table below.
| Trading conditions or market forces cause decline in levels of Gift Aid profits from the Academy trading subsidiary leadingto threat to financial sustainability. |
The cost base of the trading subsidiary has been significantly reduced principally through the furloughing of all non-essential staff. |
|---|---|
| Inability to secure funding at scale and timing needed, causing financial shortfall leading to threat to financial sustainability and/or inability to deliver programmes and activities required for successful implementation of the strategy. |
Programme activities are implemented only when sufficient funding is in place and/or can be scaled based on funding available. Confidence in current fundraising activity is based on track record, quality of proposition and competitive position. A cultivation and stewardship programme is in place. A financial strategy is in place that sets out thepurpose and appropriate levels of reserves. |
| Cyberattack causes failure or compromise of IT systems and/or data leading to reduced ability to operate and/or reputational/financial damage. |
Up-to-date technology and methodologies including third-party daily monitoring, malware protection, regular patching on laptops and servers, and email and web filtering. Encryption on laptops and VPN, and two-factor authentication is required when using Academy laptops and/or other services remotely. Risks addressed following penetration test conducted in 2020 on web applications, cloud security and infrastructure. Specific mitigation solution in place against distributed denial of service attacks. |
| Change in government priorities or capacity to fund causes reduced income beyond 2021/22 from government, leading to adverse impact on programmes and activities and ability to implement strategy. |
ODA settlement significantly lower than originally anticipated but plans in place to manage impacts and pursue alternative funding where appropriate. Despite economic impact of COVID-19, government remains committed to investing in R&D. Extensive programme of government engagement in place including at CEO and President level. |
----- Start of picture text -----
Annual Report and Accounts 2020|2021 27
----- End of picture text -----
Report of Trustee Board
Recipients of Academy grants
The Academy made over 1,000 grants and awards to organisations and individuals in 2020/21 totalling £35.4 million. The first 25 organisations, in order of total amount of funds paid to recipients, are listed below.
| Policy and | Talent and | Total | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Innovation | engagement | diversity | amount in £ | ||
| 1 | University College London | 2,899,791 | 15,347 | 45,324 | 2,960,462 |
| 2 | Imperial College London | 2,728,353 | 2,894 | 6,499 | 2,737,746 |
| 3 | University of Southampton | 1,910,396 | – | 25,570 | 1,935,966 |
| 4 | University of Glasgow | 1,681,314 | 7,498 | 21,003 | 1,709,815 |
| 5 | University of Oxford | 1,332,000 | – | 7,820 | 1,339,820 |
| 6 | University of Strathclyde | 996,974 | 7,554 | 18,985 | 1,023,513 |
| 7 | University of Newcastle | 987,940 | 7,600 | 4,800 | 1,000,340 |
| 8 | University of Bristol | 962,465 | 11,200 | 620 | 974,285 |
| 9 | University of Manchester | 924,761 | 20,000 | 11,377 | 956,138 |
| 10 | University of Cambridge | 925,940 | – | 11,500 | 937,440 |
| 11 | University of Sheffeld | 818,277 | 17,965 | 14,539 | 850,781 |
| 12 | University of Leeds | 751,705 | 11,988 | – | 763,693 |
| 13 | Heriot-Watt University | 611,415 | 10,966 | 4,266 | 626,647 |
| 14 | University of South Wales | 465,027 | – | 9,500 | 474,527 |
| 15 | Queens University Belfast | 457,975 | – | 4,780 | 462,755 |
| 16 | University of Exeter | 434,020 | – | 4,000 | 438,020 |
| 17 | University of Warwick | 416,366 | (6,875) | 17,978 | 427,469 |
| 18 | University of Bath | 368,019 | 40,798 | 9,500 | 418,317 |
| 19 | University of Birmingham | 383,694 | 11,508 | 14,500 | 409,702 |
| 20 | Loughborough University | 379,081 | 8,925 | 21,180 | 409,186 |
| 21 | University of Nottingham | 406,031 | – | – | 406,031 |
| 22 | University of Edinburgh | 381,250 | 7,647 | 13,398 | 402,295 |
| 23 | University of York | 381,643 | – | 4,000 | 385,643 |
| 24 | City, University of London | 352,862 | – | 800 | 353,662 |
| 25 | Aston University | 286,990 | – | 25,000 | 311,990 |
| Total | 22,244,289 | 175,015 | 296,939 | 22,716,243 |
----- Start of picture text -----
28 Royal Academy of Engineering
----- End of picture text -----
Report of Trustee Board
The Academy awarded grants across the UK and internationally. A heatmap of awards made across the UK is shown below by NUTS2* region. This map shows only grant funding and does not include other regionally based Academy activities.
*Nomenclature of Territorial Units for Statistics or NUTS (French: Nomenclature des unités territoriales statistiques ) is a geocode standard for referencing the subdivisions of countries for statistical purposes.
----- Start of picture text -----
Annual Report and Accounts 2020|2021 29
----- End of picture text -----
Structure, governance and management
Election to the Trustee Board
Trustee Board members are elected for a term of three years with the exception of the President who is elected for a term of up to five years. With the exception of the President, Trustees are eligible for re-election for a further three-year term. The Trustee election is by a ballot of Fellows each year. The Nominations Committee helps to ensure that there is an appropriate candidate slate for election to the Trustee Board and the associated governance roles.
Induction and training of Trustee Board members
Following election, Trustees are provided with an information pack comprising the Academy’s Charter, Statutes and Regulations, a Charity Commission publication on the responsibilities of charity trustees and the Academy strategy. Trustee Board members receive a full induction briefing from senior staff and the Academy’s legal advisor, and are encouraged to attend recommended external training courses for charity trustees.
Charity Governance Code
The Trustees have undertaken a review of current Academy practice mapped against the recommended practice of the Charity Governance Code. The vast majority of Academy practices correspond with the recommended practices set out in the Code. A governance review was conducted in 2020/21, which considered any further alignment required to adopt recommended practices of the Code.
Code of Conduct
A Code of Conduct is in place to cover the conduct and ethical behaviour expected of Fellows of the Royal Academy of Engineering. Fellows are ambassadors for the Academy and should therefore conduct themselves in a manner that supports the Academy’s aims and that upholds and enhances the reputation of the Academy and its Fellows. Fellows are expected to follow the Nolan principles of selflessness, integrity, objectivity, accountability, openness, honesty, and leadership. Fellows who are working for or on behalf of the Academy must act in accordance with Academy policies on conduct and behaviour covering items such as conflicts of interest, equality, diversity and inclusion, antibullying and harassment, and anti-bribery. The Conduct Committee, chaired by the Vice-President for Fellowship Engagement, has been established to oversee the Code and its implementation.
Internal control
Finance Committee
The Finance Committee is mandated by and reports to the Trustee Board on the following issues:
-
Setting a budget prior to each financial year for approval by the Trustee Board.
-
Appointing and monitoring the performance of independent investment advisers.
-
Approving authorised signatories and setting limits on delegated financial authorities.
-
Monitoring actual financial performance against budget.
-
Reviewing the reserves policy annually.
-
Ensuring that accounting rules are followed.
Detailed management accounts are prepared monthly within 10 working days of the month end and submitted six times a year to the Finance Committee. Summarised accounts are submitted at each Trustee Board meeting.
The Finance Committee meets at least six times during each financial year. Included in the items considered by the Committee during the year were the Academy’s investment strategy, the performance of RAE Trading Limited and the development of a financial strategy.
Audit and Risk Committee
The Audit and Risk Committee is mandated by and reports to the Trustee Board on the following issues:
-
The effectiveness and development of the Academy’s risk management policy and processes and compliance with these.
-
The review of the Academy’s main risks and their management, particularly strategic risks and control processes concerns, and assessment of the level of assurance on the controls in place.
-
The audit and review of the Academy’s activities, assessing compliance with and effectiveness of controls, policies and processes.
-
The review of significant projects, programmes and other activities to ensure that suitable contracts are in place and that the financial, operational and risk management is appropriate.
-
Recommendations on the appointment,
reappointment and removal of the external auditors.
- The review of the external auditor’s findings and in particular any problems, reservations and observations arising during the audit.
The Audit and Risk Committee meets at least four times during each financial year. Included in the items considered by the Committee during the year were the review of the external audit findings, a review of the
----- Start of picture text -----
30 Royal Academy of Engineering
----- End of picture text -----
Structure, governance and management
risk appetite statement and a review of the Academy international programmes.
Fundraising statement
Section 162a of the Charities Act 2011 requires charities to make a statement regarding fundraising activities. Although the Academy does not undertake widespread fundraising from the general public, the legislation defines fundraising as “soliciting or otherwise procuring money or other property for charitable purposes”. Such amounts receivable are presented in the Academy’s accounts as ‘voluntary income’ and include legacies and grants. The day-to-day management of all income generation is delegated to the senior leadership team, who are accountable to the Trustees.
The charity adheres to the Institute of Fundraising Code of Fundraising Practice, which outlines standards expected of all charitable fundraising organisations in the UK. The Academy has received no complaints in relation to fundraising activities. Its terms of employment require staff to behave reasonably at all times.
Grant-making policy
The grant and award programmes are run by committees or steering groups of Fellows of the Academy, and where appropriate other experts, chosen based on their experience and expertise. Fellows of the Academy offer their time freely; no remuneration was paid in the year beyond the reimbursement of reasonable expenses. There is a policy of strict impartiality and no Fellow may participate in a group/award decision if there is a conflict of interest. The role of Academy staff is one of administration of programmes.
