| Names and addresses ofadvisers (Optional information) |
Names and addresses ofadvisers (Optional information) |
||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T ofadviser Name |
Address | ||||||
| Name ofchief executive or names | ofsenior staff members (Optional |
information) | |||||
| ~ a |
a ~ | ||||||
| Description ofthe charity's trusts |
|||||||
| Type ofgoverning document |
Trust Deed dated 21 May 2006 | ||||||
| How the charity is constituted | Trust | ||||||
| Trustee selection methods | |||||||
| Appointed by resolution ofTrustees |
|||||||
| Additional governance issues (Optional information) |
|||||||
| You may choose to include additional information, where relevant, about: ~ policies and procedures |
There are three Trustees who meet regularly, including by telephone or video calls, to discuss the charity on an ad hoc, as needed basis. The Trustees make all decisions in relation to the charity. The charity does not have any employees orstaff. |
||||||
| adopted for the induction and training oftrustees; |
The Trustees are provided with the guidance Charity Commission. |
for trustees | issued by | the | |||
| ~ the charity's organisational structure and any wider network with which the charity |
The charity does not have any relationships other charities or organisations. |
with related | parties or any | ||||
| works; | |||||||
| ~ relationship with any related |
|||||||
| parties; | |||||||
| ~ trustees' consideration of |
|||||||
| major risks and the system | |||||||
| and procedures to manage |
|||||||
| them. | |||||||
| ~ ~ | |||||||
| Summary ofthe objects ofthe charity set out in its governing document |
The charity's overall objectives are: the relief ofpoverty, distress, sickness and suffering; the provision ofshelter, care, food, clothing and medical supplies and treatment; the provision ofand promotion of education and training to children and adults; primarily but not exdusively in Sri Lanka. |
| ~ ~ |
~ ~ |
a a ~ ~ ~ |
|---|---|---|
| Summary ofthe main achievements ofthe charity during the year |
The charity represents the principal source offunding ofthe Rainbow Centre in Sri Lanka and the operations ofthe Rainbow Centre would cease without this funding. |
|
| The Rainbow Centre in Sri Lanka is a unique and much praised provider ofeducation, healthcare, food and support to children and their families |
||
| from deprived backgrounds in south-west Sri Lanka. It is registered as an NGO in Sri Lanka. |
||
| During 2022/23, the operations ofthe Rainbow Centre in Sd Lanka have |
||
| normalised from the government-required, coronavirus-related |
||
| lockdowns. In September 2022, the Rainbow Centre expanded its education and welfare activities to include a Saturday school. |
||
| The Rainbow Centre in Sri Lanka continues to make good progress expanding and improving its activities with the recruitment ofadditional |
||
| teaching staff and the provision of more staff training. | ||
| The Trustees believe that the charity has substantially achieved its objectives for the year. |
| ed on be | half | ofthe charity | 's tr | ustees |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Signature(s) | ||||
| Full name(s) | Alasdair Gordon Nagle | |||
| Position | (eg | Secretary, Chair, | Trustee | |
| etc) | ||||
| 4July 2023 |
| Unrestricted | Restricted funds | Restricted funds | Restricted funds | Restricted funds | Endowment | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Categories | Details | funds | funds | ||||||||
| 81Cash funds | Cash at | bank | toucsrcs)E 33,367 |
to | nearest E | to nearest f | |||||
| Money msrkul | deposits | 330,431 | |||||||||
| Total cash funds | sss,sss | ||||||||||
| (83ISSbr)88888 | wlIhIlulr PIs888Punucus 888888as)) | ||||||||||
| Unrestricted | Restricted | funds | Endowment | ||||||||
