OpenCharities

This text was generated using OCR and may contain errors. Check the original PDF to see the document submitted to the regulator.

2024-12-31-accounts

I CHARIIY COMM15SIO FOI ÈNGLAW AND WAIE No 111 vny) Recelpts and payments accounts CC16a FoTih• p•riod•cDrn JIII?K202A Sectlon A R¢¢8lpts and payrnents ¥JnrB•trl¢ied fund• ftsRds fuhdA Tothifund Luty•4r A1 R￿1 l• 012 531 5J1 41.WO 20J¥O nk Inr•it &04• 45D JJS Sut total ARI 7.9 .J 111¥39 A2 A8•tJnd th¥•¥bMnt Mlo6. Sub lat•1 T9.420 17.JSO 113. 15.4 1.1 IJ7 I￿71 JAOJ 1.214 iJ24 lfisurènc 2.on on ItsJ5T ￿ch￿l4• C4m￿chR FAan5e R S42Q? IT5&8 1.ts52 502 552 422J és 1¥03 Frfnb & slaty 145 TAX&NI 5undrt•s mba Hgl 750 Sub lot•1 6F.Ifd 7J. ioi. 8at•nJ In¥¢srment *** tsb Sub totil e7.•71 ioi, N•¢offr•¢&pt￿(pavrn•nl5) A5 Tr4nl•r* bthv••n lunds A6 Cath lund# l•st >wr en¢J C•$h funds Ihls y¢•r 11.742 1(492 12 M.?$7 Y4.002 57.070 CCXXRI Issi 27A)7rth25

Sectlon 8 Statement of assats and Ilabiliti•s at the end of the pertod unm6￿ctld dA R••tri¢t•d Efjdtswn•nt fuTrd• lund• 81 fvnd• IIITI rol•lu$h hth¢ts •JA35 ndi D¥tsl 83 Inv•8tm•rbtaM•ts Dekni 84 ￿8•*￿ r•laln•d forth• 85 UabllNI SyAturn toof / ￿￿.P tj 27m7,

TW EVANSEUCAL CHURCH r•th￿ 31ST DEC.2Q24 otNepAL FUNO I P¢tyC4th1 IN 44051 75 75 Jrio To*il¢ofrfG¥or 141 2.07297 Ekncw0&￿ÈQlHII s.￿57 421103 2.019 52 1 12455 1.535. 1481.YJ o( 1024f& T¥ 2W12 2WI3 INTOACCOUNT B25S2 78 13121AJ ncome BU￿￿¢8 Bnxffjht FaAbwd 58651 75 gS674 19 95674 19 ￿n￿re 1824342 t8Z4142 INTO AC¢OU14T OUT OF ACC(KJPIT 288Dth) 141017J 7930 ¢J) 8Jlgnce 8rwghl 16782 73 1$7V2 73 Fmm 10 27973 4W57 4ts157 •AN02U• 2W5 12 Oaicw 23142.71 1817U42 2n7 102.47 Ppityca B•nevWThtFuthl 4267 73 .70 745Jl.4J Tui•l-. s1¢09￿)

Independent examination of Feltham Evangelical church The Independent examination of charity accounts checklist (CC32a) was used to carry out the independent examination of the accounts. These accounts were generated by the trustees using form CC16A along with a receipts and payments sheet. These are attached. The charity was eligible for an independent examination of accounts rather than an audit. Also, accruals accounts were not required to be generated. This was due to the level of income (< £IOO,000 per annum} and there was no other reason identified why an audit might be required. There was no conflict of interest that prevented the examiner from carrying out his independent examination. The trustees considered that the examiner was suff iciently skilled to carry out the examination. The examiner obtained an understanding of the chariws constitution, objectives. organisational structure. the funds managed, its activities and accounting records and systems. The examiner carried out the following checks (along with other general checks) that the: l. accounting records are kept to the required standard 2. accounts are consistent with the accounting records {including checking opening and closing bank statements for the year and checking various transactions) 3. separate funds of the charity have been correctly accounted for and reported corrertly in the accounts. 4. the income and expenditure from each of the accounts cash book matched the totals given in the accounts. An analytical review of the accounts was undertaken. No issues We￿ identified with the generation of and with the accounts. Dr Andrew Beck FORS Date:

