Charity number: 1185925 

## Conservation Collective 

Report and financial statements For the year ended 31 December 2021 




The Conservation Collective 

## Contents 

For the year ended 31 December 2021 

Reference and administrative information  ...................................................................................... 1 Trustees’ annual report  .................................................................................................................. 2 Independent auditor’s report  ....................................................................................................... 30 Statement of financial activities (incorporating an income and expenditure account)  ................... 34 Balance sheet  ............................................................................................................................... 35 Statement of cash flows  ............................................................................................................... 36 Notes to the financial statements  ................................................................................................. 37 



The Conservation Collective 

## Reference and administrative information 

## For the year ended 31 December 2021 

Charity number 1185925 Country of registration England & Wales Registered office and operational address The Old Plough St. Mary Bourne Andover SP11 6AY Trustees Trustees who served during the year and up to the date of this report were as follows: Ben Goldsmith Chair George Duffield India Heathcote Alice Brudenell-Bruce Sarah Poulios Brendon Moorhouse Appointed: 21 April 2021 Christopher Parker Appointed: 14 March 2022 Key management Jade Brudenell Executive Director personnel Kendra Walsh Network Director Amanda Keetley Executive Director Devon Environment Foundation Bankers HSBC UK 2 The Promenade Cheltenham GLSO 1LR Solicitors Bates Wells & Braithwaite London LLP 10 Queen Street Place London EC4R 1BE Independent Jonathan Orchard Auditors Sayer Vincent LLP Chartered Accountants Invicta House 108-114 Golden Lane LONDON EC1Y 0TL 

1 



The Conservation Collective 

## Trustees’ annual report 

## For the year ended 31 December 2021 

The trustees present their report and the financial statements for the year ended 31 December 2021. 

Reference and administrative information set out on page 1 forms part of this report. The financial statements comply with current statutory requirements, the charity's trust deed and the Statement of Recommended Practice - Accounting and Reporting by Charities: SORP applicable to charities preparing their accounts in accordance with FRS 102. 

Objectives and activities - purposes and aims of the CIO 

- (1) to promote for the benefit of the public the conservation, protection and improvement of the physical and natural environment, in particular but not exclusively by monitoring and protecting natural habitats and biodiversity, in the land and in the sea and establishing marine protected areas; 

- (2) to advance the education of the public in conserving, protecting and improving the physical natural environment through the dissemination of information about conservation, protection and improvement activities including waste, water and energy usage. 

## About 

The Conservation Collective is a network of local foundations funding effective grass-roots conservation initiatives to protect the environment, restore nature and safeguard against climate change. The Conservation Collective: 

1. Incubates and launches new foundations based on a proven model of environmental grantmaking that is effective, nimble and, non-bureaucratic. 

2. Strengthens existing members with 

- a) Operational support (back office) 

- b) Strategic support (shared learnings, joint programs) 

- c) Communications support (materials, digital campaigns, events) 

- d) Financial support (seed money, management, fundraising). 

## Our philosophy 

Environmental philanthropy faces two key challenges: persuading people to direct money to the biggest issue of our time (less than 3% of total philanthropic funding is given to fixing the environment) and getting that money to the most effective environmental initiatives. 

The Conservation Collective has a proven and winning formula for both: 

We build clubs of donors linked to places they care passionately about, to open new channels of funding for nature restoration. We have seen that people are instinctively “place-based”, and that 

2 



The Conservation Collective 

## Trustees’ annual report 

## For the year ended 31 December 2021 

when it comes to conservation and philanthropy, we are all more likely to want to protect the places we know and love. 

We set up, incubate, and support local environmental foundations. All over the world, people are working tirelessly to protect the places they love from the impacts of climate change and the biodiversity crisis. Those most affected by environmental problems are often best placed to tackle them, and grassroots action is our most powerful weapon. 

Our member foundations unlock new funding for the best and most effective grassroots projects working to: 

- Preserve, protect, and regenerate natural habitats 

- Help native species to thrive 

- Slow down and adapt to climate change 

- Reduce pollution / Greenhouse Gas emissions 

Our growing network of foundations has already raised millions of pounds for impactful initiatives, and we’re only just getting started... 

## The Network 

There are 19 local foundations in our network, all rooted in their communities and working to protect the environment, restore nature, and safeguard against climate change. They encourage local philanthropy, raise awareness of understanding of climate issues, promote collective action and support communities to act more sustainably. 

## Our model 

The power of the Conservation Collective is in our ability to quickly and easily replicate our model to set up new 

foundations in new locations, raise funding more effectively and efficiently, and share knowledge and expertise across the network. As a global network we pride ourselves on removing barriers, empowering communities and getting things done.  We do this through four strategic pillars: Fundraising, Strategic Development, Local Leadership and Governance. 

## Fundraising 

- a. Identify at least 10 founding donors (individuals) from the beginning (each willing to support c.10,000 local currency, for a minimum of three years) 

- b. Target 20% growth per year by diversifying donor base to corporates and institutions 

3 



The Conservation Collective 

## Trustees’ annual report 

## For the year ended 31 December 2021 

## Strategy Development 

- a. Commission an expert local consultant to develop a scoping report which forms the basis of the future grant strategy.  The report outlines key environmental challenges and priorities, as well as opportunities for change in target locations, and maps grassroots civil society players 

- b. Year 1-3 bottom-up approach, driven by needs of local organisations and community 

Local Leadership 

- a. Hire a full time local executive director to spearhead the organization, overseeing the implementation of the grants programme and coordinating fundraising with input from the founders’ networks 

## Governance 

- a. A Steering Committee comprising a subset of the founding donor meets quarterly to review and approve grant applications proposed by the director, and to brainstorm fundraising ideas 

- b. A local advisory board comprising scientific and technical experts advises on strategy and can pre-screen projects before they are presented to the steering committee 

## List of foundations: 

## Branches: 

1. Devon Environment Foundation (DEF) 

2. Ionian Environment Foundation (IEF) 

3. Argolic Environment Foundation (AEF) 

4. Lamu Environment Foundation (LaEF) 

5. Tuscany Environment Foundation (TEF) 

6. Cyprus Environment Foundation (CEF) 

7. Dalmatian Island Environment foundation 

8. Turquoise Coast Environment Foundation 

1. Cyclades Preservation Fund (CPF) 

2. IbizaPreservation (IP) 

3. Mallorca Preservation Fund (MAPF) 

4. Menorca Preservation (MeP) 

5. St. Vincent & the Grenadines Environment Fund (SVGEF) 

6. Lanka Environment Fund (LEF) 

7. Highlands & Islands Environment Fund (HIEF) 

8. Barbados Environmental Conservation Trust (BECT) 

9. Pakistan Environment Trust (PET) 

4 



The Conservation Collective 

## Trustees’ annual report 

## For the year ended 31 December 2021 

## Associates 

1. Leuser Ecosystem Action Fund (LEAF) 

2. Iris Project 

## Explanation of local foundation structures 

- Branches: ‘in-house’ subsidiaries of the Conservation Collective UK charity, governed by a branch constitution. Decision making is delegated to local Steering Committees. Branches are expected to spin out into independent affiliates within three years. 

- Affiliates: Independently locally registered charitable entities. An affiliate agreement defines the relationship between the local entity and the Conservation Collective. 

- Associates: place-based funding organisations which are part of our extended family. They join and contribute towards shared learning opportunities but are not based exactly on the CC model. 

Well-directed philanthropic funding has a massive role to play in tackling the greatest challenge of our time – the ongoing breakdown of the Earth’s system on which we depend for everything. Worryingly, only a tiny proportion of total philanthropy is directed towards the environment. Our Conservation Collective encourages budding philanthropists to give money to the most effective grassroots initiatives, in the places that they love. Our fast-growing network of locally focused foundations has supported an extraordinarily exciting line-up of nature restoration initiatives across the world. Some of these are outlined in this brilliant report. 

## Our story 

The Conservation Collective started life in 2008 when dedicated conservationist Ben Goldsmith and friends created a foundation in Ibiza to pool funding from people who cared about the area and channel it to effective local environmental projects. 

Following the success of Ibiza Preservation, the new model was replicated in a host of other locations around the world, providing world-class oversight, management and support to new local foundations so that they could fund grassroots projects and deliver real impact. 

Throughout 2017-2020 we worked to replicate the model of the successful place-based local regranting organisations that he and friends has set up in Ibiza, the Aeolian Islands and St Vincent & the Grenadines. We collaborated with clubs of donors connected to specific places and set about proving that this model could be adapted to a myriad of local contexts. Seeing these organisations today, thriving independently, positioned to drive long lasting change and bolstering local civil society, is overwhelmingly exciting. 

We launched the Conservation Collective’s UK charity in the fateful month of March 2020 to formalise the role of the network in launching new foundations, providing network benefits – from streamlining operational efficiencies to coordinating shared learnings. We were surprised and 

5 



The Conservation Collective 

## Trustees’ annual report 

## For the year ended 31 December 2021 

delighted by the rapid early success of the Conservation Collective. Since then, we have doubled the number of foundations in our network (from 8 to 19, whilst continuing to respond to and act upon the donor-led growth of our pipeline of new locations. 

## Trustees 

The trustees have referred to the guidance contained in the Charity Commission's general guidance on public benefit when reviewing the charity's aims and objectives and in planning its future activities. In particular, the trustees consider how planned activities will contribute to the aims and objectives that have been set. 

The trustees review the aims, objectives and activities of the charity each year. This report looks at what the charity has achieved and the outcomes of its work in the reporting period. The trustees report the success of each key activity and the benefits the charity has brought to those groups of people that it is set up to help. The review also helps the trustees ensure the charity's aims, objectives and activities remained focused on its stated purposes. 

## Achievements and Performance 

In 2021 we were thrilled to welcome a range of private individuals, corporates, and trusts & foundations as core donors, eager to participate in a growing movement of environmental philanthropy. Those supporting the central network believe in our ability to attract new channels of funding, and are also motivated by the ‘multiplier effect’ – our ability to leverage funding of 10x the amount that it costs to keep the lights on in the central team, for local environmental initiatives. 

We are building a small team to provide the support to new and existing network members. New team members included a marketing manager (January 2021), a network director (March 2021) and finance manager (September 2021). 

Thanks to our experienced trustees and advisors, we built a solid governance structure, to monitor risk and set performance indicators. We started measuring KPIs of the network as part of risk management, which we review quarterly and discuss at Trustee meetings. With our new finance manager, we improved financial management by having regular branch cash flow reviews and moved our accounting to a new system -Xero. We created a trading entity to increase our capacity to manage and process corporate partnerships for our members at the central level, taking VAT advice from professional service firms. 

We worked with a charity consultant Pilotlight (comprising a team at Barclays) who quoted: “It is easy to see the fantastic achievements which the team have made, particularly impressive given the short period which the charity has been in operation and the slim head office operation which they have had in place. The infrastructure which has been set up, the funding which has been secured, the number of foundations brought on, and the return on investment from these foundations is remarkable and speaks to the dedication and hard work of the individuals involved.” 

6 



The Conservation Collective 

## Trustees’ annual report 

## For the year ended 31 December 2021 

In 2021 new foundations were launched under the CC’s umbrella, and based on our proven model, in Tuscany (Italy), the Lamu Archipelago (Kenya), the Argolic Gulf (Greece) and Cyprus. 

Before we launch a new CC foundation, we commission an expert local consultant to develop a scoping report to outline the key environmental challenges and opportunities for change in the target location. The study maps out key civil society players at the grassroots level and serves to inform the future grant strategy. A scoping study was commissioned for the foundation which launched in 2021, and for the Aegean and Mediterranean coasts of Turkey, as that and others joined our pipeline for 2022 

(including Malta, Sicily, Cayman Islands, and Croatia’s Dalmation Coast.) 

Last year the Conservation Collective member foundations worked with a consultant to develop a shared Theory of Change (TOC). See infographic below. This will inform a standardised impact monitoring, evaluation, and learnings tool. We will use this to communicate how the impact and outcomes of the work we’re supporting, are helping us to achieve our mission and vision, locally and collectively. 


## Spotlighting local stories on a global platform 

A focus of the past 12 months has been strengthening how we work together: celebrating achievements; sharing and avoiding mistakes; and replicating best practice solutions to address the biodiversity and climate emergency we face. 

Wednesday Wisdom Webinars are regular opportunities to learn from an expert or to discuss specific common issues as we build a groundswell of support for our work. Highlights have included discussions on: Campaigning (Amanda Keetley, Devon Environment Foundation), Safeguarding (external), Building Coalitions- Vinod Malwatte (Lanka Environment Fund), Environmental Law & ‘Fighting for Nature in the Courts’ (Brendon Moorehouse) and Zero Waste and Plastic Waste Management (Enzo Favioni). 

7 



The Conservation Collective 

## Trustees’ annual report 

## For the year ended 31 December 2021 

The Collectives: The inaugural Conservation Collective awards ceremony took place online in December 2021, with over 60 people in attendance.  Judged by the Conservation Collective’s trustees, each winner received £500. Initially designed as an internal event, we hope to see this grow each year and in due course be an annual live occurrence. 

Amplifying the impact: A key part of our role at the centre of the network is to amplify the local stories, to join up the dots of their work and speak with a collective voice about the work we do and the difference it makes.  Some highlights from the past year have included our ‘Protect What You Love’ campaign to celebrate our second birthday, Meet the Director, Spotlight on a Species and our ‘Local Heroes’ series which we delivered in partnership with Naturisimo. 

‘For me, action is the only way to address feeling helpless and overwhelmed by the ecological & climate crisis. It is about taking responsibility and getting hands on with the issues.’  Gary Jolliffe, Till the Coast is Clear: Till the Coast is Clear – a grantee of the Devon Environment Foundation - is a plastic pollution clean-up scheme that organises regular community beach cleans and uses a rib and a fleet of kayaks to access hard-to-reach areas of rivers, estuaries, and coastline, while engaging the community and eco-tourists on plastic waste prevention. 

‘The biggest challenge we face every day is against those who do not understand that sea is life. The sea and its inhabitants are in danger and their salvation depends on our daily behaviour: what seems like a small gesture can become very important if all of us put it into practice.’ Luana Papetti, TartAmare. TartAmare – a grantee of the Tuscany Environment Foundation - deals with injured sea turtles' treatment and rehabilitation and, when they are completely healed, they take back them to the sea. 

## Strategic Partnerships 

As a network we are greater than the sum of our parts, and together we can do great things. Whilst each of our local foundations operate in very different contexts, the nature of the problems and solutions can be shared. We came together for the first time as a group to build a campaign called Dream Global, Think Local, in the early days of the pandemic. It enabled us to maintain our environmental focus and to provide emergency support to local communities. In the Balearics, this took the form of emergency food projects – providing surplus farmed, healthy local produce, created due to the decline in demand from tourism and hospitality to vulnerable families. This served as an emergency aid and prevented excess waste. 

Throughout the year the CC embedded its role as a catalyst for funding for its members. Raising over +£1.6M for its members from private donors, corporates (such Edmiston Yachts and Naturisimo and trusts and foundation’s (e.g. CIFF, MAVA and Oak Foundation). 

Edmiston Yachts joined as the Conservation Collective’s first major corporate partner. We built a portfolio of five marine projects which is being supported by the Edmiston Foundation. This longterm partnership serves to bring awareness to, and funding from Edmiston’s clients, for the work being done to restore nature in the places where they enjoy taking boats out. 

8 



The Conservation Collective 

## Trustees’ annual report 

## For the year ended 31 December 2021 

## Tackling illegal fishing: 

Last year Mallorca Preservation and Marilles Foundation commissioned an investigative report into illegal fishing which was presented publicly in December 2021 on the island. One of the findings estimated that unreported catches in the Balearics amounted to around 40% of the total declared catches, although these vary by species and time of year. With funding from Edmiston the three Conservation Collective Balearic Foundations are joining forces, together with Marilles & BLUE Marine Foundation and local stakeholders, to build an ambitious project to find solutions to this problem. The plan aims to build awareness, engage consumers and hospitality venues, as well as work with the authorities on possible policy measures to improve local traceability of fish. 

## Sea turtle conservation & alternative livelihoods: 

One of the biggest success stories of the St Vincent & Grenadines Environment Fund has been the sea turtle conservation project (see page 13). With funding from Edmiston SVGEF will secure turtle monitors for four beaches on the Leeward and South Coast Turtle Project beginning in April 2022. The training will be overseen by regional expert Carla Daniel from Barbados Sea Turtle Project (see page 16). Next steps are to gather this and other data to analyse the effect of the ban and to contribute towards the Sea Turtle Recovery Action Plan for SVG. 

## – Project DigiFish Catching the Digital Wave of Change. 

This project aims at enhancing marine protection by tracking recreational fishing vessels in Barbados. Barbados Environmental Conservation Trust gave a grant to BARNUFO, with 30 tracking devices distributed to the fishers. As well as providing a reassuring safety element to the fishers themselves, data collected can inform future policies around the marine spatial planning, improving and expanding marine protected areas, improving the ability of the authorities to tackle illegal fishing, and enabling sensitised fishers to avoid nursing grounds/protected areas. 

## Posidonia Alert (small Cyclades islands): 

An initiative designed and supported by the Cyclades Preservation Fund and aims at highlighting the threats posed by climate change and the boat industry to Posidonia - the precious carbon capturing Mediterranean seagrass species - and subsequently, the entire marine ecosystem. Posidonia Alert has been organising sessions with locals, tourists and businesses to raise awareness about the preservation of Posidonia and good boat practices to prevent anchor damage. The goal is to lead the way for the legal protection of this carbon capturing storage in the Aegean. 

## Pick the Alien (Ionian Islands, Greece): 

An initiative supported by the Ionian Environment Foundation is aimed at fighting, through gastronomy, the negative impact that alien invasive species have on the Mediterranean marine environment. Local partner @isea_org will encourage consumers, fishers and chefs to commercialise these edible invasive species. The dual benefit sees them removed from local marine ecosystems whilst reducing pressure on traditional, often depleted or vulnerable, fish species. 

9 



The Conservation Collective 

## Trustees’ annual report 

## For the year ended 31 December 2021 

## Grants received 

The MAVA Foundation awarded us a grant to explore creating new CC foundations in areas where it has actively supported conservation work (Cyprus, Turkey, Croatia). MAVA, due to close in 2022, chose to back the creation of new local CC foundations to ensure its legacy and securing a continued funding source for local partners. 

The MAVA grant also supported the development of the Conservation Collective’s group theory of change, developed with New Philanthropy Capital. This illustrates how the activities of our network are divided into different layers and approaches to drive change.  We will track, measure and evaluate our efficacy based on how our activities (at project, foundation and CC level) drive social cultural and economic outcomes and ultimately achieve environment impacts. 

The MAVA Foundation also selected the Conservation Collective to join the ‘Mediterranean Islands Collective’. This second grant is providing funding for replicable pilot projects, in order to contribute towards a biodiversity action plan for Mediterranean Islands. Pilot projects within our network include: 

Cycladoscope’, a networking & best practices platform for organisations working towards the protection of the Cycladic environment. Cycladoscope, an initiative of the Cyclades Preservation Fund, aims to enable knowledge sharing by supporting local (and national/international) entities with skills transfers, and with hands-on experience. 

A 2-year training programme to provide professional farmers with the necessary knowledge to implement more sustainable management of their farms, developed by Menorca Preservation, in collaboration with local specialist organisations. 

A detailed and ambitious land-use study, as part of Ibiza Preservation’s Sustainability Observatory. The long-term aim is to create a tool to analyse the natural diversity of the landscape based on real data, compare differences between municipalities and track changes over time to inform & influence policymaking for the future benefit of the environment. 

## The Iris Prize 

In 2021 CC foundations piloted projects in memory of Iris Goldsmith, a bright young girl who adored all things wild. Iris, the daughter of our founder Ben died in a tragic accident in 2019. Competitions varied in each location but essentially invited young people to propose in ‘One Minute for your Island’ ideas for environmental action to tackle problems that that were aware of. These projects helped shape the global Iris Project, launching in 2022 to enable young people to protect & restore nature. To enter the competition, local high school age children had to create a video highlighting an environmental issue that most concerned them and their island as well as proposing a solution to tackle it. 

10 



The Conservation Collective 

## Trustees’ annual report 

For the year ended 31 December 2021 

## Filmmaking to Promote Environmental Awareness 

In the Cyclades, the award enabled winners the opportunity to work with a professional filmmaker on exclusive documentary workshops in Amorgos & Syros; and a follow-up 2-day field trip to Naxos for both contestants. The idea of the award was to provide young and creative environmentalists with the right tools to spread the word about their main sustainability concerns and to inspire environmental action in their islands. The two winning videos focused on the islands of Syros and its waste management issues; and the geographic predisposition of Amorgos to rain shortages and droughts that have been aggravated by overgrazing and unsustainable agricultural practices. 

## Taking Environmental Action for Coral Reefs in the Caribbean 

Aimed at encouraging entrepreneurial teenagers and youngsters to act on local sustainability matters, SVGEF identified that the local youth were particularly concerned about the decaying state of coral reefs due to sea temperature rise and bleaching events in the Caribbean and the effects of beach erosion on the health of coastal ecosystems and, consequently, local communities. Ranging from coral reef rehabilitation and mangrove restoration in Bequia, to waste management in Questelles, the three winning projects were awarded a cash donation of US$1,000 each to achieve their mission and enable young individuals to lead the action towards a more sustainable Future. 

## Kilometres of Plastic for Iris - Join the Fight Against Plastic Pollution 

The CC foundations in the Balearics (Ibiza, Mallorca and Menorca) initiated a Balearic-wide initiative aimed at recognising and involving young people in protecting the environment and conserving the Mediterranean. Young people from all over the Balearic Islands are invited to participate for free, organising nature walks with friends and family to share ideas on reducing plastic pollution on their islands. The collective goal is to reach a total of 10,000 km travelled against plastic pollution by 30th April 2022. Kilometres of Plastic for Iris is about working together to campaign for cleaner, healthier islands, and participants are also given the opportunity to put themselves forward to enter the “One minute for your island” competition in pairs by creating a one-minute video answering the question: “What would you do to fight plastic pollution on your island?” 

## Grant-making policy and aims 

The Conservation Collective brings people together to find local solutions to global challenges. Our network of foundations around the world are delivering and funding work which delivers the following environmental impact s across LAND, MARINE AND FRESHWATER 

- Preserves, protects, and regenerates natural habitats 

- Helps native species to thrive 

- Slow down and adapt to climate change 

11 



The Conservation Collective 

## Trustees’ annual report 

For the year ended 31 December 2021 

- Reducing pollution/greenhouse gas emissions 

## Achievements and performance 

We understand that direct action isn’t always enough to address the complex issues we face and almost all of the work of The Conservation Collective and our local foundations seeks to achieve the following social, cultural and economic outcomes. 

- People have a greater appreciation of the natural world 

- Governments, public institutions, and media act in ways that support the natural world 

- Businesses become nature positive (farming, fisheries, tourism etc) 

- Changes in public behaviour to better preserve, protect and regenerate the natural world 

- Reduced waste and improved waste management 

- Increased use of low carbon technology and energy 

The charity's main activities and who it tries to help are described below. All its charitable activities focus on increasing environmental philanthropy to fund effective grassroots conservation initiatives. 

## Financial Review 

The results of the company for the year ended 31 December 2021 are set out in the accounts on pages 34-49. 

During the year, The Conservation Collective raised £1,647,195 (2020: £819,278) for local environmental initiatives of which £332,428 (2020: £222,460) related to unrestricted funds and £1,314,767 (2020: £596,818) related to restricted funds. 

Unrestricted income from our founding Trustee £76,061 (2020: £131,462), Oak Foundation £100,000 (2020: Nil), Children’s Investment Fund Foundation £78,015 (2020: £78,015) and the MAVA Foundation supported with a donation of £37,559 (2020: £75,500), a combination of restricted and unrestricted. 

In 2021, the Conservation Collective received the first year of three years’ worth of substantial funding from the Oak Foundation and two years’ from Children’s Investment Fund Foundation (CIFF) to grow its central team and to continue to support its model of effective environmental philanthropy and increase the number of new foundations. 

The £55,500 restricted income from MAVA in 2020 was transferred internally from New Funds 2021 to be allocated to new three new local foundations in Cyprus, Croatia and Turkey of £10,000 

12 



The Conservation Collective 

## Trustees’ annual report 

For the year ended 31 December 2021 

each. The remaining £25,500 was allocated to the Theory of Change Impact Report, which will be completed in 2022. 

During the year, The Conservation Collective expenditure amounted to £1,319,765 (2020: £612,372).  This consisted of grants given to local foundations in the network totalling £ 924,131 (£623,780 unrestricted and £300,351 restricted) (2020 grants given: £433,308).  Foundations increased from 12 in 2020 to 17 in 2021 with a further 3 new foundations in the pipeline to being launched early 2022.  These contributions are broken down on the next page alongside the total amount raised and deployed by the local foundations in 2021, and a brief impact summary. The remaining expenses comprised administration, governance and support costs totalling £395,634 (2020: £179,064). 

This results in a net income during the year of £327,430, being £141,853 (2020: £108,620) unrestricted and £185,577 (2020: £98,286) restricted. 

The trustees retain full discretion whether to provide funding. The trustees confirm that they have referred to the Charity Commission’s general guidance on public benefit when reviewing the charity’s aims and objectives, managing the charity’s assets and considering applications for financial assistance. 

13 



The Conservation Collective 

## Trustees’ annual report 

For the year ended 31 December 2021 

Overview of the Conservation Collective network’s members, including information about amount raised and granted in 2021, amount provided as core grants from the Conservation Collective, and amount regranted (e.g., raised on their behalf through the Conservation Collective). We’ve also provided project examples related to grants given, and impact examples to give a flavour for the work being supported. 

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

## IbizaPreservation - IP (affiliate) 

## In 2021 

-IP raised a total of £365,143 and distributed £301,088 in grants. 