| funds | funds | ||||||||||
| Details | tu uusrusl f | lo | nearest E | to uuuruulf | |||||||
| 82Other monetary assets | |||||||||||
| Fund lo which asset | Current value | ||||||||||
| 83Investment assets | Details | be)cuss | (cpa coul) | ||||||||
| Fvlul to which Sssut | Current value | ||||||||||
| 84Assets retained for the | Details | bul | (ops ousl) | ||||||||
| charity's own use |
|||||||||||
| (optional) | |||||||||||
| Fund lu which | Amount | duu | When duu | ||||||||
| 85Lish(fit(os | Details | nabnlty relates |
(cpUSSSI) | ||||||||
| Signed by one behalf ofas the |
or two trustees on trustees |
Sgnature | Print Name | Date ofapproval | |||||||
| /WQ | ft | Alasdair Gordon | Na | le | 044ul-22 |
| independent examination finalisation |
Comments, | inl5als and date | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Ihave reviewed in detail the financial statements Iaccount and statement and the supporting schedules anSe. |
lead | ||
| 2 I have completed the ovwsll review as scheduled alA31. |
|||
| 3. I have docunwnled my decisions regwding the points brought lo my altenfion (add schedule |
|||
| reference) | Y | ||
| 4. Iam sabsfied that the pans detailed atsechon Bwere appropriate forthis assignment. |
|||
| 5. Ihave confirme Sat ah my and the managers revaw points have been ssfisfsrriorily wsrrivsd schedule mference), 5. Iconfisn that where mlevant spp 'ale safeguanls have been xnplerrwnted toaddmss any 'independence' issues Iderelled onf12orthmughorri the exwninalion, |
(add | Y v/ |
|
| 7. Ihave discussed the nwiew and the accounls with senior sts5ofthe charfiy. and members ofthe tnstees, as documented (edd schedule referees). 8. Vgrilten representations have been reosived fmm managemwri as appmprisle. |
I/I Y |
||
| 9. Iam safisfied that adequate work has been performed and remntsd wfih raged togohtg concern. Gven Ihe avel ofconcern, Iconcur that anxoprisle disdosum, ifany, has been made in the finanoal statemerris |
|||
| and itrelevant the examination reporL |
| Overall review ofthe financial statements | Nofea (mfar toother scheduhrs where appficable) |
|
|---|---|---|
| 1.Consider whefiwr the rmancisl statements Iaccount and statement adequalsly rsfiact the Inkxmafion explanabons pmviously obtabiad and condusicns maenad dumg Ihe course ofthe exambtatke. fina nda |
and | |
| 2. Consider whether any new fadon have been revealed which may atfixri the presentabon of ordisckwum in, the financial statements. |
||
| 3. Ccnsidsrwhether tha msulls of analytical procedures appfied (Sedion C)show that the ststemenls are consistent with our knorriedge ofthe charily's affairs. |
||
| 4. Consider whether the presentallon adopted inthe finandal sbriernenls may have been unduly infiuenced bythe hostess' desim topresent matters in a I'svoursble or unfavourable ligM. |
||
| 5 Consider tlw potereal impact on the finandsl stalemen!s Ieeoctmt and statement ofthe aggregate of rxrcorrectsd misslatemants (including those arising from Mas in makbrg accounsog estimates idenfified) during Ihe course ofthe examina5on and the preceding pmiod's examinatkm 5any. |
W/If), | |
| 6. Ifconediorw lobe made to the accounting mcords. has tnwtee appxw el been sought and cbtwned? Ensum that Income Iasset levels for audit have nol been breached. |
'tv)/4, | |
| 7. Revimv: | ||
| bansfms loorbum resbkted Idesignated fund accounts; afiocabon d income end expenditure between daererri fund categories; pmsenlation ofspecial or insgular mcome and expandibxe; |
||
| adequacy ofyear and funds tomeal futum lisbfiawe | ||
| disclosum ofrastridad funds. |
||
| 8. (England 3wales and Northern Ireland) Evaluate the reasonableness ofany material estbnsles or iudgments made in preparing the accounts. |
||
