| The superior quality ofthe kit will result in more effective patrols forthe rangers who will be working under extremely tough conditions. This will enable them to remain alert and will also increase the amount oftime for |
The superior quality ofthe kit will result in more effective patrols forthe rangers who will be working under extremely tough conditions. This will enable them to remain alert and will also increase the amount oftime for |
The superior quality ofthe kit will result in more effective patrols forthe rangers who will be working under extremely tough conditions. This will enable them to remain alert and will also increase the amount oftime for |
|---|---|---|
| which they will be able to be deployed. | ||
| Orangutan Foundation The Orangutan Foundation is working to save orangutans by protecting their tropical forest habitat, working |
with | |
| local communities, and promoting research and education. |
||
| The Orangutan Foundation operates five orangutan post-release monitoring camps within the Lamandau Wildlife Reserve, a resenre spanning almost 160,000acres in Indonesia Borneo. At these camps, field teams |
||
| care for orphaned orangutans in a soft release programme and continuously monitor orangutans in surrounding |
||
| forest. | ||
| The young orangutans in the soft-release programme leam forest skills necessary for life in the wild, and once |
||
| fully prepared are ready forrelease. From time to time, situations arise where the team help with the rescue and translocation oforangutans |
||
| stranded in threatened areas, such as community land and fragmented sections offorest. Veterinary assistance |
||
| ensures the highest welfare standards are available to expertly treat these orangutans straight away before |
||
| release into the Lamandau Wildlife Reserve. |
||
| In 2022, Action forthe Wild donated R7,000forthe vet's annual salary to provide critical veterinary aid, |
||
| contributing towards the cost oforangutan monitoring in the forest and providing equipment for a new veterinary |
||
| clinic in Pangkalan Bun, essenfial for wildlife rescues and translocations. |
||
| ECL(Association Europhenne pour I'etude et la Conservation des Lemuriens) |
||
| AEECL aims toadvance the understanding and conservation ofMadagascar's lemurs through scientific |
||
| research, captive propagation and protection oftheir natural habitat. |
||
| In 2022, Action forthe Wild donated its R1,712.48 membership fee. |
||
| The Sahamalaza region in Madagascar has been the AEECL's focus ofscientific and conservation interest |
since | |
| 1988.The AEECL aims to protect the habitat and ecosystems within the Sahamalaza peninsula, monitor and |
||
| increase lemur populations and bea strong conservation ambassador forthe area. |
||
| In 2022, AEECL undertook a range of activities such asforest monitoring; reforestation of150bags of mangrove propagules in the village ofAntafiatabalaka and 30,000young plants over an area of20hectares |
in | |
| Mahialambo Rural Commune Ampandiiakilandy Antsohihy; subsidised 78teachers; met secondary school |
||
| students who receive an AEECL grant to provide encouragement in advance oftheir national exams and |
||
| pledged to give more scholarships forthe five best students who want to pursue university studies; and took |
part | |
| in various celebration days such as World Environment Day and aworkshop to create a Protected Areas |
||
| Manager Platform for Sofia Region. | ||
| By investing in local communities through education, resource management and communication, this helps |
||
| ensure the communities oftoday can forge a safe haven for wildlife tomorrow. |
||
| Elephant Orphanage Project |
||
| The Elephant Orphanage Project (EOP) is working to rescue, rehabilitate and release orphaned elephants asa |
||
| direct result ofpoaching. | ||
| In 2022, Action forthe Wild donated Z10,000to help provide food and medical treatment for the orphans and |