Senior leadership team
Day-to-day management of the Academy is the responsibility of the Chief Executive who, with the directors, comprise the senior leadership team listed below, which meets weekly. Strategy is set by the Trustee Board, and implemented by the senior leadership team, with oversight provided by Academy committees.
The directors who served during the period of the report are as follows:
Chief Executive | Dr Hayaatun Sillem CBE
Chief Operating Officer | Chris Boyle
Director, Development | Samantha Bagchi Director, Programmes | Dr Andrew Clark
Director, Engineering and Education | Dr Rhys Morgan Director, Policy | Dr Nick Starkey
Director, Communications and Engagement | Joanna Trigg
Director, Enterprise and Sustainable Development | Ana Avaliani (appointed 1 January 2021)
Director, Finance | Burnham Quail (appointed 1 January 2021)
Director, Queen Elizabeth Prize for Engineering | Keshini Navaratnam (resigned 31 December 2020)
Grant awardees are issued with agreements and progress is monitored and recorded utilising a grant management system.
Remuneration policy
The Academy’s policy is to pay staff salaries at the market mid-point. Salaries are reviewed in alternate years following a market benchmarking exercise conducted by an independent consultancy. The last independent review was undertaken during 2019 to inform the salary review implemented with effect from 1 April 2020.
The remuneration of the Chief Executive and directors is set annually by the Remuneration Committee. In setting appropriate levels of senior management pay, the Remuneration Committee considered the skills, experience and competencies required for each role, and the remuneration level for those roles in sectors where suitable candidates would be found.
Signed on behalf of the Trustee Board on 12 July 2021
Professor Sir Jim McDonald FREng FRSE President
Professor Stephen Young FREng Chair of the Finance Committee
----- Start of picture text -----
Annual Report and Accounts 2020|2021 31
----- End of picture text -----
Auditor’s report
Independent auditor’s report to the members and Trustees of the Royal Academy of Engineering
Opinion on the financial statements
In our opinion, the financial statements:
-
give a true and fair view of the state of the Group’s and of the Parent Charity’s affairs as at 31 March 2021 and of the Group’s incoming resources and application of resources and the Parent Charity’s incoming resources and application of resources for the year then ended;
-
have been properly prepared in accordance with United Kingdom Generally Accepted Accounting Practice; and
-
have been prepared in accordance with the requirements of the Charities Act 2011.
We have audited the financial statements of Royal Academy of Engineering (“the Parent Charity”) and its subsidiary (“the Group”) for the year ended 31 March 2021 which comprise the Consolidated Statement of Financial Activities, the Consolidated and Parent Charity balance sheets, the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows and notes to the financial statements, including a summary of significant accounting policies. The financial reporting framework that has been applied in their preparation is applicable law and United Kingdom Accounting Standards, including Financial Reporting Standard 102 The Financial Reporting Standard applicable in the UK and Republic of Ireland (United Kingdom Generally Accepted Accounting Practice).
Opinion on other matter as required by BEIS grant letters
In our opinion, in all material respects, the grant payments received from the Department for Business, Energy, and Industrial Strategy (BEIS) have been applied for the purposes set out in the Grant Letters and in accordance with the terms and conditions of the agreements.
Basis for opinion
We conducted our audit in accordance with International Standards on Auditing (UK) (ISAs (UK)) and applicable law. Our responsibilities under those standards are further described in the Auditor’s responsibilities for the audit of the financial statements section of our report. We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion.
Independence
We remain independent of the Group and the Parent Charity in accordance with the ethical requirements that are relevant to our audit of the financial statements in the UK, including the FRC’s Ethical Standard, and we have
fulfilled our other ethical responsibilities in accordance with these requirements.
Conclusions related to going concern
In auditing the financial statements, we have concluded that the Trustees’ use of the going concern basis of accounting in the preparation of the financial statements is appropriate.
Based on the work we have performed, we have not identified any material uncertainties relating to events or conditions that, individually or collectively, may cast significant doubt on the Group and the Parent Charity’s ability to continue as a going concern for a period of at least twelve months from when the financial statements are authorised for issue.
Our responsibilities and the responsibilities of the Trustees with respect to going concern are described in the relevant sections of this report.
Other information
The Trustees are responsible for the other information. The other information comprises the information included in the Annual Report, other than the financial statements and our auditor’s report thereon. The other information comprises: the Chairman and Chief Executive’s Statement and the Report of the Trustees (including the Strategic Report).
Our opinion on the financial statements does not cover the other information and, except to the extent otherwise explicitly stated in our report, we do not express any form of assurance conclusion thereon.
Our responsibility is to read the other information and, in doing so, consider whether the other information is materially inconsistent with the financial statements or our knowledge obtained in the audit or otherwise appears to be materially misstated. If we identify such material inconsistencies or apparent material misstatements, we are required to determine whether there is a material misstatement in the financial statements or a material misstatement of the other information. If, based on the work we have performed, we conclude that there is a material misstatement of this other information, we are required to report that fact.
We have nothing to report in this regard.
Matters on which we are required to report by exception
We have nothing to report in respect of the following matters in relation to which the Charities Act 2011 requires us to report to you if, in our opinion:
• the information contained in the financial statements
----- Start of picture text -----
32 Royal Academy of Engineering
----- End of picture text -----
Auditor’s report
is inconsistent in any material respects with the Trustees’ Annual Report
-
adequate accounting records have not been kept by the Parent Charity
-
the Parent Charity financial statements are not in agreement with the accounting records and returns
-
we have not received all the information and explanations we require for our audit.
Responsibilities of Trustees
As explained more fully in the Trustees’ responsibilities statement, the Trustees (who are also the directors of the charitable company for the purposes of company law) are responsible for the preparation of the financial statements and for being satisfied that they give a true and fair view, and for such internal control as the Trustees determines is necessary to enable the preparation of financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.
In preparing the financial statements, the Trustees are responsible for assessing the Group’s and the Parent Charity’s ability to continue as a going concern, disclosing, as applicable, matters related to going concern and using the going concern basis of accounting unless the Trustees either intend to liquidate the Group or the Parent Charity or to cease operations, or have no realistic alternative but to do so.
Auditor’s responsibilities for the audit of the financial statements
We have been appointed as auditor under section 144 of the Charities Act 2011 and report in accordance with the Acts and relevant regulations made or having effect thereunder.
Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements as a whole are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and to issue an auditor’s report that includes our opinion. Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance, but is not a guarantee that an audit conducted in accordance with ISAs (UK) will always detect a material misstatement when it exists. Misstatements can arise from fraud or error and are considered material if, individually or in the aggregate, they could reasonably be expected to influence the economic decisions of users taken on the basis of these financial statements.
Extent to which the audit was capable of detecting irregularities, including fraud
Irregularities, including fraud, are instances of noncompliance with laws and regulations. We design procedures in line with our responsibilities, outlined above, to detect material misstatements in respect
of irregularities, including fraud. The extent to which our procedures are capable of detecting irregularities, including fraud is detailed below:
-
We enquired of management, and the Audit and Risk Committee, including obtaining and reviewing supporting documentation, concerning the group’s policies and procedures relating to:
-
identifying, evaluating and complying with laws and regulations and whether they were aware of any instances of non-compliance;
-
detecting and responding to the risks of fraud and whether they have knowledge of any actual, suspected or alleged fraud; and
-
the internal controls established to mitigate risks related to fraud or non-compliance with laws and regulations.
-
We obtained an understanding of the legal and regulatory frameworks that are applicable to the Charity, specifically the Charities Act 2011.
-
We evaluated management’s incentives and opportunities for fraudulent manipulation of the financial statements (including the risk of override of controls), and determined that the principal risks were related to posting inappropriate journal entries to manipulate financial results and management bias in accounting estimates.
Audit response to risks identified
-
We reviewed the financial statement disclosures and tested supporting documentation to assess compliance with relevant laws and regulations discussed above;
-
We performed analytical procedures to identify any unusual or unexpected relationships that may indicate risks of material misstatement due to fraud;
-
We read minutes of meetings of those charged with governance, and reviewed serious incident reports filed with the Charity Regulators; and
-
In addressing the risk of fraud through management override of controls, we tested the appropriateness of journal entries and other adjustments; assessed whether the judgements made in making accounting estimates are indicative of a potential bias; and evaluated the business rationale of any significant transactions that are unusual or outside the normal course of business.
Our audit procedures were designed to respond to risks of material misstatement in the financial statements, recognising that the risk of not detecting a material misstatement due to fraud is higher than the risk of not detecting one resulting from error, as fraud may involve deliberate concealment by, for example, forgery, misrepresentations or through collusion. There are inherent limitations in the audit procedures performed and the further removed non-compliance with laws and regulations is from the events and transactions reflected
----- Start of picture text -----
Annual Report and Accounts 2020|2021 33
----- End of picture text -----
Auditor’s report
in the financial statements, the less likely we are to become aware of it.
A further description of our responsibilities for the audit of the financial statements is located at the Financial Reporting Council’s (“FRC’s”) website at: www.frc.org.uk/ auditorsresponsibilities. This description forms part of our auditor’s report.