| 9. Enqwe wfih the bustees astowhether outstanding invo'ees, bills and commitmerris csn be setfied as they fall due and consider the impficstions vrilh regards togoing concern. |
||
| Forreceipts snd paymerris accounts only: | ||
| 10. Consider whether the format ofthe accounts is appropriale end consi slant with the previous period. |
Y~s | |
| 11. Ifa nriatad pwty note is induded, consider whether the information discbsed Isaccurate. 12. (Northern Ireland) Consider whether S64ofthe CharfiiesArri (Northern Ireland) 2008can be applied (m it isan unincorporated chaay wfih income ofno mom than RÃ0000), snd that funds em conecfiy idenliTied. |
/A, kl/A, |
|
| Foraccruafs accounts only: | ||
| 13. Consider whether the infomwtion pmse cled in the firumcial statements is inacrxxdsnoa wbh the soRp, accounting standards and wham relevant, applicable company law, N parbcular, rrriated pwty transacfions 'denlified an:fully disdosed. |
||
| 14. Conskfer whether the accounting policies enqrioyed am In accordance with the SOPPand fundamental accounrxig concepts, properly disdosed, consistently applied anri appmprlate tothe charily induding the trustees' assessment ofgoing concenx |
||
| 15.Also rmrisw. | ||
| ~ valuation ofgas in kind; ~ vakwfion ofared asset investments wham no market prirws axial; |
'M/j(k, | |
| ~ esbmates resuifing fiom bunsacfions not being fully recorded in the accountbrg racordr, and ~ whee applicable, the allocaion ofcosh batween various expenditure categories ofthe SOFA. |
||
| 16.Are eny depariums bom arpficable accounting blended sother than those expmssty pasniltsdby the SORP, necesswy axdw finandal stalemenls togive atrue and fairview? |
4/4 | |
| 17. Dothe 5nancial statements milect the substance ofthe underiyire transacbons and not merely Iheir form? |
||
| 18. Read afiother Wonnafion in the fiiuxxrisl statements and annual report, indvding the msawes poky and level ofreserves. Consider whether thew am any apparent mbslatements ixmaterial inconsistencies wfih the financial statements. |
A(A | |
| Planning review |
Notes (refer toother schedules where appficable) |
|
| 1. Did we reriew and mvise our plans es additional information became avafieble7 2. Was the exwnlnafion conducted in eccordance wbh the plans and were all points noted atthe plannirbf surge pmperly considered in the exanaisfion? |
M/4 e5 |
|
| 3. Have afi ethical issues idenbTied on B12orthmughotri the engagement been summarised forIhe engagement partner? |
| Completion checklist |
||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Evidence | Notes (mfer toother schedules where appgcable) |
|||||||
| 1.Have aa imporlarri matters been documented in the warkirs papaw, pascularly tha nature pmcedures, reasoning on magee ofjudgement and condusions7 |
and mac nt of | 6S | ||||||
| 2. Have gmri analygcal procedums been urdmtsksn ard comments on signscsnt Iludualions mlallonships been recorded snd corroborated7 AR ttesmmmmnanm have nar been~ed wenixxar nnmidnrbxanuw Ibvm inicemmmlners |
orwmxpeded Ivpmt |
'les | ||||||
| 3, Have we noted any material expendlum orarrion which appears not tobe in |
acconlsnoe | vnlh | the lruats of | |||||
| gw cherty? | ||||||||
| na wnemsuanmnanrabmwmzunsdwesrmuuccnetrbrbxenrngrmmbrgreereminerS | mpbrt | |||||||
| 4. Have lhera been any malism on which the trustees have failed toprovide us with adequate |
information or |
|||||||
| explanations? | ||||||||
| As, uame Rms msans hme occmmd wesbonkiccnskbvnxlildhg lenin brglemefwlc/5 |
mpcrt | |||||||
| 5. Have we ocnsidemd the need to update customer due csigence procedwes? | es | |||||||
| 6. Have we mmained almt to addigonai infomwtlon throughout the examination toensue thai |
audit and | |||||||
| accmrnts thmshdds have not been breached? Whee bmached, have the acmunls been refened |
back | tothe | ||||||
| tnmtees7 | ||||||||
| 7. Have all stair acted in arxordance with the gnn's anlimoney kmndering procedures7 |
||||||||
| 48. Obefs cfansxtamnmoneyaundering ncariies sbnvid ncrbe drtnkxr oneeindependent examinsam |
Sn. | |||||||
| Compliance | Notes (refer toother schetkries whew applicable) |
|||||||
| 1.Have stsutory accounts and annual mport been dralled and refemnced to the |
examination | schedules7 | eS | |||||
| 2 Have comperatives been agreed to pmvious year's acooimts? |
Y~s | |||||||
| 3. Has audk exemption eligibilily (criter on B02)been corrirmed7 |
||||||||
| 4. Hasa rekwant Charees Accounts disdoswe checklist (A32)been completed? 5. Hss ths whistlebbwing checklist (A43)been cenpleted? |
As4s | |||||||
| Administration | Notes (mfer toother schedtriss where appgcable) |
|||||||
| 1.Hasa points fonvard schedrrie been drsged? 2. Has next yeara stallirq) requinmmnt been considered snd recmded7 |
fk ji)7v |
|||||||
| 3. Has the pennarmnt Ire been updated forhformalion acquimd dming tlw examineaon wmk? |
/A, | |||||||
| Trustees' annual report |
Notes (refertoother schedules whma applicable) |
|||||||
| 1. Consider whether the trustees' repmt isconsistent with the frnandal ktformsllon |
In the gnancial | slalmnerris, | ||||||
| In parrimriar consider the macmes policy and that any ggums forresmves quoted | is not materially | inconsistent | ||||||
| with the accoimta | ||||||||
| 2, Where Hconsislendes are idenrified which may have a signiTicanl erect onspmper undemlsnding accourris, such matters should be brought tothe atlangon ofthe tmslees. |
ofthe | VIA | ||||||
| Ifno nppqpn'nrv nmendrnnni ismndn br the armrmAepori enn ckmiu cvgm maser srmuube |
pcvtbxrin are | nxnminmk | npwt | |||||
| Prepared by | it4/s | L& | ||||||
| Rmriewed by jvtO |
th/7 | 2-'3 |
| Objective: To consider whether any signiTicant matters should be reported to the regulator. |
Objective: To consider whether any signiTicant matters should be reported to the regulator. |
|
|---|---|---|
| TbadieiIungarlwfseannwaaemiemiear ing»rxxriseoibb/l»rucrkkfimuyamager wkbbieraa»lulbeacaak»ivsgxks erg»crxvkyarcfanyaxnexvd'nsrhxiimmbedy wbkh Ibamwniherbex maxcmbkl cerise klkessve isNacry Itlba ci'imrm'sr rtyldceixe Ibraepwpmi» crNle axe»isa bygiaieguklkv ores elllrikms. |
anri | |
| Na. Themgvreavaxmeikbs mgbbmriin Engkmd earwabs isIbe cbenly Grmmimion IbrEngland end wbks, insmamditb IkaaRe orIbeRousb charily nsgublur and bi Ncrisemrmimri kisthe Charily anvnissmarxkuhemimkvxl Fcrcessscnrarcaeiigea mpcrlsakovkri»marieloaNmgvbkvsasaoregubkxbdl»rnwrkrl»g»bad mgvbiivin Iasebarbbrring, Forilvlbwdsisw miIkedvree emr rkyrb lu wpmr aiIbemgubur NeeIeagudmce nolea Iimixbd wain Ibismaxuat |
||
| TbeIbmnksr em kxgrekxs am»am ammey need taberspciteri rcg» mgubku lbham 6»anmmrir )eyihnnar emib abcekr begiven. |
||
| Matter 1 - Dishonesty and fraud involving asignificant loss of, or of material risk to, charitable funds orassets |
YeslNo(add comments as needed) | |
| 1.Evidence suggesting fabe aacounung. | 0 | |
| 2. Evidence suggesting nrisuse ofthe pm party ofthe chaay. |
bio | |
| 3. Knovriedge arsuspicion afthdl or misappropriation, |
'No | |
| 4. Evkfenoe giving rise lodouble as to6m honesly orintegifiy ofany charily trustee. Forexample: |
0 | |
| llm paean isdisqualiTied from acing asatrustee. |
||
| ~ The examiner has been slructed by any adion or inacbon sfthe paean ficm obtaining ai |
||
| necessary Infonuabon and explanegons. |
||
| Matter 2 - Internal controls and governance | ||
| Ns. There edoeiyt» empwgxg duly re» i»gaxrmsvkeri e mvkt rmult in amalrrtaikes org» cbwsra asselk crwbicb Inlurromabn'ariunds beingpvrarmekxrbk internal |
Yesrno (add comments as needed) | |