- The Conservation Collective re-granted IP £48,646 (2020: £59,883) for the following purposes £4,270 in core funding, £500 the Collective’s Innovation Award, £15,693 restricted fund from MAVA Foundation and re-grant £28,183 

Ibiza’s four programmatic areas continue to be: 

- Strengthening Ibiza’s food production capacity to reinvigorate soils and landscapes. 

- Phasing out single-use plastics in Ibiza and Formentera by 2023. 

- Protecting Posidonia meadows to keep our sea pristine and full of life. 

- Improving knowledge about socioenvironmental issues on Ibiza. 

## Impact Example: 

IP won a Collective Award for it’s innovative approaches during the COVID-19 pandemic, around local produce promotion (connecting growers and buyers) and environmental education. IP partnered with a food delivery company to create a local produce online supermarket, provided online learning materials about sustainability; and helped supply families in need with healthy, balanced, and fresh meals. 

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

## St Vincent & the Grenadines Environment Fund - SVGEF (affiliate) 

## In 2021 

-SVGEF raised a total over £264,822 and dispersed £65,381 in grants. 

- The Conservation Collective re-granted SVGEF £45,477 (2020: £62,924) for the following purposes £3,631 in core funding, £500 for the Collective Fundraising Award, £18,146 restricted fund from Edmiston Funding for Marine Sea Turtles and re-grant £23,200. 

The eruptions of the La Soufriere volcano (April 9 -22nd 2021), presented a national challenge that warranted the Fund's short-term involvement in relief efforts. Whilst not wholly consistent with the Fund's stated mandate, the events were seen as a major socio-economic and 

14 



The Conservation Collective 

## Trustees’ annual report 

For the year ended 31 December 2021 

environmental disaster threatening all the factors which contribute to resilience and sustainability. 

SVGEF donors were particularly generous in response to this crisis and 2021 was a recordbreaking year for fund raising. Some of these funds were allocated to the post-natural disaster restoration of the Cumberland Nature Trail project, which will serve to conserve one of the habitats of the Amazonia Guildingii, the St. Vincent parrot and bring livelihoods to communities impacted by the eruptions. SVGEF won a Collective Award for this commitment to its communities and ecosystems. 2021 also saw the continuation of successful projects in preserving biodiversity on Frigate Island, protecting sea birds in the Grenadines, and in sea turtle conservation (see above regarding turtle monitoring work). 

Monitoring and ensuring the success of the turtle killing ban (2017): 

Windward Marine Sea Turtle and  Livelihood Project - £18,352 

In collaboration with National Parks, this project seeks to declare as protected areas two beaches with high density turtle nesting for leatherbacks at Colonarie and Big Sand on the Windward coast of SVG. Initial zoning maps have been drawn to facilitate zoning and mapping of the Colonarie and Sandy Bay beaches, public consultation/ declaration orders for the beaches and preparation of management plans for both beaches. 

## Union Island's sea turtles project 

In 2021 the SVGEF funded the monitoring of turtle nesting activity on the beaches of Union Island by supporting the local NGO Union Island Environmental Attackers. They witnessed about a dozen successful nestings throughout the year and on June 29th 2021 they tagged their first leatherback turtle. The members of the team that night named her Mashrd, the newest citizen of Union Island, according to team leader Roseman Adams. 

## Flora & Fauna - £20,454 

This grant was to conduct a study of biodiversity in the Chatham Bay area. The purpose of the study was investigate the wellbeing of the Union Island gecko and the pink rhino iguana, as well as other species in the area.  In turn, it hoped to pave the way for a development plan concerning biodiversity protection with a formal ‘Chatham Bay: Ridge to Reef’ proposal. 

Environmental Protection in the Caribbean (EPIC) - £11,828. 

Seabird research and conservation efforts continued in 2021. EPIC hosted two meetings of the Grenadines Seabird Conservation Plan Working Group during the past year. This group is comprised of local stakeholders who help to guide conservation efforts outlined in the Community-based Seabird Conservation Plan for the Transboundary Grenadines. The first meeting sought community-driven solutions to the issue of illegal harvesting of seabirds, their eggs, and their chicks. The second meeting focused on prioritizing island restoration sites throughout the transboundary Grenadines, particularly those being negatively impacted by non-native mammals 

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

15 



The Conservation Collective 

## Trustees’ annual report 

## For the year ended 31 December 2021 

## Cyclades Preservation Fund – CPF (affiliate) 

## In 2021 

-CPF raised in total £126,606 and disbursed £105,701 in grants. 

-The Conservation Collective re-granted CPF £36,159 (2020: £9,378) for the following purposes £4,280 in core funding, £500 for the Collective Fundraising Award, £14,423 restricted fund from Edmiston Funding Posidonia Alert, £788 restricted fund from Taspoutzo Tzoulia Green Volunteers and re-grant £16,168. 

In 2021 the CPF created a Greek local charity and began closing its UK charity. All funds were regranted to the new Greek charity in the year. Conservation Collective does not hold any funds on behalf of CPF at the end of 2021. 

## Impact Example: 

Amorgorama: a successful pilot programme saw fishermen in Amorgos (Greece) paid to collect plastic instead of fishing. The project reached the agreement of 28 no-fishing days, while at the same time 11 beaches were cleaned, where from more than 900 large bags of litter were collected, 12 tons of plastic were shipped for recycling and 960 kgs of fishing nets and ropes were additionally recycled. Given the success of the initiative, the Greek Minister for the Environment secured € 70,000 for the work to continue in 2022. 

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

## Menorca Preservation – MEP (affiliate) 

## In 2021 

-MEPF raised £192,173 in total and disbursed £156,673 in grants. 

-The Conservation Collective re-granted MEPF £32,598 (2020: £9,380) for the following purposes £4,482 in core funding, £500 for the Collective Fundraising Award, £8,444 restricted fund from MAVA, and re-grant £19,172. 

## Impact example: 

Project: 0 Plastic Menorca. Creating a certification awarded to businesses reducing their single-use plastic consumption, this alliance aims to lead the change towards a plastic-free island. They will achieve this by training and supporting community members and business owners and providing them with the appropriate materials and resources. 

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

## Mallorca Preservation Fund - MAPF (affiliate) 

## In 2021 

- MAPF raised £ 88,680.00 in total and disbursed £55,626 in grants. 

-The Conservation Collective re-granted MAPF £27,400 (2020: £26,579) for the following purposes £3,844 in core funding, £17,076 restricted fund from Edmiston Fund Illegal Fishing Belearics, and re-grant £6,480. 

16 



The Conservation Collective 

## Trustees’ annual report 

## For the year ended 31 December 2021 

## Impact Example: 

The Nursehound catshark was once a common species found off the coast of the Balearic Islands. However, unsustainable fishing practices and bycatch have driven the population to a dramatic decline. Despite their bad reputation, sharks are essential for the health of the marine environment. MAPF is working to restore the population of Nursehound sharks in Mallorca by supporting a breeding program that helps pups mature in captivity until they can survive in the wild. 

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

## Barbados Environmental Conservation Trust – BECT (affiliate) 

## In 2021 

-BECT raised £32,725 and gave £51,863 in grants (there were significant reserves available from the previous year). 

- The Conservation Collective re-granted BECT £52,691 (2020: £5,801) for the following purposes 

£7,344 restricted fund from Edmiston Fund Digi Fish Project, and re-grant £45,347. 

## Impact example: 

In 2021 The Barbados Sea Turtle Project rescued over 63,000 critically endangered hawksbill hatchlings during the hatching season, recorded 465 nesting females and 100 special needs turtles in the turtle ICU. Currently, they are fundraising $100k to sustain operational costs of the project and calling for volunteers to help with the monitoring of the nesting turtles and hatchlings on the beach. 

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

## Lanka Environment Fund - LEF (affiliate) 

## In 2021 

-LEF raised £57,574 and gave £18,944 in grants. 

-The Conservation Collective re-granted LEF £61,570 (2020: £0) for the following purposes £7,258 in core funding, £500 for the Collective Fundraising Award, restricted fund from Pearl Protectors £3,511, restricted fund from Federation of Environment £7,315, restricted fund from EFL Colibri £8,118, and a re-grant of £34,868. 

## Pearl Protectors - £3,511 

This project was initiated after the MV X-press Pearl shipping container sank off the coast of Colombo, releasing billions toxic nurdles into the seawater and adjacent coastline. Through volunteer mobilizations this project aims to clean as many beaches as possible along the western and southern coastlines removing nurdles and micro-plastics using a variety of special low-cost tools. 

17 



The Conservation Collective 

## Trustees’ annual report 

## For the year ended 31 December 2021 

Federation of Environment Organisations - £7,315 

Employing local communities whose livelihoods were affected by COVID-19 to manually remove seeds from invasive plant species in the Lunugamvehera National Park thus, reducing the risk that invasive species pose to local biodiversity. 

## EFL - £8,118 

A project called ‘Colibri’ which will help safeguarding the fragile coastal reef ecosystems of the Bar Reef Marine Sanctuary by strengthening civil society’s capacity to promote sustainable use of natural resources, improve local community livelihoods and increase monitoring and scientific knowledge of the reef ecosystem. 

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

## Pakistan Environment Trust – PET (Affiliate) 

PET is a registered UK charity, while the foundation has been setting themselves and putting financial systems in place it was agreed by the Conservation Collective Trustees to continue to hold the funds for PET in 2021.  PET is accounted as an affiliate in this set of accounts. The Conservation Collective re-granted PET £433,297 (2020: £0) for the following purposes £7,274 in core funding and re-grant £426,023. 

## Impact summary: 

- Voluntary carbon offsets: Establish Pakistan’s first project developer for the voluntary carbon market, with a portfolio of certified carbon offset projects (e.g. forestry, off-grid renewable energy, waste management) that could mobilise a market opportunity of $200M per annum by 2030. 

- Wildlife and habitat conservation: Re-build viable populations of at-threat species (e.g. Asian Rhino and Cheetah) in wildlife sanctuaries across Pakistan (four national parks shortlisted in Punjab’s Salt Range) and set up community-led initiatives such as eco-tourism to ensure long-term sustainability. 

- Net zero coalition for Pakistan: Convening Pakistan’s leading corporations and public sector institutions to set a national net zero carbon manifesto/roadmap for 2050 under a coalition to be championed by the Prime Minister. 

18 



The Conservation Collective 

## Trustees’ annual report 

## For the year ended 31 December 2021 

## Highlands and Islands Environment Foundation – HIEF (Affiliate) 

In 2021 

- HIEF raised £287,500 and granted £128,057 

- The Conservation Collective re-granted HIEF £10,500 (2020: £82,750) for the following purposes £10,000 in core funding and £500 for the Conservation Collective Marine Award. 

## Impact example: 

Wester Ross native oyster restoration in Scotland: Shellfish use CO2 available in the ocean to manufacture their shells, thus acting as effective carbon capturing and storage mechanisms. Highlands and Islands Environment Foundation granted £15,000 to establish a native oyster nursery at the head of Loch Broom to cultivate 100,000 native oysters a year for 3 years to regenerate the depleted oyster beds in Loch Broom, Little Loch Broom and Old Dornie, Achiltibuie. As well as the clear environmental benefits this will bring, this project will help to empower the local communities, creating a pool of trained & committed practitioners & advocates with a vested interest in championing marine conservation in their area. 

## Conservation Collective branches 

The branches continued to perform well, raising funds and awarding grants to impactful and exciting grassroots organisations. See below for full lists of each individual grant paid out by each branch. 

## Devon Environment Foundation - DEF (branch) 

## In 2021 

-DEF raised £186,682 (2020: £162,230) and gave out £97,234 in grants (2020: £58,686). The Conservation Collective gave £10,000 as a core grant, and £500 as a Collective Award. 

## Impact Example: 

## Apricot Centre - £24,394 

The grant in 2021 to this regenerative farm was to enable the use of the data it has collected to demonstrate to other farmers and the public how farms can be productive, sequester carbon, be resilient to climate change, and support biodiversity. DEF awarded a grant to undertake a feasibility study to enable phase two of the Apprentice Academy, that has the potential to unlock significant change for farming in Devon. 

After completing the feasibility study and the certification of the qualification in 2021, in 2022 the Apricot Centre welcomed its first round of apprentices (a total of 20), who will acquire a Level 3 certification in Regenerative Land Based Studies. 

## Till the Coast is Clear - £19,020 

A plastic pollution clean-up scheme that organises regular community beach cleans and uses a rib and a fleet of kayaks to access hard-to-reach areas of rivers, estuaries, and coastline, while engaging the community and eco-tourists on plastic waste prevention. 

19 



The Conservation Collective 

## Trustees’ annual report 

## For the year ended 31 December 2021 

## Devon Wildlife Trust (Beavers) - £10,000 

Project aims to apply learnings from the river Otter to enable beavers to colonise successfully on the river Tamar, bringing an abundance of biodiversity, along with cleaner water, flood prevention, and eco-tourism. 