to | |
| support the wage ofone ofthe elephant caregivers, Aaron, who has worked at the project since 2012. |
||
| At the end of2022, a total of25orphans were under the Elephant Orphanage Project's care or monitoring |
||
| spanning the sixstages ofrelease, with 2new rescues over the year. The youngest, Chikumbi, was rescued |
||
| from Rufunsa which has always been a hotspot for orphans and has now seen 16orphan rescues since the |
||
| EOP's inception. | ||
| The project has two camps; Lilayi Elephant Nursery where keepers provide constant care and feeding for5 |
||
| young orphans, and the Kafue Release Facility, where 13orphans that need less time with humans are |
||
| prepared for release back into the wild, but which come back to the protective boma overnight. Afurther 7orphans move freely within Kafue National Park; 5ofthese spend nights outside the boma but do |
||
| return on occasions tojoin the orphan herd, and 2 live in the wild full time. |
||
| 2022 saw orphan matriarch Chamilandu finally leave the security ofthe release facility to form a wild based |
herd | |
| with her calf Mutaanzi and age mates Tafika, Mosi and Rufunsa where they have been seen moving comfortably |
||
| amongst wild Kafue herds. |
||
| Much of2022 was absorbed with rebuilding a new home for the elephant orphans in Lusaka National Park and |
||
| to create an education and awareness space that really will shape the future ofconservation through our future |
||
| generations. | ||
| Centre de Rehabilitation des Primates de Lwiro |
||
| The Centre de Rehabilitation des Primates de Lwiro (CRPL) works tocare for and rehabilitate orphaned |
||
| primates. Since 2002, the centre has rescued 128chimpanzees, most conliscated from poachers as a bywatch |
||
| ofbushmeat hunting. |
||
| The CRPL offers a permanent solubon forthe increasing number oforphaned great apes confiscated around |
||
| Kahuzi-Biega National Park in the Democratic Republic ofCongo. |
| In 2022, Action forthe Wild donated R5,000to provide the 288animals in the care ofthe CRPL with a high standard ofnutrition. |
|---|
| Action forthe Wild's 2022 donafion was used to provide fresh fruit and vegetables for CRPL's primates and parrots for7weeks in the period June 2022 to July 2022. This funding helps local communities, as the sanctuary buys all the food from local markeb', helping them tosee the benefits ofhaving the sanctuary in their vilhge and increasing their acceptance ofconservation. Byassisting with the running costs, CRPL can continue to receive confiscated animals and contribute to Congolese law in protecting these primates from poaching and the pet trade. |
| Free the Bears |
| Free the Bears (FTB)are working to protect, preserve and enrich the lives ofbears throughout the world by offering asafe sanctuary for bears rescued from the illegal wildlife trade. In 2022, Action for the Wikf donated R7,000to install solar powered lights and improve water sustainability at the Luang Prabang Wildlife Sanctuary. This helps to alleviate concerns over security and water supply provision, through the purchase ofsolar-powered water pumps to recycle bear pool water and reduce consumption during the dry season. |
| With 21 bears rescued across Cambodia, Laos and Vietnam in 2022 (many ofthem young cubs), work has continued on the development ofnew bear houses, with Bear House 7opening fora pair ofmoon bears, and building work commencing forBearHouse 8 in order to house the rapidly-growing cubs in the nursery. In 2022, more than 50bear health checks took place and FTB's animal care teams benefitted from further training in animal welfare thanks toajoint programme with Wikl Welfare. Programme managers from each sanctuary gottogether foraseries ofmeetings on consbucbon design, staff training and general strategy for the coming years, typically coinciding with the rescue ofbears in all three sanctuary countries; only the second time in FTB's history that the~e had rescues in all three countries in the same week. 2022 saw a number ofmilestones in the fight to end the practice ofbear bile farming, with South Korea formally announcing a commitment to ending the practice by the end of2025, and the number ofrescued bears in sanctuaries across Laos and Vietnam outnumbering the number ofbears remaining in bile farms forthe first time in almost two decades. |