| 1.Afailum afthe trustee body lo meet ar consider issues agecgre the charil. 2. Afailure ofthe uuslse body ta have polides tosuppori the gavemanoa ofthe chaifiy (eg.dedaring anri managing ccnacts ofinterest). |
go 0 |
|
| 3.Alack ofsuacient contrds toensure no sign scant tees ornrisappropriagon ofchaifiatrie funds (eg. no poles toconfinn the aornpleteness offurdmising income). |
||
| 4. Uncertainty exists astowha am the charily's Irusbum. |
0 | |
| 6. llm trustee body ssawhole lacks the skss neoessmy foraproper overbig Mafthe chaikys acbvbes. |
Cr | |
| L Agrass faiium an the pmtdthe trustee body tokeep accourriing mcords. |
No | |
| T. Evidence ofmdigemnce onthe part ofthe charfiy buslee or Irustee body. Far exmnple: |
0 | |
| Tho tnmlme body tends to"rubber stamp" decisions made by adamlnarrimember ofstatf. ~ Evidence that professional edvx» has not been sought orhas been disregarded without due |
||
| consideregon. | ||
| ~ Functions debrgated tothid paries are not manilomd snd conhaied. |
||
| ~ Imporianl issues ofpolicy srsuategy not being praperly decided by the trustee body. ~ A failure latake schon in the case offraud vahin orseeding Iheebsay. |
||
| Matter 3- Money laundering and crim/nal activity |
Yas/No (add contmenls as neededl | |
| 1.Knowledge orsuspiaon that the chariy's funds, in parhcular their bank accaunls, could have been used for |
||
| money laundering purpases, forexemple, an attempt to evade eny dired or imfxect tax propaly payable. |
||
| 2. The sources afsame funds am Imdear mid managemerri is unwilling to provide fwthar details, orthe refusal dbustees to explain an unusual transacgon, leafing tothe suspicion that such funds could be ths praceeds ofsetous crime. |
tdo | |
| Matter 4- Support ofterrorism gva 4quekliirgcirence esdv&edby gecae airi oi'ae nuiiham Ireland fgemenceg Arx Imis em excerssdJ |
YeelNo (add comments as neededl | |
| 1. Knowledge orsuspldon that the dwrity, istrustees, employees orassets, have been bvolved aorbeen used tosuppori lemcrism cigar within the UKorworkhride, |
||
| 2 Funds have been transfenad ta prascribed Iscariot oiganisafions sslisted by the Home Ogice on sirwww ov e ublicat' rceciibed-tenor ra r ' 'o 2. |
||
| Matter 5 - Risk to charity's beneficiaries |
YeeiNo (add comments as needed) |
| Whistle blowing - Reporting tothe regula checklist |
Whistle blowing - Reporting tothe regula checklist |
Whistle blowing - Reporting tothe regula checklist |
Whistle blowing - Reporting tothe regula checklist |
tor | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. (Biidenos that the way the charily canies out lls work mlafing tothe cwe and welfare ofbeneficiaries has |
||||||
| put them at signiTicant risk ofabuse or misbuatment. Forexample: |
||||||
| ~ Though vmriring wfih young Ivulnerable people, the charity does not have a safeguarding policy or |
||||||
| it isnot atqriying E | ||||||
| DBSchecks are not being performed on new staff and volunteers, |
||||||
| ~ Complaints have been made against the charity bybeneficiari ortheir |
families. orthere isa | legal | ||||
| case in progmss. ]I | ||||||
| Matter 6-Breaches of )aw orthe charity's trusts | ||||||
| trvtt mws usony snsispnuhs clayr mmason in nvkbncasnriunnde sarsrn sevscud |
dnrbemldycrtwaamriu | es | Yes/No | (add comments | as needed) | |
| connty snrfuvd orwss Eldy tnnnAr 8maavtdbss ormwsxnicafbn oraisnmtsl |
||||||
| 1.Trustee body nol properly consauted. | No | |||||
| 2 Amaterial application offunds ordisposal ofproperty dearly mriskle the ottscts the terms ofthe ordinal bust. |
ofthe charily | or corrimiy to | 4o | |||
| 3. An attempt by any trustee toobtain an inproper pecuniary benefit forthemselves charfiy'8 dehirnent. |
or another antyor to | the | No | |||
| 4.Speculahva orreddsss invesknents or other achons contrary tothe trusts ofOle dlarily. 5. Tnrstaas isoeMng nunuilciaboil wlhoul pfop8f powem ofconsera 6. Fafiure toobtain pmper consent from the regulator forcertain events which require nokTicafion regutstoron an adhoc basis, Forexampka |