I CHARIIY COMM15SIO FOI ÈNGLAW AND WAIE No 111 vny) Recelpts and payments accounts CC16a FoTih• p•riod•cDrn JIII?K202A Sectlon A R¢¢8lpts and payrnents ¥JnrB•trl¢ied fund• ftsRds fuhdA Tothifund Luty•4r A1 R￿1 l• 012 531 5J1 41.WO 20J¥O nk Inr•it &04• 45D JJS Sut total ARI 7.9 .J 111¥39 A2 A8•tJnd th¥•¥bMnt Mlo6. Sub lat•1 T9.420 17.JSO 113. 15.4 1.1 IJ7 I￿71 JAOJ 1.214 iJ24 lfisurènc 2.on on ItsJ5T ￿ch￿l4• C4m￿chR FAan5e R S42Q? IT5&8 1.ts52 502 552 422J és 1¥03 Frfnb & slaty 145 TAX&NI 5undrt•s mba Hgl 750 Sub lot•1 6F.Ifd 7J. ioi. 8at•nJ In¥¢srment *** tsb Sub totil e7.•71 ioi, N•¢offr•¢&pt￿(pavrn•nl5) A5 Tr4nl•r* bthv••n lunds A6 Cath lund# l•st >wr en¢J C•$h funds Ihls y¢•r 11.742 1(492 12 M.?$7 Y4.002 57.070 CCXXRI Issi 27A)7rth25

Sectlon 8 Statement of assats and Ilabiliti•s at the end of the pertod unm6￿ctld dA R••tri¢t•d Efjdtswn•nt fuTrd• lund• 81 fvnd• IIITI rol•lu$h hth¢ts •JA35 ndi D¥tsl 83 Inv•8tm•rbtaM•ts Dekni 84 ￿8•*￿ r•laln•d forth• 85 UabllNI SyAturn toof / ￿￿.P tj 27m7,

TW EVANSEUCAL CHURCH r•th￿ 31ST DEC.2Q24 otNepAL FUNO I P¢tyC4th1 IN 44051 75 75 Jrio To*il¢ofrfG¥or 141 2.07297 Ekncw0&￿ÈQlHII s.￿57 421103 2.019 52 1 12455 1.535. 1481.YJ o( 1024f& T¥ 2W12 2WI3 INTOACCOUNT B25S2 78 13121AJ ncome BU￿￿¢8 Bnxffjht FaAbwd 58651 75 gS674 19 95674 19 ￿n￿re 1824342 t8Z4142 INTO AC¢OU14T OUT OF ACC(KJPIT 288Dth) 141017J 7930 ¢J) 8Jlgnce 8rwghl 16782 73 1$7V2 73 Fmm 10 27973 4W57 4ts157 •AN02U• 2W5 12 Oaicw 23142.71 1817U42 2n7 102.47 Ppityca B•nevWThtFuthl 4267 73 .70 745Jl.4J Tui•l-. s1¢09￿)

Independent examination of Feltham Evangelical church The Independent examination of charity accounts checklist (CC32a) was used to carry out the independent examination of the accounts. These accounts were generated by the trustees using form CC16A along with a receipts and payments sheet. These are attached. The charity was eligible for an independent examination of accounts rather than an audit. Also, accruals accounts were not required to be generated. This was due to the level of income (< £IOO,000 per annum} and there was no other reason identified why an audit might be required. There was no conflict of interest that prevented the examiner from carrying out his independent examination. The trustees considered that the examiner was suff iciently skilled to carry out the examination. The examiner obtained an understanding of the chariws constitution, objectives. organisational structure. the funds managed, its activities and accounting records and systems. The examiner carried out the following checks (along with other general checks) that the: l. accounting records are kept to the required standard 2. accounts are consistent with the accounting records {including checking opening and closing bank statements for the year and checking various transactions) 3. separate funds of the charity have been correctly accounted for and reported corrertly in the accounts. 4. the income and expenditure from each of the accounts cash book matched the totals given in the accounts. An analytical review of the accounts was undertaken. No issues We￿ identified with the generation of and with the accounts. Dr Andrew Beck FORS Date: