## – Uganda Teacher Rising project Annual Report Jan 2025
## Teacher mentorship to improve STEAMie and learner outcomes in all subjects.
## Aims
- To improve the quality of teaching in participating schools through school-based TPD, delivered by local mentors, upskilling teachers in rural Ugandan schools to become leading practitioners (LPs), and new mentors.
- To develop a mentorship TPD cascade model to generate high-quality, rapid, scalable, and sustainable teacher learning and enhancement that is then shared with the ministry.
- To improve learners’ and teachers’ STEM and ICT skills, including developing low-resource STEAMie project-based learning income-generating businesses, making products for sale in the local community.
## **Abbreviations**
AET Africa Educational Trust EDI Explicit Direct Instruction LP Lead practitioner NTP National Teacher Policy STEAMie Science, Technology, Engineering, Arts, Maths, and innovation with enterprise TPD Teacher professional development. UTR Uganda Teacher Rising
## **Brief**
Improving education, employment, entrepreneurship, and higher education opportunities for students in Northern Uganda is crucial for driving socio-economic development. The Uganda Teacher Rising (UTR) project, building on AET’s STEAMie training, has demonstrated significant improvements in teaching and learning through a school-based mentorship model.
The Education for All (EFA) initiative highlights that quality education is fundamental to achieving its broader objectives. Without improvements in teaching quality, progress in literacy, numeracy, and life skills development remains limited. Quality learning, particularly in primary education, is essential for long-term student success (GMR 2005).
1
Better education contributes to higher lifetime earnings and more robust national economic growth and helps individuals make more informed choices about fertility and other matters important to their welfare (GMR2005, P17).
Many commonly used teaching styles do not serve children well: they are often too rigid and rely heavily on rote learning, placing students in a passive role. Many educational researchers advocate structured teaching, a combination of direct instruction, guided practice, and independent learning – in a child-friendly environment (GMR2005, P17).
## **Recent progress.**
Since 2023 the UTR project has partnered with a cluster of schools in Kyotera district in Central Uganda. Over the past 12 months, we have added two schools to the project, bringing the total to five in 2025, all of which are receiving ongoing continuous mentorship. In 2026, we plan to add two more schools to our ‘community of practice’ in the Kyotera district, and a further two/three schools each year after that. We have provided start-up funds and training for making and selling liquid soap, bar soap, sandals, and tailoring. The soap businesses have progressed well, and the tailoring project has produced washable sanitary pads for dozens of girls, whilst generating income to expand the projects further into the community. The sandals and brick-making projects require further development. Our approach is to use local skilled tradespeople as mentors to get each project started and then rely on teachers' innovation to sustain it. Access to local materials and tools needed for production can be a challenge in the rural areas where we work.
We have also had successful engagement with the district education authority, who are keen for the project to expand to as many schools as possible.
## **Charity Finance**
To date, the charity has been funded through private donations. Projections show that, when sustainability is achieved, the project cost per school could be less than $100 per year. This equates to around 40 cents per child per year, attributed to locally developed and sourced training needs at local costs. Table 1 shows the cost projections at the cost efficiency level. The cost per school steadily drops as more schools are added and can be less than $100 when the training is managed locally, thereby eliminating international expenses.
Table 1- Projected cost structure.
2
_2024-2025 accounts: Income: £8122. Expenditure: £3999._
- _There are adequate reserves in the bank account to meet the year's deficit._
- _There is already a significant increase in income for the current financial year_
## **Methods and Rationale**
Our methods have evolved from whole-day workshops, requiring teachers to be away from the classroom to a less intrusive system. Our team now immerses itself in partner schools for three days, carrying out joint observations with staff, followed by feedback and general dialogue to agree on ways to enhance the learner experience and ease teacher challenges in a large classroom context. During this visit, short end-of-day workshops are held to deliver UTR teaching pedagogy rationale and ICT and STEAMie training.
The core elements of the pedagogy are shown below.
The continuous school-based mentorship model, over a planned period of two years, ensures steady teacher improvement by integrating lesson observations and peer collaboration. This structured approach supports teachers in refining their pedagogical skills while promoting STEAMie learning and gender inclusion. Using these mechanisms and evidence-based tracking teachers can attain leveled certification seen in Picture 1.
## **UTR – Teacher Professional Development Certification**
Level 1: UTR teacher training - Complete initial training, demonstrating effective practice of UTR pedagogy and _completing reflective portfolio_ and action research.
Level 2: Lead practitioner training (LP) - Coaching and mentoring new teachers in UTR pedagogy to attain level 1 standard.
Level 3: Senior lead practitioner training - _Mentoring_ new LPs to attain level 2 standards. Support planning and implementation of whole school training.