tolhe | Mo N() 'No |
||||
| Pmperiy kei$8dlolw with connected persons. |
||||||
| ~ Charees in the draifiys acMies or gmmm tug document. |
||||||
| ~ Establishment ofcommon deposit or common Nvestment hnds. |
||||||
| Matter T - Breach ofen order ordirection tttade by a charity regulator |
YeslNo | (add COUunente | aSneeded) | |||
| 1.Renhnv regiriatcia websites snd huslee meefing minutes forevidence suggesfing breach ofan order ordimdion made by acherty mgulator urdar statutory powem. |
8deliberate Forexamplei |
orsignacant | ||||
| ~ Asuspended buslee sfill attending meetings. |
||||||
| ~ Arestrided transadion Iacthrity Igraning prohiflileri by lhe regulator sta |
goes ahead. | |||||
| Matter 8 - Qualified independent examiner's report |
Yes/No | (add comments | asneeded) | |||
| 1.on making a qualitied ada pendent examiner's report, idanlecason ofmatte m ofconcern towlrich attention isdrawn, notiiicsfion ofthe naure d modificabon Iemphasis ofmsfier or concern with supporting reasons |
||||||
| tndudlng notacafion, ifany, ofany subsequent schon tstwn by the Wstees. |
||||||
| Matter 9-Conflicts ofinterest and related party transactions | YesINo | (add comments | asneeded) | |||
| 1. Evidence suggesting that canasta ofinternet have not been managed by the trustees in accordance with glsdallca Ususd bytile ctmrity I8gUtutor. |
||||||
| 2 Evidence suggesting that related parly transacbons have not been fully disdosed by the SORP. |
a all mspacts as mqu'nad | |||||
| Conclusion | ||||||
| ten selislied that all 8'gruTicant maltws have n properly reporied tothe mg or. |
||||||
| Examiner. | ||||||
| r hfumconcsmssibniii dnelmldniidtteba sixahpinriouuls@f' |
||||||
| h axxbnd anrunmnhnvarfnmt | ||||||
| tnarhshebras@afassnfs annfin Ntnrrrnmrrsbnd snrdomnhnvrd msd |
| Planning checklist 9. Cansider whether asearch shaukl be obtained fiarnthe reguhtor. |
Planning checklist 9. Cansider whether asearch shaukl be obtained fiarnthe reguhtor. |
Planning checklist 9. Cansider whether asearch shaukl be obtained fiarnthe reguhtor. |
B | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| fg. I/pdata each sedian ofthe permanent fikvtnformafion and sign ofas mqu'uad. In particular, ensurethat the permanent file contains a record ofthe accounting syslarn assessing whether Ihe charfiy is well run and a condusion auto ils adequacy. |
||||
| Approach | Notes (rafisr to other schedules whee applhahlei |
|||
| 1. Camplete prefiminary analykcal procedures as possfirh. 2. Based an the results ofthe analyficsl review and your invdvement wfih accounts praparahon, plan the overall approach tothe assigrment. iThis approach may be filed and msmly leviswed each year.) 3. Identify which malarial items, ifany, may mqulie some faun ofvouching orevidence. Ifnone, identify which signiTicant transadions should be vouched, induding iaumals, toteal the adequacy ofthe eccounfing mails axl that the accounts are consistent with the accounting macnh. |
4/A !A |
|||
| Administration | Notes imfer toother scheduhs where appficablei |
|||
| 1./Bocate stag reqdml sccanfing totheir knowhdge and experience snd Iha cairfiawfiy ofthe assignrnsnt and ensure Ihey ara swan: ofthe fofiowing sedor 8pacilic considerations: |
||||
| a special features offiw charily such as nature and sounxa ofincome, furdraising acbvBes |
snd | |||
| opsrafing strudum; |
||||
| b. an sameness ofthe regulatory sedar, spedficafiy the legislative and regulatory fiarnanom charily is subjed kr, |
the | |||
| c tenne ofmshidedfdesignated funds; |
||||
| d. the pmvisians concemhg the examiner's duly to mpon matlem afmateial significance tothe |
||||
| rag ulster. | ||||