Use of our report
This report is made solely to the Charity’s Trustees, as a body, in accordance with the Charities Act 2011. Our audit work has been undertaken so that we might state to the Charity’s Trustees those matters we are required to state to them in auditor’s report and for no other purpose. To the fullest extent permitted by law, we do not accept or assume responsibility to anyone other than the Charity and the Charity’s Trustees as a body, for our audit work, for this report, or for the opinions we have formed.
BDO LLP Statutory auditor London, UK
Date: 10 September 2021
BDO LLP is a limited liability partnership registered in England and Wales (with registered number OC305127).
----- Start of picture text -----
34 Royal Academy of Engineering
----- End of picture text -----
Consolidated statement of financial activities
| Year ended 31 March 2021 | Unrestricted | Restricted | Total | Unrestricted |
Restricted | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Notes | funds 2021 | funds 2021 | 31 March | funds 2020 |
funds 2020 | 31 March | |
| 2021 | 2020 | ||||||
| £ | £ | £ | £ | £ | £ | ||
| Income from: | |||||||
| Charitable activities | 2,3,4 | – | 49,017,668 | 49,017,668 | – | 48,033,983 | 48,033,983 |
| Donations and legacies | 5 | 69,523 | 463,046 | 532,569 | 491,996 | 1,192,968 | 1,684,964 |
| Other tradingactivities | 6a | 444,410 | – | 444,410 | 1,602,886 | – | 1,602,886 |
| Investments | 6 | 604,932 | 612,254 | 1,217,186 | 864,317 | 768,798 | 1,633,115 |
| Total income | 1,118,865 | 50,092,968 | 51,211,833 | 2,959,199 | 49,995,749 | 52,954,948 | |
| Expenditure on: | |||||||
| Raisingfunds | 834,125 | 194,277 | 1,028,402 | 1,407,431 | 212,988 | 1,620,419 | |
| Charitable activities | 7 | 1,666,483 | 51,734,943 | 53,401,426 | 1,736,462 | 47,063,692 | 48,800,154 |
| Other | 8 | 64,104 | 12,517 | 76,621 | 46,482 | 7,496 | 53,978 |
| Total expenditure | 2,564,712 | 51,941,737 | 54,506,449 | 3,190,375 | 47,284,176 | 50,474,551 | |
| Net gains/(losses) on | |||||||
| investment | 11 | 3,995,164 | 5,157,955 | 9,153,119 | (2,820,094) | (2,284,615) | (5,104,709) |
| Net income /(expenditure) | 2,549,317 | 3,309,186 | 5,858,503 | (3,051,270) | 426,958 | (2,624,312) | |
| Transfer between funds | 930,891 | (930,891) | – | 564,756 | (564,756) | – | |
| Net movement in funds | 3,480,208 | 2,378,295 | 5,858,503 | (2,486,514) | (137,798) | (2,624,312) | |
| Fund balances brought | |||||||
| forward 1 April | 28,605,144 | 33,947,470 | 62,552,614 | 31,091,658 | 34,085,268 | 65,176,926 | |
| Fund balances carried | 16, 17 | ||||||
| forward 31 March | 32,085,352 | 36,325,765 | 68,411,117 | 28,605,144 | 33,947,470 | 62,552,614 |
All the above results are derived from continuing activities. There are no gains and losses other than those stated above.
----- Start of picture text -----
Annual Report and Accounts 2020|2021 35
----- End of picture text -----
Balance sheets
| At 31 March 2021 Notes |
Group 2021 2020 £ £ |
Charity 2021 2020 £ £ |
|---|---|---|
| Tangible fxed assets 10 Investments 11 |
24,836,180 24,642,166 53,099,866 44,332,050 |
24,836,181 24,642,167 26,722,246 22,383,024 |
| Total fxed assets | 77,936,046 68,974,216 |
51,558,427 47,025,191 |
| Current assets: | ||
| Debtors 12 |
8,795,658 7,893,094 |
8,968,764 8,021,314 |
| Stock 13 |
3,108 3,195 |
3,108 3,194 |
| Cash at bank | 3,198,637 5,645,736 |
2,391,975 4,927,873 |
| Short-term deposits | 377,879 532,661 |
61,008 167,072 |
| 12,375,282 14,074,686 |
11,424,855 13,119,453 |
|
| Liabilities | ||
| Creditors (amounts falling due within one year) 14a |
(10,400,211) (8,996,288) |
(9,407,400) (8,796,169) |
| Net current assets | 1,975,071 5,078,398 |
2,017,455 4,323,284 |
| Total assets less current liabilities | 79,911,117 74,052,614 |
53,575,882 51,348,475 |
| Creditors (amounts falling due beyond oneyear) 14c |
(11,500,000) (11,500,000) |
(11,500,000) (11,500,000) |
| Total net assets | 68,411,117 62,552,614 |
42,075,882 39,848,475 |
| **The funds of the charity: ** | ||
| Restricted income funds 16 |
36,325,765 33,947,470 |
10,154,781 11,334,191 |
| Unrestricted funds | ||
| Special funds | – – |
– – |
| Designated fund | 3,197,927 2,456,831 |
329,256 329,256 |
| General fund | 28,887,425 26,148,313 |
31,591,845 28,185,028 |
| Total unrestricted funds | 32,085,352 28,605,144 |
31,921,101 28,514,284 |
| Total charitable funds | 68,411,117 62,552,614 |
42,075,882 39,848,475 |
These financial statements were approved and authorised for issue by the President and Chair of the Finance Committee under delegated authority from the Trustee Board.
Signed on behalf of the Trustee Board on 12 July 2021
Professor Sir Jim McDonald FREng
President
Professor Stephen Young FREng Chair of the Finance Committee
----- Start of picture text -----
36 Royal Academy of Engineering
----- End of picture text -----
Consolidated statement of cash flows
| Year ended 31 March 2021 | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 2020 | |
| £ | £ | |
| Cash fows from operating activities: | ||
| Net cash expended byoperatingactivities | (3,475,530) | 1,444,443 |
| Cash fows from investingactivities: | ||
| Dividends, interest and rents from investments | 1,217,183 | 1,633,115 |
| Purchase ofproperty,plants and equipment | (728,836) | (382,052) |
| Proceeds from the sale of investments | 9,985,319 | 3,806,629 |
| Purchase of investments | (9,600,017) | (3,070,576) |
| Net cashprovided byinvestingactivities | 873,649 | 1,987,116 |
| Cash fows used in fnancingactivities: | ||
| Change in cash and cash equivalents in the reporting period | (2,601,881) | 3,431,559 |
| Cash and cash equivalents at 1 April | 6,178,397 | 2,746,838 |
| Cash and cash equivalents at 31 March | 3,576,516 | 6,178,397 |
| Reconciliation of net income/(expenditure) to net cash fow | ||
| from operating activities | ||
| Net (expenditure)/income for the reporting periods (as per the statement of | ||
| fnancial activities) | 5,858,503 | (2,624,312) |
| Net losses/(gains)on investments | (9,153,119) | 5,104,709 |
| Adjustments for: | ||
| Depreciation charges | 534,822 | 566,271 |
| Dividends, interest and rents from investments | (1,217,186) | (1,633,115) |
| Decrease in stocks | 87 | (1,917) |
| Decrease /(increase)in debtors | (902,564) | (2,808,614) |
| (Decrease)/increase in creditors | 1,403,927 | 2,841,421 |
| Net cash expended by operating activities | (3,475,530) | 1,444,443 |
| Analysis of cash and cash equivalents | ||
| Cash in hand | 3,198,637 | 5,645,736 |
| Notice deposits | 377,879 | 532,661 |
| Total cash and cash equivalents | 3,576,516 | 6,178,397 |
----- Start of picture text -----
Annual Report and Accounts 2020|2021 37
----- End of picture text -----
Notes to the accounts
For the year ended 31 March 2021
Note 1 – Accounting policies
(a) Basis of preparation of the accounts
The annual report, incorporating the financial statements for the year ended 31 March 2021, has been prepared in accordance with the Academy’s Royal Charter, and in compliance Accounting and Reporting by Charities: Statement of Recommended Practice 2019 applicable to charities preparing their accounts in accordance with the Financial Reporting Standard applicable in the UK and Republic of Ireland (FRS102) (effective 1 January 2015) – (Charities SORP (FRS102)), the Financial Reporting Standard applicable in the UK and Republic of Ireland (FRS102). The Academy meets the definition of public benefit entity under FRS102. These financial statements are prepared under FRS102.
(b) Historical cost convention
The financial statements have been prepared under the historical cost convention, as modified for the inclusion of investment assets at market value.
(c) Consolidation
The financial statements consolidate the results of the Academy and its own wholly owned subsidiaries, RAE Trading Limited and the Queen Elizabeth Prize for Engineering Foundation, on a line-by-line basis. Transactions and balances between the Academy and its subsidiaries have been eliminated from the consolidated financial statements. Balances between the Academy and the subsidiaries are disclosed in the notes of the Academy’s balance sheet. A separate statement of Financial Activities and Income and Expenditure Account for the Academy has not been presented because the Academy has taken advantage of the exemption afforded by FRS 102.
(d) Income
The specific bases for accounting for income are described below. In general terms, income is accounted for on a receivable basis, gross of related expenditure. Income is only recognised where there is evidence of entitlement, where it is probable that income will be received and recognised only when income can be measured.
-
Grants receivable are recognised when entitlement to the grant is approved and communicated, and also include returned grants that are accounted for on receipt.