Level 4: Specialist leader in education - Developing LP training model and supporting STEM pedagogical training development across _multiple schools and districts_ .
3
– Figure 1 levelled and certified teacher professional development.
– Figure 2 Lesson observation followed by quality feedback.
Figure 3 – Live 3-step teacher feedback and peer feedback/learning.
4
## **STEAMie**
UTR’s STEAMie multi-disciplinary project-based learning approach has a goal to produce real business enterprises with earnings opportunities. This is extremely motivational for teachers and learners. Learners must go through a business planning process, engage with business and marketing concepts, and use business mathematics learning even before making the product for sale. They must also learn the science of how their product is made and use engineering skills to make it. Marketing the product will then require art design and literacy skills.
A Kalisizo school teacher and mentor recently said ‘The STEMie project is doing very well at Kalisizo primary school. We managed to get a profit of 300000 Uganda shillings in 2024 and we now are aiming to get more profits in the new year.’
## - Pictures 4 and 5 show liquid soap and shoe making training of young learners. Picture 6 reveals the STEAMie cycle framework described above and Picture7 show ICT training at one of our new schools
**----- Start of picture text -----**
STEM projects- making and selling soaps whilst learning science
maths and business skills.
**----- End of picture text -----**
– Figure 4 Soap production and training at St Agnes Primary School, Kalisizo Uganda.
5
– Figure 5 Students learning to make sandals Kalisizo Primary School, Uganda.
– Figure 6 Students learning to make bricks at St Agnes Primary School, Kalisizo Uganda.
- Figure 7 STEAMie cycle for learning shows a project based learning approach.
6
**----- Start of picture text -----**
CT Training in
small groups
(MS ffice)
**----- End of picture text -----**
- Figure 8 ICT training of teachers in St Andrews Primary School.
## **Focus group review and analysis (2024)**
It’s clear that the new UTR project has made significant progress in equipping teachers with learner-centered teaching methods, ICT skills, and STEM training—especially live marking and collaborative learning—are making a big impact on both teachers and learners. The shift towards teacher facilitation rather than solely direct instruction has brought benefits like instant feedback, improved student engagement, and stronger classroom relationships. Feedback from teachers, head teachers, and mentors shows improved student and teacher motivation, and practical skills development. However, some challenges remain, particularly regarding managing differentiation in large classroom contexts, time constraints, and access to STEM resources.
## **Key Takeaways & Benefits:**
- Live marking saves teachers hours of post-lesson marking and provides immediate feedback, though it requires careful time management.
- Collaborative learning boosts student communication skills, participation, and motivation, with expert learners assisting in assessment.
- Differentiation using Bloom’s Taxonomy is helpful but challenging for teachers unfamiliar with its levels.
- STEM training has had both educational and financial benefits, with teachers and learners gaining skills to generate income.
- ICT training has helped teachers stay connected and continue learning through platforms like WhatsApp.
- Head teachers support the methods, noting that they improve relationships between teachers and learners while making assessments more efficient.
7
- Cost structure can fall below $100 per school year, by developing local mentorship skills, thus making this training model very efficient and scalable.
## **Challenges & Suggested mprovements:**
- Live marking can be time-consuming – Consider rotating marking across the week or limiting it to specific exercises.
- Expert learners helping with assessment may face jealousy – Rotating roles ensures fairness, and teacher supervision helps prevent misinformation.
- Differentiation is difficult for some teachers – More training on Bloom’s Taxonomy and leveled questioning could help.
- Group work participation varies – Teachers should monitor closely and encourage all students to contribute.
STEM material accessibility is a challenge – Schools will need to locate better supply chains Portfolio language is complex – Simplifying terminology could make it easier for teachers to engage with reflective tasks.
Teacher motivation is key – Certification could help, but there’s concern about corruption. Fair allowances to support private costs incurred in training is essential.
## Conclusion
The overall response is very positive, and while some adjustments are needed, teachers, head teachers, and learners are seeing real benefits. Expanding training and mentorship—while addressing concerns like differentiation, time management, and material access—will help sustain these improvements.
Local STEAMie business & learning enterprises are developing well and already supporting school communities’ with added income streams.
## References
1. AET (2021). BRITE Futures Endline Report.
2. Bounajim, D. (2021) Applying Cognitive Load Theory to Examine STEM Undergraduate Students’ Experiences in An Adaptive Learning Environment: A Mixed-Methods Study
3. Fomunyam, K. (2020). Towards Enhancing Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) Education; A Case for Higher Education in Africa.
4. Holmes, K. Mackenzie, E,. Berger, N and Walker, M. (2021). Linking K-12 STEM Pedagogy to Local Contexts: A Scoping Review of Benefits and Limitations.
5. Margot, K and Kettler, T. (2019). Teachers’ perception of STEM integration and education: a systematic literature review.