| 2 Furfiwr undarstandlra, commensurate wfih the hdivlduars role ard responsibiliTies in tha exsminafian piocess, 8iiupilfcd of'. |
||||
| a. Ihe gavemhg document dthe chsrily, |
||||
| h. IesponsMbes sfbuslees under general and charfiy law, |
||||
| c. detailed knawhdge ofthe mafiem an which the examiners are required routinely to report d. any guidance issued by the mgulalor wllh rasped to maltha on which the examined am required |
||||
| raubnely to mpmt | ||||
| 3. Oecide level ofsupawision required based upon Imowledge ard experience ofteam and the odnplsxily gie asslgnnumt. |
of | |||
| 4. Ran fimetable foraccounts and examinason work and confir with the dient. |
5 | |||
| 5. Phn dates far manager and partner review. 6. Canfnm in wrfiing details ofschedules / infonnabon tobeprepared by the disnt. 2 Review fime sunuiwries and vsrhnces fram previous year. Cansider whether there was any wsstedfinegicient time hat year. |
Y-fiS Yes .5 |
|||
| 8. Pfoduc8 finw budg8t and fcccsliiiist8. | ec | |||
| 9. Brief afi staff in detafi reganrsrg responsibfifihs and impudent matters. Record detsih ofthe msefing including who was pmsent and the mailed discussed. |
4r5 | |||
| 16. Ensum afi slafi am swam ofthe finn's internal anfimoney hund ering pracedums. |
'As | |||
| 11, Olhen | ||||
| bJIA, | ||||
| n /aiW | ||||
| Revhwad by |
n | f | ||
| Examiner approval | ||||
| Ihave reviewed Ihe planning sedian, supporting schedukw end planned work programmss and appmve |
the work | asplanned. | ||
| Examiner |
| Objective: Toconfirm that the standalone char(t)f is a ~ |
u |
dit exempt and require |
dit exempt and require |
dit exempt and require |
dit exempt and require |
dit exempt and require |
s an inde |
pendent | examination. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| rcra iruriate ccmpuuyin sfixwpsrunul'o oraurer i»nrw cruuxyor |
S | ucax» 2aud 2 err» fiutbuuuncbs | orNumanuuriv | ucuuuuu4ed. | |||||
| uu«ruuruuuulnul uu uruuvurrlr Rnlunr clurn»I rurw uvuric«au tus |
|||||||||
| trial | Yes/No | (add commerris asneeded) | |||||||
| Unincorporated charities and CIOs - England and Wales |
|||||||||
| I, check accounang records (eg. balanc) and confirm wfih the hu«ass exemption conditions will be msl and that the charily requims an independent |
that they believe thai the examiruriion, ie. |
||||||||
| ~ grass Inc«ne we ncl be m«e than E250,000;or |
|||||||||
| ~ ifgross inccrre is between E250,00Danri E1,00tkDDD. total assets E3,34000. |
will nol be mom | than | |||||||
| NS:rfixx»kx»me uifu«umrud rrficoq uxtuual rcrrrihyis nur uw«ry Iutuiiad |
|||||||||
| Unincorporated charitfes and SCIOs SScotland+ |
|||||||||
| I. Confirm vulh the trustees thai they believe that the exemption conditions mquims an Independent exaninafion, ie. |
will be mel and | that the charfiy | |||||||
| gross inoorrw will be lessthan E500000;and |
|||||||||
| Iobri assets will not bemore than E3260000. | |||||||||
| Unincorporated charities - Northern Ireland t |
|||||||||
| 1.Check accounrrng remrds (eg.trial balance) and confirm with the hostess exempfion oondaons will be met and that the charily Iequlms an Ndependant |
that they believe that the exeminafion, ie. |
||||||||
| ~ gross income wifi nct bs more than E500,000. |
|||||||||
| AII unincorporated charities, CIOs and SCIOs |
|||||||||
| 1. Confirm the governing document does not require a fufi audi Iva rau coustha»uunvtucmcus Isbcn ras2 nvunvx» Nuudirnayuuilwxx»anauur«ou Sucrose.SaCNe fiudauce uoles ciNs uuvxuu |
pwfixluud | I2ubrio | /ecx, | C445 tT(yj ~cd+ |
|||||
| 2. conlkmlhat Ih«a is no other «quirament fora«s (eg.grani pmvideri other statutory regime). |
|||||||||
| Umited companies -England and Wales |
|||||||||
| 1.Check accounbng records (eg.tria!balance) and confirm wfih Ihe trustees exemption conriaons wfil be met and that the chsrfiy requires an independent |