-
Gifts and donations and legacies are included in full in the statement of financial activities when receivable.
-
For legacies, entitlement is taken as the earlier of the date on which either: the Academy is aware that probate has been granted, the estate has been finalised and notification has been made by the executor(s) to the Academy that a distribution will be made; or when a distribution is received from the estate. Receipt of a legacy, in whole or in part, is only considered probable when the amount can be measured reliably and the Academy has been notified to the executor’s intention to make a distribution.
-
Income from sales of goods or contracts for services is recognised when the goods and services are delivered.
-
Investment income is included in the Statement of Financial Activities in the year in which it is receivable.
– Other incoming resources consist of subscriptions, including income tax recoverable.
(e) Donated services and facilities
Donated professional services and donated facilities are recognised as income when the Academy has control over the item, any condition associated with the donated item has been
met, the receipt of economic benefit from the use by the Academy of the item is probable and that economic benefit can be measured reliably. On receipt, donated professional services and donated facilities are recognised on the basis of the value of the gift to the Academy, which is the amount the Academy would have been willing to pay to obtain services or facilities of equivalent economic benefit on the open market; a corresponding amount is then recognised in expenditure in the period of receipt.
(f) Expenditure
Expenditure is recognised on an accruals basis, gross of any related income. Costs are allocated to activities as described below. Indirect costs are apportioned to activities on a basis consistent with the use of the resources.
-
Costs of raising funds comprise direct costs and expense of staff involved with fundraising, fees paid to investment fund managers, and trading costs.
-
Charitable activities – grants. Grants payable are charged in the year in which the commitments to pay the grants are made.
-
Charitable activities – other. Other charitable expenditure includes all direct expenditure, including irrecoverable VAT and staff costs, which is directly attributable to activities. Indirect costs are allocated to each charitable activity based on the number of staff directly supporting the activity.
(g) Support costs
Support costs are those functions that assist the work of the Academy and mainly comprise of staff costs and overheads. Support costs, which include irrecoverable VAT, are assigned to the Academy’s charitable objectives in line with the direct expenditure under each heading.
----- Start of picture text -----
38 Royal Academy of Engineering
----- End of picture text -----
Notes to the accounts
(h) Operating leases
Rental costs under operating leases are charged to the Statement of Financial Activities evenly over the term of the lease.
(i) Tangible fixed assets
Depreciation is provided on all tangible fixed assets at rates calculated to write off the cost of each asset over its expected useful life, as follows:
Office fixtures and fittings – over
five years
Computer equipment – over
three years
Leasehold cost – over term of
lease
Carlton House Terrace – over the term of lease
(j) Investments
Listed investments are included in the financial statements at market value at the balance sheet date. Gains/losses on disposal of investments and revaluation of investments are recognised in the year of gain or loss and are allocated to the funds to which the investments relate. Investments in subsidiaries are included in the financial statements at cost.
(k) Pensions
The Academy operates a defined contribution pension scheme. The assets of the scheme are held separately from those of the Academy in independently administered funds. The pensions cost charge represents contributions payable to the scheme in the year. The Academy has no liability under the scheme other than the payment of those contributions.
(l) Funds
General funds are those that are available for use at the Council’s discretion in the furtherance of the Academy’s objectives. Designated funds are unrestricted funds set aside for unrestricted purposes and which would otherwise form part of general funds. Details of the nature and purpose of each designated fund are set out in note 16. Restricted funds are funds that are subject
to restrictions imposed by donors and are applied in accordance with these restrictions. Details of the nature and purpose of each restricted fund are set out in note 16.
(m) Debtors
Trade and other debtors are recognised at the settlement amount due after any trade discount offered. Prepayments are valued at the amount prepaid net of any trade discounts due.
(n) Stock
-
Stock is included at the lower of cost or net realisable value.
-
(o) Cash and cash equivalents at bank
-
Cash and cash equivalents at bank includes cash and short term highly liquid investments obtainable within three months.
(p) Creditors
Creditors are recognised where the Academy has a present obligation resulting from a past event that will probably result in the transfer of funds to a third party and the amount due to settle the obligation can be measured or estimated reliably. Creditors are normally recognised at their settlement amount after allowing for any trade discounts due.
(q) Financial instruments
The Academy only has financial assets and financial liabilities of a kind that qualify as basic financial instruments. Basic financial instruments are initially recognised at transaction value and subsequently measured at their settlement value with the exception of bank loans, which are subsequently measured at amortised cost using the effective interest method.
(r) Corporation taxation
The Academy is exempt from tax on income and gains falling within section 505 of the Taxes Act 1988 or section 252 of the Taxation of Chargeable Gains Act 1992 to the extent that these are applied to its charitable objectives.
(s) Going concern
No material uncertainties that may cast significant doubt about the ability of the charity to continue as a going concern have been identified by the Trustees and therefore these accounts have been prepared on a going concern basis. The Royal Academy of Engineering’s senior leadership team monitor the Group and Charity’s cash position on a monthly basis by looking at the cash flow forecast for the next 12 months, broken down by month. This forecast, combined with an assessment of the future reserves position, forms the basis of our assessment of going concern. It has been stress tested to reflect a number of possible scenarios regarding the coronavirus pandemic and its impact on the wider economy, including using reverse stress testing. In doing so, we have particularly considered the impact of a global economic recession that results in austerity measures and the Charity’s government funding being reduced over and above our key risk assumptions (set out in the Financial Review). Based on these forecasts, and the Group and Charity’s net asset position of £68.4 million, which is comprised primarily of cash and investments, we believe that the going concern basis of accounting remains appropriate for our accounts. We have also considered whether there is any material uncertainty that may cast significant doubt over the use of that basis for a period of at least 12 months from the date of approval of the financial statements and we do not believe that this is the case.
(t) Government grants
Grants payable are recognised when entitlement to the grant is approved and communicated, and also include returned grants that are accounted for on receipt.
----- Start of picture text -----
Annual Report and Accounts 2020|2021 39
----- End of picture text -----
Notes to the accounts
| Year ended 31 March 2021 | Unrestricted | Restricted | Totals | Unrestricted | Restricted | Totals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| funds | funds | 31 March | funds | funds | 31 March | |
| 2021 | 2020 | |||||
| £ | £ | £ | £ | £ | £ | |
| Note 2 – Grants | ||||||
| Government grant | ||||||
| (See note 3) | – | 13,800,231 | 13,800,231 | – | 11,749,214 | 11,749,214 |
| Note 3 – Governmentgrant | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grant was expended on: | ||||||
| Programme expenditure | – | 11,696,206 | 11,696,206 | – | 10,491,000 | 10,491,000 |
| Cost of managing | ||||||
| programmes | – | 2,104,026 | 2,104,026 | – | 1,258,214 | 1,258,214 |
| – | 13,800,231 | 13,800,231 | – | 11,749,214 | 11,749,214 | |
| Note 4 – Other grants and | ||||||
| contracts | ||||||
| Investment in Research Talent | – | 13,977,048 | 13,977,048 | – | 12,797,763 | 12,797,763 |
| Global Challenges Research | ||||||
| Fund | – | 8,277,532 | 8,277,532 | – | 8,531,252 | 8,531,252 |
| Newton Fund | – | 7,820,780 | 7,820,780 | – | 7,994,202 | 7,994,202 |
| Enterprise Hub | – | 1,135,362 | 1,135,362 | – | 70,553 | 70,553 |
| UK Intelligence Community | ||||||
| (IC) Postdoctoral Research | ||||||
| Fellowships | – | 855,000 | 855,000 | – | 703,000 | 703,000 |
| ConnectingSTEM Teachers | – | 558,561 | 558,561 | – | 1,309,845 | 1,309,845 |
| Sainsbury Management | ||||||