6. Ring, M. (2019). The Pedagogy of Teaching STEM.
7. Rosenshine, B. (2012) Principles of Instruction.
8. Scientix (2022). The importance of STEM Education in Primary Schools. https://blog.scientix.eu/2022/09/theimportance-of-stem-education-in-primary-schools/
9. Tikly, L. Joubert, M. Mbogo , A. Bainton, D, Cameron, L & Doyle, H. (2018). Supporting Secondary School STEM education for Sustainable development in Africa.
10. Uganda M.O.E.. (2019) National Teacher Policy (2019).
8
## Accounts
Title : Transactions Report generated by : The Education Stream Foundatio Report generated on : 28/01/2026 11:12 AM Account Number : 00035504 Start Date : 01/04/2024 End Date : 01/05/2024
||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|**Posting Date**|**Value Date**|**Transaction**
**Amount**|**Balance**|**Description**|||||
|02/04/2024|02/04/2024|-556.68|4066.82|POS POLANI TRAVEL Mr W Bannister|||||
|20/03/2025|20/03/2025|-525.48|9327.17|POS TRAVEL UP|||||
|16/10/2024|16/10/2024|-496.48|3557.92|POS TRAVEL UP Mr W Bannister|||||
|14/11/2024|14/11/2024|-217.4|2640.97|ATM CASH MASAKA_2 MASAKA_ 1025000UGX@0.000212|||||
|14/11/2024|14/11/2024|-217.4|2858.37|ATM CASH MASAKA_2 MASAKA_ 1025000UGX@0.000212|||||
|01/11/2024|01/11/2024|-216.28|3065.77|ATM CASH MASAKA_2 MASAKA_ 1025000UGX@0.000211 Mr W Bannister|||||
|01/11/2024|01/11/2024|-216.28|3282.05|ATM CASH ENTEBBE ENTEBBE 1025000UGX@0.000211 Mr W Bannister|||||
|04/04/2025|04/04/2025|-214.26|8798.67|ATM CASH Ecobank Uganda E 1012100UGX@0.000212|||||
|04/04/2025|04/04/2025|-214.26|9012.93|ATM CASH Ecobank Uganda E 1012100UGX@0.000212|||||
|16/04/2024|16/04/2024|-210.99|3308.28|ATM CASH KYOTERA KYOTERA 1010000UGX@0.000209 Mr W Bannister|||||
|16/04/2024|16/04/2024|-210.99|3519.27|ATM CASH KYOTERA KYOTERA 1010000UGX@0.000209 Mr W Bannister|||||
|10/04/2024|10/04/2024|-206.7|3587.71|ATM CASH KCB NDEEBA NDEEB 1000000UGX@0.000207|||||
|10/04/2024|10/04/2024|-206.7|3794.41|ATM CASH KCB NDEEBA NDEEB 1000000UGX@0.000207|||||
|03/04/2024|03/04/2024|-40.96|4025.86|POS GUARANTY TRUST BANK ( 51.50USD@0.795340 Mr W Bannister|POS GUARANTY TRUST BANK ( 51.50USD@0.795340 Mr W Bannister|POS GUARANTY TRUST BANK ( 51.50USD@0.795340 Mr W Bannister|POS GUARANTY TRUST BANK ( 51.50USD@0.795340 Mr W Bannister|POS GUARANTY TRUST BANK ( 51.50USD@0.795340 Mr W Bannister|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|20/03/2025|20/03/2025|-39.87|9287.3|POS GT UGANDA 51.50USD@0.774175 Mr W Bannister|||||
|03/04/2025|03/04/2025|-25.8|9227.19|POS ALDI 77 776 Mr W Bannister|||||
|08/04/2024|08/04/2024|-24.75|3991.11|POS LIDL GB LONDON - NEWB Mr W Bannister|||||
|25/04/2024|25/04/2024|-21.08|3237.57|POS SHANGAI HOTEL
LT30474
100000UGX@0.000211 Mr
W Bannister22/04/2024|########|
-
49.63|3258.65|
POS HOTEL GOODNEWS
LIMITE
235000UGX@0.000211 Mr
W Bannister|
|27/03/2025|27/03/2025|-16.31|9267.51|POS eBay O*05-12861-96786 Mr W Bannister|||||
|16/10/2024|16/10/2024|-15|4054.4|POS ASDA SUPERSTORE Mr W Bannister|||||
|19/03/2025|19/03/2025|-11.02|9863.37|POS eBay O*14-12817-61666 Mr W Bannister|||||
|20/03/2025|20/03/2025|-10.72|9852.65|POS TRAVEL UP|||||
|16/10/2024|16/10/2024|-10.13|3547.79|POS TRAVEL UP Mr W Bannister|||||
