REGISTERED COMPANY NUMBER: 02748744 (England and Wales)
REGISTERED CHARITY NUMBER: 1062008
Report of the Trustees and
Un2udiled Fin#n¢ial Statements for the Year Ended 31 Mareh 2024
for
The Monitoring Group Limited
Grant Harrod Lemian Davis LLP
Chartered Accountants
1st Floor
Healthaid House
Marlborough Hill
Harrow
Middlesex
HAI IUD

The Monitoring Group Limited
Contents of the Finanei21 Statements
for the year ended 31 March 2024
Page
Report of the Trustees
I to 8
Independent Examiner's Report
Ststement of Financial Activities
io
Balance Sheet
Notes to the Financial S¢4tements
12 to 16

The Monitoring Group Limited
Report of the Trustees
for the year ended 31 March 2024
The t￿￿te¢S who are also director5 of the charity for the purposes of the Companies Act 2006, present their report with
the financial statements of the charity for the year ended 31 March 2024. The trustees have adopted the provisions of
Accounting and Reporting by Charities: Statement of Recommended Practice applicable to charities preparing their
a¢counts in accordanGe with the Financial Reporting Standard applicable in the UK and Republi¢ of Ireland (FRS 102)
(effective l January 2019).
Page I

The Monitoring Group Limited
Report of the Trustees
for the year ended 31 March 2024
OBJECTIVES AND AcfiviTIES
Signific*nt activiti¢s
I: The impaet of CovRd 19 pandemic and lockdown
Last year we faced great challenges during the COVID 19 pandemic and the subsequent lockdown. During the current
period thes¢ were accentuated by a number of key staff who took sickness leave for over 5 months. As a result. our work
suffered and all of us- Trustees. staff, volunteers and especially clients - felt its adverse impact.
In summary, however. our operational response. reflected:
Increase in working hours for the remaining staff despite adapting to working remotely ' Our team-work has suffered
given the lack of person and person contact and absences ' Increased use of emotional support to everyone involved
with our services
Increased volunteering to provide mutual aid io many our clients suffered economic hardship. Despite our efforts the
impact of poverty An poorer communities harder to manage and bear
In summary, the group continued to appraise it work will in the future by assessing on the following area5:
- Increase in remote working
- Expanded roles for Trustees and staff ' Separation of critical skills and roles
De-humanising of people in work settings
- Building resilience to face the uncertainty and impact of the pandemic
2.. Advo¢acy for victims of race hate crimes . the main headlines
TMG has continu¢d lo support victims of racism in London, primarily through a project called CATCH. CATCH is a
group of charities providing advocacy services to victims of race hate crirne5. The current partners are:
Galop.- L¢$bian, gay, bisexual, and transgender hate crime
- East European Resource Centre (EERC): Eastern European hate crirn¢
- The Community Security Trust {CST)
- Antisemitic hate crime
- Tell MAMA: Anti-muslim (Islamophobic) hate crime
Choice in HaGkn¢y-. Anti-Disability hate crime
Stay Safe East: Anti-Disability hate crime
- R¢al: Anti-Dtsability hate crime
The service has be¢n funded by the Mayor's Office for Policing and Crime (MOPAC) spe¢ifi¢ally to deliver better
criminal justice oulcomes. During the past year, we have assisted 819 people. and at any given momenL we have around
145 live cases. The types of cases can vary, and 50 Can the background5 of tndividuals employed to manage the
casework is varied, reflecting both the ¢1&8s, race, gender, and nationalities present in London. The types of incidents
can be persistent harassment which could b¢ noise. verbal threats to actual assaults and death threats.
Our Clients reflect peopl¢ whose heritage comes from a majority of global backgrounds. However. within this group.
there are a variety of inlerscdional issues we address since over 600/0 of the Clients are women, 40/0 are from LBGT
Communities, and 160/0 have some form of disability, including mentsl ill health. All ¢lients require emotional. legal, and
inforniation suppor¢ and in most cases. we deal with ourselves since less than l /0 of them will get refe￿¢d to other
agencies.
Our success on the cases is very good. However, our clients are also isolated, 50 ihis year, we ran weekly support groups
in our office to bring isolated clients together to share thought5 and develop a strategy for mutual support. We also
involved a therapist to support us with this work. Over the coming year we want to develop this trauma support service.
Case Studies
Case of A
Page 2