| Fellowships | – | 485,015 | 485,015 | – | 484,625 | 484,625 |
| Tier 1 Visa Applications | – | 329,950 | 329,950 | – | 164,475 | 164,475 |
| Leverhulme Fellowships | – | 310,810 | 310,810 | – | 199,958 | 199,958 |
| 1851 Royal Commission | ||||||
| Enterprise Fellowships | – | 300,000 | 300,000 | – | 239,922 | 239,922 |
| RAEng/EPSRC Research | ||||||
| Fellowships | – | 237,324 | 237,324 | – | 185,776 | 185,776 |
| BEIS Bhattacharrya | – | 235,998 | 235,998 | – | 30,935 | 30,935 |
| Other awards and contracts | – | 229,899 | 229,899 | – | 181,641 | 181,641 |
| Welsh Valleys Bursaries | ||||||
| Scheme | – | 170,100 | 170,100 | – | 1,100 | 1,100 |
| Pandemic Response | – | 123,400 | 123,400 | – | – | – |
| Africa Prize for Engineering | ||||||
| Innovation | – | 100,000 | 100,000 | – | 107,640 | 107,640 |
| Sir Ralph Robins Scholarships | – | 50,000 | 50,000 | – | 41 | 41 |
| MacRobert Award | – | 20,158 | 20,158 | – | 41,000 | 41,000 |
----- Start of picture text -----
40 Royal Academy of Engineering
----- End of picture text -----
Notes to the accounts
| Year ended 31 March 2021 | Unrestricted | Restricted | Totals | Unrestricted | Restricted | Totals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| funds | funds | 31 March | funds | funds | 31 March | |
| 2021 | 2020 | |||||
| £ | £ | £ | £ | £ | £ | |
| KS2 STEM Resources & CPD | ||||||
| Programme | – | 500 | 500 | – | 79,317 | 79,317 |
| Programme for safer complex | ||||||
| industrial and engineered | ||||||
| systems | – | – | – | – | 1,000,000 | 1,000,000 |
| End of engineered life | – | – | – | – | 1,000,000 | 1,000,000 |
| Engineering skills where they | ||||||
| are most needed | – | – | – | – | 1,000,000 | 1,000,000 |
| Global Grand Challenges | ||||||
| Summit 2019 | – | – | – | – | 88,193 | 88,193 |
| Education Studies and | ||||||
| Support | – | – | – | – | 66,700 | 66,700 |
| VisitingProfessors | – | – | – | – | 6,830 | 6,830 |
| – | 35,217,437 | 35,217,437 | – | 36,284,768 | 36,284,768 | |
| MSc Aerospace Bursary Programme | showing negative | income 2018/19 | due to release of | provision following | the end of the | scheme |
| Total charitable activities | – | 49,017,668 | 49,017,668 | – | 48,033,983 | 48,033,983 |
| Note 5 – Donations and | ||||||
| legacies | ||||||
| Annual Appeal | 60,806 | – | 60,806 | 37,904 | – | 37,904 |
| This is Engineering | – | 259,000 | 259,000 | – | 992,968 | 992,968 |
| Queen Elizabeth Prize for | ||||||
| Engineering | – | 204,046 | 204,046 | – | 200,000 | 200,000 |
| Legacies | – | – | – | 434,660 | – | 434,660 |
| Other | 8,717 | – | 8,717 | 19,432 | – | 19,432 |
| 69,523 | 463,046 | 532,569 | 491,996 | 1,192,968 | 1,684,964 | |
| Note 6 – Investment income | ||||||
| Dividends and income | ||||||
| from equity investments | ||||||
| and fxed interest bonds | 601,616 | 612,070 | 1,213,685 | 843,477 | 767,195 | 1,610,672 |
| Interest on bank deposits | 3,316 | 184 | 3,501 | 20,840 | 1,603 | 22,444 |
| 604,932 | 612,254 | 1,217,186 | 864,317 | 768,798 | 1,633,115 | |
| Note 6a – Other trading | ||||||
| income | ||||||
| Sponsorshipand events | 61,774 | – | 61,774 | 150,382 | – | 150,382 |
| Subscription income | 335,271 | – | 335,271 | 331,586 | – | 331,586 |
| Advertising income and | ||||||
| merchandising | 26,208 | – | 26,208 | 21,649 | – | 21,649 |
| Conferencingbusiness | 21,157 | – | 21,157 | 1,099,269 | – | 1,099,269 |
| 444,410 | – | 444,410 | 1,602,886 | – | 1,602,886 |
----- Start of picture text -----
Annual Report and Accounts 2020|2021 41
----- End of picture text -----
Notes to the accounts
| Talent and | Innovation | Policy and | Queen | Total | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| diversity | engagement | Elizabeth | 31 March | 31 March | ||
| Prize for | 2021 | 2020 | ||||
| Engineering | ||||||
| Foundation | ||||||
| £ | £ | £ | £ | £ | £ | |
| Note 7 – Charitable | ||||||
| activities | ||||||
| Unrestricted | ||||||
| Charitable activities | 6,495 | – | 79,619 | – | 86,114 | 118,275 |
| Charitablegrants | 65,366 | – | – | – | 65,366 | 37,386 |
| Direct salaries | 46,947 | – | 245,240 | – | 292,187 | 400,563 |
| Support costs | 327,453 | – | 895,364 | – | 1,222,817 | 1,180,238 |
| 446,261 | – | 1,220,223 | – | 1,666,484 | 1,736,462 | |
| Restricted | ||||||
| Charitable activities | 485,338 | 5,390,931 | 905,063 | 1,378,044 | 8,159,376 | 11,238,045 |
| Charitablegrants | 1,329,025 | 34,078,498 | 831,747 | – | 36,239,270 | 28,972,490 |
| Direct salaries | 328,783 | 2,216,161 | 1,825,059 | 270,036 | 4,640,039 | 4,148,384 |
| Support costs | 121,460 | 2,362,467 | 201,863 | 10,467 | 2,696,257 | 2,704,773 |
| 2,264,605 | 44,048,058 | 3,763,732 | 1,658,546 | 51,734,942 | 47,063,692 | |
| Total charitable | ||||||
| activities | 2,710,866 | 44,048,058 | 4,983,955 | 1,658,546 | 53,401,426 | 48,800,154 |
Total support costs of £3,919,074 are made up of indirect staff costs totalling £1,672,285 and accommodation costs and overheads totalling £2,246,789
| 2020 Total charitable | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| activities | 5,480,485 | 40,865,794 | 1,826,776 | 627,099 | 48,800,154 |
In 2020 £1,736,462 of charitable activities expenditure related to unrestricted funds and £47,063,692 related to restricted funds
| 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|
| £ | £ | |
| Note 8 – Other costs | ||
| Auditor’s fees: | ||
| – Audit | 35,026 | 28,134 |
| – Other services | 3,050 | 17,699 |
| Legal andprofessional fees | 38,544 | 8,145 |
| 76,621 | 53,978 | |
| £6,144 was charged to the Academyin relation to operatingleases |
----- Start of picture text -----
42 Royal Academy of Engineering
----- End of picture text -----
Notes to the accounts
| Note 9 – Staff andpensions costs | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| Gross salaries | 5,886,843 | 5,114,657 |
| Employer's National Insurance less NI Allowance | 651,935 | 566,706 |
| Benefts in kind | 39,839 | 31,253 |
| Pension charge | 608,871 | 523,618 |
| Recruitment costs | 52,833 | 87,970 |
| Temporarystaff costs | 28,895 | 64,822 |
| Trainingcosts | 28,431 | 88,476 |
| Other costs | 121,161 | 85,077 |
| 7,418,807 | 6,562,579 | |
| Average number of staff in theyear byactivity: | 2021 | 2020 |
| – Talent and diversity | 13 | 11 |
| – Innovation | 39 | 35 |
| – Policyand engagement | 40 | 35 |
| – Executive, development, finance and administration | 32 | 30 |
| – Queen Elizabeth Prize for EngineeringFoundation | 6 | 7 |
| 130 | 118 |
No remuneration is paid to the President or members of the Trustee board of the Academy. Travelling expenses to attend Trustee Board meetings were reimbursed to seven board members in 2020/21 amounting to £271 (2019/20 £13,699 – ten members). Ex gratia payments of £72,000 were made in 2020/21 (2019/20 £8,093)
| The emoluments of higherpaid staff within the followingscales were: | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| £60,000 – £70,000 | 11 | 5 |
| £70,001 – £80,000 | 3 | 3 |
| £80,001 – £90,000 | 1 | 3 |
| £90,001 – £100,000 | 3 | 2 |
| £100,001 – £110,000 | 1 | 2 |
| £110,001 – £120,000 | 2 | – |
| £120,001 – £130,000 | – | 1 |
| £130,001 – £140,000 | 1 | – |
| £170,001 – £180,000 | 1 | – |
| £180,001 – £190,000 | – | 1 |
| £190,001 – £200,000 | 1 | – |
time equivalent. The senior management team comprises of a chief executive and nine directors (2019/20 seven directors) who manage the day-to-day operations of the charity. Their aggregate remuneration in the year was £1,340,893 (2019/20 £1,018,719).
Note: There was one resignation and two appointments among the senior management team during the year.
----- Start of picture text -----
Annual Report and Accounts 2020|2021 43
----- End of picture text -----
Notes to the accounts
Note 9(b) – Pensions
compliant with auto-enrolment legislation. The assets of the scheme are held separately from those of the Academy in independently administered funds. The Academy has no liability under the scheme other than the payment of contributions..
| Note 10 | Computer systems | Offce fxtures | Leasehold | Carlton House | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| and equipment | and fttings | Terrace | |||
| improvement | |||||
| £ | £ | £ | £ | £ | |
| Tangible fxed assets | |||||
| (group and charity) | |||||
| Cost | |||||
| At 1 April 2020 | 1,437,271 | 996,537 | 12,509,790 | 13,868,807 | 28,812,405 |
| Additions | 250,769 | 350,267 | – | 127,800 | 728,836 |
| At 31 March 2021 | 1,688,040 | 1,346,804 | 12,509,790 | 13,996,607 | 29,541,241 |
| Depreciation | |||||
| At 1 April 2020 | (1,149,993) | (494,758) | (1,376,662) | (1,148,826) | (4,170,239) |
| Charge foryear | (140,578) | (177,793) | (91,257) | (125,194) | (534,822) |
| At 31 March 2021 | (1,290,571) | (672,551) | (1,467,919) | (1,274,020) | (4,705,061) |
| Net book value | |||||
| At 31 March 2021 | 397,469 | 674,253 | 11,041,871 | 12,722,587 | 24,836,180 |
| At 31 March 2020 | 287,278 | 501,779 | 11,133,128 | 12,719,981 | 24,642,166 |
| All assets are used for charitable purposes. |
Medal collections
-
The Sir Denis Rooke Medals Collection is on loan from the family of Sir Denis Rooke, who served as Academy President from 1986 to 1991. The collection includes many of the awards Sir Denis received during his distinguished career as a pioneer of the UK’s gas industry.