|03/04/2024|03/04/2024|-10|4015.86|ATM CASH 555-557 CRANBROO Mr W Bannister|||||
|18/10/2024|18/10/2024|-10|3498.33|ATM CASH 555-557
CRANBROO17/10/2024|########|
-
39.46|3508.33|
POS GUARANTY TRUST
BANK (
51.50USD@0.766214 Mr
W Bannister|
|27/03/2025|27/03/2025|-6.94|9252.99|POS eBay O*18-12846-
2869327/03/2025|########|-7.58|9259.93|
POS eBay O*24-12853-
56730 Mr W Bannister|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|26/03/2025|26/03/2025|-6.8|9283.82|POS eBay O*08-12853-78160 Mr W Bannister|||||
|15/04/2024|15/04/2024|-5|3582.71|Monthly Account Fee|||||
|15/05/2024|15/05/2024|-5|3242.57|Monthly Account
Fee08/05/2024|########|10|3247.57|
FP MUM IS PROUD
PAMELA BANNISTER|
|15/08/2024|15/08/2024|-5|3551.63|Monthly Account
Fee09/08/2024|########|98|3556.63|
FP E Afanasyeva Ekaterina
Afanasye|
|16/09/2024|16/09/2024|-5|3654.63|Monthly Account Fee|||||
|15/10/2024|15/10/2024|-5|4069.4|Monthly Account Fee|||||
|15/01/2025|15/01/2025|-5|2697.54|Monthly Account Fee|||||
|17/02/2025|17/02/2025|-5|9869.39|Monthly Account
Fee10/02/2025|########|10|9874.39|
FP MUM IS PROUD
PAMELA BANNISTER|
|17/03/2025|17/03/2025|-5|9874.39|Monthly Account Fee|||||
|||-3999.28|||||||
|27/12/2024|26/12/2024|1.57|2692.54|INTEREST TO
DATE16/12/2024|########|-5|2690.97|Monthly Account Fee|
|26/06/2024|26/06/2024|1.73|3347.3|INTEREST TO
DATE17/06/2024|########|-5|3345.57|Monthly Account Fee|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|26/03/2025|26/03/2025|3.32|9290.62|INTEREST TO DATE|||||
|08/04/2024|08/04/2024|10|4001.11|FP MUM IS PROUD PAMELA BANNISTER|||||
|10/06/2024|10/06/2024|10|3252.57|FP MUM IS PROUD PAMELA BANNISTER|||||
|08/07/2024|08/07/2024|10|3357.3|FP MUM IS PROUD PAMELA BANNISTER|||||
|08/08/2024|08/08/2024|10|3458.63|FP MUM IS PROUD PAMELA BANNISTER|||||
|09/09/2024|09/09/2024|10|3561.63|FP MUM IS PROUD PAMELA BANNISTER|||||
|08/10/2024|08/10/2024|10|3976.4|FP MUM IS PROUD PAMELA BANNISTER|||||
|08/11/2024|08/11/2024|10|3075.77|FP MUM IS PROUD PAMELA BANNISTER|||||
|09/12/2024|09/12/2024|10|2695.97|FP MUM IS PROUD PAMELA BANNISTER|||||
|08/01/2025|08/01/2025|10|2702.54|FP MUM IS PROUD PAMELA BANNISTER|||||
|10/03/2025|10/03/2025|10|9879.39|FP MUM IS PROUD PAMELA BANNISTER|||||
|20/01/2025|20/01/2025|19.5|2766.09|FP STRIPE Stripe Payments
UK20/01/2025|########|49.05|2746.59|
FP STRIPE Stripe Payments
UK|
|18/11/2024|18/11/2024|50|2685.97|FP Donation BIRD MISS V
A/ROYA15/11/2024|########|-5|2635.97|Monthly Account Fee|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|16/07/2024|16/07/2024|96.33|3448.63|FP STRIPE Stripe Payments
UK15/07/2024|########|-5|3352.3|Monthly Account Fee|
|14/06/2024|14/06/2024|98|3350.57|FP June Donation Ekaterina Afanasye|||||
|11/09/2024|11/09/2024|98|3659.63|FP E Afanasyeva Ekaterina Afanasye|||||
|11/10/2024|11/10/2024|98|4074.4|FP E Afanasyeva Ekaterina Afanasye|||||
|03/02/2025|03/02/2025|98.3|9864.39|FP STRIPE Stripe Payments UK|||||
|15/04/2024|15/04/2024|147.55|3730.26|FP STRIPE Stripe Payments UK|||||
|30/09/2024|30/09/2024|310|3966.4|FP kids charity Success It
Ltd26/09/2024|########|1.77|3656.4|INTEREST TO DATE|
|03/02/2025|03/02/2025|7000|9766.09|FP Charity 2024|||||