| Vulpro |
| ANcan vultures are some ofthe most threatened species on the planet with some populations having dedined by over 80'/0 in the last three decades. VulPro isworking to halt this decline ofvultures throughout Africa. Part ofthe work that VulPro has been partaking in for many years is in-situ, breeding population monitoring, induding ANcan white-backed vulture (Gyps afiicanus) breeding surveys. These surveys include walked transects ofnesting sites, gathering data to aid the understanding ofbreeding success and what factors might be driving this success, as well as nest site selection. These data are important to understand which sites to protect in order to conserve these birds. |
| Nest sites are repeatedly surveyed at the beginning ofevery breeding season (between May and June 2023) and again at the end ofthe breeding season (between September and October 2023).This allows fora record ofhow many nests are active atthe beginning ofthe season and how many at the end, providing a measure of breeding success. During each ofthese surveys, new nests and their variables are also recorded. |
| During 2022, VulPro monitored sixcape vulture cohnies across the northern parts ofSouth Nrica. Atotal of 2,036active nests were observed during the initial survey. Furthermore, the ANcan white-backed vulture tree nesting survey efforts covered atotal ofthree areas, comprising 23properbes and 187active nests. VulPro's cNf monitoring, which focuses on the northern parts ofthe cape vulture population, is home to approximately 50to 60/0 ofthe entire breeding population. Each ofthe six colonies monitored have shown a slight increase in the number ofbreixting pairs. Between the three African white-backed vulture sites, the breeding success rate ranged between 69and 74/o. |
| Action forthe Wild donated F4,287.92 in 2022 to enable the researchers to stay near the field sites to conduct the monitoring and to purchase the necessary equipment forthe survey work. Comparison ofannual monitoring results is critical as all Afi1can vulture species continue to rapidly decline across their ranges. |
| Komodo Survival Program |
| The Komodo Survival Program aims to protect and monitor Komodo dragons and their habitat with the involvement ofthe local community. |
| In 2022, Action forthe Wild donated f885.98to support this projecL In 2022,a new five year cooperation agreement was signed focusing on strengthening monitoring and conservation in Komodo dragon distribution areas beyond protected areas on Flores Island. Capacity building of staff, stakeholder engagement, community awareness and education programmes for local communities are the pnonty agenda forthe next five years. |
| In 2022, a Komodo dragon population monitoring programme was conducted on Longos Island on western |
|
|---|---|
| Flores and Ontoloe Island on northern Flores. Camera trapping was carried out to monitor the long-term |
|
| population trends and live trapping to observe the Komodo dragon demographics and body size on the small |
|
| island populations. Twenty and thirteen camera trapping locations were used on Longos Island and Ontoloe |
|
| Island respectively. | |
| Morphological measurements, such as:head length, head width, total body length, snout tovent length (SVL), |
|
| weight etc.,were taken from each dragon caught and newly captured dragons were fitted with a transponder | to |
| mark and identify each individual. Four dragons were caught on each island. |