thai they believe that the «uxnin stion, ie. |
||||||||
| ~ the charity does not «quire sn audit under the charifies Act |
|||||||||
| o grass Inc«he we nclbe mom than E25D.DDD;or |
|||||||||
| o ifgmss ac«ne isbebvaen E250000and E1,0009%total ssselswifi |
r»t bemom | ||||||||
| Ihan r3,260000.;and | |||||||||
| ~ the company isenreed tothe wnsfi comparriss audit examphon. |
|||||||||
| xs.Iruuwluuuuuuluf utlllullsfiluquuuuuuuuvlyuuuuuauyruoiuu |
|||||||||
| Limited companies -Scotland 2 | |||||||||
| t. Confirm vrifit the directors that they befieve filat the exemp5on conditions requires an independent exaltwlafion, ie. |
wifi be met and | that the charfiy | |||||||
| grass income will belessthan 6500,000; | |||||||||
| total assets will not be Inurn than E3,260,000stthe end oftha yser, and fiw company is enfified tothe small companies aura exemption. |
|||||||||
| Limited companies - Northern Ireland + |
|||||||||
| 1.Check accounting records (eg.trial balance) and confir with the dire««s exemphon condaons will be met and that the charfiy requilea an adependant |
Ihat they befieve examinafion, N. |
that the | |||||||
| gloss Inconla we Ixri ba m«e th«I E500,000I'and | |||||||||
| ~ the company iserfiaad tothe wnafi comps ries audit exempbon. |
|||||||||
| All limited companies |
|||||||||
| 1. Conrum the company's Arfides cfAssodalion permit the company todefense with an alxfit |
|||||||||
| 2 Conrum that fewer than 10yv in number ofmemb«s have lodged a request registeref ofilcsofthe c»rnpany. |
for an audit in | writing stthe | |||||||
| Conclusion | |||||||||
| Tick fiw rahivant condusion below: |
|||||||||
| assed onthe abave, the charily does qualify foraudit axempfion and requires |
an Infiependelfi | examination. |
| Acceptance ofappointment or reappointment |
Acceptance ofappointment or reappointment |
Acceptance ofappointment or reappointment |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Fees', litigation, gifts and hospitality |
Yestffo | ||
| 1. Isthem s risk that insuadent stslf time and skill has been afaceted tothe engagement. kisspecam ofthe fee7 |
(do | ||
| 2 Isthe engagement orany other pml'ess'onal work being undertaken on a contingent ise basis? |
0 | ||
| 3. Am there any nonsrivlal professional fees overdue7 4. DoIntel fees forthe diant Igroup ofdients mpresent a signiTicant proponion of |
4(3 | ||
| a. the finn's total annual fee income: or |
|||
| b. whew profits me not shared cm a firmnride basis, ofthe part ofthe finnby referenos to which the |
|||
| engagamerfi parine/s pnriit sham iscalxrtatsd? |
|||
| 6.Are any membms ofthe engagement team evaluated on orcompensated frx selling nonnrnrisw services to Bwdent? |
|||
| 6. IsNe firm involved, orSrelyto became invoked, N any legal schon with the cfient? T. Has any individual Inthe linn ortheir humorists family received gas, services or hospfialily, from the cfient? |
a 40 |
||
| Other considerations | |||
| 1.Am there any concerns regarding whether the exanirmr h Imlependent (ie.conoems reganling dose personal relaficnships with the tnwtess, day todsy hwolvemsnt in the administration ofthe charity, the examiner having served on asubcomrretee Ihat oversees the finances orfundraising ofthe charily, the examiner being dependent es a beneficiary on the chanly, the examiner being amalmial donor tothe charily orNe examiner having accepted hospitality orgilh fram the chanly ofitsbushes) or whether Uw exwniner Is suitably quafifxxrF concerns |
|||
| 2. Are there eny other farriom that coukl (orcould beseen to)alfect the firm's cblecbvity and independence? | |||
| 3.Are thms any regarding Ihs integrity ofibis cfient7 |
|||
| 4. Am them any other masons why we should not accept (re)appointmerri7 |