-
The Whittle Medals Collection is on loan from the family of Sir Frank Whittle, who patented the jet propulsion engine in 1930. The medals relate to his achievements in engineering and celebrate his successes.
-
The Warner Medals Collection was a personal gift by Professor Sir Frederick Warner after his death in 2010. The medals relate to his achievements in engineering and celebrate his successes.
These medal collections are not held on the balance sheet, the Trustees consider that it is not practicable to obtain a valuation, but are satisfied that the value of the medals collections is not material.
----- Start of picture text -----
44 Royal Academy of Engineering
----- End of picture text -----
Notes to the accounts
Note 11 – Investments (group and charity)
Investments held in the general fund portfolio represent those held by the Royal Academy of Engineering with the objective of generating income for the Academy’s charitable object while preserving the capital value of the portfolio.
Investments held in the restricted fund portfolio represent those held by the Queen Elizabeth Prize for Engineering Foundation with the objective of generating income for the Foundation’s charitable object.
| 2021 | 2021 | 2021 | 2021 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Designated | Restricted | ||||
| General fund | income funds | Total funds | fund | Total Portfolio | |
| (Charity) | (Charity) | (Charity) | (Subsidiary) | (Group) | |
| Market value at 1 April | 20,964,640 | 1,418,284 | 22,382,924 | 21,949,126 | 44,332,050 |
| Add acquisitions at cost | 6,887,946 | 681,896 | 7,569,842 | 2,030,175 | 9,600,017 |
| Less: salesproceeds | (6,784,793) | (679,380) | (7,464,173) | (2,521,146) | (9,985,319) |
| Net investment (losses)/gains | |||||
| for theyear | 3,995,163 | 238,390 | 4,233,553 | 4,919,565 | 9,153,118 |
| Market value at 31 March | 25,062,956 | 1,659,190 | 26,722,146 | 26,377,720 | 53,099,866 |
Investments in the general fund (charity) consist of securities listed on global stock markets (71% of portfolio) and fixed interest bonds/ diversified assets (29% of portfolio).
The designated income funds consists of funds invested in line with the general fund (charity) investment strategy to support the MacRobert Award and funds invested in securities listed on global stock markets to support the Colin Campbell Mitchell Award.
| Group 2021 £ 20120 £ |
Charity 2021 £ 2020 £ |
|
|---|---|---|
| Note 12 – Debtors | ||
| Grants and sponsorshipreceivable | 7,835,039 6,944,615 |
7,835,041 6,944,618 |
| Prepayments | 130,584 164,439 |
130,584 164,439 |
| Other debtors | 830,035 784,040 |
740,232 622,340 |
| Gift aid receivable from RAE TradingLimited | – 227,912 |
|
| Amounts due for subsidiaryundertakings | – – |
262,907 62,005 |
| Other taxes and social securitycosts | – – |
– – |
| 8,795,658 7,893,094 |
8,968,764 8,021,314 |
|
| Note 13 – Stocks(Group and Charity) | ||
| Publications, Academy ties, presentation plates and medals |
3,108 3,195 |
3,108 3,195 |
----- Start of picture text -----
Annual Report and Accounts 2020|2021 45
----- End of picture text -----
Notes to the accounts
| Group 2021 £ 20120 £ |
Charity 2021 £ 2020 £ |
|
|---|---|---|
| Note 14a – Creditors (amounts falling due within oneyear) |
||
| Committedgrants andprizes | 7,861,464 7,005,376 |
7,861,465 7,005,376 |
| Deferred income | 598,475 727,601 |
598,475 727,601 |
| Subscriptions in advance | 173,494 180,990 |
173,494 180,990 |
| Other creditors | 1,593,652 909,313 |
436,452 687,719 |
| Amounts due to subsidiaryundertakings | – – |
164,388 21,475 |
| Social securityand other costs | 173,126 173,008 |
173,126 173,008 |
| Bank loan | – – |
– – |
| 10,400,211 8,996,288 |
9,407,400 8,796,169 |
|
| Note 14b – Deferred income |
| Deferred income comprises of advance funding for the Connecting Teachers Programme, Enterprise Fellowships and Research Fellowship. |
Deferred income comprises of advance funding for the Connecting Teachers Programme, Enterprise Fellowships and Research Fellowship. |
Deferred income comprises of advance funding for the Connecting Teachers Programme, Enterprise Fellowships and Research Fellowship. |
|---|---|---|
| Balance at 1 April | 727,601 548,061 |
727,601 548,061 |
| Amount released to income earned from charitable activities |
(1,299,062) (1,367,693) |
(1,299,062) (1,367,693) |
| Amount deferred inyear | 1,169,936 1,547,233 |
1,169,936 1,547,233 |
| Balance as at 31 March | 598,475 727,601 |
598,475 727,601 |
| Note 14c – Creditors(amounts falling beyond oneyear) | ||
| Bank loan* | ||
| – Due one to twoyears | – – |
– – |
| – Due within two to fveyears | – – |
– – |
| – Due after fveyears | 11,500,000 11,500,000 |
11,500,000 11,500,000 |
| 11,500,000 11,500,000 |
11,500,000 11,500,000 |
- being applied. The loan is secured against 3 Carlton House Terrace, which was valued at £31.95 million on 28 February 2020. There is currently a 36% loan to value ratio. There is a maximum 45% loan to value ratio set out in the terms of the loan.
| Note 15 – Future commitments | ||
|---|---|---|
| Total minimum commitments under operating leases | ||
| Rent | 240,000 240,000 |
240,000 240,000 |
| Maturingbetween one and fveyears(equipment) | 1,305 7,450 |
1,305 7,450 |
| Total | 241,305 247,450 |
241,305 247,450 |
----- Start of picture text -----
46 Royal Academy of Engineering
----- End of picture text -----
Notes to the accounts
Note 16 – Statement of changes in reserves
(a) Restricted funds
The Academy’s restricted funds consist of the monies received under grants, corporate donations and contracts to support specific schemes as follows:
– Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy (BEIS) provides a government grant to fund programmes in the areas of engineering research and promoting the public understanding of engineering. – Investment in Research Talent recognises the importance of engineering research to the UK. The government has provided the Royal Academy of Engineering with a significant increase in funding over the next four years to attract the best research talent to the UK and support their work. – End of engineered life is a programme funded by the Lloyd’s Register Foundation to improve safety in waste and decommissioning for industrial and engineered systems, delivered through Engineering X.
– Programme for safer complex industrial and engineered systems is a programme funded by the Lloyd’s Register Foundation, delivered through Engineering X.
– Engineering skills where they are most needed is a programme funded by the Lloyd’s Register Foundation, delivered through Engineering X.
– Gatsby Charitable Foundation supports Sainsbury Management Fellowships.
– RAEng/EPSRC Research Fellowships are administered by the Academy and funded jointly by the Academy and the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council.
-
Leverhulme Trust supports Senior Research Fellowships of one-year duration.
-
Engineering Leaders Scholarships assist undergraduate engineering students to realise their full
potential and achieve their career goals.
Connecting STEM Teachers
programme is building a national network of support for STEM leaders in secondary schools and is supported by Shell, The Arthur Clements Fund, BAE Systems, Boeing, the estate of the late Mr John Gozzard, and the Helsington Foundation.
- Further Education Fund is made
up of various donations that are used to support the development of new, and the extension of existing, programmes in further education.
KS2 STEM Resources and
CPD Programme is funded by BAE Systems and supports the development and dissemination of contextualised resource boxes for use in primary and secondary schools.
– The Enterprise Hub harnesses the expertise, insight and networks of Academy Fellows, who include some of the UK’s most successful entrepreneurs and business leaders, to support the country’s most promising engineering entrepreneurs.
Africa Prize for Engineering Innovation aims to stimulate, celebrate and reward innovation and entrepreneurship in subSaharan Africa.
–
Ms Morag Campbell Nelder
Legacy is to be used to fund the Colin Campbell Mitchell Award, which is given to an individual or group of outstanding engineers. Newton Fund schemes promote research and innovation intended to have a direct and longterm impact on the economic development and social welfare of countries participating with the UK in the Newton Fund.
The Capital Building Fund has been used to create a base for the Academy’s enterprise activities and develop 3 Carlton House Terrace into a national forum of engineering excellence.
–
This is Engineering , previously known as the Engineering Talent Project, is a multi-year campaign
to encourage more young people from all backgrounds to consider a career in engineering by changing perceptions of the profession. Enriching Engineering Education Programme is centred on a combination of two way secondments and collaborative workshops. These secondments and workshops lead to improved industry-academia links and result in wide-ranging benefits for both parties.
Project CARE was launched in March 2020 with a goal to mobilise the Academy’s alumni of Africanbased entrepreneurs and leverage the Fellowship and their networks to help strengthen capacity and provide resources to address the consequences and impacts of COVID-19 in African communities in a constructive and sustainable way.
Other awards and contracts are donations and contracts by a number of companies for specific programmes each year.
Global Challenges Research
–
Fund is part of a £1.5 billion UK government fund to support cutting-edge research that addresses the challenges faced by developing countries through collaborative research and innovation, and research and innovation capacity building within both the UK and developing countries.
UK Intelligence Community (IC) Postdoctoral Research
Fellowships are offered by the Government Office for Science with the Academy acting as academic engagement partner. They support outstanding earlycareer science or engineering researchers to promote unclassified basic research in areas of interest to the intelligence, security and defence community.