The Monitoring Group Limited
Report of the Trustees
for the ye4r ended 31 Mareh 2024
A w&s facing ra¢ial harassment from her neighbour for a long time. In February 2022 she was violently attacked after the
neighbour entered her premises and dragged her across the floor and punched her many times in the facelover her body.
Client has sustained injuries from the attack, and after these another two other physical assaults ￿¢￿rred. In May 2022
she opened her front door and found a letter outside on the floor of her doorstep reading ￿atch your back paki,. A's
anxiety levels were high, and she had a few panic attacks and rarely leaves her flat. She also attempted suicide and called
the local crisis Ilne. She is now on anti-depressants and anti-anxiety medication. She called CATCH aft¢r she received
from th¢ police inforniing her that she was Ixing treated as a suspect and needed to attend a police interview.
TMG assisted her by asking the Housing Association to take action against the perpetrator, and instsll 5e¢urity cameras.
We a150 bought serYi¢¢s from a solicitor to ensure that the client had proper legal representation during the police
interview. With the assistance of the solicitor, the police accepted she was the victim, and no further action was taken.
After TMG intervention, the case was reviewed, and the perpetrator was Charged with assault.
Case of B
Mrs S has been facing racial harassment from her neighbour for a long time. She was ffferred to CATCH and TMG in
July 22. After talking to the elient. we contacted the Housing Association, who informed us that little action was taken
due to & lack of evidence. In August we met with the client and discovered video recordings and witnesses to various
incident5, including incidents where ihe perpetrator is shouting 'monkey' over the fen¢e. A report from our visit was sent
to the client, but the Housing association did not want to act, instead they agreed to visit the client within 10 days. This
took 3 weeks to arrange and eventually, the housing association collated a detailed report of all the incidents. but still,
they did not act. TMG wrote to the MP to request a meeting with the Housing Asso¢iation. A few days we received a
letter inforniing us that the perpetrator would give a Notice to Quit soon. This process is still undenyay, and we ar¢
awaiting a court date.
Case of C
Mr and Mrs C had been facing racial harassment from her neighbour for around 2 and a half years. This consisted of
regular racist abuse. assaults and ihings thrown at them. Although the Police and Council have visited them. they had
failed to lake any action to deter the neighbour from ¢ontinuing his conducl. Mr C'5 anxiety levels were high and he
attempted suicide, and now both Mr and Mrs D receive mental health support from the local T￿St. They are both on
anti￿¢press8ntS and anti-anxiety medication. They were referred to CATCH by a police officer.
TMG assisted them through visited and calling on a regular ba515. and writing to both the Police and Council to raise
concems about how the case was handled. After another incident we r4i5¢d the issue again, and the neighbour was
arrested. He was atrested and is being detained in custody. and then later imprisoned. He no longer lives next door after
the counctl lake away his property. Mr and Mrs C say they feels more confident but are still struggling. They appreciate
the support network around th¢m.
3.. Undercover Policing Inquiry
Background
The Jnquiry was set up in 2015. announced by the then-Home Se¢r¢tary Theresa May. This wa5 in response to
independent reviews by Mark Ellison QC, which found "appalling practices in undercover policing"
The Inquiry's investigations are bn)ken down into three modules-
- Module One.. Examination of th¢ deployment of undercover officers in the past, their conduct, and the impact of their
activities on themselves and others.
Module Two: Examination of the management and oversight of undercover officers, including their selection, training.
Supervision, ¢are after the end of an undercover deployment, and the legal and regulatory framework within which
undercover policing was carried out.
- Module Two (a) will involve managers and administrator5 from within undercover policing units.
Page 3

The Monitoring Group Limited
Report of the Trustees
for the yeAr ended 31 March 2024
- Module Two (b) will involve Senior managers higher in the chain of command as well as poli¢e personnel who hlndled
intelligence provided by undercover police officers. Module Two (c) will involve other government bodies with a
connection to undercover poli¢ing. including the Home Offi¢e.
Module Three: Examination of current undercover policing practices and of how undercover policing should be
condv¢t¢d in future.
To manage such a broad remit, the Inquiry has divided its work for Modules One and Two into the following six
"tranches":
Tl: Spectal Demonstration Squad officers and managers and those affected by deployments (1968-1982)
T2- Special Demonstration Squad officers and managers and th05e affected by deployments (1983-1992)
T3: Special Demonstration Squad officers and managers and those affe¢ted by deployments (1993-2007)
T4= National Public Order Intelligence Unit officers and managers and those affected by deployments
T5: Other undercover policing oifir¢rs and managers and those affected by deployments
T6.. Management & oversight (including of intelligence dissemination) by mld and senior rank officers, other agencies
and government departments
Management and oversight issues that forni Tranche 6 will now be investigated in the relevant tranche for the relevant
period or policing unit.
As investigations into future Tranches are still ongoing, the Chair of the Inquiry will not be making a statement or giving
interviews on the publication of this interim report.
The Group's representatives attend b--monthly meetings
with both core participants and lawyers
response to upcorning hearing or collation of evidence between hearings.
to discuss its
Over this period. there have been ongoing discussion on spying of criminal gangs and far rights groups by undercover
groups. In essence, there are Iwo appToaches.' the firs¢ favoured by us, involves examination of all evidence in public.
The second position argues examination of evidence by a special advocate and limiting some inforniation only to ¢or¢
participants.
An interim report was published in June 2023. It only deals with evidence from the Tranche I period. 1968-1982.
There are a number of area5 that the report does not cover: Some of those have been specifically emphasised by the
Inquiry, as areas with conclusions reserved until all the evidence has been given. Those are:
- The purpose of gathering intelligence on justice Campaigns
- The impact on the relatives of the dead children
- The impact on the many women who were deceived into sexual relationships
The interim report concluded that the long-lem undercover deployments into the private and politi¢al lives of thousands
of left-vding activists wa5 not justified.
It was not justified on either of the grounds put fonvard, i.e'. a) the policing of Public Order or b) Countersubversion
And as a result, the interim report concluded that the Special Demonstration Squad s hould have been shut down or
disbanded
The argument on Public Order". Th¢ SDS was established, and funded by the Home Office, with the 5tsted aim of
policing public order risks such as the Grosvenor Square disturbances in 1968.
The Met Police principle position was to try to justify the SDS by saying that the unit played a huge part in preventing
public disorder.
That posilion was challenged, across the board, by the Non-state Core Participants.
The Inquiry found thal the und¢r¢over unit's contribution to policing public order "should not be overststed"
In respecl of the most significant incidents of public disorder in the Tranche I period the contribution was limited.
Page 4

The Monitoring Group Limited
Report of the TTUStees
for the year ended 31 March 2024
The two major examples:
The Battle of Lewisham in August 1977: The report ¢oncluded that SDS reporting had some tsctical value but basically
confimied what was already obvious.
And it was obvious: if a street violent fascist organisation like the National Front are going to launch a deliberdtely
provocative T￿]st march, againsl the stated wishes of the local community, you don't need an embdded undercover lo
tell you what the publi¢ order issue is going to be.
tn respect of Southall in April 1979, another example of deliberate fascist provocation, when Blair Peach w&8 killed by
the police. the SDS contribution was found to be of minimal value.
This conclusion, in respect of public order policing, was clear on the face of the evidence.
The report included an evidential snapshot from 1975 to 1978:
2600 SDS reports from the period were examined. 1400 of those Teports dealt with personal details of peoples, lives.
1200 dealt wlth meetings and activities of organisations i.e. political organisation. Only 200 of those contained
inforniation that might have had an impact on public order policing. That's less than 80/0. I stress the word might because
it is not suggested that 80/0 did have an impa¢t on policing. The 80/0 simply made ref¢ren¢e to public order.
Evidentially, the position on that was overwhelming. The ends clearly didn't justify the means.
On Subversion: The secondary position on justification was that the SDS assisted the Security Servi¢es in
counter-subversion. The polir¢ position was that gathering personal infonnation was a 'by-produ¢t" of the univs public
order work. That became unsustainable as soon as the scale of it became apparent. Which it really was, on the evidence.
The clear focus of th¢ SDS reporting was on the personal lives and politlcal views of its targets.
The key conclusion in the report were that:
I: The SDS iasking on monitoring "potential subversives" was "questionable"
2- Of the hundreds of groups infiltrated, only three met the criteria of constituting an athal threat to the safety or
well-being of the state.
It follows that not a single one of the Non-state Core Participants met the ¢riteria.
So, in the absence of justification, the report went on to consider four key features that should have led to the SDS being
shui dowm.
I: It was inevitable that long-temi deploymenls would involve (at least) the befriending of individuals and intrusion into
thekr private and political lives. that required cogent justification before even being contemplated as a police tactic
2: that most deployments would require entry Énto people's homes by deceit
3-. that officers taking positions of responsibility in organisations would inevitably involve
(a) gathering data protected by law relating to confidential inforn]ation and
(b) Ihat taking high position5 of responsibility would in¢vitably involve organising political activity
4.. the use of dead children's identilies would inevitably have given rise to legitimate public concern and that those
responsible for the unit were aware of the Tisk of that practice becoming public from at least as early as 1975.
4: Public Interest cases
The Group is dealing with 30 public interest caseslcampaigns. Below we provide details on a selection of cases that
involved considerable time both in supporting families and in preparing for critical meeting or legal hearings
Elizabeth Chau
In January 2024, the Met's specialist Homicide department decided not to dig for Elizabeth's remains despite
representations (both verbal and in meeting and written) to the Commissioner, the Commander in charge of the specialist
homicide group and via the Mayor of London who we have met Iwi¢¢ on this case. Last week, we agreed to work Glosely
with specialist private investigator together with forensic teams to begin the search for Elizabeih's remains this will also
include re-interviewing the serial killer who has confessed to the murder. The suspect's solicitor is working with the us
and the privat¢ investigator.
Page 5

The Monitoring Group Limited
Report of the Trustees
for the yegr ended 31 March 2024
Christopher Kapessa
The 50-page narrative verdict by a senior corner on the killing of a young black school Child in South Wales in
mid-January 2024 ¢losed the door on any legal challenge by any interested party. The coroner openly criticised the
suspect's verslon of events and ¢oncluded that Jaden Pugh deliberately pushed Christopher to his death without any
provoGation bul as a dangerous 'prank'.
In addition to building the campaign over the last few years. we were able to develop a Strong relationship between the
lawyers, the family and us so that we could emerge with a result at the inquest On appeal, however. the legal aid board
agreed to meet legal representation costs. We managed to gain extensive national media coverage on this case. The
campaign has made significant inroads in Wales - the Wales TUC and Black women pastors in churches now actively
support it acros5 the region.
In this period, a submission was sent to the CPS urging them to act 88 their initial refusal to charge the suspect on public
interest ground had weakened significantly. Representations have been also been made to the leader of the Senedd
Cymru urging them to carry out an independent Wales review on this and other incidents involving poli¢e response to
ra¢ialised communities. .
Lakhvinder Ricky Reel
We are awaiting the completion of the Met's re-investigation into Rocky death. The ¢ampaign meets with the local MP
and the solicitor on fortnightly basis for updates on ongoing work
The Ri¢ky Reel memorial lecture, organised in conjunction with The Monitoring Group, In O¢tober last year at Kingston
Town Hall was very well attended and the campaign has been galvanized by Sukhdev's book d¢tsiling her family's quest
for justice over two de¢ades
Gurwinder Kaur
Given our representations, the CPS finally decided in November 2023 to charge Gurwinder's husband for sexutl
violence {rape and domestic violence) despite the fact that she has died. The decision is unprecedented and is based on
¢vidence that Gurwinder herself collated whilst she w&8 alive.
Anu Abraham".
ADugrah Abraham, 21, from Bury, Greater Manchester, was training to become a police officer with West Yorkshire
Police in Halifax when he was found dead in woodland in March 2023. His family claim Mr Abraham, whom they called
Anu, was bullied and suffered racism as a trainee His family and 5UPPOrters established a campaign to seek answers on
the circumstances leading to his death
5: Academic Partnerships
Over the period. w¢ have consolidated partnerships with the following academic institutions:
London Southy Bank University Law Department - work has been on going to develop a national online advocacy
network for victims of racism supported by a range of human rights lawyers
SOAS- the Group has eslabli5hed a project partnership on the Leicester Commission
6: Southall Partnerships
We have developed solid partnerships and organic working relationships with a range of local groups including Southall
Community Alliance, Tudor Rose support group and Ealing Trades Council:
Weekly presentations at schools on local history
Monthly history walk5
Dev¢loping after school 5UPPQrt for young school children from 13 years to 17 years of age on life learning. bhangra and
self defence classes
Planning to establish a local museum on racism and migralion
7.. Lei¢ester Work
Leicester Commission of Inquiry into violence in Leicester 2022
The Long Read section of The Guardian published a comprehensive pie¢¢ on Leicester violence.
Page 6