Devon Wildlife Trust – Water Voles Volunteer Training - £3,500 A project run by DWT, training local volunteers to provide vital data for the Devon Biodiversity Record Centre about water vole populations in the lower Avon Valley, South Devon - the learnings will be shared with our West Devon water release project and other water vole conservation projects across Devon. 

## Wildlife Wardens - £5,000 

A scalable grassroots community project to inspire and empower local people to protect, restore, and enhance wildlife and habitat in their local area. It required funding for a part-time Coordinator to organise training, keep Parish/Town/Ward records, and deal with day-to-day requests for information and advice to help neighbouring areas. 

## Regenerative Dartmoor – £2,500 

A hyper-local, grassroots feasibility study to scope the potential to create wildlife corridors in two neighbouring river catchments to deliver landscape scale change on the high moor. DEF funded a feasibility study (Phase 1) to test the potential for Phase 2, a larger vision of a Regenerative Dartmoor as a flagship National Park for innovation in wilder land management. 

## Regenerative Exmoor – £15,000 

A project that aims to replicate the Dartmoor 'Moor Trees' model on Exmoor, to create resilient native woodland, while engaging local communities, that prevents downstream flooding and soil erosion, and enhances water quality and biodiversity. 

## Hayes Farm - £5,000 

A water vole release project, to be implemented in partnership with Derek Gow, on this exemplary regenerative cattle farm, aiming to re-establish a substantive, genetically diverse population back into West Devon. 

## Flete Field Lab - £9,570 

A pioneering trial to discover soil improvement recipes using mycelium and biochar to clean up soil and waterways around Flete estate and share best practice across Devon and beyond. 

## Litter Free Sea Project and Union Fabrication £3,250 

Rockfish Litter Free Sea is a pilot project trialling exciting and experimental initiatives to capture and clean up the plastic pollution that collects in Brixham harbour – devising a learning experience that will inform future Litter Free Sea projects to be rolled out to other Rockfish coastal locations in future. 

20 



The Conservation Collective 

## Trustees’ annual report 

For the year ended 31 December 2021 

The Union Fabrication project supports the production of a life-size galvanised steel whale connected to the Litter Free Sea Project as well. 

## Ionian Environment Foundation - IEF (branch) 

## In 2021 

-IEF raised £118,759 (2020: £98,996) and gave out £39,121 in grants (2020: £73,477). 

-The Conservation Collective gave £8,893 as a core grant and a Collective Award of £500 

‘Save Erimitis’ campaign - £24,162 

- Supporting and coordinating the communications of the campaign to 'Save Erimitis', which aims to protect the pristine natural habitat of Erimitis from an unsustainable development now and for the future, whilst working to find grounds for formal protection of its wetlands and wealth of biodiversity. 

- Contribution to Erimtis Plous, a residents’ association coordinating the local campaign. 

- A survey investigating the larger mammals of Corfu's waterways to gather information as to the present status of these species in the Erimitis area. The information gathered will be used as guidelines for future actions 

- Monk Seal Surveys - A systematic ten-day survey of marine caves along the coastline of NE and NW Corfu for the conservation of the Mediterranean monk seal, Monachus monachus. 

## Archipelagos - £2,631 

Aims to inform the general public and relevant stakeholders about the presence of cetaceans in the Ionian Sea, thus contributing to the preservation of the marine biodiversity of the area and increasing the likelihood of future conservation measures. Digital and printed posters and brochures distributed across the region to raise awareness. 

Surveys on the northeast coast of Corfu with regard to its suitability as habitats for the endangered monk seal species, which is known to have presence in much of the Ionian Sea and in this area. Connected to the campaign to 'Save Erimitis', the objectives are to identify the extent to which the coastline of NE Corfu can still provide habitat for monk seals and to identify possibilities for connections of protected areas in the vicinity (in Corfu and Albania), through the presence of monk seals. 

## Green Tank - £1,276 

An investigation into EU financing available for a sustainable future in the Ionian Islands. This will involve and inform key stakeholders at the national and regional levels about the sustainability funding potential for the Cyclades and Ionian regions during the 2021-2027 programming period. The Programme includes actions related to green transition and climate change, protection of the environment and resources, sustainable mobility, but also the enhancement of human resources with relevant skills to participate in this transition. First releases of resources expected for the second half of 2022. 

21 



The Conservation Collective 

## Trustees’ annual report 

## For the year ended 31 December 2021 

Waste Action Awareness Week - £5,201 

A one-week course about waste management in primary schools. It also aims to promote crossgenerational awareness, understanding and action towards the critical issues associated with excessive waste disposal in the Ionian islands. The pilot has since been approved by the Ministry of Education to be rolled out to new areas in Greece. Due to covid related school closures, in 2021 the project was carefully redesigned to take the format of teacher training seminars. 

Tethys/Ionian Dolphin Project - £3,576 

Dolphin research with the aim of ensuring the long-term viability of marine mammals living in the coastal waters of the eastern Ionian Sea. Providing clear guidelines to sailors to minimise disturbance on marine life, and providing the tools to allow them to contribute meaningfully to the data collection 

Corfu Butterfly Conservation Project - £2,275 

Corfu Butterfly Conservation (CBC) has an ambitious five-year project in mind, the culmination of which will be the production of a Corfu Butterfly Atlas (a reference book illustrated with photographs, distribution maps and phenology charts, and including information on the ecology of Corfu’s butterfly species). The IEF will support the initial phase of raising awareness through the production and circulation of posters and leaflets. 

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

## Lamu Environment Foundation - LaEF (branch) 

## In 2021 

- -LaEF raised £135,862 (2020: N/A) and gave out £19,783 and grants (2020: N/A). -The Conservation Collective gave £7,274 as a core grant. 

Fanya Safi Coalition Waste Management - £15,409 

Streamlining waste collections, arranging regular clean-ups, education and awareness trainings and community buy ins of recyclable waste across Lamu and Manda Islands. Kickstarting a waste management industry. 

Sisters 4 Change Female Education Project £4,374 

Environmental education focussed on female youth in Lamu East - a particularly marginalised area. Aims to give an overview of the environment and peoples impact upon it and offering awareness training for alternative behaviours and potential livelihood streams. 

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

## Tuscany Environment Foundation - TEF (branch) In 2021 

-TEF raised £76,709 (2020: N/A) and gave out £19,655 in grants (2020: N/A). 

- -The Conservation Collective gave £8,546 as a core grant. 

22 



The Conservation Collective 

## Trustees’ annual report 

## For the year ended 31 December 2021 

TartaAmare - £15,016 

Monitoring and protect sea turtle Caretta caretta nests along the Tuscan coasts and dissemination of information on marine biodiversity and its conservation through widespread environmental education campaigns. 

## X-Pollination - £4,639 

Citizen Science project encouraging people to create appropriate pollinator friendly habitats and improving green areas. Beehotels and flowering plant seeds will distribute as a polli-kit for favouring pollinating insects and make people actively involved. 

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

## Network Indicators 

The network benefits aim to ensure that Conservation Collective local foundations (affiliates and branches*) are supported with the tools they need to thrive independently, growing year-on-year, making impactful grants, and following a high standard of governance. Performance is audited regularly, and support and recommendations provided, as part of quality control measures, and as a reputational risk management measure. 

Since May 2021, the CC has been tracking formally the progress of local foundations using a framework of standardised indicators to create a visual snapshot for the CC Trustees to review on a quarterly basis to see and track performance at a global level. This allows us to notice any issues, and to work with that foundation to troubleshoot. For affiliates this is lighter touch, for branches it is more hands-on. Indicators are based on the following categories: fundraising, grant giving, finance and operations, interaction with the network, marketing and communications, governance: legal and compliance. 

The Conservation Collective Trustees will monitor the team’s progress in terms of: 

- Pipeline of new foundations and number of new foundations set up 

- Funding secured (centrally and for flow through to projects) 

- Number of workshops/events held for network 

- Connections made within the network (learning) 

- Projects or grants replicated across the network 

- Network indicators on good governance and practices 

- Media hits/joint campaigns that CC has led which helped raise profile of foundations 

- Low and representative costs for the network members 

- Reputational risks of the group managed 

- Outstanding local foundations developed into 'centres for excellence' from which to develop further regional CC local foundations. 

23 



The Conservation Collective 

## Trustees’ annual report 

## For the year ended 31 December 2021 

## External factors: 

In 2021 the charity attracted funding from a wide range of donors, and, in spite of the global pandemic continued to draw new funding from private donors with connections to our local foundation locations. 

## Principal risks and uncertainties 

## Risk management 

The Trustees have identified five main areas where risks may occur: 

- Governance and management 

- Operational 

- Financial 

- Reputational 

- Conflicts of interest 

## Governance and management 

The Trustees consider their Chairman and the Board of Trustees, their legal adviser and their Administrators, The Trust Partnership, to be well qualified and with a sufficiently broad range of experience to undertake their duties effectively and properly. The Trustees are well briefed and committed to furthering the objects of the Charity and have in place effective controls, policies and procedures to ensure, as far as possible, that the business of the charity is run properly, economically and safely. 

Steering Committees are recruited for the branches and affiliates of the network, by the Conservation Collective and the founding donors of each organisation. They comprise actively engaged donors who participate in driving the strategic direction of their local foundation. Their role and that of Chairman is on a three yearly, renewable term. More details on roles and responsibilities can be found in the network’s guiding Operational Manual. 

## Operational 

All grant applications are scrutinised by the Executive Directors of the branches, and members of their steering committees to whom decision making is delegated by the CC Trustees; a member of the CC (either an employee or a Trustee also sits on these steering committees). There are also local advisory boards in place to give expert technical opinions. For CC branches these recommendations are submitted to Trustees at the quarterly meetings. The Trustees themselves are sufficiently qualified to ensure that grants are made in line with the aims and objectives of the Charity. The risk of making inappropriate grants is minimised by conducting appropriate due diligence checks. Where appropriate, all beneficiaries are required to undertake to return the funds if they cease operating within one year of the grant. All beneficiaries awarded grants by instalment 

24 



The Conservation Collective 

## Trustees’ annual report 

## For the year ended 31 December 2021 

need are required to submit a report which is approved by the appropriate authority before subsequent instalments are paid. 

Beneficiaries may be visited from time to time although it is not considered a responsible use of the Charity's funds to visit them unless warranted. 

The day-to-day administration is handled by The Trust Partnership which is experienced in this work. All data is stored securely and appropriately backed up. 

## Financial 

Budgets and management accounts are prepared by The Trust Partnership for quarterly Trustee meetings and accounts are also prepared by them for audit. The potential of inflation greater than expected could impact budget planning as well as uncertainty on exchange rate between Euros and the British pound. 

A Conservation Collective employee, as well as representatives from the Trust Partnership (including the founder) are registered bank users. Mitigating the risk of one person losing access/being unavailable to process an urgent transaction. 

The Trust Partnership keeps a record of reconciliation of ring-fenced funding received, to be channelled to the affiliates and branches of the Conservation Collective. Full paper trails are saved and stored online. 

The Trustees believe that the reports they receive, and the scrutiny of their advisers leave little risk of misinterpretation or mismanagement. 

## Reputational 

The Trustees believe that there is little risk to the reputation of the Charity through its association with its professional advisers and with its beneficiaries. 

Affiliates, associated members of the network and branches, their grants and activities are regularly monitored by Conservation Collective employees. They receive (at least) quarterly financials, annual accounts and updates on grants and activities. 

If there is a reputational risk perceived, it is discussed at the Trustees meeting, or by email in the interim. It will be addressed with the local executive director and their Chairman, and if it is not surmountable, notice will be served that the relationship with the Conservation Collective will terminate in three months as per the affiliate agreement 

Having assessed the major risks to which the charity is exposed, in particular those relating to its finances, the Trustees believe that by monitoring reserve levels, by ensuring that controls exist 

25 



The Conservation Collective 

## Trustees’ annual report 

For the year ended 31 December 2021 

over key financial systems and by examining the operational and business risks faced by the Charity, they have established effective systems to mitigate those risks. 

## Conflicts of interest 

Any conflicts of interest are declared at the beginning of Steering Committee or Trustee meetings, and minutes are recorded accordingly. People involved in grantee organizations excuse themselves from the decision-making part of the meeting. 

## Reserves policy and going concern 

The balance sheet shows total funds of £534,336 (2020: £206,906) as at 31 December 2021, of which £479,054 (2020: £200,691) was restricted and £55,282 (2020: £6,215) was unrestricted. The size of the unrestricted funds sustains and supports the level of donations which the trustees wish to make over time. The trustees consider free reserves to be adequate but not excessive in the light of the charity's reserves policy set out below. 

The trustees' policy is to operate on the basis of having sufficient income to use towards meeting their charitable objects and to accord with their principal aims. The trustees are of the opinion that the charity's funds at 31 December 2021 together with anticipated donations remain sufficient to enable them to continue this ongoing objective. 

The charity has sufficient, but not excessive, funds to maintain its current level of charitable distributions. Despite the social and economic challenges that may arise, this level of reserves is deemed appropriate and the trustees are content that the charity is a going concern. 

## Fundraising 

The Conservation Collective’s trustees are committed to ensuring that fundraising activities are carried out in an ethical manner and is committed to adhering to the Code of Fundraising Practice as set out by the Fundraising Regulator. The Conservation Collective agrees with the four values supporting the standards in the Code: 

- Legal. All fundraising must meet the requirements of the law. 

- Open. The Conservation Collective will be open with the public about its processes and will 

- Willing to explain (where appropriate) if asked for more information 

- Honest. The Conservation Collective will act with integrity and must not mislead the public about the cause it is fundraising for or the way a donation will be used. 

- Respectful. The Conservation Collective will demonstrate respect whenever it has contact with any member of the public. 

26 



The Conservation Collective 

## Trustees’ annual report 

## For the year ended 31 December 2021 

The Conservation Collective has an in-house fundraising team whose efforts are focused on raising funds from established trusts and foundations, corporate partners and high-net-worth individuals. The Conservation Collective does not have widespread engagement with the general public, run digital campaigns or use third party fundraisers. 

The Conservation Collective carries out due diligence and has agreements in place with all corporate partners and commercial participators. 

The Conservation Collective has received no complaints about its fundraising in the year ended 31 December 2021. 

## Plans for the future 

The strategy for the next three years is to seize on the wide range of new opportunities to fulfil our purpose to grow new channels of funding for the environment, whilst overseeing a solid and effective grant-giving structure focussed on local grassroots initiatives. We will achieve growth by setting up new foundations, and by strengthening existing members, by adding capacity. We will build resource for and at the Conservation Collective HQ to embed and enhance the network's existing role, and to ensure high quality across the network can be retained at scale. Growth will be focussed on: 

- Launching new foundations and expanding the Conservation Collective network 

- Consolidating and strengthening network benefits offered to existing members support 

- them to achieve their goals. 

- Building out the CC central team’s fund-raising capacity 

- Refining the CC model, the role of the CC network and financial sustainability for the CC. 

Whilst there will undoubtedly be challenges ahead, the trustees do not expect material concerns to arise over the charity’s financial position. 

## Structure, governance and management 

The organisation is a charitable incorporated organisation registered as a charity on 22 October 2019 in England and Wales. 

All trustees give their time voluntarily and receive no benefits from the charity. Any expenses reclaimed from the charity are set out in note 6 to the accounts. 

The names of the trustees who were in place on 31 December 2021 are set out as part of the reference and administrative details on page 1 of this annual report and accounts. 

The trustees held a full board meeting four times during the year. The Chair of the trustees receive updates from the executive director weekly and hold update calls between meetings to maintain an overview of the grant portfolio and to input into due diligence processes between meetings. 

27 



The Conservation Collective 

## Trustees’ annual report 

## For the year ended 31 December 2021 

Trustees are required to disclose all relevant interests and withdraw from decisions where a conflict of interest arises. 

The trustees hold ultimate responsibility for the policies, activities and assets of the charity.   The trustees agree the broad strategy of the charity, review and confirm policy decisions, review proposals, approve grants, assess and discuss grant-holder performance reports and discuss financial and investment issues and performance. 

When necessary, the trustees seek advice and support from professional advisors, including legal advisors and auditors. The charity does not hold an investment portfolio but receives donations into its bank accounts at HSBC UK which it then uses to make grants and to cover its administrative costs. 

The trustees are aware of the Charities Governance Code and are taking steps to incorporate the code into the structure and culture of the Conservation Collective. 

## Appointment of trustees 

The power of appointing new trustees is vested in the trustees are nominated by a simple majority of votes at any meeting of the Trustees. 

## Trustee induction and training 

New Trustees are provided with guidance as to their responsibilities from existing Trustees, from the Senior Executives and the Conservation Collective’s Terms of Reference. 

## Remuneration policy for key management personnel 

The Conservation Collective aims to maximise its impact through paying fair salaries to reward talented people and ensure we pay fairly to attract the right skills to have the greatest impact in delivering our charitable objectives. In determining remuneration of key management, the trustees will consider all relevant factors including benchmarking against the charity sector, the complexity of the role, the experience of the member of staff and ensuring the pay is responsible in the with our charitable objectives. This is reviewed annually including reference to benchmarking with other charities whilst remaining sensitive to the broader issues of executive pay the gender pay gap. 

## Funds held as custodian trustee on behalf of others 

The Conservation Collective held funds in its bank account that were under the legal control of affiliate organisations.  As such these funds have been excluded from Conservation Collective’s balance sheet.  The balances represented were: 

- Saint Vincent & Grenadines Environment Fund - £39,517 (2020: £62,924) 

- Ibiza Preservation Fund - £86,822 (2020: £55,309) 

- Pakistan Environment Trust £243,771 (2020: £nil) 

- Lanka Environment Foundation £42,623 (2020: £nil) 

28 



The Conservation Collective 

## Trustees’ annual report 

For the year ended 31 December 2021 

- Mallorca Preservation £nil (2020: £16,222) 

- Highlands & Islands Environment Foundation £nil (2020: £62,345) 

The funds can only be drawn down on the instructions of the foundations and are held in a separate bank account which is in the name of the foundations, every month a bank statement is sent to each of the foundations. These funds do not form part of the Conservation Collective’s own assets. 

## Statement of responsibilities of the trustees 

Law applicable to charities in England and Wales requires the trustees to prepare financial statements for each financial year which give a true and fair view of the charity's financial activities during the period and of its financial position at the end of the period. In preparing financial statements giving a true and fair view, the trustees should follow best practice and: 

- Select suitable accounting policies and then apply them consistently 

- Observe the methods and principles in the Charities SORP 

- Make judgements and estimates that are reasonable and prudent 

- State whether applicable UK Accounting Standards and statements of recommended practice have been followed, subject to any material departures disclosed and explained in the financial statements 

- Prepare the financial statements on the going concern basis unless it is inappropriate to presume that the charity will continue in operation 

The trustees are responsible for keeping proper accounting records that disclose with reasonable accuracy at any time the financial position of the charity and enable them to ensure that the financial statements comply with the Charities Act 2011. They are also responsible for safeguarding the assets of the charity and hence for taking reasonable steps for the prevention and detection of fraud and other irregularities. 

The trustees are responsible for the maintenance and integrity of the corporate and financial information included on the charity's website. Legislation in the United Kingdom governing the preparation and dissemination of financial statements may differ from legislation in other jurisdictions. 

The trustees’ annual report has been approved by the trustees on 13 July 2022 and signed on their behalf by 

Benjamin Goldsmith Trustee 

29 



Independent auditor’s report 

## To the members of 

## The Conservation Collective 

Independent auditor’s report to the trustees of Conservation Collective 

## Opinion 

We have audited the financial statements of Conservation Collective (the ‘charity’) for the year ended 31 December 2021 which comprise the statement of financial activities, balance sheet, statement of cash flows and notes to the financial statements, including significant accounting policies. The financial reporting framework that has been applied in their preparation is applicable law and United Kingdom Accounting Standards, including FRS 102 The Financial Reporting Standard applicable in the UK and Republic of Ireland (United Kingdom Generally Accepted Accounting Practice). 

In our opinion, the financial statements: 

- Give a true and fair view of the state of the charity’s affairs as at 31 December 2021 and of its incoming resources and application of resources, for the year then ended 

- Have been properly prepared in accordance with United Kingdom Generally Accepted Accounting Practice 

- Have been prepared in accordance with the requirements of the Charities Act 2011 

The financial statements of Conservation Collective for the period ended 31 December 2020 were unaudited. An independent examination was performed which expressed an unmodified opinion on those statements. 

## Basis for opinion 

We conducted our audit in accordance with International Standards on Auditing (UK) (ISAs (UK)) and applicable law. Our responsibilities under those standards are further described in the Auditor’s responsibilities for the audit of the financial statements section of our report. We are independent of the charity in accordance with the ethical requirements that are relevant to our audit of the financial statements in the UK, including the FRC’s Ethical Standard and we have fulfilled our other ethical responsibilities in accordance with these requirements. We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion. 

## Conclusions relating to going concern 

In auditing the financial statements, we have concluded that the trustees' use of the going concern basis of accounting in the preparation of the financial statements is appropriate. 

Based on the work we have performed, we have not identified any material uncertainties relating to events or conditions that, individually or collectively, may cast significant doubt on Conservation Collective's ability to continue as a going concern for a period of at least twelve months from when the financial statements are authorised for issue. 

30 



Independent auditor’s report 

To the members of 

## The Conservation Collective 

Our responsibilities and the responsibilities of the trustees with respect to going concern are described in the relevant sections of this report. 

## Other Information 

The other information comprises the information included in the trustees’ annual report, other than the financial statements and our auditor’s report thereon. The trustees are responsible for the other information contained within the annual report. Our opinion on the financial statements does not cover the other information and, except to the extent otherwise explicitly stated in our report, we do not express any form of assurance conclusion thereon. Our responsibility is to read the other information and, in doing so, consider whether the other information is materially inconsistent with the financial statements or our knowledge obtained in the course of the audit or otherwise appears to be materially misstated. If we identify such material inconsistencies or apparent material misstatements, we are required to determine whether this gives rise to a material misstatement in the financial statements themselves. If, based on the work we have performed, we conclude that there is a material misstatement of this other information, we are required to report that fact. 

We have nothing to report in this regard. 

## Matters on which we are required to report by exception 

We have nothing to report in respect of the following matters in relation to which the Charities (Accounts and Reports) Regulations 2008 requires us to report to you if, in our opinion: 

- The information given in the trustees’ annual report is inconsistent in any material respect with the financial statements; 

- Sufficient accounting records have not been kept; or 

- The financial statements are not in agreement with the accounting records and returns; or 

- We have not received all the information and explanations we require for our audit 

## Responsibilities of trustees 

As explained more fully in the statement of trustees’ responsibilities set out in the trustees’ annual report, the trustees are responsible for the preparation of the financial statements and for being satisfied that they give a true and fair view, and for such internal control as the trustees determine is necessary to enable the preparation of financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error. 

In preparing the financial statements, the trustees are responsible for assessing the charity’s ability to continue as a going concern, disclosing, as applicable, matters related to going concern and using the going concern basis of accounting unless the trustees either intend to liquidate the charity or to cease operations, or have no realistic alternative but to do so. 

31 



Independent auditor’s report 

To the members of 

## The Conservation Collective 

## Auditor’s responsibilities for the audit of the financial statements 

We have been appointed as auditor under section 144 of the Charities Act 2011 and report in accordance with regulations made under section 154 of that Act. 

Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements as a whole are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and to issue an auditor’s report that includes our opinion. Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance, but is not a guarantee that an audit conducted in accordance with ISAs (UK) will always detect a material misstatement when it exists. Misstatements can arise from fraud or error and are considered material if, individually or in the aggregate, they could reasonably be expected to influence the economic decisions of users taken on the basis of these financial statements. 

Irregularities, including fraud, are instances of non-compliance with laws and regulations. We design procedures in line with our responsibilities, outlined above, to detect material misstatements in respect of irregularities, including fraud. The extent to which our procedures are capable of detecting irregularities, including fraud are set out below. 

## Capability of the audit in detecting irregularities 

In identifying and assessing risks of material misstatement in respect of irregularities, including fraud and non-compliance with laws and regulations, our procedures included the following: 

- We enquired of management which included obtaining and reviewing supporting documentation, concerning the charity’s policies and procedures relating to: 

   - Identifying, evaluating, and complying with laws and regulations and whether they were aware of any instances of non-compliance; 

   - Detecting and responding to the risks of fraud and whether they have knowledge of any actual, suspected, or alleged fraud; 

   - The internal controls established to mitigate risks related to fraud or non-compliance with laws and regulations. 

- We inspected the minutes of meetings of those charged with governance. 

- We obtained an understanding of the legal and regulatory framework that the charity operates in, focusing on those laws and regulations that had a material effect on the financial statements or that had a fundamental effect on the operations of the charity from our professional and sector experience. 

- We communicated applicable laws and regulations throughout the audit team and remained alert to any indications of non-compliance throughout the audit. 

- We reviewed any reports made to regulators. 

- We reviewed the financial statement disclosures and tested these to supporting documentation to assess compliance with applicable laws and regulations. 

- We performed analytical procedures to identify any unusual or unexpected relationships that may indicate risks of material misstatement due to fraud. 

- In addressing the risk of fraud through management override of controls, we tested the appropriateness of journal entries and other adjustments, assessed whether the judgements 

32 



Independent auditor’s report 

## To the members of 

## The Conservation Collective 

made in making accounting estimates are indicative of a potential bias and tested significant transactions that are unusual or those outside the normal course of business. 

Because of the inherent limitations of an audit, there is a risk that we will not detect all irregularities, including those leading to a material misstatement in the financial statements or non-compliance with regulation.  This risk increases the more that compliance with a law or regulation is removed from the events and transactions reflected in the financial statements, as we will be less likely to become aware of instances of non-compliance. The risk is also greater regarding irregularities occurring due to fraud rather than error, as fraud involves intentional concealment, forgery, collusion, omission or misrepresentation. 

A further description of our responsibilities is available on the Financial Reporting Council’s website at: www.frc.org.uk/auditorsresponsibilities. This description forms part of our auditor’s report. 

## Use of our report 

This report is made solely to the charity's trustees as a body, in accordance with section 144 of the Charities Act 2011 and regulations made under section 154 of that Act. Our audit work has been undertaken so that we might state to the charity's trustees those matters we are required to state to them in an auditor’s report and for no other purpose. To the fullest extent permitted by law, we do not accept or assume responsibility to anyone other than the charity and the charity's trustees as a body, for our audit work, for this report, or for the opinions we have formed. 

27 July 2022 Sayer Vincent LLP, Statutory Auditor Invicta House, 108-114 Golden Lane, LONDON, EC1Y 0TL 

Sayer Vincent LLP is eligible to act as auditor in terms of section 1212 of the Companies Act 2006 

33 



## Conservation Collective 

Statement of financial activities (incorporating an income and expenditure account) 

## For the year ended 31 December 2021 

|For theyear ended 31 December 2021|||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|Note<br>Income from:<br>2<br>3<br>3<br>3<br>5<br>Reconciliation of funds:<br>Total funds carried forward<br>Transfers between funds<br>Net movement in funds<br>Total expenditure<br>Promoting and enhancing charitable work<br>Total funds brought forward<br>Net income for the year<br>Other<br>Raising funds<br>Total income<br>Expenditure on:<br>Donations and legacies|Unrestricted<br>£<br>332,428|Restricted<br>£<br>1,314,767|Year ended<br>31 December<br>2021<br>Total<br>£<br>1,647,195<br>1,647,195<br>44,473<br>1,188,689<br>86,603<br>1,319,765<br>327,430<br>-<br>327,430<br>206,906<br>534,336|Unrestricted<br>£<br>222,460|Restricted<br>£<br>596,818|Restated<br>Period<br>ended 31<br>December<br>2020<br>Total<br>£<br>819,278|
||332,428|1,314,767||222,460|596,818|819,278|
||7,730<br>158,480<br>24,365|36,743<br>1,030,209<br>62,238||3,861<br>91,333<br>18,646|8,950<br>462,400<br>27,182|12,811<br>553,733<br>45,828|
||190,575|1,129,190||113,840|498,532|612,372|
||141,853<br>(92,786)|185,577<br>92,786||108,620<br>(102,405)|98,286<br>102,405|206,906<br>-|
||49,067<br>6,215|278,363<br>200,691||6,215<br>-|200,691<br>-|206,906<br>-|
||55,282|479,054||6,215|200,691|206,906|



All of the above results are derived from continuing activities. There were no other recognised gains or losses other than those stated above. Movements in funds are disclosed in Note 14a to the financial statements. 

34 



Conservation Collective 

## Balance sheet 

## As at 31 December 2021 

|Note<br>£<br>Fixed assets:<br>10<br>Current assets:<br>11<br>10,444<br>500,443<br>510,887<br>Liabilities:<br>12<br>(47,551)<br>14a<br>55,282<br>Total unrestricted funds<br>Debtors<br>Restricted income funds<br>Unrestricted income funds:<br>The funds of the charity:<br>Creditors: amounts falling due within one year<br>Net current assets<br>Total net assets<br>Programme related investments<br>Cash at bank and in hand<br>General funds<br>Total charity funds|Note<br>£<br>Fixed assets:<br>10<br>Current assets:<br>11<br>10,444<br>500,443<br>510,887<br>Liabilities:<br>12<br>(47,551)<br>14a<br>55,282<br>Total unrestricted funds<br>Debtors<br>Restricted income funds<br>Unrestricted income funds:<br>The funds of the charity:<br>Creditors: amounts falling due within one year<br>Net current assets<br>Total net assets<br>Programme related investments<br>Cash at bank and in hand<br>General funds<br>Total charity funds|2021<br>£<br>71,000|£<br>6,813<br>256,358|Restated<br>2020<br>£<br>46,000|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|||71,000<br>463,336||46,000<br>160,906|
||510,887<br>(47,551)||263,171<br>(102,265)||
||55,282||6,215||
|||534,336||206,906|
|||479,054<br>55,282||200,691<br>6,215|
||||||
|||534,336||206,906|



Approved by the trustees on 13 July 2022 and signed on their behalf by 

Benjamin Goldsmith Trustee 

35 



Conservation Collective 

Statement of cash flows 

## For the year ended 31 December 2021 

|Cash flows from operating activities<br>Net income / (expenditure) for the reporting period<br>(as per the statement of financial activities)<br>Dividends, interest and rent from investments<br>(Increase)/decrease in debtors<br>Increase/(decrease) in creditors<br>Net cash provided by operating activities<br>Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the year<br>Change in cash and cash equivalents in the year<br>Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the<br>year<br>Net cash provided by / (used in) investing activities<br>Cash flows from investing activities:<br>New programme related investment loans<br>Purchase of fixed assets|£<br>£<br>£<br>£<br>327,430<br>206,906<br>-<br>-<br>(3,631)<br>(6,813)<br>(54,714)<br>102,265<br>269,085<br>302,358<br>(25,000)<br>(46,000)<br>-<br>-<br>(25,000)<br>(46,000)<br>244,085<br>256,358<br>256,358<br>-<br>500,443<br>256,358<br>Year ended 31<br>December 2021<br>Period ended 31<br>December 2020<br>Restated|
|---|---|
|||



36 



Conservation Collective 

Notes to the financial statements 

## For the year ended 31 December 2021 

- 1 Accounting policies 

- a) Statutory information 

The Conservation Collective is a charitable incorporated organisation registered with the Charity Commission for England and Wales. 

The registered office address is The Old Plough, St. Mary Bourne, Andover, SP11 6AY 

## b) Basis of preparation 

The financial statements have been prepared in accordance with Accounting and Reporting by Charities: Statement of Recommended Practice applicable to charities preparing their accounts in accordance with the Financial Reporting Standard applicable in the UK and Republic of Ireland (FRS 102) - (Charities SORP FRS 102), The Financial Reporting Standard applicable in the UK and Republic of Ireland (FRS 102) and the Charities Act 2011. 

The financial statements have been prepared to give a ‘true and fair’ view and have departed from the Charities (Accounts and Reports) Regulations 2008 only to the extent required to provide a ‘true and fair view’. This departure has involved following Accounting and Reporting by Charities preparing their accounts in accordance with the Financial Reporting Standard applicable in the UK and Republic of Ireland (FRS 102) rather than the Accounting and Reporting by Charities: Statement of Recommended Practice effective from 1 April 2005 which has since been withdrawn. 

Assets and liabilities are initially recognised at historical cost or transaction value unless otherwise stated in the relevant accounting policy or note. 

In applying the financial reporting framework, the trustees have made a number of subjective judgements, for example in respect of significant accounting estimates. Estimates and judgements are continually evaluated and are based on historical experience and other factors, including expectations of future events that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances.  The nature of the estimation means the actual outcomes could differ from those estimates. Any significant estimates and judgements affecting these financial statements are detailed within the relevant accounting policy below. 

Comparative information has been provided for the prior year period from 22 October 2019 to 31 December 2020. 

- c) Public benefit entity 

The charity meets the definition of a public benefit entity under FRS 102. 

The trustees do not consider that there are any sources of estimation uncertainty at the reporting date that have a significant risk of causing a material adjustment to the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities within the next reporting period. 

## d) Going concern 

The trustees consider that there are no material uncertainties about the charity's ability to continue as a going concern. The charity's income and expenditure is unlikely to be impacted significantly as income consists mainly of trustee donations. The charity's main activity is to provide grants. Therefore, it is able to exercise a significant degree of control over its expenditure. The trustees will continue to keep both income and expenditure under review. 

37 



Conservation Collective 

Notes to the financial statements 

## For the year ended 31 December 2021 

- 1 Accounting policies (continued) 

- e) Income 

Income is recognised when the charity has entitlement to the funds, any performance conditions attached to the income have been met, it is probable that the income will be received and that the amount can be measured reliably. 

Income from government and other grants, whether ‘capital’ grants or ‘revenue’ grants, is recognised when the charity has entitlement to the funds, any performance conditions attached to the grants have been met, it is probable that the income will be received and the amount can be measured reliably and is not deferred. 

Income received in advance of the provision of a specified service is deferred until the criteria for income recognition are met. 

- f) Donations of gifts, services and facilities 

Donated professional services and donated facilities are recognised as income when the charity has control over the item or received the service, any conditions associated with the donation have been met, the receipt of economic benefit from the use by the charity of the item is probable and that economic benefit can be measured reliably. In accordance with the Charities SORP (FRS 102), volunteer time is not recognised so refer to the trustees’ annual report for more information about their contribution. 

On receipt, donated gifts, professional services and donated facilities are recognised on the basis of the value of the gift to the charity which is the amount the charity would have been willing to pay to obtain services or facilities of equivalent economic benefit on the open market; a corresponding amount is then recognised in expenditure in the period of receipt. 

## g) Interest receivable 

   - Interest on funds held on deposit is included when receivable and the amount can be measured reliably by the charity; this is normally upon notification of the interest paid or payable by the bank. 

- h) Fund accounting 

Restricted funds are to be used for specific purposes as laid down by the donor.  Expenditure which meets these criteria is charged to the fund. 

Unrestricted funds are donations and other incoming resources received or generated for the charitable purposes. 

Designated funds are unrestricted funds earmarked by the trustees for particular purposes. 

- i) Expenditure and irrecoverable VAT 

Expenditure is recognised once there is a legal or constructive obligation to make a payment to a third party, it is probable that settlement will be required and the amount of the obligation can be measured reliably. Expenditure is classified under the following activity headings: 

- Costs of raising funds relate to the costs incurred by the charity in inducing third parties to make voluntary contributions to it, as well as the cost of any activities with a fundraising purpose 

- Expenditure on charitable activities includes the costs of delivering services undertaken to further the purposes of the charity and their associated support costs 

- Other expenditure represents those items not falling into any other heading 

Irrecoverable VAT is charged as a cost against the activity for which the expenditure was incurred. 

38 



Conservation Collective 

Notes to the financial statements 

## For the year ended 31 December 2021 

- 1 Accounting policies (continued) 

- j) Grants payable 

Grants payable are made to third parties in furtherance of the charity's objects. Single or multi-year grants are accounted for when either the recipient has a reasonable expectation that they will receive a grant and the trustees have agreed to pay the grant without condition, or the recipient has a reasonable expectation that they will receive a grant and that any condition attaching to the grant is outside of the control of the charity. 

Provisions for grants are made when the intention to make a grant has been communicated to the recipient but there is uncertainty about either the timing of the grant or the amount of grant payable. 

- k) Allocation of support costs 

Support costs represent indirect charitable expenditure. In order to carry out the primary purposes of the charity it is necessary to provide support in the form of administration services. Governance costs comprise the costs involving the public accountability of the charity (including audit costs) and costs in respect of its compliance with regulation and good practice. 

Support costs and governance are apportioned directly to the one charitable activity. 

- l) Tangible fixed assets 

Items of equipment are capitalised where the purchase price exceeds £1500. Depreciation costs are allocated to activities on the basis of the use of the related assets in those activities. Assets are reviewed for impairment if circumstances indicate their carrying value may exceed their net realisable value and value in use. 

- m) Programme related investments 

Programme related investments are carried at fair value or impaired cost where it is not practicable to recognise at fair value. Such investments are subject to regular review and any impairment is charged to the SOFA. Investment valuations are not enhanced to more than original cost. 

- n) Debtors 

Trade and other debtors are recognised at the settlement amount due after any trade discount offered. Prepayments are valued at the amount prepaid net of any trade discounts due. 

- o) Short term deposits 

Short term deposits includes cash balances that are invested in accounts with a maturity date of between 3 and 12 months. 

- p) Cash at bank and in hand 

Cash at bank and cash in hand includes cash and short term highly liquid investments with a short maturity of three months or less from the date of acquisition or opening of the deposit or similar account.  Cash balances exclude any funds held on behalf of affiliates. 

- q) Creditors and provisions 

Creditors and provisions are recognised where the charity has a present obligation resulting from a past event that will probably result in the transfer of funds to a third party and the amount due to settle the obligation can be measured or estimated reliably. Creditors and provisions are normally recognised at their settlement amount after allowing for any trade discounts due. 

39 



Conservation Collective 

Notes to the financial statements 

## For the year ended 31 December 2021 

## 1 Accounting policies (continued) 

## r) Financial instruments 

- The charity only has financial assets and financial liabilities of a kind that qualify as basic financial instruments. Basic financial instruments are initially recognised at transaction value and subsequently measured at their settlement value. 

## s) Pensions 

Contribution in respect of the charity's defined contribution pension scheme are charged to the Statement of Financial Activities for the year in the which they are payable to the scheme. 

- 2 Income from donations and legacies 

|Donations<br>Gift Aid<br>Foundations & Trusts|Unrestricted<br>£<br>130,412<br>18,153<br>183,862|£<br>782,864<br>46,195<br>485,708<br>Restricted|Year ended<br>31<br>December<br>2021<br>Total<br>£<br>913,277<br>64,348<br>669,570|Unrestricted<br>£<br>133,605<br>18,750<br>70,105|£<br>500,326<br>5,413<br>91,079<br>Restricted|Period<br>ended 31<br>December<br>2020<br>Total<br>£<br>633,931<br>24,163<br>161,184|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
||332,428|1,314,767|1,647,195|222,460|596,818|819,278|



40 



Conservation Collective 

## Notes to the financial statements 

## For the year ended 31 December 2021 

- 3a Analysis of expenditure (current year) 

|Staff costs (Note 6)<br>Grant making<br>Direct Costs<br>Consultancy fees<br>New foundations' scoping reports<br>Marketing fees<br>Professional fees<br>Other support costs<br>Office expenses<br>Support costs<br>Governance costs<br>Total expenditure 2021<br>Total expenditure 2020|Raising<br>funds<br>£<br>14,870<br>-<br>-<br>29,603<br>-<br>-<br>-<br>-<br>-|Promoting<br>and<br>enhancing<br>charitable<br>work<br>£<br>143,128<br>924,131<br>47,622<br>-<br>1,716<br>386<br>35,090<br>35,381<br>1,235|Governance<br>costs<br>£<br>27,883<br>-<br>-<br>7,697<br>-<br>-<br>12,978<br>-<br>-|Support<br>costs<br>£<br>-<br>-<br>-<br>21,906<br>-<br>12,465<br>-<br>2,663<br>1,011|Year ended<br>31<br>December<br>2021 Total<br>£<br>185,881<br>924,131<br>47,622<br>59,206<br>1,716<br>12,851<br>48,068<br>38,044<br>2,246|Restated<br>Period ended<br>31 December<br>2020 Total<br>£<br>97,920<br>433,308<br>9,955<br>9,954<br>4,119<br>15,554<br>28,844<br>6,410<br>6,308|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
||44,473<br>1,751<br>1,522|1,188,689<br>46,807<br>32,849|48,558<br>(48,558)|38,045<br>-<br>(34,371)|1,319,765<br>-|612,372<br>-|
||47,746|1,268,345|-|3,674|1,319,765|612,372|
||13,846|598,526|-|-|||



41 



Conservation Collective 

Notes to the financial statements 

## For the year ended 31 December 2021 

## 3b Analysis of expenditure (prior year) 

|Staff costs (Note 6)<br>Grant making<br>Direct Costs<br>Consultancy fees<br>New foundations' scoping reports<br>Marketing fees<br>Professional fees<br>Other support costs<br>Office expenses<br>Support costs<br>Governance costs<br>Total expenditure 2020|Raising<br>funds<br>£<br>7,834<br>-<br>-<br>4,977<br>-<br>-<br>-<br>-<br>-<br>12,811<br>499<br>536<br>13,846|Promoting<br>and<br>enhancing<br>charitable<br>work<br>£<br>75,398<br>433,308<br>9,955<br>-<br>4,119<br>467<br>21,056<br>5,961<br>3,469<br>553,733<br>21,608<br>23,185<br>598,526|Governance<br>costs<br>£<br>14,688<br>-<br>-<br>1,245<br>-<br>-<br>7,788<br>-<br>-<br>23,721<br>-<br>(23,721)<br>-|Restated<br>Support<br>costs<br>Period<br>ended 31<br>December<br>2020<br>£<br>£<br>-<br>97,920<br>-<br>433,308<br>-<br>9,955<br>3,732<br>9,954<br>-<br>4,119<br>15,087<br>15,554<br>-<br>28,844<br>449<br>6,410<br>2,839<br>6,308<br>22,107<br>612,372<br>(22,107)<br>-<br>-<br>-<br>-<br>612,372|
|---|---|---|---|---|



42 



Conservation Collective 

Notes to the financial statements 

## For the year ended 31 December 2021 

- 4a Grant making (current year) 

|Grant making (current year)|||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|At the end of the year<br>Cost<br>H&I - Oysters restoration<br>H&I - Saving Scotland's rainforest<br>DEF - Moor Meadows - Wildlife Wardens<br>DEF -Till the Coast is Clear - plastic collection<br>DEF -Devon Wildlife Trust —beavers<br>DEF - Wildlife wardens<br>Barbados Environmental Conservation Trust Ibiza<br>Lamu - Fanays Safi Coalition Waste Management<br>Smile of Child - shared charitable income<br>Mallorca Preservation Foundation<br>Menorca Preservation Fund<br>Cyclades Preservation Fund<br>Ibiza & Formentera Preservation<br>Lanka Environment Fund<br>H&I - Friends of Sound of Jura<br>DEF -Devon Wildlife Trust - water voles<br>DEF - Regenerative Exmoor<br>DEF - Hayes Farm<br>DEF - Flete Field Lab<br>DEF - Union Fabrication<br>DEF - Sizer PR Litter Fee Sea Project<br>IEF - Erimitis Campaign - communications,<br>IEF - Archipelagos - cetacean research and<br>IEF - Ionian Dolphin Project - research<br>IEF  - iSea - Pick the Alien Campaign<br>IEF - Green Tank - European funding study<br>IEF - Waste Awareness Action Week - Paxos<br>IEF - ENALEIA<br>IEF-ARIANA<br>DEF -Apricot Centre - Regenerative farming data<br>DEF - Regenerative Dartmoor<br>IEF - Corfu Butterfly Conservation Project<br>Lamu - Sisters 4 Change Female Education Project<br>TEF -  Tart Amare<br>TEF - X-Pollination<br>Lanka - EFL Colibri<br>Highlands & Islands Environment Fund<br>Lanka - Federation of Environment Organisations<br>Lanka - Pearl  Protectors<br>Pakistan Environment Trust<br>Saint Vincent & Grenadines Environment Fund<br>H&I - Bird boxes|Unrestricted<br>£<br>-<br>-<br>-<br>-<br>-<br>-<br>-<br>-<br>-<br>-<br>-<br>-<br>-<br>-<br>-<br>-<br>-<br>-<br>-<br>-<br>-<br>-<br>-<br>-<br>-<br>-<br>-<br>-<br>-<br>-<br>-<br>-<br>42,626<br>10,500<br>-<br>3,631<br>10,324<br>24,154<br>20,948<br>45,347<br>433,297<br>32,953|Restricted<br>£<br>24,162<br>2,631<br>3,576<br>-<br>1,276<br>5,201<br>2,275<br>-<br>-<br>24,394<br>-<br>19,020<br>10,000<br>3,500<br>5,000<br>2,500<br>15,000<br>5,000<br>9,570<br>3,000<br>250<br>-<br>-<br>-<br>-<br>15,409<br>4,374<br>15,016<br>4,639<br>3,511<br>7,315<br>8,118<br>-<br>-<br>-<br>41,846<br>17,076<br>8,444<br>15,211<br>7,344<br>-<br>15,693|Year ended<br>31<br>December<br>2021<br>£<br>24,162<br>2,631<br>3,576<br>-<br>1,276<br>5,201<br>2,275<br>-<br>-<br>24,394<br>-<br>19,020<br>10,000<br>3,500<br>5,000<br>2,500<br>15,000<br>5,000<br>9,570<br>3,000<br>250<br>-<br>-<br>-<br>-<br>15,409<br>4,374<br>15,016<br>4,639<br>3,511<br>7,315<br>8,118<br>42,626<br>10,500<br>-<br>45,477<br>27,400<br>32,598<br>36,159<br>52,691<br>433,297<br>48,646|Restated<br>Period<br>ended 31<br>December<br>2020<br>£<br>21,754<br>4,520<br>6,338<br>8,143<br>3,054<br>2,944<br>-<br>8,621<br>18,103<br>11,186<br>5,000<br>15,000<br>20,000<br>-<br>5,000<br>2,500<br>-<br>-<br>-<br>-<br>-<br>7,250<br>15,000<br>7,000<br>7,500<br>-<br>-<br>-<br>-<br>-<br>-<br>-<br>-<br>82,750<br>7,700<br>62,924<br>26,579<br>9,380<br>9,378<br>5,801<br>-<br>59,883|
||623,780|300,351|924,131|433,308|



Saint Vincent & Grenadines Environment Fund - Conservation Collective Core Grant £3,631, Conservation Collective Award £500, Edmiston Funding for Marine Sea Turtles £18,146 and re-grant £23,200. 

Highlands & Islands Environment Fund- Conservation Collective Core Grant £10,000 and Conservation Collective Marine Award £500. 

Mallorca Preservation Foundation- Conservation Collective Core Grant £3,844, Edmiston Fund Illegal Fishing Belearics £17,076 and regrant £6,480. 

Menorca Preservation Fund - Conservation Collective Core Grant £4,482, Conservation Collective Award Waste £500, MAVA £8,444 and regrant £19,172. 

Cyclades Preservation Fund £14,423 Edmiston Fund Posidonia Alert, £788 Taspoutzo Tzoulia Green Volunteers, Conservation Collective Core Grant £4280, Conservation Collective Award Impact £500 and re-grant £16,168. 

Barbados Environment Conservation Trust, £7,344 Edmiston Fund Digi Fish Project and re-grant £45,347. 

Lanka Environment Foundation - Conservation Collective Core Grant £7,258, Conservation Collective Award £500, Pearl Protectors £3,511, Federation of Environment £7,315, EFL Colibri £8,118 and re-grant £34,868. 

Pakistan Environment Trust- Conservation Collective Core Grant £7,274 and re-grant £426,023. Ibiza Preservation Fund - Conservation Collective Core Grant £4,270, £15,693 MAVA Foundation, Conservation Collective Award £500 and re-grant £28,183. 

43 



Conservation Collective 

Notes to the financial statements 

## For the year ended 31 December 2021 

- 4b Grant making (prior year) 

|Grant making (prior year)||||
|---|---|---|---|
|Ionian Dolphin Project - research<br>iSea - Pick the Alien Campaign<br>Green Tank - European funding study<br>Waste Awareness Action Week - Paxos<br>IEF - ENALEIA<br>At the end of the year<br>Cost<br>Ibiza & Formentera Preservation<br>H&I - Oysters restoration<br>Erimitis Campaign - communications, research and legal<br>Archipelagos - cetacean research and brochures<br>IEF-ARIANA<br>Apricot Centre - Regenerative farming data collection<br>Moor Meadows - Wildlife Wardens<br>Till the Coast is Clear - plastic collection Devon Wildlife Trust -<br>Devon Wildlife Trust —beavers<br>DEF - Wildlife wardens<br>DEF - Regenerative Dartmoor<br>H&I - Bird boxes<br>H&I - Friends of Sound of Jura<br>H&I - Saving Scotland's rainforest<br>Smile of Child - shared charitable income Mallorca Preservation<br>Mallorca Preservation Foundation<br>Highlands & Islands Environment Fund<br>Saint Vincent & Grenadines Environment Fund<br>Menorca Preservation Fund<br>Cyclades Preservation Fund<br>Barbados Environmental Conservation Trust Ibiza & Formentera|Unrestricted<br>£<br>-<br>-<br>-<br>-<br>-<br>-<br>-<br>-<br>-<br>-<br>-<br>-<br>-<br>-<br>-<br>-<br>-<br>-<br>82,750<br>-<br>20,579<br>9,380<br>9,378<br>5,801<br>62,924<br>59,883|Restricted<br>£<br>21,754<br>4,520<br>6,338<br>8,143<br>3,054<br>2,944<br>8,621<br>18,103<br>11,186<br>5,000<br>15,000<br>20,000<br>5,000<br>2,500<br>7,250<br>15,000<br>7,000<br>7,500<br>-<br>7,700<br>6,000<br>-<br>-<br>-<br>-<br>-|Restated<br>Period<br>ended 31<br>December<br>2020<br>£<br>21,754<br>4,520<br>6,338<br>8,143<br>3,054<br>2,944<br>8,621<br>18,103<br>11,186<br>5,000<br>15,000<br>20,000<br>5,000<br>2,500<br>7,250<br>15,000<br>7,000<br>7,500<br>82,750<br>7,700<br>26,579<br>9,380<br>9,378<br>5,801<br>62,924<br>59,883|
||250,695|182,613|433,308|



At 31 December 2020, the charity had no grant commitments in respect to grants awarded but payable only on the fulfilment of certain conditions. 

## 5 Net income for the year 

This is stated after charging / (crediting): 

|This is stated after charging / (crediting):||
|---|---|
|Auditor's remuneration  (excluding VAT):<br>Audit<br>Other Services<br>Foreign exchange gains or losses<br>Independent Examination|Year ended<br>31<br>December<br>2021<br>Period<br>ended 31<br>December<br>2020<br>£<br>£<br>8,600<br>-<br>-<br>720<br>1,100<br>-<br>6,134<br>-|
||15,834<br>720|



44 



Conservation Collective 

Notes to the financial statements 

## For the year ended 31 December 2021 

- 6 Analysis of staff costs, trustee remuneration and expenses, and the cost of key management personnel 

Staff costs were as follows: 

|Staff costs were as follows:|||
|---|---|---|
|Salaries and wages<br>Social security costs<br>Employer’s contribution to defined contribution pension schemes|Year ended<br>31<br>December<br>2021<br>£<br>167,000<br>14,377<br>4,504|Restated<br>Period<br>ended 31<br>December<br>2020<br>£<br>83,478<br>12,887<br>1,555|
||185,881|97,920|



No employee earned more than £60,000 during the year (2020: nil). 