(b) Designated funds
Strategic Development Fund is used to deliver impactful charitable activities over the next five years and strengthen the Academy for the longer term.
----- Start of picture text -----
Annual Report and Accounts 2020|2021 47
----- End of picture text -----
Notes to the accounts
| Balance at | Incoming | Resources | Transfers | Net |
Balance at | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 April | resources | expended | between | investment |
31 March | |
| 2020 | funds | gains/(losses) | 2021 | |||
| £ | £ | £ | £ | £ | £ | |
| Restricted funds | ||||||
| Government grant | – | 13,800,231 | (13,800,231) | – | – | – |
| Investment in Research Talent | – | 13,977,048 | (13,977,048) | – | – | – |
| End of engineered life | 675,998 | – | (329,057) | – | – | 346,941 |
| Programme for safer complex | ||||||
| industrial and engineered systems | 925,712 | – | (414,967) | – | – | 510,745 |
| Engineering skills where they are | ||||||
| most needed | 761,544 | – | (525,437) | – | – | 236,107 |
| BEIS Bhattacharyya | – | 235,998 | (235,998) | – | – | – |
| Sainsbury Management Fellowships | – | 485,015 | (485,015) | – | – | – |
| RAEng/EPSRC Research Fellowships | – | 237,324 | (237,324) | – | – | – |
| Leverhulme Fellowships | – | 310,810 | (310,810) | – | – | – |
| Engineering Leaders Scholarships | 183,646 | – | (6,800) | – | – | 176,846 |
| Connecting STEM Teachers | 1,327,182 | 558,561 | (643,042) | (250,000) | – | 992,701 |
| Sir Ralph Robins Scholarships | 258,339 | 50,000 | (27,708) | – | – | 280,631 |
| Welsh Valleys Bursaries Scheme | 36,990 | 170,100 | (119,619) | – | – | 87,471 |
| Engineering FE | 136,617 | – | (14,226) | 250,000 | – | 372,391 |
| KS2 STEM Resources and CPD | ||||||
| Programme | 107,120 | 500 | (107,620) | – | – | – |
| Enterprise Hub | 265,654 | 1,135,362 | (186,295) | – | – | 1,214,721 |
| Africa Prize for Engineering | ||||||
| Innovation | 453,024 | 100,000 | (320) | – | – | 552,704 |
| Colin Campbell Mitchell Award | 339,567 | 10,131 | (25,675) | – | 47,809 | 371,833 |
| Newton Fund | – | 7,820,780 | (7,820,780) | – | – | – |
| Capital Building Fund | 2,862,740 | – | – | (728,836) | – | 2,133,904 |
| This is Engineering | 260,953 | 259,000 | (505,996) | – | – | 13,957 |
| Enriching Engineering Education | ||||||
| Programme | 364,561 | – | (51,037) | – | – | 313,524 |
| MacRobert Award | 1,092,435 | 49,321 | (62,237) | – | 190,581 | 1,270,100 |
| Other awards and contracts | 206,234 | 229,899 | (213,434) | – | – | 222,699 |
| 1851 Royal Commission Enterprise | ||||||
| Fellowships | – | 300,000 | (300,000) | – | – | – |
| Global Challenges Research Fund | – | 8,277,532 | (8,277,532) | – | – | – |
| Tier 1 Visa Applications | – | 329,950 | (329,950) | – | – | – |
| UK Intelligence Community (IC) | ||||||
| Postdoctoral Research Fellowships | 985,016 | 855,000 | (992,817) | – | – | 847,199 |
----- Start of picture text -----
48 Royal Academy of Engineering
----- End of picture text -----
Notes to the accounts
| Balance at | Incoming | Resources |
Transfers | Net |
Balance at | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 April | resources | expended | between | investment |
31 March | |
| 2020 | funds | gains/(losses) | 2021 | |||
| £ | £ | £ | £ | £ | £ | |
| Project CARE | – | 123,400 | (77,344) | – | – | 46,056 |
| Queen Elizabeth Prize for | ||||||
| Engineering | 22,704,140 | 777,005 | (1,863,418) | (202,055) | 4,919,565 | 26,335,237 |
| Total restricted funds | 33,947,470 | 50,092,968 | (51,941,737) | (930,891) | 5,157,955 | 36,325,765 |
| Designated funds | ||||||
| Strategic Development Fund | 2,456,831 | – | – | 75,000 | – | 2,531,831 |
| Capital Building Fund | – | – | – | 666,096 | – | 666,096 |
| Ingenia Designated fund | – | 26,144 | (26,144) | – | – | – |
| Total designated funds | 2,456,831 | 26,144 | (26,144) | 741,096 | – | 3,197,927 |
| General fund | 26,148,313 | 1,092,721 | (2,538,568) | 189,795 | 3,995,164 | 28,887,425 |
| Total funds | 62,552,614 | **51,211,833 ** | (54,506,449) | – | 9,153,119 | 68,411,117 |
“The general fund deficit of £1,445,847 is the difference between incoming resources of £1,092,721 and resources expended of £2,538,568 All other funds, other than the Queen Elizabeth Prize for Engineering, are funds of the parent charity.
----- Start of picture text -----
Annual Report and Accounts 2020|2021 49
----- End of picture text -----
Notes to the accounts
| Balance at | Incoming | Resources | Transfers | Net |
Balance at | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 April | resources | expended | between | investment |
31 March | |
| 2019 | funds | gains/(losses) | 2020 | |||
| £ | £ | £ | £ | £ | £ | |
| Restricted funds | ||||||
| Government grant | – | 11,749,214 | (11,749,214) | – | – | – |
| Investment in Research Talent | – | 12,797,763 | (12,797,763) | – | – | – |
| End of engineered life | – | 1,000,000 | (324,002) | – | – | 675,998 |
| Programme for safer complex | ||||||
| industrial and engineered systems | – | 1,000,000 | (74,288) | – | – | 925,712 |
| Engineering skills where they are | ||||||
| most needed | – | 1,000,000 | (238,456) | – | – | 761,544 |
| Sainsbury Management Fellowships | – | 484,625 | (484,625) | – | – | – |
| RAEng/EPSRC Research Fellowships | – | 185,776 | (185,776) | – | – | – |
| Leverhulme Fellowships | – | 199,958 | (199,958) | – | – | – |
| Engineering Leadership Scheme | 223,646 | – | (40,000) | – | – | 183,646 |
| Connecting STEM Teachers | 526,896 | 1,309,845 | (509,559) | – | – | 1,327,182 |
| Sir Ralph Robins Scholarships | 285,601 | 41 | (27,303) | – | – | 258,339 |
| Welsh Valleys Bursaries Scheme | 221,100 | 1,100 | (185,210) | – | – | 36,990 |
| Engineering FE | 169,035 | – | (32,418) | – | – | 136,617 |
| KS2 STEM Resources & CPD | ||||||
| Programme | 71,219 | 79,317 | (43,416) | – | – | 107,120 |
| Enterprise Hub | 377,741 | 70,553 | (182,640) | – | – | 265,654 |
| Africa Prize for Engineering | ||||||
| Innovation | 372,495 | 107,640 | (27,111) | – | – | 453,024 |
| Ms Morag Campbell-Nelder | 459,692 | 20,815 | (20,603) | – | (120,337) | 339,567 |
| Newton Fund | – | 7,994,202 | (7,994,202) | – | – | – |
| Capital Building Fund | 3,244,787 | – | – | (382,047) | – | 2,862,740 |
| This is Engineering | 295,000 | 992,968 | (1,027,015) | – | – | 260,953 |
| Enriching Engineering Education | ||||||
| Programme | 364,561 | – | – | – | – | 364,561 |
| MacRobert Award | 1,348,900 | 79,083 | (149,803) | – | (185,745) | 1,092,435 |
| Other awards and contracts | 271,477 | 374,299 | (439,542) | – | – | 206,234 |
| 1851 Royal Commission Enterprise | ||||||
| Fellowships | – | 239,922 | (239,922) | – | – | – |
| Global Challenge Research Fund | – | 8,531,252 | (8,531,252) | – | – | – |
| Tier 1 Visa Applications | – | 164,475 | (164,475) | – | – | – |
| UK Intelligence Community (IC) | ||||||
| Postdoctoral Research Fellowships | 1,050,905 | 703,000 | (768,889) | – | – | 985,017 |
| Queen Elizabeth Prize for | ||||||
| Engineering | 24,802,216 | 909,900 | (846,734) | (182,709) | (1,978,533) | 22,704,141 |
| Total restricted funds | 34,085,268 | 49,995,749 | (47,284,176) | (564,756) | (2,284,615) | 33,947,470 |
----- Start of picture text -----
50 Royal Academy of Engineering
----- End of picture text -----
Notes to the accounts
| Balance at | Incoming | Resources | Transfers | Net |
Balance at | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 April | resources | expended | between | investment |
31 March | |
| 2019 | funds | gains/(losses) | 2020 | |||
| £ | £ | £ | £ | £ | £ | |
| Designated funds | ||||||
| Special funds | ||||||
| – Building maintenance fund | 78,639 | – | – | (78,639) | – | – |
| Total special funds | 78,639 | – | – | (78,639) | – | – |
| Strategic Development Fund | – | – | – | 2,456,831 | – | 2,456,831 |
| Education Support Designated Fund | 5,531 | – | – | (5,531) | – | – |
| External Education Designated Fund | 71,020 | – | – | (71,020) | – | – |
| Ingenia Designated fund | 32,058 | 20,939 | (52,997) | – | – | – |
| Forum Partnerships Programme | ||||||
| Designated Fund | 220,647 | – | (220,647) | – | – | |
| Total designated and special funds | 407,896 | 20,939 | (52,997) | 2,080,993 | – | 2,456,831 |
| General fund | 30,683,762 | 2,938,260 | (3,137,378) | (1,516,237) | (2,820,094) | 26,148,313 |
| Total funds | 65,176,926 | 52,954,948 | (50,474,551) | – | (5,104,709) | 62,552,614 |
The general fund deficit of £199,118 is the difference between incoming resources of £2,938,260 and resources expended of £3,137,378. All other funds, other than the Queen Elizabeth Prize for Engineering, are funds of the parent charity.
Note 17 – Analysis of net assets between funds
| Tangible fxed | **Investments ** | Current assets | Liabilities | Total net | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| assets | assets | ||||
| £ | £ | £ | £ | £ | |
| Restricted funds | 24,836,180 | 28,036,910 | 5,222,686 | (21,770,011) | 36,325,765 |
| Special and designated funds | – | – | 3,197,927 | – | 3,197,927 |
| General funds | – | 25,062,956 | 3,954,669 | (130,200) | 28,887,425 |
| Total funds | 24,836,180 | 53,099,866 | 12,375,282 | (21,900,211) | 68,411,117 |
Note 18 – Subsidiary activities
The Academy has one wholly owned subsidiary, RAE Trading Limited (registered company number 08038360), and a charitable subsidiary company, the Queen Elizabeth Prize for Engineering Foundation (registered charity number 1147743, registered company number 8077332). RAE Trading Limited was formed in April 2012 and manages a conferencing business at Prince Philip House; all available trading profits are gift-aided to the charity.
The Academy owns all 100 £1 shares in RAE Trading Limited.
The Queen Elizabeth Prize for Engineering Foundation was formed in May 2012 and advances the education of the public in the subject of engineering by awarding biennially a high-profile and internationally recognised prize for engineering. In future, the award will move to an annual cycle.
All activities have been consolidated on a line-by-line basis in the statement of financial activities and these results have been adjusted to eliminate income and expenditure relating to conferencing activities to the Academy and the Queen Elizabeth Prize for Engineering, and management fees payable to the Academy.
----- Start of picture text -----
Annual Report and Accounts 2020|2021 51
----- End of picture text -----
Notes to the accounts
| At 31 March 2021 | RAE Trading Ltd 2021 2020 £ £ |
Queen Elizabeth Prize for Engineering Foundation 2021 2020 £ £ |
|---|---|---|
| Total incomingresources | 20,957 1,369,489 |
777,005 909,900 |
| Total resources expended | (173,172) (1,141,577) |
(2,065,473) (1,029,443) |
| (152,215) 227,912 |
(1,288,468) (119,543) |
|
| Total investment(losses)/gains | – – |
4,919,565 (1,978,533) |
| Net funds beforegift aid | (152,215) 227,912 |
3,631,097 (2,098,076) |
| Gift aid to Royal Academyof Engineering | 152,215 (227,912) |
– – |
| Retained net funds for theyear | – – |
3,631,097 (2,098,076) |
| The aggregate of the assets, liabilities and funds was: | ||
| Assets | 59,338 426,505 |
27,550,402 22,789,247 |
| Liabilities | (211,453) (198,493) |
(1,215,165) (85,107) |
| Funds | (152,115) 228,012 |
26,335,237 22,704,140 |
The parent charity’s results for the year are disclosed as follows:
| Academy 2021 £ 2020 £ |
|
|---|---|
| Gross income | 49,694,456 35,397,281 |
| Retained net funds for theyear | 2,176,634 815,245 |
Note 19 – Related party transactions
The Academy has the following transactions within its subsidiaries during the year:
| Sales | Salary | Management | Debtors | Creditors | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| recharges | charges | ||||
| £ | £ | £ | £ | £ | |
| Queen Elizabeth Prize for EngineeringFoundation | – | 323,636 | 202,055 | 172,175 | 4,241 |
| RAE TradingLimited | (200) | – | – | 90,732 | 21,475 |
A member of staff of the Royal Academy of Engineering R Earnshaw is a close family relation of C Earnshaw who is a Trustee of the Royal Academy of Engineering. The staff appointment was made prior to C Earnshaw becoming a Trustee. All employee salaries including that of R Earnshaw are set in line with market benchmarks.
All transactions in respect of trustees is provided for in Note 9.
----- Start of picture text -----
52 Royal Academy of Engineering
----- End of picture text -----
Legal and administrative information
Name and Registered Office
The Royal Academy of Engineering is a registered charity No. 293074. It is a corporate body governed by Royal Charter. The registered office is Prince Philip House, 3 Carlton House Terrace, London SW1Y 5DG.
Professional advisers
Bankers
National Westminster Bank plc Charing Cross, London Branch PO Box 113, Cavell House 2a Charing Cross Road London WC2H 0NN
Solicitors
Bristows 100 Victoria Embankment London EC4Y 0DH
Womble Bond Dickinson 4 More London Riverside London SE1 2AU
Auditor
BDO LLP 55 Baker Street London W1U 7EU
Investment advisers
Waverton Investment Management Limited 16 Babmaes Street London SW1Y 6AH
Trustee Board members
The Academy’s Trustee Board comprises 13 members elected by and from the Fellowship with the discretion to co-opt up to two additional members. Trustee Board members are the Trustees of the Academy as defined under its status as a registered charity. The Trustee Board meets at least six times a year and is responsible for the governance of the Academy. At these meetings, the Trustee Board will discuss issues of strategy and policy and also matters referred to it by the governance committees for Finance, Audit and Risk, Membership and Nominations, and Remuneration.
All Trustee Board members and committee members give their time freely; no remuneration was paid in the year beyond the reimbursement of reasonable expenses. The majority of Academy activities are controlled by committees composed of Fellows. The members of the Trustee Board during the year were:
Officers
Professor Sir Jim McDonald FREng FRSE (appointed 30 September 2019)
Vice-Presidents
Naomi Climer CBE FREng Vice-President for Fellowship Engagement
Professor Peter Guthrie OBE FREng Vice-President for Committee Coordination (appointed 22 September 2020)
Professor Iain Gray CBE FREng FRSE Vice-President for Committee Coordination (retired 22 September 2020)
----- Start of picture text -----
Annual Report and Accounts 2020|2021 53
----- End of picture text -----
Legal and administrative information
Members of the Trustee Board at the date the report was approved:
Professor Sir Jim McDonald FREng FRSE
Naomi Climer CBE FREng
Sir Simon Bollom KBE CB FREng
Professor Peter Goodhew OBE FREng (appointed 22 September 2020)
Chris Earnshaw OBE FREng (appointed 22 September 2020)
Dr Martin Grant FREng
Professor Peter Guthrie OBE FREng (appointed 22 September 2020)
Dame Judith Hackitt DBE FREng
Professor Eileen Harkin-Jones OBE FREng (appointed 22 September 2020)
Professor John Loughhead CB OBE FREng
Professor Jeremy Watson CBE FREng
Professor Stephen Williamson FREng
Professor Stephen Young FREng FRS
Other Trustees who served during the period of the report: Professor Geoffrey Maitland CBE FREng (retired 22 September 2020)
Professor Liz Tanner OBE FREng FRSE (retired 22 September 2020)
Professor Iain Gray CBE FREng FRSE (retired 22 September 2020)
----- Start of picture text -----
54 Royal Academy of Engineering
----- End of picture text -----
----- Start of picture text -----
Annual Report and Accounts 2020|2021 © University of Southampton55
----- End of picture text -----
IJ
----- Start of picture text -----
Annual Report and Accounts 2020|2021
----- End of picture text -----
----- Start of picture text -----
© This is Engineering57
----- End of picture text -----
The Royal Academy of Engineering is harnessing the power of engineering to build a sustainable society and an inclusive economy that works for everyone. In collaboration with our Fellows and partners, we’re growing talent and developing skills for the future, driving innovation and building global partnerships, and influencing policy and engaging the public.
Together we’re working to tackle the greatest challenges of our age.
What we do
TALENT & DIVERSITY
We’re growing talent by training, supporting, mentoring and funding the most talented and creative researchers, innovators and leaders from across the engineering profession.
We’re developing skills for the future by identifying the challenges of an ever-changing world and developing the skills and approaches we need to build a resilient and diverse engineering profession.
INNOVATION
We’re driving innovation by investing in some of the country’s most creative and exciting engineering ideas and businesses.
We’re building global partnerships that bring the world’s best engineers from industry, entrepreneurship and academia together to collaborate on creative innovations that address the greatest global challenges of our age.
POLICY & ENGAGEMENT
We’re influencing policy through the National Engineering Policy Centre – providing independent expert support to policymakers on issues of importance.
We’re engaging the public by opening their eyes to the wonders of engineering and inspiring young people to become the next generation of engineers.
Royal Academy of Engineering Prince Philip House 3 Carlton House Terrace London SW1Y 5DG
Tel 020 7766 0600 www.raeng.org.uk @RAEngNews
Registered charity number 293074