The Monitoring Group Limited
Report of the Trustees
for the year ended 31 March 2024
As a unique joint venture between Lawyers. Academics and community activists. the Commission has made
considerable progress in their investigation into incidents that rocked East-midlands toHm in the summer of 2022. W¢
Tecruited the legal panel members, local advisors, researchers and community workers, and have successfully..
' Organised community engagement public meetings that were well attended
Created and acted upon a strategic plan for collating evidence, meeting individuals and organisations from different
communitie$ and targeted specific sections that remain marginalised - women. working class and young people
' Build confidence with key communities that were affected by the violence and on- going communal politics.
8.. International Campaigns
Support for Palestine civil society
In July 2023, we established contact and solidarity work with representatives of Sufat Re￿gee camp to enable work with
disabled. From November 2023, we have worked with British Arabs and Palestinians affected by hate Crimes and
discrimination.
9.. India Human Rights & Democracy Campaign
Our solidarity work with Indian human rights defenders, dissidents and victims of genocidal violence have been
transfonned over this period enabling us to reach new sections of the British Indian society.
The rise of Hindu nationalism and authoritarianism in India is alarniing and is advers¢ly impacting on UK'S Indian and
South Asian communitie5 and diaspora. There ha5 been a precipitous drop on every global index related to democratic
backsliding. We have seen any independent media annihilated as well as Opposition leaders and dissenting voices under
constant attack. Leaders from civil society. student activists and even business leaders are in jail or under threat through
tax raids, for example. All other checks and balances like Parliament and autonomou5 institutions such as the Election
Commission have been neutered. The greatest worry is thal prevailing Hindu majoritarian rhetorlc is poisoning and
dividing Indian society globally and in the UK.
A new organisation, called Plarform for Indian Democracy was established in January 2024. The organisation will
establish branches in key UK cities and campuses creating 8 space for the Indian community and the diaspora to voi¢¢
their concerns about the current developments in India.
FINANCIAL REVIEW
Reserves policy
The Trustees have established a policy whereby the unrestricted funds not committed or invested in tangible fixed assets
{"the free r¢serves") held by the charity should be equal to 3 months of unrestricted operating expenditure, which
equ3ted to £25,000 in general funds. At this level the Trustees feel that they would be able to continue the cu￿ent
activities of the charity in the event of a significant drop in funding. It would obviously be necessary to consider how the
funding would be replaced or a¢tivities changed.
The Management Committee ha5 examined the charity's requirements for reserves in lighi of the main risks to the
organisation.
The present level of reserves available to the charity met the target level. Although the strategy is to continue to build
reserves through planned operating surpluses, the Management Committee h&8 also considered the extent to which
existing activities can be rationalised, should such circum5taDces arise.
FUTURE PLANS
The Monitoring Group continues to build contacts wilh new funders and make bids to develop its work strategically
omplementing ils operational response to the problem of racism is all its fornis. The current land￿ape on funding is
changing significantly but we remain hopeful in g31vanising our resources on a national b&8is, as one of the pivotal
organisations in the UK that supports viclims and communities experiencing the problem. A key elernent in our
development plan is to incr¢a5e our profile with private funders and usage of social media and media outlets.
Page 7

The Monitoring Group Limited
Report of the Trustees
for the year ended 31 March 2024
STRUCTURE, GOVERNANCE AND MANAGEMENT
Governing document
The charity is controll¢d by its governing documen( a deed of trus¢ and CODstitLrtes a limited company, limited by
guarantee, as defined by the Con]panies Act 2006.
REFERENCE AYJ D ADMINISTRATIVE DETAILS
Registered Company number
02748744 (England and Wales)
Registered Charity number
1062008
Re¥istsred office
2 Langley Lane
VauKh￿l
London
SW8 IGB
Trustee5
A Njie
Professor J I Siddiqi
R Davies
A Babarinde
Dr A Elliotlooper
J Niiiar
Company Secretary
Professor J I Siddiqi
Independent Examiller
Grant Harrod Lerman Davis LLP
Chartered Accountants
1st Floor
Healthaid House
Marlborough Hill
Hanow
Middlesex
HAI IUD
Approved by order of the board of tnLstses on .......
. and signed on its behalf by:
ANji¢-
te
Page 8

Independent ExamiDer'$ Report to the Trustees of
The Monitoring Group Limited
Indep¢nd¢nt examiner's report to the trustees of The Monitoring Group Limited ('the Company,)
I report to the charity trustees on my examination of the arrounts of the Company for the year ended 31 March 2024.
Responsibilities and basis of report
As the charity's t￿Ste¢S ofthe Company (and also its directors for the purposes of company law) you are responsible for
the preparation of the accounts in accordance with the requiremenls of the Companies Act 2006 ('the 2006 Act,).
Having satisfied myself that the accounts of the Company are not required to be audited under Part 16 of the 2006 A
and are eligible for independent examination, I report in respect of my examination of your charity's accounts as carried
out under Section 145 of the Charities Act 2011 {'the 2011 Act,). In carrying out my examination I have followed the
Directions given by the Charity Commission under Section 145(5) (b) of the 2011 Act.
Independent ex*miner'5 St41ement
Since your charity's gross income exceeded £250.000 your examiner must be a member of a listed body. I can confirn)
that l am qualified to undertake the examination because I am a member of the Association of Chartered Certified
Accountants, which is one of the listed bodies.
I have completed my examination. I ronfirni that no matters have come lo my attention in Connection with the
examlnation giving me cause to believe:
accounting records were not kept in respect of the Company as required by Section 386 of the 2006 Act. or
the accounts do not accord with those records; or
the accounts do not ￿mplY with the a¢¢ounting requirements of Section 396 of the 2006 Act other than any
requirement that the accounts give a true and fair view which is not a matter considered as part of an independent
examination; or
the accounts have not been prepared tn accordance with the methods and principles of the Statement of
Recommended Praclice for accounting and reporting by charities (applicable to charities preparing their a¢counts
in accordance with the Financial Reporting Standard applicable in the UK and Republic of Ireland (FRS 102)).
I have no con¢erns and have come across no other matters in connection with the examination to which attention should
be drawn in ihis report in order to enable a proper understsndlng of the accounts to be reached.
Jeremy Harrod FCCA
Grant Harrod Lernian Davis LLP
Chartered Accountants
1st Floor
Healthaid House
Marlborough Hill
Harrow
Middlesex
HAI IUD
Date..
Page 9

The Monitoring Group Limited
Statement of Financial Aclivities
for the year ended 31 M#r¢h 2024
2024
Total
funds
2023
Total
funds
Unrestrirted
funds
Reslricted
funds
Notes
INCOME AND ENDOWMENTS FROM
Donations and legacies
106
106
325
Charitable aetivities
Charitable activities
16,082
248,649
264,731
216.666
Other trading activities
3,000
3.000
21,000
Total
19,188
248,649
267,837
237,991
EXPEIYDITURE ON
Charitable #etivities
Charitable activities
36,975
228,181
265.156
230,710
NET INCOME/{EXPENDITURE)
Transfers bebvetn funds
{17,787)
8,468
20.468
(8,468)
2.681
7,281
Net movement in funds
(9,319)
12,000
2.681
7.281
RECONCILJATION OF FUNDS
Total funds brought forward
38.618
12.000
50.618
43,337
TOTAL FUNDS CARRIED FORWARD
29,299
24,000
53,299
50,618
The notes fomi part of these financial statements
Page 10

The Monitoring Group Limited
Balance Sheet
31 March 2024
2024
Totsl
funds
2023
Total
funds
Unrestricted
fimds
Restrided
ftmds
Notes
FIXED ASSETS
Tangible assets
5243
5,243
5,418
CURRENT ASSETS
Debtors
Cash at bank
45,980
16,730
45,980
40,730
61.218
14.907
24,000
62,710
24,000
86,710
76,125
CREDITORS
Amounts falling due within one year
(38,654)
(38,654)
(30,925)
NET CURRENT ASSETS
24,056
24,000
48,056
45,200
TOTAL ASSETS LESS CiJRRENT
29,299
24,000
53,299
50,618
NET ASSETSI(LIABILITIES)
29,299
24,000
53,299
50,618
Unrestricted funds
R¢stricted funds
29.299
24,000
38,618
12,000
TOTAL FUNDS
53,299
50,618
The clwltsble company is entitled to exemption from audit under Section 477 of the Companies Act 2006 for the year
ended 31 March 2024.
The members have not required the company to obtsin an audit of its financial statements for the year ended
31 March 2024 in accordance with Section 476 of the Companies Act 2006.
The trustees acknowledge their responsibilities for
(a)
ensurtng that the charitable company keeps accounting records that comply with Sections 386 and 387 of the
Companies Act 2006 and
preparing fllwLcial statements which give a true and fair view of the stats of affairs of the cR￿ltable company as
at the end of each financial year and of its surplus or deficit for each financial year ID accordance with the
requirements of Sections 394 alld 395 and which otherwlse comply with the requirements of the Companies Act
2006 relating to financial statements, so far as applicable to the charitable company.
Ib)
These financial statements have been prepared in ￿cordanCe with the provisions applicable to charitsble companies
subject to the small companies regime.
ements were approved by the Board of Trnstees and authorised for issue
. and were sigtted on its behalf by..
on
ANjie-T
The notss form part of these fu￿ncial statements
Page 11

Th¢ Monitorlng Group Limited
Notes to the Financial Statements
for the year ended 31 March 2024
ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Basis of preparing the financi41 statements
The fjnancial statements of the charitable Gompany, which is a public benefit entity under FRS 102, have been
prepared in accordance with the Charities SORP (FRS 102) 'Accounting and Reporting by Charities: Statement
of Recommended Practice applicable to charities preparing their accounts in a¢cordance with the Financial
Reporting Standard applicable in the UK and Republic of Ireland (FRS 102) (effe¢tive l January 2019),.
Financial Reporting Standard 102 The Financial Reporting Standard appli¢able in the UK and Republic of
Ireland, and the Companies Act 2006. The financial statements have been prepared under th¢ historical cost
¢onvention.
Ineome
All income is recognised in the Statement of Financial Activities once the ¢harity has entitlement to the fund5, it
is probable that the income will be re¢eived and the amount ¢an be measured reliably.
Expenditure
Liabilities are recognised as expenditure as soon as there is a legal or constructive obligation committing the
charity to that expenditure. it is probable that a transfer of economic benefits will be required in settlement and
the amount of the obligation can be measured reliably. Expenditure is accounted for on an accruals basis and has
been classified under headings thal aggregate all cost related to the category. Where costs cannot be directly
attributed to particular headings they have been allocated to activities on a basis consistent with the use of
resources.
Tangible fixed Assets
Depreciation is provided at the following amiual rates in order to write off each asset over its estimated useful
life.
Fixtures and fittings
150/0 on reducing balan¢e
TaxatioD
The charity is exempt from corporation tax on its charitable activities.
Fund accounting
Unrestricted funds ¢an be used in accordance with the charitable objectives at the dis¢retion of the tntstees.
Restricted funds can only be used for particular restrict¢d purposes within the objects of the charity. Restrictions
arise when specified by the donor or when funds are raised for particular restricted purposes.
Further explanation of the nature and purpose of each ￿nd is included in the notes lo the fiTwicial statements.
OTHER TRADING ACTIVITIES
2024
2023
Activities for generating funds
3,000
21,000
Page 12
continued...

The Monitoring Group Limited
Notes to the FinaneiAI Statements - eontinued
for the ye4r ended 31 March 2024
IYET INCOMEI{EXPENDTTURE)
Net income/(expenditure) is stated after ¢hargingl(crediting)-
2024
2023
Depreciation- owned assets
925
956
TRUSTEES, REMUNERATION AND BENEFITS
There were no trnstees, remuneration or other benefits for the year ended 31 March 2024 nor for the year ended
31 MarGh 2023.
Trustees, expenses
There were no trustees, expenses paid for the year ended 31 March 2024 nor for the year ended 31 Mar¢h 2023.
COMPARATIVES FOR THE STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL ACTIVITIES
Unrestricted
funds
Restricted
funds
Total
funds
INCOME AND ENDOWMENTS FROM
Donations and legacies
325
325
Charitable activities
Charitable activities
216,666
216.666
Other trading activities
21.000
21,000
Tot*1
21,325
216.666
237,991
EXPENDITURE ON
Charitable activities
Charitable activities
20,044
210,666
230,710
NET INCOME
1,281
6.000
7.281
RECONCILIATION OF FUNDS
Total funds brought foThTard
37,337
6,000
43,337
TOTAL FUNDS CARRIED FORWARD
38.618
12,000
50,618
Page 13
continued...

The Monitoring Group Limited
Notes to the Financial Statements- continued
for the yeAr ended 31 Mar¢h 2024
TANGIBLE FIXED ASSETS
Fixture5
fittings
COST
At l April 2023
Additions
84.197
750
Ai 31 March 2024
84.947
DEPRECIATION
At l April 2023
Charge for year
78,779
925
At 31 March 2024
79.704
NET BOOK VALUE
At 31 March 2024
5,243
At 31 March 2023
5,418
DEBTORS: AMOUNTS FALLING DUE WITHIN ONE YEAR
2024
2023
Trade debtors
Prepayments and accNed income
40.500
5,480
54.619
6,599
45.980
61,218
CREDtTORS: AMOUNTS FALLING DUE WITHIN ONE YEAR
2024
2023
Social security and other taxes
Other creditors
Accruals and deferred income
3.126
13,248
22,280
2,053
592
28,280
38,654
30,925
MOVEMENT IIY FUNDS
Net
movement
in ￿ndS
Transfers
between
funds
At
31.3.24
At 1.4.23
Unrestrieted fund5
General fimd
38,618
(17.787)
8.468
29,299
Restricted funds
GALOP (CATCH Project)
Open Society Fund
12,000
3.962
16,506
(6,962)
(1,506}
9.000
15,000
12.000
20.468
(8,468)
24.000
TOTAL FUNDS
50.618
2,681
53,299
Page 14
ontinued...

The Monitoring Group Limited
Note5 to the Financial Statement$- continued
for th¢ year ended 31 March 2024
MOVEMENT IN FUNDS- continued
Net movement in funds, included in the above are a5 follows:
Incoming
resources
Resources
expended
Movement
in funds
Unrestricted funds
General fund
19.188
(36,975)
{17.787)
Restrieted funds
GALOP (CATCH project)
Open Society Fund
162,000
86.649
(158,038)
(70,143)
3.962
16,506
248.649
(228,181)
20,468
TOTAL FUNDS
267.837
(265,156)
2,681
Comparatives for movement in funds
Net
movement
in fvnds
At
31.3.23
At 1.4.22
Unrestricted fund$
General fund
37,337
1,281
38,618
Restrieted funds
GALOP (CATCH project)
6.000
6.000
12,000
TOTAL FUNDS
43,337
7.281
50,618
Comparative net movement in funds, included in the above are as follows:
Incoming
resources
Resources
expended
Movement
in funds
Unrestriettd funds
General fimd
21,325
(20,044)
1.281
RestTieted funds
The J05¢ph Rowntree Charitable Trust
GALOP (CATCH project)
54,666
162,000
(54.666)
(156,000)
6.000
216,666
(210.666)
6,000
TOTAL FUNDS
237.991
(230.710)
7,281
Page 15
continued...

The Monitoring Group Limited
Notes to the Finaneial Statements- continued
for the year ended 31 March 2024
MOVEMENT IN FUNDS- eontinued
A current year 12 months and prior year 12 months Combined position is as follows:
Net
movement
in funds
Transfers
between
funds
At
31.3.24
Ai 1.4.22
Unrestricted funds
General fund
37,337
(16,506)
8.468
29,299
Restricted fllnds
GALOP (CATCH project)
Open Society Fund
6,000
9.962
16,506
(6,962)
(1,506)
9,000
15.000
6,000
26,468
(8,468)
24,000
TOTAL FUNDS
43,337
9,962
53,299
A current year 12 months and prior year 12 months combined net movement in ￿nds, included in the above are
as follows:
Incoming
resources
Resources
expended
Movement
in fimds
Unrestricted funds
General fund
40.513
{57,019)
{16,506)
Restricted funds
The Joseph Rowmtree Charitsble Trust
GALOP (CATCH projecl)
Open Society Fund
54.666
324,000
86,649
{54,666)
(314,038)
(70,143)
9.962
16,506
465.315
(438,847)
26,468
TOTAL FUNDS
505.828
(495,866)
9,962
io.
RELATED PARTY DISCLOSURES
There were no related party transactions for the year ended 31 March 2024.
Page 16