The key management personnel of the charity in charge of directing and controlling the charity comprises the trustees, the Executive Director and the Network Director of the Conservation Collective, and the Executive Directors of the Devon Environment Foundation. 

The total employee benefits (including pension contributions and employer's national insurance) of the key management personnel were £163,175 (2020: £97,922). 

The charity trustees were neither paid nor received any other benefits from employment with the charity in the year (2020: £nil).  No charity trustee received payment for professional or other services supplied to the charity (2020: £nil). 

1 trustee was reimbursed for expenditure incurred in the performance of their duties during the year £500 (2020: none). 

## 7 Staff numbers 

The average number of employees (head count based on number of staff employed) during the year was 4 (2020: 2.7). 

## 8 Related party transactions 

During the period to 31 December 2021, one of the trustees, Benjamin Goldsmith donated £76,061 to the charity. During the period to 31 December 2021, one of the trustees' mother, Lady Annabel Goldsmith donated £18,000 to the charity for the Iris Prize Project. 

During the period to 31 December 2020, the charity gave grants from core funding to the Mallorca Preservation Fund (£3,844), the Menorca Preservation Fund (£4,482) and the Cyclades Preservation Fund (£4,280). The chair and founder of the Conservation Collective is a trustee of the Mallorca Preservation Fund, the Menorca Preservation Fund and the Cyclades Preservation Fund. 

Aggregate donations received from members of Steering Committee: Argolic Environment Foundation £39,448 Barbados Environmental Conservation Trust were £17,224 Cyclades Preservation Fund were £4,250 Cyprus Environment Trust were £4,252. Devon Environment Foundation were £70,048 Ibiza Preservation were £8,434 Ionian Environment Foundation were £16,796. Lamu Environment Foundation were £85,516. Lanka Environment Fund were £3,750. St. Vincent & The Grenadines Environment Fund were £10,000. 

Tuscany Environment Foundation were £31,524. 

During the period to 31 December 2021, the charity received a donation of £6,500, to be held as ringfenced funds on behalf of the Lanka Environment Foundation. One of the trustees of the Conservation Collective is also a trustee of the charity that made the donation. 

During the period to 31 December 2021, the charity received funding of £78,015  from the Children's Investment Fund Foundation (CIFF), with a subsequent payment of £78,015 in 2022.The chairman and founder of the Conservation Collective is also a trustee of CIFF. 

During the period to 31 December 2021, the amount of £1,021 was paid for catering at fundraising and promotional events to Tarts Kitchen Ltd which is owned by the wife of the Chair and founder of Conservation Collective. No amounts outstanding at the end of the year. 

There were no other related party transactions in the period to 31 December 2021. 

45 



Conservation Collective 

Notes to the financial statements 

## For the year ended 31 December 2021 

- 9 Taxation 

The Conservation Collective is a registered charity and, therefore, is not liable to income tax or corporation tax on income or gains derived from its charitable activities as they fall within the various exemptions available to registered charities. 

## 10 Programme related investments 

|Programme related investments|||
|---|---|---|
|Loan repayments<br>Fair value at the start of the year<br>Additions at cost<br>Fair value at the end of they year|2021<br>£<br>46,000<br>25,000<br>-|Restated<br>2020<br>£<br>-<br>46,000<br>-|
||71,000|46,000|



Programme related investments relate to social loans granted by the Devon Environment Foundation to Biome Algae in support of a kelp project. 

## 11 Debtors 

|Debtors|||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|Net current assets<br>Net current assets<br>Programme related investments<br>Accruals<br>Other creditors<br>Creditors: amounts falling due within one year<br>Programme related investments<br>Net assets at 31 December 2020<br>Analysis of net assets between funds (current year)<br>Trade creditors<br>Net assets at 31 December 2021<br>Analysis of net assets between funds (prior year)<br>Taxation and social security<br>Grants payable<br>Trade debtors<br>Other debtors<br>Prepayments|General<br>unrestricted<br>£<br>-<br>55,282|Designated<br>£<br>-<br>-|2021<br>£<br>10,444<br>-<br>-|2020<br>£<br>-<br>6,463<br>350|
||||10,444|6,813|
||||2021<br>£<br>-<br>5,219<br>18,372<br>-<br>23,960|2020<br>£<br>5,988<br>-<br>72,688<br>6,463<br>17,126|
||||47,551|102,265|
||||Restricted<br>£<br>71,000<br>408,054|Total funds<br>£<br>71,000<br>463,336|
||55,282|-|479,054|534,336|
||General<br>unrestricted<br>£<br>-<br>6,215|Designated<br>£<br>-<br>-|Restricted<br>£<br>46,000<br>154,691|Restated<br>Total funds<br>£<br>46,000<br>160,906|
||6,215|-|200,691|206,906|



- 12 Creditors: amounts falling due within one year 

## 13a Analysis of net assets between funds (current year) 

- 13b Analysis of net assets between funds (prior year) 

46 



Conservation Collective 

## Notes to the financial statements 

## For the year ended 31 December 2021 

14a Movements in funds (current year) 

|Movements in funds (current year)||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|Total restricted funds<br>General funds<br>Tuscany Environment Foundation<br>MAVA Impact Assessment<br>Turquoise Coast Environmental Fund<br>(Turkey)<br>Ionian Environment Foundation<br>Mallorca Preservation Foundation<br>Menorca Preservation Fund<br>Cyclades Preservation Fund<br>Devon Environment Foundation<br>Lamu Environment Foundation<br>Highlands & Islands Environment<br>Lanka Environment Fund<br>Barbados Environmental<br>Total funds<br>Total unrestricted funds<br>St. Vincent & The Grenadines<br>New funds 2021<br>Dalmatians Island Environment<br>Foundation (Croatia)<br>Cyprus Environment Foundation<br>Unrestricted funds:<br>Iris Project<br>Argolic Environment Foundation<br>Restricted funds:<br>Ibiza & Formentera Preservation<br>Pakistan Environment Trust|Restated<br>At 1 January<br>2021<br>£<br>(21,832)<br>-<br>-<br>-<br>86,683<br>-<br>37,243<br>(86)<br>43,183<br>-<br>-<br>-<br>-<br>-<br>-<br>-<br>-<br>-<br>-<br>55,500|Income &<br>gains<br>£<br>118,759<br>22,974<br>27,563<br>35,008<br>186,682<br>-<br>16,292<br>53,563<br>382,838<br>43,893<br>41,574<br>-<br>-<br>50,726<br>86,074<br>135,862<br>76,709<br>36,250<br>-<br>-|Expenditure<br>& losses<br>(72,356)<br>(27,254)<br>(32,598)<br>(39,761)<br>(151,793)<br>(10,500)<br>(61,293)<br>(53,477)<br>(433,295)<br>(48,663)<br>(45,705)<br>(1,361)<br>-<br>(5,331)<br>(37,158)<br>(37,035)<br>(43,037)<br>(18,713)<br>(9,860)<br>-|Transfers<br>£<br>9,392<br>4,280<br>5,035<br>4,780<br>10,500<br>10,500<br>7,758<br>-<br>7,274<br>4,770<br>4,131<br>10,000<br>10,000<br>10,000<br>8,546<br>7,274<br>8,546<br>-<br>25,500<br>(55,500)|At 31<br>December<br>2021<br>£<br>33,963<br>-<br>-<br>27<br>132,072<br>-<br>-<br>-<br>-<br>-<br>-<br>8,639<br>10,000<br>55,395<br>57,462<br>106,101<br>42,218<br>17,537<br>15,640<br>-|
||200,691|1,314,767|(1,129,190)|92,786|479,054|
|||||||
||6,215|332,428|(190,575)|(92,786)|55,282|
||6,215|332,428|(190,575)|(92,786)|55,282|
||206,906|1,647,195|(1,319,765)|-|534,336|



The narrative to explain the purpose of each fund is given at the foot of the note below. 

47 



Conservation Collective 

## Notes to the financial statements 

## For the year ended 31 December 2021 

14b Movements in funds (prior year) 

|Movements in funds (prior year)||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|Ionian Environment Foundation<br>Total restricted funds<br>General funds<br>Mallorca Preservation Foundation<br>Menorca Preservation Fund<br>Cyclades Preservation Fund<br>Total unrestricted funds<br>Total funds<br>Highlands & Islands Environment<br>Restricted funds:<br>Barbados Environmental<br>Unrestricted funds:<br>Pakistan Environment Trust<br>Ibiza & Formentera Preservation<br>St. Vincent & The Grenadines<br>New funds 2021<br>Devon Environment Foundation<br>Lanka Environment Fund|At 22 October<br>2019<br>£<br>-<br>-<br>-<br>-<br>-<br>-<br>-<br>-<br>-<br>-<br>-<br>-|Income &<br>gains<br>98,996<br>22,222<br>-<br>-<br>162,230<br>109,499<br>35,110<br>530<br>53,680<br>55,355<br>59,196<br>-|Expenditure<br>& losses<br>(120,828)<br>(22,222)<br>-<br>-<br>(85,547)<br>(119,499)<br>(8,662)<br>(616)<br>(22,853)<br>(55,355)<br>(62,950)<br>-|Transfers<br>-<br>-<br>-<br>-<br>10,000<br>10,000<br>10,795<br>-<br>12,356<br>-<br>3,754<br>55,500|Restated<br>At 31<br>December<br>2020<br>£<br>(21,832)<br>-<br>-<br>-<br>86,683<br>-<br>37,243<br>(86)<br>43,183<br>-<br>-<br>55,500|
||-|596,818|(498,532)|102,405|200,691|
|||||||
||-|222,460|(113,840)|(102,405)|6,215|
||-|222,460|(113,840)|(102,405)|6,215|
||-|819,278|(612,372)|-|206,906|



## Purposes of restricted funds 

New funds 2021- £30,000 was to create three new foundations in places where MAVA (the donor) currently funds projects, as discussed in the Trustees' report. £30,000 has now been transferred internally from New Funds 2021 to the three local foundations as agreed with MAVA in Cyprus, Croatia and Turkey for £10,000 each. The remaining has been transferred to a restricted fund as agreed by MAVA to the Theory of Change Impact Report,  which will be completed in 2022. In 2021 CC foundations piloted projects in memory of Iris Goldsmith. These projects helped shape the global Iris Project, launching in 2022 to enable young people to protect & restore nature. 

Transfer from unrestricted to restricted funds for core grant for Foundations and the Conservation Collective Awards comprising of funds for the inaugural ceremony in December 2021, designed to celebrate and story tell about the work of the foundations. There were 8 categories judged by the trustees and each winner received a small grant. 

## 15 Funds held on behalf of affiliate organisations 

Conservation Collective held funds in its bank account that were under the legal control of affiliate organisations. As such these funds have been excluded from Conservation Collective's balance sheet. The balances represented were: 

Saint Vincent & Grenadines Environment Fund £39,517 (2020: £62,924) Ibiza Preservation £86,822 (2020: £55,309) 

Pakistan Environment Trust £243,771 (2020: £nil) 

Lanka Environment Foundation cash held at the bank £42,623 (2020: £nil) Mallorca Preservation £nil (2020: £16,222) 

Highlands & Islands Environment Foundation £nil (2020: £62,345) 

48 



Conservation Collective 

Notes to the financial statements 

## For the year ended 31 December 2021 

16 Prior period adjustments 

|Reserves position<br>Funds previously reported<br>Adjustments on restatement<br>Reclassification of social investment loan<br>Removal of cash held on behalf of affiliates<br>Funds restated<br>Net income as previously reported<br>Adjustments on restatement<br>Reclassification of social investment loan<br>Removal of cash held on behalf of affiliates<br>Net income as restated<br>Details of adjustments<br>Recognition of programme related investment<br>Removal of cash held on behalf of affiliates<br>Impact on income and expenditure|Unrestricted<br>Restricted<br>Total<br>31 December 2020|Unrestricted<br>Restricted<br>Total<br>31 December 2020|Unrestricted<br>Restricted<br>Total<br>31 December 2020|Unrestricted<br>22|Restricted<br>Total<br>October 2019|Restricted<br>Total<br>October 2019|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
||£<br>6,215<br>-<br>-|£<br>351,491<br>46,000<br>(196,800)|£<br>357,706<br>46,000<br>(196,800)|£<br>-<br>-<br>-|£<br>-<br>-<br>-|£<br>-<br>-<br>-|
||6,215|200,691|206,906|-|-|-|



Cash at bank held on behalf of affiliates was incorrectly included in the prior year on Conservation Collective's balance sheeet. Cash at bank, restricted funds carried forward and expenditure have been adjusted to recognise the amounts as grants payable from Conservation Collective to the affiliate in 2020. 

49