|
| The monitoring results were disseminated to heads ofvillages and local community members to increase local |
|
| community awareness and encourage them to be involved in Komodo dragon conservation efforts beyond |
|
| protected areas. | |
| Throughout the rest of2022, Komodo dragon population monitoring was conducted atWae Wuul Nature |
|
| Reserve„training was conducted for local community patrol members on the SMART Patrol application for better |
|
| patrolling activities and planning, and the SMART Patrol application was implemented in the local community |
|
| patrol activities at Torong Padang. | |
| Red Panda Network Forest Guardian Sponsorship Scheme |
|
| The Red Panda Network is committed to the conservation ofwild red pandas and their habitat through the |
|
| education and empowerment oflocal communities. |
|
| Acbon for the Wild teams up annually with other European Zoos to support aforest guardian scheme and |
|
| donated 8214.06 in 2022.Aforest guardian monitors and protects red panda habitats, as well as educates |
|
| communities on the importance ofthe species. |
|
| The forest guardian team has grown to over 100members and will continue to increase with recruitments in the |
|
| 3new districts ofeastern Nepal. Since 2014,Action forthe Wild has worked with other European zoos to | |
| sponsor up to 15forest guardians. | |
| The funds are used for capacity and skili-building training, supporting children and siblings with education |
|
| scholarships, distributing improved cooking stoves, and providing guardians with field gear and monitoring |
|
| equipment All forest guardians receive training on community-based red panda monitoring and anti-poaching |
|
| patrolling which includes training on camera trap handling, installation, and data management to enable them |
to |
| monitor their red panda monitoring blocks on a quarterly basis, conduct bi-annual anti-poaching patrolling, install |
|
| camera traps and establish new monitoring blocks. |
|
| This support benefits not only the red pandas, but provides employment and development within the local |
|
| community, giving them asense ofpride in protecting this endangered species, with income generated from |
|
| sustainable means. |
|
| International Otter Survival Fund |
|
| The International Otter Survival Fund is working to provide aseries ofcapacity building workshops to train |
|
| conservationists, government otficials and other similar stakeholders to engage with otters, demonstrate |
|
| techniques in education, research, dealing with threats and other similar conservation issues. |
|
| In 2022, Action forthe Wild donated f4,910tothe International Otter Survival Fund to help run their sixth Asian |
|
| (eighth in total) workshop, this time in Malaysia. Previous workshops have been held in Cambodia, Indonesia, |
|
| Bangladesh, China, Lao PDR, Tanzania and Guyana. |
|
| During the Malaysian workshop, IOSFpartnered with the Malaysia Nature Society (MNS) and Malaysian Otter |
|
| Network (MON). The workshop was held at Kuala Selangor Nature Park, which isa protected area in the |
|
| Selangor region ofPeninsula Malaysia. |
|
| In Asia there are very few scientists working on otters and their habitats. Following this series ofinternational |
|
| Otter Survival Fund workshops, work is now ongoing in communities, through country networks linked together |
|
| by the Asian Otter Conservation Network. |
|
| During the Malaysian workshop, 71attendees took part, either in person orvirtually through Zoom sessions. |
The |
| workshop covered topics such as global otter conservation, surveying techniques, education and illegal trade |
|
| issues. | |
| HelpSimus | |
| Helpsimus works to protect the greater bamboo lemur in Madagascar through the Bamboo Lemur Programme, |
|
| which combines scientwc monitoring ofthe species, protecting its habitat, supporting the development ofthe |
|
| nearby villages and financing the education oflocal children. | |
| The greater bamboo lemur is one ofthe most threatened lemurs ofMadagascar. Helpsimus is based close to |
|
| the National Park ofRanomafana but in an unprotected zone, located at the heart ofthe agricultural land of |
|
| several villages inhabited by the largest wild population ofgreater bamboo lemurs (almost 600specimens). |
|
| In 2022, Action for the Wild donated F1,035to Helpsimus to deliver its conservation activities. |
| Three components make up Helpsimus' strategy: an environmental component to idenNy the priority conservation areas on the programme site, improving knowledge about the eco-ethology ofthe species and working on resolving human/lemur conflicts; a socio-economic component to improve the standard ofliving of the local populations by helping to secure the products oftheir harvest and improving yields, developing new revenue generating activities, building infrastructure and means ofcommunication, and implementing better hygiene practices to improve the health ofthe communities, and an educational component to improve awareness among local communities, and facilitate access to education for the children from villages involved in the project. |
|---|
| Over 660children and their teachers benefit from the school canteens in the programme's 5schools and the project now follows 23groups oflemurs: 14groups ofgreater bamboo lemurs, 4groups ofred-bellied lemurs, 2 groups ofRanomafana bamboo lemurs and 3groups ofPeyrieras' woolly lemurs. Almost 640 lemurs are in this way protected directly by Helpsimus. |
| Amur Leopard Fund (Melanism Testing) The Amur Leopard European ExSitu Programme (EEP)has initiated a lab-based project looking for identmers ofmelanism in the Amur leopard captive population. The aim is to test a total ofabout 70leopards for now, with samples ofwhole blood and hair containing the follide analysed at the EAZA Biobank in Edinburgh. All western EEPholders were asked to donate toget the study started and, in 2022, Action for the Wild donated 629.63so the lab could buy the consumables. |
| Yellow+reasted Capuchin Monkey Conservation Programme in the Dry Forests ofBrazil (Phase II: Ecology and behaviour) |
| The yellow-breasted capuchin monkey is a primate species ranked as critically endangered on the IUCN Red Ust ofThreatened Species In 2002-2005, asurvey was conducted ofthe remaining populations ofyellow-breasted capuchin monkeys to estabmsh the status ofthe species and to precisely identify the threats to its survivaL Toadd to this survey, a comparative ecological study was needed in the western part ofthe capuchins' distribution, where populations seem tobe scarcer and inhabit very different and harsher environments, such asthe diy forests and open scrub. This aspect ofthe project started in 2014to fill knowledge gaps regarding the conservation status and the biological peculiarities ofthe western population, providing infoimafion on activity budgets, the pattern of exploitation ofthe home range, and how seasonal variations affect behaviour, ecology, and social structure of the species in harsh environments. This will make itpossible to compare the two environments (humid forest and diy forest) where yellow breasted capuchin monkey survive. In 2022, Action forthe Wild donated f4,486.65to this project to support the researcheCs carmaintenance and fuel costs when working in the field studying the capuchins and to provide extra drone batteries to extend the search time forthe monkeys in the forest. A drone with athermal camera is used to assist in the search forthe monkeys and increase the number ofencounters with them, thus reducing the time spent for its habituation. |
| 31.12.22 | 31.12.21 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unrestricted | Restricted | Total | Total | |||
| fund | funds | funds | funds | |||
| INCOME AND ENDOWMENTS | FROM | Notes | F | 6 | ||
| Donations and legacies | 2 | 624,963 | 624,963 | 1,280,472 | ||
| Other trading activities investment income |
3 4 |
1,705 15,231 |
1,705 15,231 |
'I,174 71 |
||
| Total | 641,&99 | 641,899 | 1,2&1,717 | |||
| EXPENDITURE ON | ||||||
| Raising funds | 1,210 | 1,210 | 285 | |||
| Charitable activities |
||||||
| Wildlife conservation | 386,756 | 386,756 | 284,700 | |||
| Total | 387,966 | 387,966 | 284,985 | |||
| NET INCOME | 253,933 | 253,933 | 996,732 | |||
| RECONCIUATION OF FUNDS |
||||||
| Total funds brought forward | 1,288,886 | 3~9 | 1+92,355 | 295,623 | ||
| TOTAL FUNDS CARRIED FORWARD | 1,542,819 | 3,469 | 1,546,288 | 1,292,355 |
| 31.1222 | 31.12.21 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unrestricted | Restricted | Total | Total | ||
| Notes | fund | funds | funds f |
funds | |
| FIXEDASSETS | |||||
| Tangible assets | 12 | 130 | 130 | 173 | |
| CURRENT ASSETS | |||||
| Debtors | 13 | 205,300 | 205,300 | 10,560 | |
| Cash at bank | 1,347,270 | 3,469 | 1,350,739 | 1,306,570 | |
| 1,552,570 | 3,469 | 1,556,039 | 1,317,130 | ||
| CREDITORS | |||||
| Amounts falling due within one year |
14 | (9,881) | (9,881) | (24,948) | |
| NET CURRENT ASSETS | 1,542,689 | 3,469 | 1,546,158 | 1,292,182 | |
| TOTAL ASSETSLESSCURRENT LIABILITIES | 1,542,819 | 3,469 | 1,546,288 | 1,292,355 | |
| NET ASSETS | 1,542,819 | 3,469 | 1,546,288 | 1,292,355 | |
| FUNDS | 15 | ||||
| Unrestricted funds |
1,542,819 | 1,288,886 | |||
| Restricted funds | 3,469 | 3,469 | |||
| TOTAL FUNDS | 1,546,288 | 1,292,355 |
| 31.12.22 | 31.12.21 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Notes | |||||
| Cash flows from operating | activities | ||||
| Cash generated from operations |
28,938 | 1,015,178 | |||
| Net cash provided by operating a livities |
28,938 | 1,015,178 | |||
| Cash Rows from investing | activities | ||||
| Interest received | 15,231 | 71 | |||
| Net cash provided by investing activities |
15,231 | 71 | |||
| Change in cash and cash the reporting period Cash and cash equivalents |
equivalents atthe |
in | 44,169 | 1,015,249 | |
| beginning ofthe reporting |
period | 1,306,570 | 291,321 | ||
| Cash and cash equivalents | atthe end | of | |||
| the reporting period |
1,350,739 | 1,306,570 |
| RECONCILIATION | OF NET INCOME TO NET CASH FLOW FROM OPERATING | OF NET INCOME TO NET CASH FLOW FROM OPERATING | OF NET INCOME TO NET CASH FLOW FROM OPERATING | ACTIVITIES | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 31.12.22 f |
31.1221 f |
|||||
| Net income forthe | reporting | period (as per the Statement ofFinancial | ||||
| Activities) | 253,933 | 996,732 | ||||
| Adjustments for: |
||||||
| Depreciation charges |
43 | 57 | ||||
| Loss on disposal of | fixed assets | 21 | ||||
| Interest received | (15,231) | (71) | ||||
| Increase in debtors | (194,740) | (3,118) | ||||
| (Decrease)/increase | in creditors | (15,067) | 21,557 | |||
| Net cash provided | by operations | 28,938 | 1,015,178 | |||
| 2. | ANALYSIS OF CHANGES | IN | NET FUNDS | |||
| At1.1.22 | Cash flow | At31.1222 f |
||||
| Net cash | ||||||
| Cash at bank | 1,306,570 | 44,169 | 1,350,739 | |||
| 1,306,570 | 44,169 | 1,350,739 | ||||
| Total | 1,306,5TQ | 44,169 | 1,350,739 |
| 3. | OTHER TRADING ACTMTIES | OTHER TRADING ACTMTIES | OTHER TRADING ACTMTIES | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 31.12.22 | 31.12.21 | ||||||
| E | E | ||||||
| Research fees | 1,705 | 1,174 | |||||
| 4. | INVESTMENT INCOME | ||||||
| 31.12.22 | 31.1221 | ||||||
| Deposit account interest | 15,231 | 71 | |||||
| 5. | RAISING FUNDS | ||||||
| Raising donations and legacies |
|||||||
| 31.12.22 f |
31.12.21 | ||||||
| Reamrch costs | 1,210 | 285 | |||||
| 6. | CHARITABLE ACTIVITIES COSTS | ||||||
| Grant | |||||||
| funding of | |||||||
| activities | Support | ||||||
| (see note | costs (see | ||||||
| 7) | note 8) f |
Totals | |||||
| Wildlife conservation | 381,926 | 4,830 | 386,756 | ||||
| 7. | GRANTS PAYABLE | ||||||
| 31.12.22 | 31.12.21 | ||||||
| E | |||||||
| Wildlife conservation | 381,926 | 278,692 | |||||
| The total grants paid to institutions | during the year was as follows: | ||||||
| 31.12.22 | 31.12.21 | ||||||
| AEECL | 1,712 | ||||||
| EAZA Leopard Project | 630 | ||||||
| Elephant Orphanage | Project | 10,000 | |||||
| Orangutan Foundation |
7,000 | ||||||
| Save The Rhino international | 7,125 | ||||||
| Umphafa Private Nature Reserve |
322,071 | 254,247 | |||||
| Colchester Zoo | 24,445 | ||||||
| Free the bears | 7,000 | ||||||
| International Otter Survival |
Foundation | 4,910 | |||||
| LWIRO Chimp Project | 5,000 | ||||||
| Red Panda Network | 214 | ||||||
| VulPro | 4,288 | ||||||
| Komodo Survival Program | 886 | ||||||
| HelpSimus | 1,035 | ||||||
| Capuchin Project |
4,487 | ||||||
| 376,358 | 278,692 |
| COMPARATIVES FOR THE ST | ATEMENT OF FINAN | CIAL ACTIVITIES | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unrestricted | Restricted | Total | ||
| INCOME AND ENDOWMENTS | FROM | fundf | fundsf | fundsf |
| Donations and legacies |
1,280,472 | 1,280,472 | ||
| Other trading activities Investment income |
1,174 71 |
1,174 71 |
||
| Total | 1,281,717 | 1,281,717 | ||
| EXPENDITURE ON | ||||
| Raising funds | 285 | 285 | ||
| Charitable activities |
||||
| Wildlife conservation | 284,700 | 284,700 | ||
| Total | 284,985 | 284,985 | ||
| NET INCOME | 996,732 | 996,732 | ||
| RECONCILIATION OF FUNDS |
||||
| Total funds brought forward | 292,154 | 3,469 | 295,623 | |
| TOTAL FUNDS CARRIED FORWARD | 1,288,886 | 3,469 | 1,292,355 |
| 12. | TANGIBLE FIXEDASSETS | TANGIBLE FIXEDASSETS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fixtures | |||||
| and | |||||
| fittings | |||||
| COST | |||||
| At 1January 2022 and 31 December 2022 | 2,840 | ||||
| DEPRECIATION | |||||
| At 1 January 2022 | 2,667 | ||||
| Charge foryear | 43 | ||||
| At 31December 2022 | 2,710 | ||||
| NET BOOKVALUE | |||||
| At31 December 2022 | 130 | ||||
| At31 December2021 | 173 | ||||
| 13. | DEBTORS:AINOUNTS FALLING DUE WITHIN ONE YEAR | ||||
| 31.12.22 | 31.12.21 | ||||
| R | |||||
| Trade debtors | 6,239 | 10,560 | |||
| Other debtors | 199,061 | ||||
| 205,300 | 10,560 | ||||
| 14. | CREDITORS: AIIOUNTS FALLING DUE WITHIN ONE YEAR | ||||
| 31.12.22 | 31.12.21 | ||||
| Other creditors | 19,066 | ||||
| Accrued expenses | 9,881 | 5,882 | |||
| 9,881 | 24,948 | ||||
| 15. | IHOVEINENT IN FUNDS |
||||
| Net | |||||
| movement | At | ||||
| At 1.1.22 | in funds | 31.12.22 | |||
| F | F | ||||
| Unrestricted funds |
|||||
| General fund | 1,288,886 | 253,933 | 1,542,819 | ||
| Restricted funds | |||||
| WildNe Vels international | (Amur leopard | ||||
| and tiger) | 3,469 | 3+69 | |||
| TOTAL FUNDS | 1,292,355 | 253,933 | 1,546,288 |
| MOVEMENT IN FUNDS | MOVEMENT IN FUNDS | -contin | -contin | -contin | ued | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net movement in funds, |
induded | in the above | are as follows: | |||||
| Incoming | Resources | Movement | ||||||
| Unrestricted | funds | resources f |
expended f |
in funds f |
||||
| General fund | 641,899 | (387,966) | 253,933 | |||||
| TOTAL FUNDS | 641,899 | (387,966) | 253,933 | |||||
| Comparatives formovement |
in funds | |||||||
| Net | ||||||||
| movement | At | |||||||
| Unrestricted | funds | At 1.1.21 f |
in funds f |
31.12.21 f |
||||
| General fund | 292,154 | 996,732 | 1,288,888 | |||||
| Restricted funds | ||||||||
| Wildlife Vets | International | (Amur leopard | ||||||
| and tiger) | 3,469 | 3,469 | ||||||
| TOTALFUNDS | 295,623 | 996,732 | 1,292,355 | |||||
| Comparative | net movement | in | funds, included | in the above are as follows: | ||||
| Incoming | Resources | Movement | ||||||
| Unrestricted | funds | resources f |
expended f |
in funds f |
||||
| General fund | 1,281,717 | (284,985) | 996,732 | |||||
| TOTAL FUNDS | 1,281,717 | (284,985) | 996,732 |